Topic: deleted - page 2. (Read 2189 times)
Heard this is good for GPU miners. Can I mine this on a GTX 1050 Ti?
LOL. Like you're doing? I would suggest that last little quip supports nollaig's point, but that would probably be considered another attack on character.
You and your "team" seem to be at this all hours of the day, writing articles, writing tweets, editing videos, building websites, submitting to scamwatch, writing blogs... You're investing A LOT of time singularly focused on Dynex. You seem to have no other purpose. I wonder why?
I suppose they should be honoured, but no one goes to this effort for nothing.
Are you being paid? Or are you fuelled just by old-fashioned vengeance? Are you part of the group that stole a big bag of DNX at the start, only to get it wiped during the blockchain rollback?
I notice the twitter attacks are coming from previously dormant accounts, which have been kept idle for a number of years. Can't say this doesn't make this little campaign look like a complete hatchet job.
Please feel free to tell us a bit more about yourself and your team if you all have such noble motives and lofty principles concerning doxxing.
PS: Sorry, but your "revelations" are anything but and have already been priced in.
Unsubstantiated attacks on character are fair game, but tell more about the attacker than the target.
As for the time spent on this, it should be common knowledge by now that you can generate incredible amounts of information output and promotion with not that much work. All you need to do is look a bit of light research and know how to use some basic contemporary automation tools.
As stated before, we do not have any personal vested interest in this project. This is just open information to give investors an alternative view to the project. Any valid endeavour should be able to be exposed in the public. Currently the sentiment is driven by the Dynex marketing team and it is fair to give alternative views.
As for our personal information and any further information we have given out all the information have found and will be returning to hiatus.
Ideally we would love to have the Dynex team fix the reported security vulnerabilities to protect to protect users of their software, but that is not our battle.
We have reached our endgame as from this point onward there are two options:
- DynexSolve and the project is legitimate and these details will be spec in the rear view mirror
- Dynex is not real, the team goes into hiding, but it will be very easy to track who they are
PS: Are you really suggesting the crypto markets are rational? Seriously.
PS: No need to create another account to try to show your strength in numbers.
LOL. Like you're doing? I would suggest that last little quip supports nollaig's point, but that would probably be considered another attack on character.
You and your "team" seem to be at this all hours of the day, writing articles, writing tweets, editing videos, building websites, submitting to scamwatch, writing blogs... You're investing A LOT of time singularly focused on Dynex. You seem to have no other purpose. I wonder why?
I suppose they should be honoured, but no one goes to this effort for nothing.
Are you being paid? Or are you fuelled just by old-fashioned vengeance? Are you part of the group that stole a big bag of DNX at the start, only to get it wiped during the blockchain rollback?
I notice the twitter attacks are coming from previously dormant accounts, which have been kept idle for a number of years. Can't say this doesn't make this little campaign look like a complete hatchet job.
Please feel free to tell us a bit more about yourself and your team if you all have such noble motives and lofty principles concerning doxxing.
PS: Sorry, but your "revelations" are anything but and have already been priced in.
Imagine being this obsessed that you wrote an essay that recycles the same thing you just wrote. Being obsessed with a conspiracy theory and yet no one cares and see's right through it. Now I understand how Flat Earthers think.
But really feel bad for this guy, all the major signs are here of his mental health deteriorating.
In the meantime, excited for these new DNX listings
But really feel bad for this guy, all the major signs are here of his mental health deteriorating.
In the meantime, excited for these new DNX listings
Again another attack on character.
yeah, it doesn't seem particularly selfless. there's something intensely personal going on with this guy (or group).
he seems to think he's some unique sleuth and no one did their own due diligence and found this stuff already. his "revelations" aren't the bombshells he thinks they are.
he seems to think he's some unique sleuth and no one did their own due diligence and found this stuff already. his "revelations" aren't the bombshells he thinks they are.
All that is shared by us is public information for potential investors and network participators. People are free to draw their own conclusions based on all available information to them. So far the Dynex team has not chosen to respond in a public forum which casts further doubt on their legitimacy. Especially given the security concerns and lack of public third party security audits to their software as the reported vulnerabilities in the Dynex blockchain explorer remain unpatched.
As a petty exploit can be shown here: alert%28%27Daniel%20had%20a%20little%20lamb%27%29">Daniel had a little lamb (timestamped copy from May 17 2023)
There are many similar attack vectors in the explorer code base. This could be used to attack the node running the explorer, which is not that meaningful for users. But what is worrisome to us is that the upcoming client side wallet uses this backend and could be exploited to access users' accounts once this goes live: https://samrahmeh.com/DynexWallet-js/
PS: No need to create another account to try to show your strength in numbers.
yeah, it doesn't seem particularly selfless. there's something intensely personal going on with this guy (or group).
he seems to think he's some unique sleuth and no one did their own due diligence and found this stuff already. his "revelations" aren't the bombshells he thinks they are.
maybe he's part of the fgpa hack from way back at the start. bitter about the rollback of the chain which wiped out the illegitimately mined coins (which was the right and fair call).
on twitter him or his buddy are saying "where's my money dynex?"
they're trying to be intimidating, so my guess is they started off directly harassing the team which didn't work and now are resorting to embarrassing themselves in public.
he seems to think he's some unique sleuth and no one did their own due diligence and found this stuff already. his "revelations" aren't the bombshells he thinks they are.
maybe he's part of the fgpa hack from way back at the start. bitter about the rollback of the chain which wiped out the illegitimately mined coins (which was the right and fair call).
on twitter him or his buddy are saying "where's my money dynex?"
they're trying to be intimidating, so my guess is they started off directly harassing the team which didn't work and now are resorting to embarrassing themselves in public.
Imagine being this obsessed that you wrote an essay that recycles the same thing you just wrote. Being obsessed with a conspiracy theory and yet no one cares and see's right through it. Now I understand how Flat Earthers think.
But really feel bad for this guy, all the major signs are here of his mental health deteriorating.
In the meantime, excited for these new DNX listings
But really feel bad for this guy, all the major signs are here of his mental health deteriorating.
In the meantime, excited for these new DNX listings
We have published our reasoning for why we believe the Dynex cryptocurrency is a scam. Here is a copy of it for public record:
Why we believe the Dynex cryptocurrency is a scam
With cryptocurrency there often a veil of mystery. Starting from the days of Bitcoin and its anonymous founder (or group founders) using the alias Satoshi Nakamoto. There are many cryptocurrency projects launched each week ranging from meme coin rugpulls like Squid Game to VC backed projects like Ethereum, Ironfish and Solana, looking to invest for a return in fiat money. These projects can have issues, etc. but are not scams per se.
One recent coin that has been rising in awareness is the Dynex PoUW coin. Many people are weary about this coin. The Dynex project has supposedly created a distributed computing model they call the “Dynex Neuromorphic Computer”. This means that the distributed network of GPUs (and possibly FPGA and ASICs) will perform useful work and be paid back in the Dynex cryptocurrency. This all sounds good and well, but there are quote a few red flags regarding this project as well. None of this is investment advice. Always do your own research. All information here is publicly available.
Here we list our reasoning why the Dynex project is highly likely a scam orchestrated by SEC sanctioned Austrian business man Daniel Mattes.
1. Veil of anonymity and blocking information
The Dynex project claims to have come from a research project. They are supposedly in the process of incorporating in the tax heaven of Lichtenstein in central Europe. While it is understandable that a team may choose to be undoxxed, but usually there would be a valid reason for it. It is also very fishy to pump your coin and list it on exchanges before undoxxing.
In this case there seems to be no valid reason given for anonymity, aside from simply wanting to stay anonymous. Why? Your technology is already open source (see below). Also handily the blockchain itself is encrypted, allowing insiders to move around large amount of coins anonymously.
But none of that privacy matters if your operations on hiding your personality is done very poorly, with personal information available in open data sources in your own distributed version control system that can be duplicated at a click. Deleting the repositories won’t cover the tracks. This record cannot be scrubbed since there are copies around the globe.
2. Business model? Why pump a cryptocurrency?
Next why did this research driven team without any experience in blockchain choose to go through the route of an anonymous cryptocurrency? They claim they see a large number of GPUs in the mining market that is underutilized. This is true and there are other PoUW (Proof of Useful Work) blockchains being developed, but there are challenges in this.
The team also claims to be doing a lot of continuous work, but none of this progress is shown in a major way in the public GitHub repositories of the project. So far the core assets have been unchanged since for 6+ months after the launch of the project. The team has spent time on fixing their substandard web wallet as well as pumping the price via AMA and exchange listings. Almost as if preparing for a pump and dump here.
Also, it is disturbing that the Dynex project forced us to do a disclosure of trivial XSS vulnerabilities in the Dynex Blockchain Explorer. The team never got back to us via email. Instead they chose to block us on Discord.
Finally: Why is the “Dynex Neuromorphic Computer” only being pumped through the crypto? Why is the technology industry and associated media not picking up on this publicly available information on a transformational technology shift in computing? So many unanswered questions on Dynex.
3. The DynexSolve algorithm, technology jargon and blocking skeptics
The Dynex team seems to be adamant that their technology is so advanced that it cannot be explained in clear fashion. In their communications they keep referring to very technical terms, in a way that doesn’t seem to give any real answers. The project quotes some references, but there is no evidence beyond their claims and a few videos showing “something” is happening on a computer screen. It is difficult to take these seriously.
The DynexSolve algorithm is also a bit of a mystery. The team says they had it published as open source, but then removed it because of abuse in December 2022. Currently they have the reference miner public. It uses some binary libraries that have the username of “daniel” included in them.
There are also two third party miners (SRB Miner and OneZeroMiner) that implement the DynexSolve Algorithm. Curiously some like Lolminer who have refused to implement DynexSolve. Why is this? Are SRB and OneZeroMiner using the provided blackbox library doing something? It would be interesting to hear from OneZeroMiner and SRB devs on how they have implemented DynexSolve. Why Lolminer refuses to implement it?
In addition to miners Dynex also offers a reference implementation of their “proprietary” Dynex Neuromorphic Chip. This implementation seems to include two open source SAT solvers for both CPU and GPU (CUDA for Nvidia). It is a functional SAT solver, but does it have anything to do with the DynexSolve algorithm? If so, then what exactly is the proprietary IP they need to protect since they have licensed DynexSolve under the permissive BSD Open Source license? Read the terms on that one, people.
A good sign of someone telling they’re worth their salt is that they can explain complex topics in a simple way. The project lead “Sumitomo” (who we believe is Daniel Mattes) is clearly versed in bullshit, but not deep technical insight needed to explain complex topics in simple manner.
In addition to casual communications on Twitter and Discord the Dynex team has published some research document looking whitepapers. In these documents they have a lot of information about their technology, which at a glance seems to be legitimate. They are also very attached to repeating some terminology like “intractable” in their communications sounds like it means business.
