it is impossible to lead a thorough discussion about a specific crypto project in a group with nearly 10 000 members, where a coherent discussion thread is only possible with the citation of the previous snippet of the conversation, always interrupted through several other discussion fragments. The discussions in groups over 1000 members have a half-life period of just a few minutes, afterwards the thread is getting a useless data garbage.
Dude, I get your point. I am just saying its a distraction from what really has you triggered enough to post the topic at all: We would not allow you to break the rule against promotions. I wont be distracted from it.
Everyone knows this and nobody will disagree. When I wanted logically to link to an outsourced non-profit discussion group, the moderators of CMC claimed the territorial sovereignty of discussion and said: “No, you have to discuss here, and you are not allowed to link to your own discussion!” How ridiculous!
No, we simply said promotions are not allowed and you proceeded to let us know how idiotic we were in your mind for not knowing that promotions only involve things for monetary profit. I tried to explain there was no distinction but you insisted.
And as if this wouldn’t have been enough, the querulous chat moderator began to troll me, indeed quite like a little child, after
just four private messages and a friendly bye, with "
I am right and you are wrong". A “
dear colleague, you have your opinion, I have my opinion, that's ok!” he couldn’t accept.
Again, I certainly could have accepted your ending the convo with a word or phrase but I chose not to. How silly to expect someone to simply say nothing more to you on demand. Luckily for you they make a feature that blocks DMs and we humans were made with the ability to ignore things. At least you did employ the block feature, but the ignoring part is what you find hard it seems.
Although the deleted link to my channel was just the trigger, but not the issue of this thread (what of course this moderator never will get), I asked the creator of the CoinGecko Group for his opinion.
And what did he say? >.< Let's walk this through. Not only do you demand channels allow you to post links, but also promote your own newly created channel, and keep the channel membership down to under 1000 members? Why dont you create one and see how allowing links and promotions go for you? Im sure you'll have no hindrance at all to conversations. I suspect you will be back before long, as you run into the next channel that dared not allow you to do as you liked.
So I can end the discussion with "Bye"? Ok, bye.