you had 7 G hash on it - you would have ended up fine
Actually i saw 9GH
Topic: deleted - page 174. (Read 227373 times)
Actually i saw 9GH
how many the guy did collect of btc selling IPO's 2 people 
wasn't he able to pay even a good webmaster 2000$ to make a good launching ?
sOooo many questions and yet no answer from any dev (boo)
wasn't he able to pay even a good webmaster 2000$ to make a good launching ?
sOooo many questions and yet no answer from any dev (boo)
you had 7 G hash on it - you would have ended up fine
wow. nice job devs. you fucking idiots are so skilled. thanks for wasting everyone's electricity and time.
A re-launch is the best option, that way investors won't lose out.
If the invested BTC was in escrow, how would investors be losing out?
If I'm understanding this correctly, a relaunch means that everyone here just wasted 2 hours of time and resources, as opposed to only two (apparently garbage) devs having to refund a handful of BTC.
Are there other factors that I am not considering? The choice seems fairly obvious to simply cancel the IPO...
Yes why think about the 50-60 people who actually invested money in this
.time (and electricity) is money... and how many days ahead was 1500 really anyway?
yes time is money, we waited 12-14 days only to see our investment halved in 2 hrs
and we are wrong for complaining. your investment didn't halved, you still woulda made a profit. you were also right to complain. just saying more was wasted overall this route. things woulda played out fine if it kept going
A re-launch is the best option, that way investors won't lose out.
If the invested BTC was in escrow, how would investors be losing out?
If I'm understanding this correctly, a relaunch means that everyone here just wasted 2 hours of time and resources, as opposed to only two (apparently garbage) devs having to refund a handful of BTC.
Are there other factors that I am not considering? The choice seems fairly obvious to simply cancel the IPO...
Yes why think about the 50-60 people who actually invested money in this
.time (and electricity) is money... and how many days ahead was 1500 really anyway?
yes time is money, we waited 12-14 days only to see our investment halved in 2 hrs
and we are wrong for complaining. Invest 1 BTC, IPO gets cancelled, receive 1 BTC back.
I'm seriously trying to figure this out so I can empathize with you. I'm just not understanding your problem, where I know very well that a lot of people just wasted a lot of time and resources for a relaunch.
I left my sell order of 1700pawn in nxt-e...
Now I'm seeing there is a relaunch and so I go to the exchange and see that all is sold.
I'm lucky I think...
Now I'm seeing there is a relaunch and so I go to the exchange and see that all is sold.
I'm lucky I think...
A re-launch is the best option, that way investors won't lose out.
If the invested BTC was in escrow, how would investors be losing out?
If I'm understanding this correctly, a relaunch means that everyone here just wasted 2 hours of time and resources, as opposed to only two (apparently garbage) devs having to refund a handful of BTC.
Are there other factors that I am not considering? The choice seems fairly obvious to simply cancel the IPO...
Yes why think about the 50-60 people who actually invested money in this
.time (and electricity) is money... and how many days ahead was 1500 really anyway?
yes time is money, we waited 12-14 days only to see our investment halved in 2 hrs
and we are wrong for complaining. 
adding to scamcoin list
EPIC FAIL IN RED AND BOLD
A re-launch is the best option, that way investors won't lose out.
If the invested BTC was in escrow, how would investors be losing out?
If I'm understanding this correctly, a relaunch means that everyone here just wasted 2 hours of time and resources, as opposed to only two (apparently garbage) devs having to refund a handful of BTC.
Are there other factors that I am not considering? The choice seems fairly obvious to simply cancel the IPO...
Yes why think about the 50-60 people who actually invested money in this
.time (and electricity) is money... and how many days ahead was 1500 really anyway?
A re-launch is the best option, that way investors won't lose out.
If the invested BTC was in escrow, how would investors be losing out?
If I'm understanding this correctly, a relaunch means that everyone here just wasted 2 hours of time and resources, as opposed to only two (apparently garbage) devs having to refund a handful of BTC.
Are there other factors that I am not considering? The choice seems fairly obvious to simply cancel the IPO...
exactly what i was saying.
Not yet confirmed, We are not gonna rush. First 1500 blocks will be 1 reward
Seriously? I am out.
Easier for my rigs to find coins. What a 2.5 day delay does is sets the actual relaunch for the weekend.... pretend it is not relaunching until then and you will feel better! A slow launch is good.
You two idiots or what ...
what do those who buy this coin for btc?
what do those who buy this coin for btc?
it's your own damn fault. You rush and buy a brand new coin that had a failed launch, so you can have it now. You should try and plant it in your virtual garden maybe you will get a virtual money tree and become a virtual millionaire.
i still think relaunch screwed the masses to satisfy the whales. in the long run 1500 was still an early enough fork, and it wouldn't of wasted everyone's time
dude look at the investors list
how many whales do u see. Not yet confirmed, We are not gonna rush. First 1500 blocks will be 1 reward
Seriously? I am out.
for ipo investors:
Not yet confirmed, We are not gonna rush. First 1500 blocks will be 1 reward
God this dev is an idiot. Not here for launch, doesn't realize they coded KGW to kick in at block 35000, and now expects people to mine for 2 and a half days with no reward. Please just refund the IPO and kill the coin, with this kind of massive incompetence you're bound to fail.
Jump to: