Also, to further fight spam, we will reduce the MAX post count for payment to 200 posts. NONE of the non-spammers passed 100 posts, so 200 is a fair margin for any case
This doesn't make sense to me. If you don't count spam posts anyway, why limit the non-spammers like this?
I've made over 300 posts this month and don't spam.
Yes me too , I think all the users prefer to be paid directly in their btc address ..( it's only my personal opinion 
).
).I prefer to be paid to my account on the site. Username 'dooglus'.
i still 200 posts per month is more than fair, and to fully support this i wouldnt mind take a case-by-case anyone who will post more than 200 constructive posts per month while on campaign, and fully pay for it even if they exceed it.
Fair enough.
It doesn't seem low to me at a glance, but if you look at what legendary rank gets paid, then yes, it does seem quite low 
You don't even want to know how much I was offered per post to switch to a different site's signature.
As said, i am willing to go per-case for any person who will exceed 200 constructive posts
The 200 is the general rule though And especially for Legendary accounts, which we have the maximum payout per post ever Also thanks for all your support, esp to you Dooglus. Its highly appreciated, from any point of view(starting from sig campaign to bugs and suggestions!!) 
. I prefer to be paid directly in my btc address , but if this is not possible it's good enough in my DiceBitco.in account 
. What about in the middle for Full Members, 0.0006? I love the campaign and I want to stay in it, but that's disappointing. For 100 posts, I get the same pay in other campaigns for 50 posts.