Topic: DEMAND - 1st StratumV2 Mining Pool - SOLO - page 2. (Read 608 times)

You are correct, but!!, This does not increase the profit for miners, in fact, it reduces it, only the pool would make more profit by scamming miners off their potential profit, the fact that Viabtc ignored my questions in the past shows that they do not share any of that profit with the miners, it's pretty much a scam if you ask me, which is one of the reasons why I stopped using them.

An example of using $ to keep things simple is if said pool charged $100 on a transaction that is paying $1 in fee on the blockchain while removing another transaction that was paying $50, you should pay the miners $49 out of that $100, otherwise the pool is stealing.

I have checked my daily payouts over and over again to see any mention of "acceleration profit", or at least an answer of some sort, I got none, so I could only assume that they keep all of it, so as far as miners are concerned any pool that doesn't use the default getblocktemplate is certainly paying them less.

Edit: to be even more fair to Viabtc i did contact them again asking the same question, this will be my last attempt.

As I like to say. Yes with a but or no with an however.

If you take a TX with a low fee that someone paid you to mine that brings the fees above what is in the mempool. I did not maximize my FEES but I maximized my PROFIT.
How much extra does VIABTC make with their paid accelerator?

So as a rule yes getblocktemplate will give you the best deal, but it is not absolute when you have other ways of getting BTC for mining.

But, FEES are not the only thing so it's not an absolute.

-Dave

Using bitcoin core's command to getblocktemplate will (currently) maximise the fees in your block.

Any changes to that will reduce the total fees.

Okay with crazy high tx numbers that we have now. could this set the bar higher?

Ie no fee under 400 sats a byte when fees are high and it cherry picks higher  by 50 %  would it be more likely to get a block with 3 btc in fees while a non biased one would be more likely to get a block with 2 btc in fees as it allows for low fees.


In my example above it would appear on the surface that he would hit fatter feed blocks.

Or am I simply wrong.

BTW if I am right his method is only good when fees are high.


right now if you set 120 sats as your cut off and I set no cutoff leaving it alone does he  hit higher fees  then the open non biased pool






I think he wants to leave that impression that his way results in bigger fees.


and I am asking is that true or false?

Alas V2 is, by definition, transaction bias.

Not allowing all transactions in the blockchain is a very bad idea for the free open bitcoin transaction system.

Mara pool tried doing this and stopped because of the obvious expected backlash.

Not sure why anyone would want to promote this.

It doesn't give you more blocks on the blockchain, it allows you to do 2 things:
1) Remove transactions "you don't like" = transaction bias
2) Put cheaper transactions in your blocks = devalue bitcoin and get less reward mining

I highly suggest everyone to avoid this.

Hi Dave,

SRI (Stratum Reference Implementation) already have a testnet infra that you can use for it.
pool: 89.116.25.191:34254
job declarator server: 89.116.25.191:34264
template provider:  89.116.25.191:8442

We are mining on testnet since more then one year and we fund a lot of blocks.
Here a telegram bot that keep tracks of them: https://t.me/+_ooR21QNH101NjE8

Don't know if you saw my comment in the now locked thread:

Cool that you are doing this.
BUT, any reason you are not doing it on Testnet?
There might be some people who would point to your pool to figure things out but would want verification.
Doing it on mainnet is going to mean the odds of a block being found by people just figuring things out is just about 0.

-Dave

Stratum v2: Superior Security, Flexibility, and Performance

Bandwidth Consumption:
SV2 optimizes bandwidth by encoding messages in minimized binary and eliminating redundant messaging. Stratum V1's JSON-RPC protocol is 2-3x heavier due to human-readable text. SV2 reduces average network message size from ~100 bytes (unencrypted) to 48 bytes (encrypted), lowering infrastructure costs and enabling precise hashrate measurement.

Server CPU Load:
SV2 allows efficient caching and eliminates Merkle Root recomputation for each share submission. It enables header-only mining, significantly reducing server CPU load.

Job Distribution Latency:
SV2 separates mining prevhash and future job messages, allowing faster job distribution. This minimizes latency and increases efficiency in starting new block mining.

Binary Encoding:
SV2's binary encoding is optimized for efficient computation and networking, significantly reducing message size compared to Stratum V1's JSON-RPC.

Man-in-the-Middle Attack Prevention:
SV2 ensures data integrity and confidentiality with robust encryption (AEAD), protecting against hashrate hijacking and maintaining miner-pool privacy.

Eliminate Empty Block Mining:
SV2's efficient job distribution eliminates the incentive to mine empty blocks, reducing the likelihood of empty block propagation in the network.

Job Selection:
SV2 allows miners to choose their work, decentralizing mining and limiting pools' ability to censor transactions. This enhances Bitcoin's censorship resistance.

Header-Only Mining:
SV2's header-only mining protocol reduces bandwidth and CPU load, optimizing for speed and efficiency in large-scale mining operations.

Multiplexing:
SV2 enables multiple communication channels over a single connection, reducing infrastructure complexity and costs.

Implicit Work Subscription:
SV2 assumes implicit job assignment requests upon channel opening, eliminating unnecessary data transfers and improving protocol efficiency.

Native Version Rolling:
SV2 natively supports version rolling, enhancing the mining process by extending the search space and reducing new job distributions.

Zero-time Backend Switching:
SV2 facilitates efficient backend switching and job allocation from different pools, optimizing complex mining setups.

Same Connection - Different Jobs:
SV2's multiplexing allows transmission of data for different jobs over a single connection, reducing the need for multiple connections and simplifying infrastructure.

Source: Stratumprotocol.org