However, if you look closer at the sources and the topics they refer to it seems that they are parsing together and incomprehensible soup of different concepts like quantum computing, memcomputing, neuromorphic computing, bio-inspired and more. Without having any public peer reviews published on these topics it is difficult to take these publications from the Dynex project seriously. In fact, you could look at them critically, say the DynexSolve paper and question if they actually a describe a patented invention: SELF — ORGANIZING LOGIC GATES AND CIRCUITS AND COMPLEX PROBLEM SOLVING WITH SELF — ORGANIZING CIRCUITS
As reference to this we recommend looking into some research and commercial information on related where their “research” and technology marketing claims seem to be originating from:
We have earlier invited the Dynex project to respond to our comments on the public bitcointalk.org forum, but they have yet to respond: Dynex [DNX] | New POW World‘s First Decentralised Neuromorphic Supercomputing Platform
We repeat our invitation to address our feedback on a public forum. We do not feel the Discord of the DynexCoin project is a fair forum for discourse.
4. The recent ventures from Daniel Mattes have failed to yield much results (aside from litigation)
Since his earlier business ventures Daniel Mattes seems to have lost his Midas’ touch. After being forced to pay back almost $17 million for his fraud in Jumio in 2019, Mattes has not been very successful in his business ventures.
His flagship venture, 42.cx set out to provide advice for Artificial Investment advising and technology development, but instead ended up a being closed down in 2022 following a failure to make their K1 AI investment technology perform according to Mattes’ claims:
Before shutting down, it seems Mattes’ seeked to open source his artificial intelligence platform: https://github.com/ares-austria/AI-Analyst
Another ones of his now defunct ventures was been Q.Solutions. That company also had made a breakthrough in computing, describing the Q.Solutons product in very similar words to what Dynex is now presenting.
So, Mattes has a clear tendency to go for easy money by talking up his companies, but ending up just enriching himself to support his lifestyle
5. Patterns indicating that Dynex is a Daniel Mattes venture
By now it is beyond easy to show that either Daniel Mattes is behind Dynex or someone desperately wants everyone to believe that (unlikely). From revealing his first name in an AMA to his username being written all over the place in the Dynex codebase:
With the sample of Mattes’ PHP code in the explorer repository it is easy to see some of the practises in development of the 42.cx AI-Analysts repository he open sourced in the summer of 2022. We wouldn’t store a dime on these.
Another pattern that indicates that Dynex is a Daniel Mattes venture is the use of the office@ email address. Mattes’ previous 42.cx and Q.Solutions ventures have also used the office@ address for general inquiries:
This could be a coincidence, but it is not often that you see an address like [email protected] being used by companies in Austria or elsewhere.
But why do such an elaborate crypto scam?
Ultimately what is most strange about the Dynexcoin debacle and Mattes is why go through all this trouble to fake something? Why is it so imperative to keep the identity of the team hidden? Why block anyone asking around about Daniel Mattes and his evident involvement.
To us it seems more likely that Mattes is from an old world. Today you don’t need to do any real work to make money off scams. Just create a meme token (danielcoin?) and pump the living daylights out of that thing.
It is almost as this person has no idea how the internet works. Maybe Daniel is used to working in the “boomerverse” where his jargon goes through and impresses rich old people wanting to make even more money. In the crypto industry the scene is very different. Bullshit is easier to disprove.
Maybe we are wrong and he will reveal a groundbreaking technology that will change the world. But this person’s character, proved past in financial deception and his background in failing to provide results to back his words make us weary on the legitimacy of the Dynex project.
Do you think Daniel Mattes has the pedigree to create something world changing? Or is Dynex just a white collar conman trying to rip off cryptocurrency enthusiasts? What do you think?
Why we believe the Dynex cryptocurrency is a scam
With cryptocurrency there often a veil of mystery. Starting from the days of Bitcoin and its anonymous founder (or group founders) using the alias Satoshi Nakamoto. There are many cryptocurrency projects launched each week ranging from meme coin rugpulls like Squid Game to VC backed projects like Ethereum, Ironfish and Solana, looking to invest for a return in fiat money. These projects can have issues, etc. but are not scams per se.
One recent coin that has been rising in awareness is the Dynex PoUW coin. Many people are weary about this coin. The Dynex project has supposedly created a distributed computing model they call the “Dynex Neuromorphic Computer”. This means that the distributed network of GPUs (and possibly FPGA and ASICs) will perform useful work and be paid back in the Dynex cryptocurrency. This all sounds good and well, but there are quote a few red flags regarding this project as well. None of this is investment advice. Always do your own research. All information here is publicly available.
Here we list our reasoning why the Dynex project is highly likely a scam orchestrated by SEC sanctioned Austrian business man Daniel Mattes.
1. Veil of anonymity and blocking information
The Dynex project claims to have come from a research project. They are supposedly in the process of incorporating in the tax heaven of Lichtenstein in central Europe. While it is understandable that a team may choose to be undoxxed, but usually there would be a valid reason for it. It is also very fishy to pump your coin and list it on exchanges before undoxxing.
In this case there seems to be no valid reason given for anonymity, aside from simply wanting to stay anonymous. Why? Your technology is already open source (see below). Also handily the blockchain itself is encrypted, allowing insiders to move around large amount of coins anonymously.
But none of that privacy matters if your operations on hiding your personality is done very poorly, with personal information available in open data sources in your own distributed version control system that can be duplicated at a click. Deleting the repositories won’t cover the tracks. This record cannot be scrubbed since there are copies around the globe.
2. Business model? Why pump a cryptocurrency?
Next why did this research driven team without any experience in blockchain choose to go through the route of an anonymous cryptocurrency? They claim they see a large number of GPUs in the mining market that is underutilized. This is true and there are other PoUW (Proof of Useful Work) blockchains being developed, but there are challenges in this.
The team also claims to be doing a lot of continuous work, but none of this progress is shown in a major way in the public GitHub repositories of the project. So far the core assets have been unchanged since for 6+ months after the launch of the project. The team has spent time on fixing their substandard web wallet as well as pumping the price via AMA and exchange listings. Almost as if preparing for a pump and dump here.
Also, it is disturbing that the Dynex project forced us to do a disclosure of trivial XSS vulnerabilities in the Dynex Blockchain Explorer. The team never got back to us via email. Instead they chose to block us on Discord.
Finally: Why is the “Dynex Neuromorphic Computer” only being pumped through the crypto? Why is the technology industry and associated media not picking up on this publicly available information on a transformational technology shift in computing? So many unanswered questions on Dynex.
3. The DynexSolve algorithm, technology jargon and blocking skeptics
The Dynex team seems to be adamant that their technology is so advanced that it cannot be explained in clear fashion. In their communications they keep referring to very technical terms, in a way that doesn’t seem to give any real answers. The project quotes some references, but there is no evidence beyond their claims and a few videos showing “something” is happening on a computer screen. It is difficult to take these seriously.
The DynexSolve algorithm is also a bit of a mystery. The team says they had it published as open source, but then removed it because of abuse in December 2022. Currently they have the reference miner public. It uses some binary libraries that have the username of “daniel” included in them.
There are also two third party miners (SRB Miner and OneZeroMiner) that implement the DynexSolve Algorithm. Curiously some like Lolminer who have refused to implement DynexSolve. Why is this? Are SRB and OneZeroMiner using the provided blackbox library doing something? It would be interesting to hear from OneZeroMiner and SRB devs on how they have implemented DynexSolve. Why Lolminer refuses to implement it?
In addition to miners Dynex also offers a reference implementation of their “proprietary” Dynex Neuromorphic Chip. This implementation seems to include two open source SAT solvers for both CPU and GPU (CUDA for Nvidia). It is a functional SAT solver, but does it have anything to do with the DynexSolve algorithm? If so, then what exactly is the proprietary IP they need to protect since they have licensed DynexSolve under the permissive BSD Open Source license? Read the terms on that one, people.
A good sign of someone telling they’re worth their salt is that they can explain complex topics in a simple way. The project lead “Sumitomo” (who we believe is Daniel Mattes) is clearly versed in bullshit, but not deep technical insight needed to explain complex topics in simple manner.
In addition to casual communications on Twitter and Discord the Dynex team has published some research document looking whitepapers. In these documents they have a lot of information about their technology, which at a glance seems to be legitimate. They are also very attached to repeating some terminology like “intractable” in their communications sounds like it means business.
However, if you look closer at the sources and the topics they refer to it seems that they are parsing together and incomprehensible soup of different concepts like quantum computing, memcomputing, neuromorphic computing, bio-inspired and more. Without having any public peer reviews published on these topics it is difficult to take these publications from the Dynex project seriously. In fact, you could look at them critically, say the DynexSolve paper and question if they actually a describe a patented invention: SELF — ORGANIZING LOGIC GATES AND CIRCUITS AND COMPLEX PROBLEM SOLVING WITH SELF — ORGANIZING CIRCUITS
As reference to this we recommend looking into some research and commercial information on related where their “research” and technology marketing claims seem to be originating from:
- m0leCon 2020 — Fabio Traversa — Memcomputing and Empirical Results Using Self-Organizing Logic
- Introduction to MemComputing and its Applications in High Performance Computing
- Hello Tomorrow Global Summit Presentation (Memcomputing Inc.)
- Autonomous Vehicle Routing Optimization
(pay attention how to how Dynex has even chosen to use the exact same stock video footage at ~30 seconds)
We have earlier invited the Dynex project to respond to our comments on the public bitcointalk.org forum, but they have yet to respond: Dynex [DNX] | New POW World‘s First Decentralised Neuromorphic Supercomputing Platform
We repeat our invitation to address our feedback on a public forum. We do not feel the Discord of the DynexCoin project is a fair forum for discourse.
4. The recent ventures from Daniel Mattes have failed to yield much results (aside from litigation)
Since his earlier business ventures Daniel Mattes seems to have lost his Midas’ touch. After being forced to pay back almost $17 million for his fraud in Jumio in 2019, Mattes has not been very successful in his business ventures.
His flagship venture, 42.cx set out to provide advice for Artificial Investment advising and technology development, but instead ended up a being closed down in 2022 following a failure to make their K1 AI investment technology perform according to Mattes’ claims:
Quote
“Speaking to Bloomberg, 42.cx founder Daniel Mattes said none of the computer scientists advising him were involved with Deep Blue, but one, Vladimir Arlazarov, developed a 1960s chess program in the Soviet Union known as Kaissa. He acknowledged that experience may not be entirely relevant to investing. Algorithms have gotten really good at beating humans in games because there are clear rules that can be simulated, something stock markets decidedly lack. Arlazarov told Bloomberg that he did give Mattes general advice but didn’t work on K1 specifically.”
- Going to Court Over Losses When Robot Is to Blame
- Going to Court Over Losses When Robot Is to Blame
Before shutting down, it seems Mattes’ seeked to open source his artificial intelligence platform: https://github.com/ares-austria/AI-Analyst
Another ones of his now defunct ventures was been Q.Solutions. That company also had made a breakthrough in computing, describing the Q.Solutons product in very similar words to what Dynex is now presenting.
So, Mattes has a clear tendency to go for easy money by talking up his companies, but ending up just enriching himself to support his lifestyle
5. Patterns indicating that Dynex is a Daniel Mattes venture
By now it is beyond easy to show that either Daniel Mattes is behind Dynex or someone desperately wants everyone to believe that (unlikely). From revealing his first name in an AMA to his username being written all over the place in the Dynex codebase:
- https://github.com/dynexcoin/Dynex/commit/6e9f33e6800ca99495ba4cfcbbc00b8601cc86ef
- https://github.com/dynexcoin/Dynex-Blockchain-Explorer/commit/fcf9a6e4df9511583943ff6206c23f83f15521fb
With the sample of Mattes’ PHP code in the explorer repository it is easy to see some of the practises in development of the 42.cx AI-Analysts repository he open sourced in the summer of 2022. We wouldn’t store a dime on these.
Another pattern that indicates that Dynex is a Daniel Mattes venture is the use of the office@ email address. Mattes’ previous 42.cx and Q.Solutions ventures have also used the office@ address for general inquiries:
This could be a coincidence, but it is not often that you see an address like [email protected] being used by companies in Austria or elsewhere.
But why do such an elaborate crypto scam?
Ultimately what is most strange about the Dynexcoin debacle and Mattes is why go through all this trouble to fake something? Why is it so imperative to keep the identity of the team hidden? Why block anyone asking around about Daniel Mattes and his evident involvement.
To us it seems more likely that Mattes is from an old world. Today you don’t need to do any real work to make money off scams. Just create a meme token (danielcoin?) and pump the living daylights out of that thing.
It is almost as this person has no idea how the internet works. Maybe Daniel is used to working in the “boomerverse” where his jargon goes through and impresses rich old people wanting to make even more money. In the crypto industry the scene is very different. Bullshit is easier to disprove.
Maybe we are wrong and he will reveal a groundbreaking technology that will change the world. But this person’s character, proved past in financial deception and his background in failing to provide results to back his words make us weary on the legitimacy of the Dynex project.
Do you think Daniel Mattes has the pedigree to create something world changing? Or is Dynex just a white collar conman trying to rip off cryptocurrency enthusiasts? What do you think?
Coins like DNX with unlimited issuance are even more profitable than bank robberies. Do the chives still think that a scammer can lead you to become rich together? Wake up, I'll just mock you guys
Looks like people are scared of Dynex. BULLISH BABY!
Please pay attention to this fraud team. Please pay attention to this fraud team. The fraud development team has brought their Chinese community to cheat money. If you have any loss of money, please report it directly to the police. Advise those stubborn leeks not to be regretted again. This is your own fault, not worth pitiing, or you are also a member of a fraud gang, hahahaha
Please pay attention to this fraud team. Please pay attention to this fraud team. The fraud development team has brought their Chinese community to cheat money. If you have any loss of money, please report it directly to the police. Advise those stubborn leeks not to be regretted again. This is your own fault, not worth pitiing, or you are also a member of a fraud gang, hahahaha
This below is what it looks like when you've gone years of life with your mental health untreated
Obsession is a disease, this person's demeanor is very indicative that we have a massive mental health problem in society
Looking forward and excited to have DynexSolve help with computations for medicines that seek to address mental health issues like this below
Obsession is a disease, this person's demeanor is very indicative that we have a massive mental health problem in society
Looking forward and excited to have DynexSolve help with computations for medicines that seek to address mental health issues like this below
A textbook ad hominem attack. Nice.
This below is what it looks like when you've gone years of life with your mental health untreated
Obsession is a disease, this person's demeanor is very indicative that we have a massive mental health problem in society
Looking forward and excited to have DynexSolve help with computations for medicines that seek to address mental health issues like this below
Greetings DynexDNX! I am looking forward to you and the whole 25 person Dynex team "spoonfeeding" all the technical details of DynexSolve here.
In the meanwhile I have continued to do some research and would be interested in hearing how your invention differs from technology patented by MemComputing Inc and University of California. I assume you would not risk patent infringement in such a groundbreaking technology that could disrupt the whole computing industry.
The patent can be a bit tough to read without deep insight into the topic, but the slide deck and presentation are much more approachable:
On discord "Sumitomo" stated MemCPU is MemComputing and Dynex is Neuromorphic Computing:
But it would seem you are describing a Memcomputing device and not a neuromorphic computing device in the Dynex whitepaper and you refer to Dynex using "memprocessors" as primitives:
Maybe you can clear this up too?
Looking forward to hearing back from you!
Obsession is a disease, this person's demeanor is very indicative that we have a massive mental health problem in society
Looking forward and excited to have DynexSolve help with computations for medicines that seek to address mental health issues like this below
We happily invite you for an in-depth dialogue about the technology implemented in Dynex. PM us on one of our channels, so we can spoon-feed you all technical details before you make such incorrect claims.
Greetings DynexDNX! I am looking forward to you and the whole 25 person Dynex team "spoonfeeding" all the technical details of DynexSolve here.
In the meanwhile I have continued to do some research and would be interested in hearing how your invention differs from technology patented by MemComputing Inc and University of California. I assume you would not risk patent infringement in such a groundbreaking technology that could disrupt the whole computing industry.
The patent can be a bit tough to read without deep insight into the topic, but the slide deck and presentation are much more approachable:
- Introduction to MemComputing and its Applications in High Performance Computing
- Massimiliano Di Ventra, UCSD: Memcomputing: leveraging memory and physics to compute efficiently
On discord "Sumitomo" stated MemCPU is MemComputing and Dynex is Neuromorphic Computing:
Quote
[DYNEX DISCORD] sumitomo — 04/06/2023 8:40 AM: Of course we know of them
, we also have been referencing some of their work in our papers. It is clear that Dynex is
not the only player in the alternative computing paradigm environment - and it would also
not be a good sign if we where. Competition is healthy, and will help grow acceptance of
upcoming technology. Dynex -> neuromorphic computing, LightSolver -> optical computing,
Purdue -> probabilistic computing, Memcpu -> Memcomputing, Ferenc Molnar ->
Analog computing, etc. Everyone is following a different approach
, we also have been referencing some of their work in our papers. It is clear that Dynex is
not the only player in the alternative computing paradigm environment - and it would also
not be a good sign if we where. Competition is healthy, and will help grow acceptance of
upcoming technology. Dynex -> neuromorphic computing, LightSolver -> optical computing,
Purdue -> probabilistic computing, Memcpu -> Memcomputing, Ferenc Molnar ->
Analog computing, etc. Everyone is following a different approach
But it would seem you are describing a Memcomputing device and not a neuromorphic computing device in the Dynex whitepaper and you refer to Dynex using "memprocessors" as primitives:
Quote
In a Dynex architecture, memprocessors are the basic building blocks. We define a
memprocessor as an object defined by the fourtuple (x, y, z, σ) where x is the state
of the memprocessor, y is the array of internal variables, z the array of variables
that connect from one memprocessor to other memprocessors, and σ an operator
that defines the evolution
memprocessor as an object defined by the fourtuple (x, y, z, σ) where x is the state
of the memprocessor, y is the array of internal variables, z the array of variables
that connect from one memprocessor to other memprocessors, and σ an operator
that defines the evolution
Maybe you can clear this up too?
Looking forward to hearing back from you!
We happily invite you for an in-depth dialogue about the technology implemented in Dynex. PM us on one of our channels, so we can spoon-feed you all technical details before you make such incorrect claims.
Greetings DynexDNX! I am looking forward to you and the whole 25 person Dynex team "spoonfeeding" all the technical details of DynexSolve here.
In the meanwhile I have continued to do some research and would be interested in hearing how your invention differs from technology patented by MemComputing Inc and University of California. I assume you would not risk patent infringement in such a groundbreaking technology that could disrupt the whole computing industry.
The patent can be a bit tough to read without deep insight into the topic, but the slide deck and presentation are much more approachable:
- Introduction to MemComputing and its Applications in High Performance Computing
- Massimiliano Di Ventra, UCSD: Memcomputing: leveraging memory and physics to compute efficiently
On discord "Sumitomo" stated MemCPU is MemComputing and Dynex is Neuromorphic Computing:
Quote
[DYNEX DISCORD] sumitomo — 04/06/2023 8:40 AM: Of course we know of them
, we also have been referencing some of their work in our papers. It is clear that Dynex is
not the only player in the alternative computing paradigm environment - and it would also
not be a good sign if we where. Competition is healthy, and will help grow acceptance of
upcoming technology. Dynex -> neuromorphic computing, LightSolver -> optical computing,
Purdue -> probabilistic computing, Memcpu -> Memcomputing, Ferenc Molnar ->
Analog computing, etc. Everyone is following a different approach
, we also have been referencing some of their work in our papers. It is clear that Dynex is
not the only player in the alternative computing paradigm environment - and it would also
not be a good sign if we where. Competition is healthy, and will help grow acceptance of
upcoming technology. Dynex -> neuromorphic computing, LightSolver -> optical computing,
Purdue -> probabilistic computing, Memcpu -> Memcomputing, Ferenc Molnar ->
Analog computing, etc. Everyone is following a different approach
But it would seem you are describing a Memcomputing device and not a neuromorphic computing device in the Dynex whitepaper and you refer to Dynex using "memprocessors" as primitives:
Quote
In a Dynex architecture, memprocessors are the basic building blocks. We define a
memprocessor as an object defined by the fourtuple (x, y, z, σ) where x is the state
of the memprocessor, y is the array of internal variables, z the array of variables
that connect from one memprocessor to other memprocessors, and σ an operator
that defines the evolution
memprocessor as an object defined by the fourtuple (x, y, z, σ) where x is the state
of the memprocessor, y is the array of internal variables, z the array of variables
that connect from one memprocessor to other memprocessors, and σ an operator
that defines the evolution
Maybe you can clear this Dynex memcomputing vs neuromorphic computing disrepancy too?
Looking forward to hearing back from you!
Usually easy to tell when someone has personal motives
Show up out of the blue
Pretend to care about folk
Making up a narrative in your twisted mind
Spat it out
Why thank you for services, you've been so selfless.
Show up out of the blue
Pretend to care about folk
Making up a narrative in your twisted mind
Spat it out
Why thank you for services, you've been so selfless.
You're welcome, just making sure people have access to all the public information available to make their own decisions. Have a great week!
Usually easy to tell when someone has personal motives
Show up out of the blue
Pretend to care about folk
Making up a narrative in your twisted mind
Spat it out
Why thank you for services, you've been so selfless.
This is not astrology, mate. Negative energy does not matter. Only what the team can deliver on their bold claims.
So far provably a fork of a blockchain and a mining algorithm that does "something".
Everything else is noise.
Show up out of the blue
Pretend to care about folk
Making up a narrative in your twisted mind
Spat it out
Why thank you for services, you've been so selfless.
Mindblowing to me that you think anyone would give weight to someone who created an account out of the blue, to generate negative energy towards a project, is here to "protect" consumers. What would we do without you? How will we survive?
You really think quite highly of yourself.
You really think quite highly of yourself.
This is not astrology, mate. Negative energy does not matter. Only what the team can deliver on their bold claims.
So far provably a fork of a blockchain and a mining algorithm that does "something".
Everything else is noise.
Mindblowing to me that you think anyone would give weight to someone who created an account out of the blue, to generate negative energy towards a project, is here to "protect" consumers. What would we do without you? How will we survive?
You really think quite highly of yourself.
You really think quite highly of yourself.
This is not astrology, mate. Negative energy does not matter. Only what the team can deliver on their bold claims.
So far provably a fork of a blockchain and a mining algorithm that does "something".
Everything else is noise.
Mindblowing to me that you think anyone would give weight to someone who created an account out of the blue, to generate negative energy towards a project, is here to "protect" consumers. What would we do without you? How will we survive?
You really think quite highly of yourself.
It's not recycled baseless stuff, just sharing information that is out there in the public (thanks to the Dynex team!). As for this Sam from Cali who also is working on the new Dynex wallet (what a coincidence, huh!) he should share his information somewhere else then some ephemeral chatroom where messages are deleted by admins. Build trust in the public.
And sure Daniel may be an AI whizzbang, but I'd have to give him a pass for a web developer intern job based on his GitHub references.
We might never understand each other, but it's likely just due to conflicting interests. It's just business, nothing personal.
You really think quite highly of yourself.
You show up out of nowhere, make a new account, recycle some baseless stuff on a random project because you're here to protect us? You really don't expect anyone to believe that right? You think people are naive, can't research things, and need YOU to protect us? You sound like Gary Gensler. I wonder if he's out here making anon accounts and jumping into threads too.
Sam, from Cali, has answered many of your questions btw, just because you don't want to hear it doesn't mean it's not valid.
As for the article, just showcases that Daniel (if it's him) has been involved in plenty of AI driven technologies for a very long time and now may have stumbled on an incredible way to utilize GPU power.
I will never understand folk like you, it's like you're blinded by your own ego or whatever else is happening in your head.
Sam, from Cali, has answered many of your questions btw, just because you don't want to hear it doesn't mean it's not valid.
As for the article, just showcases that Daniel (if it's him) has been involved in plenty of AI driven technologies for a very long time and now may have stumbled on an incredible way to utilize GPU power.
I will never understand folk like you, it's like you're blinded by your own ego or whatever else is happening in your head.
It's not recycled baseless stuff, just sharing information that is out there in the public (thanks to the Dynex team!). As for this Sam from Cali who also is working on the new Dynex wallet (what a coincidence, huh!) he should share his information somewhere else then some ephemeral chatroom where messages are deleted by admins. Build trust in the public.
And sure Daniel may be an AI whizzbang, but I'd have to give him a pass for a web developer intern job based on his GitHub references.
We might never understand each other, but it's likely just due to conflicting interests. It's just business, nothing personal.
You show up out of nowhere, make a new account, recycle some baseless stuff on a random project because you're here to protect us? You really don't expect anyone to believe that right? You think people are naive, can't research things, and need YOU to protect us? You sound like Gary Gensler. I wonder if he's out here making anon accounts and jumping into threads too.
Sam, from Cali, has answered many of your questions btw, just because you don't want to hear it doesn't mean it's not valid.
As for the article, just showcases that Daniel (if it's him) has been involved in plenty of AI driven technologies for a very long time and now may have stumbled on an incredible way to utilize GPU power.
I will never understand folk like you, it's like you're blinded by your own ego or whatever else is happening in your head.
Sam, from Cali, has answered many of your questions btw, just because you don't want to hear it doesn't mean it's not valid.
As for the article, just showcases that Daniel (if it's him) has been involved in plenty of AI driven technologies for a very long time and now may have stumbled on an incredible way to utilize GPU power.
I will never understand folk like you, it's like you're blinded by your own ego or whatever else is happening in your head.
It's not recycled baseless stuff, just sharing information that is out there in the public (thanks to the Dynex team!). As for this Sam from Cali who also is working on the new Dynex wallet (what a coincidence, huh!) he should share his information somewhere else then some ephemeral chatroom where messages are deleted by admins. Build trust in the public.
And sure Daniel may be an AI whizzbang, but I'd have to give him a pass for a web developer intern job based on his GitHub references.
We might never understand each other, but it's likely just due to conflicting interests. It's just business, nothing personal.
You show up out of nowhere, make a new account, recycle some baseless stuff on a random project because you're here to protect us? You really don't expect anyone to believe that right? You think people are naive, can't research things, and need YOU to protect us? You sound like Gary Gensler. I wonder if he's out here making anon accounts and jumping into threads too.
Sam, from Cali, has answered many of your questions btw, just because you don't want to hear it doesn't mean it's not valid.
As for the article, just showcases that Daniel (if it's him) has been involved in plenty of AI driven technologies for a very long time and now may have stumbled on an incredible way to utilize GPU power.
I will never understand folk like you, it's like you're blinded by your own ego or whatever else is happening in your head.
I am not invested in this project. I have no interest in moving the price. I just don't want to get desperate-to-get-rich people get taken for a ride.
Cali Global may be a real company, but sharing some details in a private chatroom isn't really what I would call open. The current Cali Global testimonial video gives more questions than it does answer. Unpacking that would be a good start: What is going on in the video? I know it's a "hard problem", but you can explain some basics.
Look, I want to believe this is real. I like technology and progress. It's often the people that are rotten, so Daniel Mattes being involved is a big red flag for me, and that being denied even more so. Even before they made rudimentary mistakes with version control, they've had bloopers on their AMAs to reveal their identity:
As for your trust in Mattes I congratulate, but recommend looking into his previous businesses, not just the old Jajah and Jumio sagas, but the most recent "Artificial Intelligence investing bio-machine K1" from 42.cx:
Read the full fascinating story here: Going to Court Over Losses When Robot Is to Blame
Sam, from Cali, has answered many of your questions btw, just because you don't want to hear it doesn't mean it's not valid.
As for the article, just showcases that Daniel (if it's him) has been involved in plenty of AI driven technologies for a very long time and now may have stumbled on an incredible way to utilize GPU power.
I will never understand folk like you, it's like you're blinded by your own ego or whatever else is happening in your head.
I didn't make an account to promote this coin - where did I promote it? I defended it, yes, because people like you seemingly have not much better to do than to go out of your way to disrupt hardwork. I get it, you have 0 creative ideas of your own, you've done nothing successful in your own life, so you waste your time and energy trying to admonish others.
Now why would someone do that? Beats me. You think you're a virtuous saint helping others? Or is it a selfish intention that you've realized the disruptive nature of this project and are seeking to try to lower the price?
Cali Global is a REAL company. Not sure why its a "dubious" claim. Sam (one of the founders) was more than willing to share the equations and results with everyone in discord/telegram. Due diligence could be a useful thing for you. What happens when there's more testimonials? What goal posts will you move then?
You question someone's brilliance yet you've clearly achieved nothing yourself. Someone with any measurable personal success does not spend their time and energy creating fake accounts and spamming other projects.
If it is Daniel Mattes, then everyone in this topic just stumbled on maybe one of the most successful future projects in the world. Good luck
Now why would someone do that? Beats me. You think you're a virtuous saint helping others? Or is it a selfish intention that you've realized the disruptive nature of this project and are seeking to try to lower the price?
Cali Global is a REAL company. Not sure why its a "dubious" claim. Sam (one of the founders) was more than willing to share the equations and results with everyone in discord/telegram. Due diligence could be a useful thing for you. What happens when there's more testimonials? What goal posts will you move then?
You question someone's brilliance yet you've clearly achieved nothing yourself. Someone with any measurable personal success does not spend their time and energy creating fake accounts and spamming other projects.
If it is Daniel Mattes, then everyone in this topic just stumbled on maybe one of the most successful future projects in the world. Good luck
I am not invested in this project. I have no interest in moving the price. I just don't want to get desperate-to-get-rich people get taken for a ride.
Cali Global may be a real company, but sharing some details in a private chatroom isn't really what I would call open. The current Cali Global testimonial video gives more questions than it does answer. Unpacking that would be a good start: What is going on in the video? I know it's a "hard problem", but you can explain some basics.
- What exactly being done in this video? Absolutely no context.
- What is the comparison between the normal system and DynexSolve
- Is DynexSolve using a single GPU or the whole network here?
- What significance is the Windows Resource monitor here?
Look, I want to believe this is real. I like technology and progress. It's often the people that are rotten, so Daniel Mattes being involved is a big red flag for me, and that being denied even more so. Even before they made rudimentary mistakes with version control, they've had bloopers on their AMAs to reveal their identity:
As for your trust in Mattes I congratulate, but recommend looking into his previous businesses, not just the old Jajah and Jumio sagas, but the most recent "Artificial Intelligence investing bio-machine K1" from 42.cx:
Quote
Li’s lawyers argue Costa won his trust by hyping up the qualifications of the technicians building K1’s algorithm, saying, for instance, they were involved in Deep Blue, the chess-playing computer designed by IBM Corp. that signaled the dawn of the AI era when it beat the world champion in 1997. Tyndaris declined to answer Bloomberg questions on this claim, which was made in one of Li’s more-recent filings.
Speaking to Bloomberg, 42.cx founder Daniel Mattes said none of the computer scientists advising him were involved with Deep Blue, but one, Vladimir Arlazarov, developed a 1960s chess program in the Soviet Union known as Kaissa. He acknowledged that experience may not be entirely relevant to investing. Algorithms have gotten really good at beating humans in games because there are clear rules that can be simulated, something stock markets decidedly lack. Arlazarov told Bloomberg that he did give Mattes general advice but didn’t work on K1 specifically.
Speaking to Bloomberg, 42.cx founder Daniel Mattes said none of the computer scientists advising him were involved with Deep Blue, but one, Vladimir Arlazarov, developed a 1960s chess program in the Soviet Union known as Kaissa. He acknowledged that experience may not be entirely relevant to investing. Algorithms have gotten really good at beating humans in games because there are clear rules that can be simulated, something stock markets decidedly lack. Arlazarov told Bloomberg that he did give Mattes general advice but didn’t work on K1 specifically.
Read the full fascinating story here: Going to Court Over Losses When Robot Is to Blame
We happily invite you for an in-depth dialogue about the technology implemented in Dynex. PM us on one of our channels, so we can spoon-feed you all technical details before you make such incorrect claims.
PS: Calling Dynex a "scam" without any substantial evidence is considered a crime in some jurisdictions, not even speaking of people who might got influenced by your false accusations and loosing on potential profits.
PS: Calling Dynex a "scam" without any substantial evidence is considered a crime in some jurisdictions, not even speaking of people who might got influenced by your false accusations and loosing on potential profits.
Seems like a scam from Daniel Mattes
https://medium.com/@ares_61826/how-to-find-reference-to-daniel-mattes-in-the-dynex-code-131f96c85d6
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VecEvumSRts
https://medium.com/@ares_61826/how-to-find-reference-to-daniel-mattes-in-the-dynex-code-131f96c85d6
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VecEvumSRts
I'm not going to join some shady chatroom and beg to be "spoonfed" with more ChatGPT jargon. Life is too short for that. Just do your big reveal and prove it's real. In the meanwhile I'll happily watch a step-by-step YouTube rundown of the SAT solution with DynexSolve compared to other solvers.
I didn't state Dynex is a scam. I said it seems like one to me. I hope I will never be in a jurisdiction where free thought is a crime. And for loosing potential profits is the risk all investors must take. I mean DYOR, after all. When someone wins, someone else loses. Maybe it's your turn.
P.S. Keep working on those PHP skillz, Daniel: https://github.com/daniel009988/AI-Analyst/blob/main/source/ai_analyst_consulting.php
Jump to: