This stuff was invented almost 100 years ago and you still didn´t get it worky?
Put in some data mining power to analyse the Fourier Transfroms, should easily give you the parameters.
... provided the math underneath it isn´t bullshit.
Topic: Did I do it right this Time, Analysis - page 3. (Read 9020 times)
Im just about ready to go back to my original formula, top secret.
Me too!
I was doing fine before I knew different various TA's! But, now that I've learned them, I wish I could un-learn some of them. I find my self second guessing a decision because I see another indicator that contradicts my previous decision.
Really, this market is too small for TA to be very useful. It is gamed too easily for it to work, at least for any length of time once an indicator is found to work well.
Nice what just happened, its always more obvious to count the waves after they occur
so they lag just like technical indicators. So Elliot wave works it lags bad.
profits without elliotwave and indicators 60% guessing and using chart patterns.
profits with elliotwave and indicators blah, too much learning, lagging , but it is
a fun experience and may help you long
term with elliotwave , and indicators can be useful to follow other players, also, i really
havent put it to play yet, as while i learn i dont bet much, but when i do get back
into the groove ,
i will put into play trendlines, indicators , and more into my trading experience.
I really have to say all this drawing sometimes takes away from an instinctive trade, but it takes some of the fear of loss away from the equation, knowing the likelihood of the bottoms. I just now have to work it all together with timing. Which timeing is the hardest part.
Im just about ready to go back to my original formula, top secret.
so they lag just like technical indicators. So Elliot wave works it lags bad.
profits without elliotwave and indicators 60% guessing and using chart patterns.
profits with elliotwave and indicators blah, too much learning, lagging , but it is
a fun experience and may help you long
term with elliotwave , and indicators can be useful to follow other players, also, i really
havent put it to play yet, as while i learn i dont bet much, but when i do get back
into the groove ,
i will put into play trendlines, indicators , and more into my trading experience.
I really have to say all this drawing sometimes takes away from an instinctive trade, but it takes some of the fear of loss away from the equation, knowing the likelihood of the bottoms. I just now have to work it all together with timing. Which timeing is the hardest part.
Im just about ready to go back to my original formula, top secret.
i'm sorry for myself not aknowledging the existence of this topic earlier
Last one to the bottom loses. lol.
Many losers! But, some more than others.
Last one to the bottom loses. lol.
Looks like a head and shoulder then a rebottom.
To the moon.
They got us again, fucking aliens
Looks like a head and shoulder then a rebottom.
Looks like a head and shoulder then a rebottom.
The good thing about self-fulfilling prophecies is, no need to care for. They do it themselves. 
As yes I have almost 2 months experience, im still playing. My main window is 30m to 4hr. set up
30 120
60 240
and flip flop
30 120
60 240
and flip flop
EW int try to apply EW to anything
for them the wave 3 was from '70, i dont see EW to be the solution for everything
for them the wave 3 was from '70, i dont see EW to be the solution for everything
I saw that too and the fifth wave is now over right, so doom is coming right , collapse maybe..
The worst depression?
I keep Mac on all , the first indicator i learned.
use Rsi , thanks for that article waveaddict. and on the moving averages... but somethings I disagree with you with as i try to keep it simpler, I always try to simplify.
bollinger bands and squeeze in samechart. but not on just to check.
use Rsi , thanks for that article waveaddict. and on the moving averages... but somethings I disagree with you with as i try to keep it simpler, I always try to simplify.
bollinger bands and squeeze in samechart. but not on just to check.
I have sierra with three chartbooks, each with 3 or 4 timeframes.
Yes correct I misphrased them, sorry i know what they were and i was doing something else at the time and noticed after typing but didnt feel like correcting myself, thanks for the support.....
0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5 , 8 , 13 , 21, and phi. but,, the golden ratio. and you probably can predict your death with these numbers.... dunno. or when the world blows up.. but go figure, dont chase it to far, like...you might find out the real deal..or not, maybe just wind up on the weird side of youtube.
Munehisa Homma... I give you break on rice today..... but tomorrow you pay more. The weather is going to be bad. lol..
Thanks wave, I find your info useful for learning......
dont forget multiple timeframes all open at once....
0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5 , 8 , 13 , 21, and phi. but,, the golden ratio. and you probably can predict your death with these numbers.... dunno. or when the world blows up.. but go figure, dont chase it to far, like...you might find out the real deal..or not, maybe just wind up on the weird side of youtube.
Munehisa Homma... I give you break on rice today..... but tomorrow you pay more. The weather is going to be bad. lol..
Thanks wave, I find your info useful for learning......
dont forget multiple timeframes all open at once....
Everything has its place when used properly:
1) EW is 'most useful' for limiting risk
2) Fibs are 'most useful' when searching for quick reversal areas
3) MACD, RSI, OBV, ADX, etc. along with MAs are 'most useful' when searching for tops, bottoms, and consolidating regions in both the long and short term
However, the true art of investing comes from blending all three
1) EW is 'most useful' for limiting risk
2) Fibs are 'most useful' when searching for quick reversal areas
3) MACD, RSI, OBV, ADX, etc. along with MAs are 'most useful' when searching for tops, bottoms, and consolidating regions in both the long and short term
However, the true art of investing comes from blending all three
I just leave that here
just like sales of million dollar automobiles are up, 23% to 100%, fibonnacci numbers, while the poor suffer, how did they do that.
Sir, do you even know what Fibonacci numbers are? 23 and 100 are certainly not examples of such numbers!
In fact, you're calling PERCENTAGES Fibonacci numbers! That boggles my mind!
Perhaps you should consider doing some research before accusing others of ignorance, though he poorly phrased them as Fibonacci numbers rather than retracement levels. The percentages are based off of the fact that as the Fibonacci sequence approaches a large n, the n value is about 61.8% of the n+1 value. Take a guess of what 61.8% of 61.8 is.... and 61.8% of 38.2. Obviously 50% has nothing to do with Fibonacci as such, but it is a useful retracement as well.
Jump to: