Topic: Dice gambling method #1 - Use wisely. - page 3. (Read 2683 times)
yup, you can reduce the house edge but still u r in the disadvantage due to <50% of winning. and this method may seems to work in the short run but still loss in the long run cause it is really easy to loss 9 in a row and when u loss, u loss big. u can win most of the time, but the winning is still not that much as compare to lossing.
x%100 on loss seems usual, and it's usually make me lose when I reach %300 of my balance
If your gambling once in awhile than nothing wrong in trying different ideas but we should remember what ever the house edge either big or small but at the end house will win in dice games. So just enjoy the game with small amount but don't try to beat the house edge because you may lose lot of money.
More often then not if you're gambling with a low balance youre praying period. I've been playing dice for about 2 years now. I even have my own site on moneypot that I will gamble on here n there for fun but the 1 thing I've noticed is you need a balance to even have a chance at winning. All strategies can go for super long losing streaks. 10-50 reds in a row on 2x is what I've seen personally. The higher the multiplier the higher the losing streak can go as well.
Another thing I've noticed when ppl gamble is the lack of patience. Someone deposits .01 and goes balls to the wall hoping to hit. Normally ending in a bust.
A personal strategy I've been using is x14.9 8 base(this is in bits) with a 10% increase on loss. My starting balance is normally .1-.2 to ensure I can handle a long losing streak. I'm not guaranteeing a win here its just working for me. I'm up .3 in the last hour or so
Another thing I've noticed when ppl gamble is the lack of patience. Someone deposits .01 and goes balls to the wall hoping to hit. Normally ending in a bust.
A personal strategy I've been using is x14.9 8 base(this is in bits) with a 10% increase on loss. My starting balance is normally .1-.2 to ensure I can handle a long losing streak. I'm not guaranteeing a win here its just working for me. I'm up .3 in the last hour or so
Another gambling "method", how lovely.
I suggest you stay away from this, no strategies work in gambling, it's a game of pure chance and luck, take care.
I suggest you stay away from this, no strategies work in gambling, it's a game of pure chance and luck, take care.
Then why are you suggesting us to stay away from this strategy like it's going to matter, it's not like this strategy is going to make you lose all your money in the first roll, I have seen worse strategies than this.
Personally, I don't believe in any single strategy to win in dice gambling. Gambling is gambling and martingale is martingale. The Casino wants to get your money, and the best way to get your money is to make you believe that you are winning but in the long run, they are the ones who walk to the bank laughing.
its a really interesting idea but i think i used it at one point in the past, but it failed really badly, thats why i dont use any strategies like that and gamble only for entertainment
There are ''real methods'' that work better than others and can even increase your odds but just a little, Dooglus used an example:
''For an example of a better strategy, try:
bet 0.5 at 33%
if you win, you get 99/33 = 3x, so you get 1.5 back, a profit of 1 - you've doubled your money
if you lose, bet the other 0.5 at 24.75%
if you win, you get 99/24.75 = 4x, so you get 2 back - you've doubled your money
the only way it goes wrong is if you lose both the 33% and the 24.75% - the chance of that is (1-0.33) * (1-0.2475) = 0.504175
so the chance of success is 1 - 0.504175 = 0.495825 = 49.5825% - a fraction higher than 49.5''
As you can see, you are literally increasing your odds to 49.58 instead of 49.5 but of course that's still not enough to win long term but definitely better long term than this strategy.
''For an example of a better strategy, try:
bet 0.5 at 33%
if you win, you get 99/33 = 3x, so you get 1.5 back, a profit of 1 - you've doubled your money
if you lose, bet the other 0.5 at 24.75%
if you win, you get 99/24.75 = 4x, so you get 2 back - you've doubled your money
the only way it goes wrong is if you lose both the 33% and the 24.75% - the chance of that is (1-0.33) * (1-0.2475) = 0.504175
so the chance of success is 1 - 0.504175 = 0.495825 = 49.5825% - a fraction higher than 49.5''
As you can see, you are literally increasing your odds to 49.58 instead of 49.5 but of course that's still not enough to win long term but definitely better long term than this strategy.
I usually implement a similar strategy but it all comes down to your luck that day really. Long term based on your numbers and Martingale system you will ALWAYS lose to the house edge. So the key here is betting once in a while, try to not be greedy, just bet for entertainment and consider your money gone the minute you decide to bet. You know...just for fun. You can't beat the casinos.
Nothing new, simple martingale strategy, which fail sooner or later.
Exactly and when newbies do it and finally loose, they come and shout scam everywhere, in threads and all and finally get the treatment. So its better to know that when you have lose even 24 bets consecutively on 50% , yet the next roll loosing has a probability of 50% .
Most strategies never work in the long run due to something called the house edge. It is impossible to beat it in the long run, assuming you play infinite amount of times you are expected to win with what percent the house gives you, which is negative.
I tried this already and I can say there is a trick. 18 reds is nothing on 20%. Once I had 80 reds on x5.5. Every bet double, triple played then doubling bet. U need to chase this with a big bankroll. Or to be very lucky. I will wait for your next proposal this one is to hard to win on long run I believe.
Another gambling "method", how lovely.
I suggest you stay away from this, no strategies work in gambling, it's a game of pure chance and luck, take care.
I suggest you stay away from this, no strategies work in gambling, it's a game of pure chance and luck, take care.
There are ''real methods'' that work better than others and can even increase your odds but just a little, Dooglus used an example:
''For an example of a better strategy, try:
bet 0.5 at 33%
if you win, you get 99/33 = 3x, so you get 1.5 back, a profit of 1 - you've doubled your money
if you lose, bet the other 0.5 at 24.75%
if you win, you get 99/24.75 = 4x, so you get 2 back - you've doubled your money
the only way it goes wrong is if you lose both the 33% and the 24.75% - the chance of that is (1-0.33) * (1-0.2475) = 0.504175
so the chance of success is 1 - 0.504175 = 0.495825 = 49.5825% - a fraction higher than 49.5''
As you can see, you are literally increasing your odds to 49.58 instead of 49.5 but of course that's still not enough to win long term but definitely better long term than this strategy.
''For an example of a better strategy, try:
bet 0.5 at 33%
if you win, you get 99/33 = 3x, so you get 1.5 back, a profit of 1 - you've doubled your money
if you lose, bet the other 0.5 at 24.75%
if you win, you get 99/24.75 = 4x, so you get 2 back - you've doubled your money
the only way it goes wrong is if you lose both the 33% and the 24.75% - the chance of that is (1-0.33) * (1-0.2475) = 0.504175
so the chance of success is 1 - 0.504175 = 0.495825 = 49.5825% - a fraction higher than 49.5''
As you can see, you are literally increasing your odds to 49.58 instead of 49.5 but of course that's still not enough to win long term but definitely better long term than this strategy.
Martingale method always lose in the long run but you can make profit fast in the first 100 bets or more.
But it always depends on luck even you are using martingale method so think twice after you made a profit with this method.
Because you will lose if you are greedy..
But it always depends on luck even you are using martingale method so think twice after you made a profit with this method.
Because you will lose if you are greedy..
Good old martingale method, which works.. until it doesn't, then you lose all of your previous hard work (because doing this is pretty time consuming) along with your money. You can't beat statistics long term OP.. so just have fun with gambling and stop gambling when you think you are pushing it too far.
Nothing new, simple martingale strategy, which fail sooner or later.
no one method cant work long term in any dice site u fool:)
it's true, I've tried several methods when playing for too long will eventually lost. good method is to know when to stop, because if I'm winning and I continue to play to get over it pretty bad and eventually all lost.
I dont really think that your strategy is really work, because this is dice game. You need luck to play it although you used martingale if you are not lucky enough you will still suffer really much loss there. So what I think just normally play like set your balance 0.01 or 0.001 then all in with 2x winning or losing stop it and if you want to continue it make sure you set again your balance well
My friend this strategy which you explained so intensely is called Martingale strategy.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martingale_(betting_system)
But this strategy gives loss more often than profit and so use it to a certain limit, once you are addicted to this method, you would find it difficult to stop.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martingale_(betting_system)
But this strategy gives loss more often than profit and so use it to a certain limit, once you are addicted to this method, you would find it difficult to stop.
This is a waste of both time and money(bitcoin). The method is proven to be unstable and it stays gambling, you never know what will happen.
You risk much bitcoins to gain less, I think that is stupid because you will always lose, it is true, no one will win if you don't stop playing, that are the dangerous things about it.
To stay on topic, this method is just crap, it does never work.
You risk much bitcoins to gain less, I think that is stupid because you will always lose, it is true, no one will win if you don't stop playing, that are the dangerous things about it.
To stay on topic, this method is just crap, it does never work.
Jump to: