Topic: Did the Philippine government lied? (Read 869 times)
There's no certainty as to who lied, maybe they have their reasons. More often Philippine media has been misleading the public of the information that the people deserve to know, it may sometimes depends on who they are protecting and who pays the right price.
Man the suspect was not an ISIS, his family already claimed it. And rappler is against the Duterte administration.
We are all never know what the truth it is. It's just a news and there is nothing proof. Social media now a days is very harmful
May be some day the classified information will be released, and it will be published in the mainstream media. But those valuable lives which were lost during the attacks can never be brought back.
We are all never know what the truth it is. It's just a news and there is nothing proof. Social media now a days is very harmful
Yeah, we don't need to trust them, niether they have proof , sometimes news are paid , so it's hard if we believe them ,it is difficult if we believe in them especially without adequate basis. Just think from different happen if it's true or not.
First, are they humans 
We are all never know what the truth it is. It's just a news and there is nothing proof. Social media now a days is very harmful
To know the news is true what not, we have to look from different sources, that's my opinion
Sometimes every news that we listen and watch is not accurate on the true story. Other might add and edit something on the news to become more interesting to everyone.
If the information remains classified, then the media can do little about it. Either they don't know what happened, or they are too afraid to publish the truth. I just hope that the truth will come out in the future.
To know the news is true what not, we have to look from different sources, that's my opinion
Well this is always going to be true of news, you're going to have to know how to work with all of the sources and evidence given to be able to work together what the unbiased news is (even if that isn't really real in the end-game)
To know the news is true what not, we have to look from different sources, that's my opinion
Sometimes every news that we listen and watch is not accurate on the true story. Other might add and edit something on the news to become more interesting to everyone.
News may do this? All news companies are funded to play a certain way on issues, it's bound to happen. People just have to understand this so they're not caught up in the lies and the bullshit.
But moving back onto the subject, who knows if they were the ones to be lying though I feel there has to be some corruption when you're getting rid of drug cartels through the means of full on violence.
To know the news is true what not, we have to look from different sources, that's my opinion
Sometimes every news that we listen and watch is not accurate on the true story. Other might add and edit something on the news to become more interesting to everyone.
Rappler is nothing but fake news accussing the philippine government without backing it up with facts is nothing but lies. Clearly rappler is a paid news site and against the president duterte, according to the national media was a gambler at the casino but he got broke and spend all his money into gambling then his wife including children left him because of his bad habit and addiction to gambling. He even has million peso debt in banks and was banned for loaning further. So that's why when all seems lost his only option is to take revenge to the casino that for him who stole his money and robbed it but the casino token was not credible from outside use to in the end he burned it and tried to open the vault but failed. In the end he killed himself by burning his body, that's the true and legit news.
I totally agree with you! You cannot trust news that came from a this paid news site. All it did is to tell all fake news and maybe to destabilize the current administration because the current administration is not corrupt and anti oligarchs. All their news were fake and it was all against the current government. They all see the wrong side but not even bother to report the good things the government has been doing for this past year. I unfollowed this news site after seeing that they are not really for the people but for their own benefit.
Rappler is nothing but fake news accussing the philippine government without backing it up with facts is nothing but lies. Clearly rappler is a paid news site and against the president duterte, according to the national media was a gambler at the casino but he got broke and spend all his money into gambling then his wife including children left him because of his bad habit and addiction to gambling. He even has million peso debt in banks and was banned for loaning further. So that's why when all seems lost his only option is to take revenge to the casino that for him who stole his money and robbed it but the casino token was not credible from outside use to in the end he burned it and tried to open the vault but failed. In the end he killed himself by burning his body, that's the true and legit news.
I am confused. At first I though that it was a terrorist incident and the perpetrator was a Muslim. The ISIS even claimed responsibility for the attack. But later, the Philippine authorities clarified that the perpetrator was a Christian and the incident was not related to Islamic terrorism. Now someone is again saying that the perpetrator was a Muslim. Whom we should believe now?
What i heard was that the incident wasn't based on terrorism at all, but it was rather a robbery attempt, and i think we have had many scenarios of ISIS taking responsibility for attacks they had no idea of at all.If it was a robbery attempt, then why the perpetrator burnt all the casino tokens and killed people indiscriminately instead of fleeing? I have my own doubts. There is something fishy in the way the attacker behaved.
To know the news is true what not, we have to look from different sources, that's my opinion
,we don't know it yet, even if you provide evidences about their lies and their corruption we still can't accuse them, anyway if they were doing bad things in th country, i still believe in karma and it is still up to them if they are doing those kind of evil things to have poweror because of greed.
When it comes to the issue of government one of the qualities one wants to look out for is how they manage information. The populace are always eager for the truth but in actual fact they are not ready for the truth because most times the truth always cause more harm than good and also because of their own selfish agenda, they keep the truth from the public. In this case, it could be true that the Philippine government lied but then in other to really decide whether its right or wrong there is need to understand the basis for such conclusion.
"You want the truth? You can't handle the truth!"?
When it comes to the issue of government one of the qualities one wants to look out for is how they manage information. The populace are always eager for the truth but in actual fact they are not ready for the truth because most times the truth always cause more harm than good and also because of their own selfish agenda, they keep the truth from the public. In this case, it could be true that the Philippine government lied but then in other to really decide whether its right or wrong there is need to understand the basis for such conclusion.
I am confused. At first I though that it was a terrorist incident and the perpetrator was a Muslim. The ISIS even claimed responsibility for the attack. But later, the Philippine authorities clarified that the perpetrator was a Christian and the incident was not related to Islamic terrorism. Now someone is again saying that the perpetrator was a Muslim. Whom we should believe now?
What i heard was that the incident wasn't based on terrorism at all, but it was rather a robbery attempt, and i think we have had many scenarios of ISIS taking responsibility for attacks they had no idea of at all.
Wouldn't doubt that a governmental regime that's trying to take down the drug trade through sheer killing and death is going to be able to lie about a couple things to be able to make themselves look better, I wouldn't even doubt that they're going to be lying about certain drug traders that they're killing to be able to gain public support when it comes to such a controversial topic. Though people like me have a tough time looking at this, as I'm from a Western nation that wouldn't allow anything like this to ever happen.
It's insane to think about it, but if you really think about how it it must've been to be able for them to elect someone that is open about doing deeds like this-- they must've been hurting pretty bad in the country, sucks.
It's insane to think about it, but if you really think about how it it must've been to be able for them to elect someone that is open about doing deeds like this-- they must've been hurting pretty bad in the country, sucks.
I am confused. At first I though that it was a terrorist incident and the perpetrator was a Muslim. The ISIS even claimed responsibility for the attack. But later, the Philippine authorities clarified that the perpetrator was a Christian and the incident was not related to Islamic terrorism. Now someone is again saying that the perpetrator was a Muslim. Whom we should believe now?
The only thing his family admitted was that he was a gambling addict. There was nothing said if he was a recent convert or if he had been talking with suspected Islamists. Though he was show grabbing tokens, the manner of death was a bit weird. I mean, who else would have thought of draping blankets and setting himself on fire?
The manner of death sort of reminded me of the suicide in Tunisia that started the Arab Spring.
The manner of death sort of reminded me of the suicide in Tunisia that started the Arab Spring.
Jump to: