Pages:
Author

Topic: delete - page 2. (Read 2664 times)

hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 504
June 14, 2014, 08:37:19 PM
#36
BTT is becoming a reality show.  Somewhere inbetween Jersey Shore and The Apprentice.
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
win
June 14, 2014, 08:37:11 PM
#35
IN regard to NXT we are basically at this early stage. I almost now cant believe the price people were giving their NXT away. I say giving cause the price was so low they almost were. Its interesting to see it took a couple of months for the frenzy to kick off.

I'm not sure Qora has the excitement of NXT cause people are jaded by new coins but what I think will happen is as the functions are steadily added over the next month or two Qora will show how user friendly and brilliant it is. Thats my guess anyway. Time will tell.


https://nxtforum.org/news-and-announcements/index-to-nxt-threads-on-bitcointalk-started-in-2013/?PHPSESSID=cnhhusc3nmfqm4hrro7fisg5o2
legendary
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1491
LEALANA Bitcoin Grim Reaper
June 14, 2014, 08:30:49 PM
#34
NEM was created to enrich utopianfuture and selected few by building a communist army of mindless slaves.

not so stupid after all! best and cleverest scam on Bitcointalk so far that has to be said for sure.

"Cleverest"?

There were much more organized scams on this forum than this. You obviously are new here.  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
June 14, 2014, 08:29:41 PM
#33
You know what if I created a coin from scratch I personally would want to own 20% at least I feel like I would deserve it. The fact that NXT probably didnt own that much amazes me. NXT was open for quite a while its not their fault that no one sent in BTC.


The big myth about NXT is that the first stakeholders made so much money when actually in the early stages of NXT anyone had the chance to buy NXT on Bitcointalk and then on Dgex at dirt cheap prices and turn a few bitcoin into a small fortune.

The stupid thing about Qoras distribution is we are still in the early dirt cheap stage and people aren't buying that much yet. People talking on here wont be able to say they didn't know when it rises 1000%.

Though I will get a kick out of saying I told you so to me honest.

Nxt has multiple 50 million accounts that never sold anything since launch until very recently. Is that the behavior of a normal investor? These accounts should have deep links to BCNext as in my theory above. I will take a look at Qora though.

Honestly you should. Not everyone on here has terrible intentions, I bought and am waiting for it to rise at least to 500 sats. Might take a month might take 6 but I know it will happen so why not tell people, its a win win for me and those who listen.

I will. We are all here trying to make some extra though. It is good to have a friendly advice. I don't like miners, neither and the vast majority of people do not want to have anything to do with mining so there is a big room for POS coins like Qora, NEM, Nxt etc.
legendary
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1491
LEALANA Bitcoin Grim Reaper
June 14, 2014, 08:28:16 PM
#32
Two days ago UtopianFuture made a huge mistake by posting with sockpuppet account, this led to grand investigation that he betrayed the entire community by stabbing the back of everyone. He claimed and sold stakes of supposedly "FAIR AND EQUAL" project New Economy Movement. THEN HE RETIRED ADMITTING THE SCAM.

However this is just the tip of the icebergs.

No, it is not enough that utopianfuture scammed the entire community making fun of anybody who invested in the project laughing his way to the bank. apparently that was not enough to him.

We have now striking evidence that utopianfuture had in total 84 fake sockpuppet accounts of which 61 sold nemstake on asset exchange until today. Overall utopianfuture has scammed about 61*20000 Nxt = 1220000 Nxt == approx 150 BTC estimate PLUS the IPO amount of countless Btc. Total scammed amount exceeds estimated 200 Bitcoin (estimated more than 100.000$ US Dollars).

talking about the largest scam on bitcointalk in history! More than intense if u ask me.

You clearly are new here. lol

PirateAt40, MyBitcoin.com, Bitcoininca, MTGOX, just to name a few are much bigger scams than this.  Grin Grin Grin
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
win
June 14, 2014, 08:25:49 PM
#31
You know what if I created a coin from scratch I personally would want to own 20% at least I feel like I would deserve it. The fact that NXT probably didnt own that much amazes me. NXT was open for quite a while its not their fault that no one sent in BTC.


The big myth about NXT is that the first stakeholders made so much money when actually in the early stages of NXT anyone had the chance to buy NXT on Bitcointalk and then on Dgex at dirt cheap prices and turn a few bitcoin into a small fortune.

The stupid thing about Qoras distribution is we are still in the early dirt cheap stage and people aren't buying that much yet. People talking on here wont be able to say they didn't know when it rises 1000%.

Though I will get a kick out of saying I told you so to me honest.

Nxt has multiple 50 million accounts that never sold anything since launch until very recently. Is that the behavior of a normal investor? These accounts should have deep links to BCNext as in my theory above. I will take a look at Qora though.



Honestly you should. Not everyone on here has terrible intentions, I bought and am waiting for it to rise at least to 500 sats. Might take a month might take 6 but I know it will happen so why not tell people, its a win win for me and those who listen.
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
win
June 14, 2014, 08:23:40 PM
#30
What was great about NXt is it was one of first time I had a chance to get into the game like the big miners were able to. Before I watched as people with tech abilities mined the crap out of coins early on and were saying how much they were making. I have a 5 year old laptop and I know shit about mining. So I am discriminated against cause I'm stupid. How is that fair?
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
June 14, 2014, 08:20:38 PM
#29
You know what if I created a coin from scratch I personally would want to own 20% at least I feel like I would deserve it. The fact that NXT probably didnt own that much amazes me. NXT was open for quite a while its not their fault that no one sent in BTC.


The big myth about NXT is that the first stakeholders made so much money when actually in the early stages of NXT anyone had the chance to buy NXT on Bitcointalk and then on Dgex at dirt cheap prices and turn a few bitcoin into a small fortune.

The stupid thing about Qoras distribution is we are still in the early dirt cheap stage and people aren't buying that much yet. People talking on here wont be able to say they didn't know when it rises 1000%.

Though I will get a kick out of saying I told you so to me honest.

Nxt has multiple 50 million accounts that never sold anything since launch until very recently. Is that the behavior of a normal investor? These accounts should have deep links to BCNext as in my theory above. I will take a look at Qora though.
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
win
June 14, 2014, 08:19:13 PM
#28
You know what if I created a coin from scratch I personally would want to own 20% at least I feel like I would deserve it. The fact that NXT probably didnt own that much amazes me. NXT was open for quite a while its not their fault that no one sent in BTC.


The big myth about NXT is that the first stakeholders made so much money when actually in the early stages of NXT anyone had the chance to buy NXT on Bitcointalk and then on Dgex at dirt cheap prices and turn a few bitcoin into a small fortune.

The stupid thing about Qoras distribution is we are still in the early dirt cheap stage and people aren't buying that much yet. People talking on here wont be able to say they didn't know when it rises 1000%.

Though I will get a kick out of saying I told you so to me honest.

So people who dislike NxT are irrational and envious?  NxT less volume than Cinni..  Wink

By the way - I have been following NxT almost as long as the NxT whales.  As soon as it hit Dgex, everyone conspired to engage in price manipulation and then it was always at least $0.01.   A lot of whales got off with $40 million at the cost of a few $Fiat, and yet you're telling me it was 'cheap enough' at $0.01 (never mind $0.04 - it raised quickly) for anyone to have bought in.

Sure...

I'm convinced Gorillajam has to be one of the original NxT whales, there's no other explanation to his weird defense of NxT's distribution.


Well you still made around 1000% at $0.01

Lots of much cheaper NXT was been passed around on BT threads. The facts are there if you want to search for old threads.

I know cause I was one of the buyers.  Grin
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
win
June 14, 2014, 08:16:52 PM
#27
There's no reason to end any IPO prematurely, unless you have 1000+ participants.

Every coin, presumably if it's a good one, is going to be here for the next several years?  Why rush an IPO?  Unless the incentive is greed?




Someone developing a coin wont want to wait more than a month or two once they have developed a coin.

Actually the biggest scams are the ones that last forever like NXTL and Ethereum that hopes to get like a bazzion Bitcoin!


Distribution doesn't happen at IPO anyway, it happens when people start selling their stake.
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 506
June 14, 2014, 08:16:17 PM
#26
You know what if I created a coin from scratch I personally would want to own 20% at least I feel like I would deserve it. The fact that NXT probably didnt own that much amazes me. NXT was open for quite a while its not their fault that no one sent in BTC.


The big myth about NXT is that the first stakeholders made so much money when actually in the early stages of NXT anyone had the chance to buy NXT on Bitcointalk and then on Dgex at dirt cheap prices and turn a few bitcoin into a small fortune.

The stupid thing about Qoras distribution is we are still in the early dirt cheap stage and people aren't buying that much yet. People talking on here wont be able to say they didn't know when it rises 1000%.

Though I will get a kick out of saying I told you so to me honest.

So people who dislike NxT are irrational and envious?  NxT less volume than Cinni..  Wink

By the way - I have been following NxT almost as long as the NxT whales.  As soon as it hit Dgex, everyone conspired to engage in price manipulation and then it was always at least $0.01.   A lot of whales got off with 10+ million at the cost of a few $Fiat, and yet you're telling me it was 'cheap enough' at $0.01 (never mind $0.04 - it raised quickly in weeks) for anyone to have bought in.

