Sadly, this is a great example of subtler marketing for ponzis masquerading as businesses. Definitely a paid article. You can either frown on Bittox for helping promote scams but then you'd have to go after all these news/media portals and force them to have stricter screening, since any number of ICOs have done similar "news" stories to bait users. This is an extreme level of shadiness, though. Should just dox the people who paid for this article, I bet you'd open a whole can of ponzi sites.
I have checked this article, actually it directs to different site called bitpetite.com it seems a regular wallet to have your bitcoin and nothing more special. Since, it is a shared private key online wallet, it might be scam us like bit.ac
This is giving giveaway information to start the investing with the benefit of money launderers. Since, risk is completely depend on your own risks.
Yes, it
is an article about bitpetite, and that's the whole point. It's masquerading as a news article purporting that people are getting rich by investing their money into bitpetite, allegedly a bitcoin tumbler. People think "wow I better take this chance to earn easy money. It's illegal but untraceable, what a find!".
What really happened: bitpetite runs a ponzi HYIP script, it pays to have that article published. People get clickbaited. So they get "legitimate" marketing instead of advertising themselves as a HYIP.
No decent tumbler will open public investments like that, and give fixed interest. And as someone pointed out, there are referral links with commissions so that's something like 15% on day 1 including commissions.
P.S. Malwarebytes blocks bitpetite.
Just out of curiosity, what are these better ways of earning Bitcoin according to you? Trading? Mining? Offering your services to the public? One way or another, you'll end up depositing your coins into whatever exchange, which by itself puts your coins at risk as well. If you choose to gamble, your coins will be at risk too (aside from the obvious fact that you can lose them with gambling). There are far more examples of how one might eventually end up handing control of its coins over to another entity - an entity that you don't know, haven't seen, that could be a scammer, etc. Only when you by default don't make use of ANY third party service, you'll at all times remain the sole owner of your private keys. 
