delete - page 75. | Bitcointalksearch.org

infofront

legendary

Activity: 2646

Merit: 2842

Shitcoin Minimalist

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: BitcoinDN.com on September 27, 2014, 12:27:05 AM

Then why not attack it instead of monero? What is your reason for attacking monero and refusing to allow devs to fix your exploit?

Hey,

They're the ones saying it's not possible.

So nothing to worry about right?

~BCX~

Actually, I believe it was the Cryptonote/Bytecoin team that said it was impossible. Everyone else pretty much acknowledged a TW attack may be possible.

BitcoinDN.com

member

Activity: 97

Merit: 10

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: BitcoinDN.com on September 27, 2014, 12:27:05 AM

Then why not attack it instead of monero? What is your reason for attacking monero and refusing to allow devs to fix your exploit?

Hey,

They're the ones saying it's not possible.

So nothing to worry about right?

~BCX~

No,

I believe your persistence merits that at least you believe you have an exploit.

In their position, what could you say? They have nothing of substance to be worried of an exploit. "Prove there are not unicorns"

I believe at least you think you have a unicorn, and I'm worried there just might be a unicorn. In case there is, can you please, please, tell the devs so they can make sure we catch the unicorn?

vuduchyld

sr. member

Activity: 364

Merit: 250

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: vuduchyld on September 27, 2014, 12:19:03 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Yep I agree, this is an awesome coin.

~BCX~

This was in the NEOS thread. Maybe we should all dump XMR and buy NEOS, another anon coin. Mass market cap exodus from XMR into a $166K cap coin...man, that could run the price up.

I guess your sarcasm detection was set to zero.

This coin is so absurd I thought it would be obvious.

~BCX~

My sarcasm meter was, indeed, set to zero. I did think you were endorsing.

I was also being sarcastic, although I'd suspect that somebody would have to have some knowledge of my post history to know it. I certainly don't blame you for missing that.

EDIT: hell, I suppose I should thank you for clarifying, just in case I was about to get victimized in a pump'n'dump

OrientA

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

Quote from: infofront on September 27, 2014, 12:25:21 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: vuduchyld on September 27, 2014, 12:19:03 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Yep I agree, this is an awesome coin.
~BCX~

This was in the NEOS thread. Maybe we should all dump XMR and buy NEOS, another anon coin. Mass market cap exodus from XMR into a $166K cap coin...man, that could run the price up.

I guess your sarcasm detection was set to zero.
his coin is so absurd I thought it would be obvious.
~BCX~

It really is an awful coin.

Coin itself is fine. Too many Monero threads.

BitcoinDN.com

member

Activity: 97

Merit: 10

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: vuduchyld on September 27, 2014, 12:19:03 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Yep I agree, this is an awesome coin.

~BCX~

This was in the NEOS thread. Maybe we should all dump XMR and buy NEOS, another anon coin. Mass market cap exodus from XMR into a $166K cap coin...man, that could run the price up.

I guess your sarcasm detection was set to zero.

This coin is so absurd I thought it would be obvious.

~BCX~

Then why not attack it instead of monero? What is your reason for attacking monero and refusing to allow devs to fix your exploit?

infofront

legendary

Activity: 2646

Merit: 2842

Shitcoin Minimalist

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: vuduchyld on September 27, 2014, 12:19:03 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Yep I agree, this is an awesome coin.

~BCX~

This was in the NEOS thread. Maybe we should all dump XMR and buy NEOS, another anon coin. Mass market cap exodus from XMR into a $166K cap coin...man, that could run the price up.

I guess your sarcasm detection was set to zero.

This coin is so absurd I thought it would be obvious.

~BCX~

It really is an awful coin.
That's what I don't get though. Why not just attack the obvious scamcoins?

infofront

legendary

Activity: 2646

Merit: 2842

Shitcoin Minimalist

Quote from: vuduchyld on September 27, 2014, 12:19:03 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Yep I agree, this is an awesome coin.

~BCX~

This was in the NEOS thread. Maybe we should all dump XMR and buy NEOS, another anon coin. Mass market cap exodus from XMR into a $166K cap coin...man, that could run the price up.

Coincidentally timed near the release of their hyped up V2 wallet.

vuduchyld

sr. member

Activity: 364

Merit: 250

Quote from: ?? on ??

Yep I agree, this is an awesome coin.

~BCX~

This was in the NEOS thread. Maybe we should all dump XMR and buy NEOS, another anon coin. Mass market cap exodus from XMR into a $166K cap coin...man, that could run the price up.

nutildah

legendary

Activity: 3010

Merit: 8114

have you seen that before?

black_jesus

newbie

Activity: 28

Merit: 0

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: black_jesus on September 27, 2014, 12:00:49 AM

I just put in random numbers close to those block ranges. Once in the range between 192298 and 192358, and once in the lower range. I'm pretty confident given the 60 second target time between blocks that this can be repeated throughout the blockchain.

That doesn't mean there isn't some sort of attack underway ... I have no clue. I'm just pointing out that the anomalies that BCX pointed out aren't anything extraordinary.

I do believe this is called back peddling.

Back peddling from what, exactly? And why do you ignore tough questions?

Karl Hungus

full member

Activity: 212

Merit: 100

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: black_jesus on September 27, 2014, 12:00:49 AM

I just put in random numbers close to those block ranges. Once in the range between 192298 and 192358, and once in the lower range. I'm pretty confident given the 60 second target time between blocks that this can be repeated throughout the blockchain.

That doesn't mean there isn't some sort of attack underway ... I have no clue. I'm just pointing out that the anomalies that BCX pointed out aren't anything extraordinary.

I do believe this is called back peddling.

Quote from: Karl Hungus on September 27, 2014, 12:02:10 AM

Price hasn't moved. I think to get any effect this time BCX needs more than just ominous words.

No cheap coins for BCX now without some real evidence.

Newsflash newbie,

I do not nor have I ever cared what the price is doing.

~BCX~

Newsflash wanker,

You have not shown any evidence you are mounting a successful attack.

Just more words to drop the price again, but I think this time it wont work.

2dogs

legendary

Activity: 1267

Merit: 1000

(Grabs some popcorn and something to drink....)

OrientA

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

How can we be sure that the close block time is not from TW attack? Will dev's recent work mitigate the attack?

nutildah

legendary

Activity: 3010

Merit: 8114

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: black_jesus on September 27, 2014, 12:00:49 AM

I just put in random numbers close to those block ranges. Once in the range between 192298 and 192358, and once in the lower range. I'm pretty confident given the 60 second target time between blocks that this can be repeated throughout the blockchain.

That doesn't mean there isn't some sort of attack underway ... I have no clue. I'm just pointing out that the anomalies that BCX pointed out aren't anything extraordinary.

I do believe this is called back peddling.

~BCX~

Hey-O!

Karl Hungus

full member

Activity: 212

Merit: 100

Price hasn't moved. I think to get any effect this time BCX needs more than just ominous words.

No cheap coins for BCX now without some real evidence.

black_jesus

newbie

Activity: 28

Merit: 0

Quote from: Viper1 on September 26, 2014, 11:56:09 PM

Quote from: black_jesus on September 26, 2014, 11:39:11 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: Hilux74 on September 26, 2014, 10:44:21 PM

Yesterday I did notice a few times, when looking at it, that my miner software was reporting periods where blocks were being found ad little as 15 seconds apart some times 3-4 in a row. I thought it was odd at the time, now after BCXs last post maybe it was more than just odd.. I guess we shall see.

I would look at recent blocks (235525,235526) (235532,235533) (235542,235543)

Coincidence, I think not.

If I were the guessing type, I would call this symptoms of an "Anonymint inspired modified ArtForz Time Warp Attack"

Just an observational opinion from a casual observer LOL

~BCX~

And (192298, 192299), (192326,192327), (192357, 192358) ... diabolical ... you've been at this for weeks!!

Edit: Months even! (122604, 122605), (122614, 122615) - what's up with THAT? You sneaky devil.

Would those blocks just happen to coincide with when BCX first came out on here and said there was a potential exploit a couple months back now?

I just put in random numbers close to those block ranges. Once in the range between 192298 and 192358, and once in the lower range. I'm pretty confident given the 60 second target time between blocks that this can be repeated throughout the blockchain.

That doesn't mean there isn't some sort of attack underway ... I have no clue. I'm just pointing out that the anomalies that BCX pointed out aren't anything extraordinary.

Cryptobro

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Quote from: Spoetnik on September 26, 2014, 11:50:51 PM

...

I guess it's the weekend and you're bored... both you and BCX come out of the woodwork and start spouting more shit.

Just when things had calmed down in here.

nioc

legendary

Activity: 1624

Merit: 1008

Quote from: Viper1 on September 26, 2014, 11:56:09 PM

Quote from: black_jesus on September 26, 2014, 11:39:11 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: Hilux74 on September 26, 2014, 10:44:21 PM

Yesterday I did notice a few times, when looking at it, that my miner software was reporting periods where blocks were being found ad little as 15 seconds apart some times 3-4 in a row. I thought it was odd at the time, now after BCXs last post maybe it was more than just odd.. I guess we shall see.

I would look at recent blocks (235525,235526) (235532,235533) (235542,235543)

Coincidence, I think not.

If I were the guessing type, I would call this symptoms of an "Anonymint inspired modified ArtForz Time Warp Attack"

Just an observational opinion from a casual observer LOL

~BCX~

And (192298, 192299), (192326,192327), (192357, 192358) ... diabolical ... you've been at this for weeks!!

Edit: Months even! (122604, 122605), (122614, 122615) - what's up with THAT? You sneaky devil.

Would those blocks just happen to coincide with when BCX first came out on here and said there was a potential exploit a couple months back now?

Blocks that are close together happen all the time.

Viper1

sr. member

Activity: 686

Merit: 320

Quote from: black_jesus on September 26, 2014, 11:39:11 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: Hilux74 on September 26, 2014, 10:44:21 PM

Yesterday I did notice a few times, when looking at it, that my miner software was reporting periods where blocks were being found ad little as 15 seconds apart some times 3-4 in a row. I thought it was odd at the time, now after BCXs last post maybe it was more than just odd.. I guess we shall see.

I would look at recent blocks (235525,235526) (235532,235533) (235542,235543)

Coincidence, I think not.

If I were the guessing type, I would call this symptoms of an "Anonymint inspired modified ArtForz Time Warp Attack"

Just an observational opinion from a casual observer LOL

~BCX~

And (192298, 192299), (192326,192327), (192357, 192358) ... diabolical ... you've been at this for weeks!!

Edit: Months even! (122604, 122605), (122614, 122615) - what's up with THAT? You sneaky devil.

Would those blocks just happen to coincide with when BCX first came out on here and said there was a potential exploit a couple months back now?

pineapples

legendary

Activity: 1204

Merit: 1000

to your stations, man the pineapples!!!

Quote from: BitcoinDN.com on September 26, 2014, 11:44:19 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: black_jesus on September 26, 2014, 11:39:11 PM

And (192298, 192299), (192326,192327), (192357, 192358) ... diabolical ... you've been at this for weeks!!

Another post from Hawaiian Islands.

Interesting.

~BCX~

Why are you doing this? You say forced evolution, but can't you just relay the exploit information to the devs? You are trying to kill a project that many people care about, and has only good intentions for all, (private, instantaneous transactions).

I make a plea to you to stop your TW and play the good fight.

yes you do have to wonder why some trolls go for the throat, while others are quite happy to explain themselves.

Topic: delete - page 75. (Read 165547 times)