Sure...  average person has $100K they're going to throw into a week(s) / month old crypto back in late 2013, to buy off BCnext and the whales who bought in at nothing.


I'm convinced Gorillajam has to be one of the original NxT whales, there's no other explanation to his weird defense of NxT's distribution.
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
win
June 14, 2014, 08:13:26 PM
#25
You know what if I created a coin from scratch I personally would want to own 20% at least I feel like I would deserve it. The fact that NXT probably didnt own that much amazes me. NXT was open for quite a while its not their fault that no one sent in BTC.


The big myth about NXT is that the first stakeholders made so much money when actually in the early stages of NXT anyone had the chance to buy NXT on Bitcointalk and then on Dgex at dirt cheap prices and turn a few bitcoin into a small fortune.

The stupid thing about Qoras distribution is we are still in the early dirt cheap stage and people aren't buying that much yet. People talking on here wont be able to say they didn't know when it rises 1000%.

Though I will get a kick out of saying I told you so to me honest.
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 506
June 14, 2014, 08:11:14 PM
#24
There's no reason to end any IPO prematurely, unless you have 1000+ participants.

Every coin, presumably if it's a good one, is going to be here for the next several years?  Why rush an IPO?  Unless the incentive is greed?
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
June 14, 2014, 08:09:53 PM
#23
In cases of Nxt, Qora, it is likely the founders withheld information about the project and sent in a large portion of the total fund themselves.

It is very easy to do. For example you quietly open an IPO thread and keep it for one month but give out no code, do no marketing. Obviously no one will care and therefore the total contribution would be low. You and and your friends then send in 10-20 btc and claim a big portion of the coin.

NEM has a certain number of stakeholder target. That is the way to go.


Qora had only about 30BTC after a month. During that time he actually released a beta wallet for people to see. He felt the BTC was not enough for a good distribution so he extended another week. Then quite a few people sent in and they ended up with 130 BTC.

Your theory in this case doesn't hold water. 

It certainly applies in the case of Nxt. For Qora, maybe the developer want money (btc) more than a bigger share of the coin? In this case, it is even worse because he has no big reason to attach to the coin in the long run.
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 506
June 14, 2014, 08:07:22 PM
#22
In cases of Nxt, Qora, it is likely the founders withheld information about the project and sent in a large portion of the total fund themselves.

It is very easy to do. For example you quietly open an IPO thread and keep it for one month but give out no code, do no marketing. Obviously no one will care and therefore the total contribution would be low. You and and your friends then send in 10-20 btc and claim a big portion of the coin.

NEM has a certain number of stakeholder target. That is the way to go.


Qora had only about 30BTC after a month. During that time he actually released a beta wallet for people to see. He felt the BTC was not enough for a good distribution so he extended another week. Then quite a few people sent in and they ended up with 130 BTC.

Your theory in this case doesn't hold water.  


The truth was that there was soooooo many IPO's about the same time as Qora that it got buried among them.

Most of them turned out to be scams. Thats the risk you take with IPO's Thats why you deserve to do well if you spot the 1 in 100 IPO that is actually a good coin. You are more likely to buy a cheap coin and see it rise than get in on a decent IPO generally. My biggest wins have been buying NXt cheap and buying Darkcoin dirt cheap too. I believe my Qora purchases will do just as well.

Yet you trash NEM, even though you are the one (right) who claims he has 10 stakes?  

Everyone seems to claim to have 10 to 50 stakes.   Grin  Why not 100 or 1000?! 
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
win
June 14, 2014, 08:01:50 PM
#21
In cases of Nxt, Qora, it is likely the founders withheld information about the project and sent in a large portion of the total fund themselves.

It is very easy to do. For example you quietly open an IPO thread and keep it for one month but give out no code, do no marketing. Obviously no one will care and therefore the total contribution would be low. You and and your friends then send in 10-20 btc and claim a big portion of the coin.

NEM has a certain number of stakeholder target. That is the way to go.


Qora had only about 30BTC after a month. During that time he actually released a beta wallet for people to see. He felt the BTC was not enough for a good distribution so he extended another week. Then quite a few people sent in and they ended up with 130 BTC.

Your theory in this case doesn't hold water.  


The truth was that there was soooooo many IPO's about the same time as Qora that it got buried among them.

Most of them turned out to be scams. Thats the risk you take with IPO's Thats why you deserve to do well if you spot the 1 in 100 IPO that is actually a good coin. You are more likely to buy a cheap coin and see it rise than get in on a decent IPO generally. My biggest wins have been buying NXt cheap and buying Darkcoin dirt cheap too. I believe my Qora purchases will do just as well.
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
June 14, 2014, 07:48:55 PM
#20
In cases of Nxt, Qora, it is likely the founders withheld information about the project and sent in a large portion of the total fund themselves.

It is very easy to do. For example you quietly open an IPO thread and keep it for one month but give out no code, do no marketing. Obviously no one will care and therefore the total contribution would be low. You and and your friends then send in 10-20 btc and claim a big portion of the coin.

NEM has a certain number of stakeholder target. That is the way to go.
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 506
June 14, 2014, 07:45:46 PM
#19
NxT did not need a developer fund because BCnext prematurely closed the IPO, as soon as people started to get interested, and then he later cashed out his entire stake for around $500K (he needed the money, 'scam succeeded' and ran off and abandoned his own project.  These are facts.  Not providing links, as this happened back in 2013 and it's common knowledge, unless you refuse to believe it, to 'old NxTers' such as myself.  If you want a link then read the old NxT thread, the original one, all your answers are there.  Google is your friend).

In contrast - the NEM developers are hardly being compensated - right now (assuming the price holds) all they would get is a measly $40K, at current prices.    At least one developer had to put his PhD on hold to contribute to NEM.  This is in contrast to the rest of us, who didn't spend hours programming, who got $1.5K just for putting $5 to $15 months ago

BCnext got off relatively easy - all he did was program a $hit browser interface, got it barely working just enough, and then dumped all the real workload on his successors while he ran off with half a cool million. BCnext likely came back to Bitcointalk but created another project - who knows if it was Qora, NEM, if he's on the Ethereum team, who honestly knows ( / don't care really)
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
June 14, 2014, 07:36:43 PM
#18
Is there any proof of him owning these accounts?

LETS NOT THROW THE STONE. we all have some mistake and dark side.



Yes.  we will hold back until official statement of NEM development team.

anyone can investigate public stakeholder list + utopianfuture accounts. all needed information is in the public.

Thanks for your response. How was this analysis conducted to get this number?

careful analysis of bitcointalk accounts, stakeholder list, public ledger information and nxt asset exchange data.

most shocking is beside utopianfuture, patmast3r, jaguar and gimre also hold several sockpuppet accounts.

I don't have any sockpuppet accounts, so I'd love to hear your "evidence".

My NXT account (the one in my signature) has a single outflow of one NXT.


While he MIGHT not have evidence its actually impossible to trace a sockpuppet account. I have some, sent money from an exchange into a brand new wallet. BOOM! untraceable stake.

Now go fuck yourself fair distribution my ass!

So guilty without proof?


The only thing that makes someone guilty is they claim NEM was a fair distribution, when it clearly isn't.

Ironically the fairest way to do POS which people have criticized so much is the way NXT and Qora did it. ie Give everyone a chance to send in BTC and your stake is shared with those who donate proportionally to the amount people are willing to bet on it. It wasn't NXT's fault no one donated. Qora got 130 BTC which was a nice amount to start from I think, ideally could of been more but people were busy getting stakes in Exocoin that hasn't even got a wallet yet.

The NEM way just rewards developers over average one stakeholders. Communism in practice. Equality for all, just not the leaders.

Developers should have more. Rewards are equal to contributions. That's fair and how the world works.
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
win
June 14, 2014, 07:32:54 PM
#17
Is there any proof of him owning these accounts?

LETS NOT THROW THE STONE. we all have some mistake and dark side.



Yes.  we will hold back until official statement of NEM development team.

anyone can investigate public stakeholder list + utopianfuture accounts. all needed information is in the public.

Thanks for your response. How was this analysis conducted to get this number?

careful analysis of bitcointalk accounts, stakeholder list, public ledger information and nxt asset exchange data.

most shocking is beside utopianfuture, patmast3r, jaguar and gimre also hold several sockpuppet accounts.

I don't have any sockpuppet accounts, so I'd love to hear your "evidence".

My NXT account (the one in my signature) has a single outflow of one NXT.


While he MIGHT not have evidence its actually impossible to trace a sockpuppet account. I have some, sent money from an exchange into a brand new wallet. BOOM! untraceable stake.

Now go fuck yourself fair distribution my ass!

So guilty without proof?


The only thing that makes someone guilty is they claim NEM was a fair distribution, when it clearly isn't.

Ironically the fairest way to do POS which people have criticized so much is the way NXT and Qora did it. ie Give everyone a chance to send in BTC and your stake is shared with those who donate proportionally to the amount people are willing to bet on it. It wasn't NXT's fault no one donated. Qora got 130 BTC which was a nice amount to start from I think, ideally could of been more but people were busy getting stakes in Exocoin that hasn't even got a wallet yet.

The NEM way just rewards developers over average one stakeholders. Communism in practice. Equality for all, just not the leaders.
Pages:
Jump to: