Topic: Did US really land on moon? (Read 889 times)

I think yes. And I also think there are too much conspiracy theories about it. I know it's hard for some people to beleive something like this has happened but so far human race has achieved even more incredible things than this. So stop breaking your head with this, man has been on the moon.

Yes they did. But if not, it doesnt matter to me  

Yes.
Question: why are you asking? It seems very obvious that they did, anybody who tells you otherwise needs to stop listening to conspiracy theories.

I think it was fake because it doesn't make sense why no nation ever has been there since,  and too hard believe we had technology back in the 60s.  . Chinese sent back some unammed photos from the moon a few years ago and it was all purplish and green moss looking, not the dead grey stuff..and many anomalies like prop rocks etc...I assume it was fake until proven otherwise

Of course they landed on the Moon you have been watching too many conspiracy theories.

No the whole story about landing on the moon is fake!

Did US really land on moon?

Yes! But because the moon is a lot smaller in diameter, US had a much tighter wrap-around when it landed there.

 

I believed Yes. The US really landed on the moon.

But why are there so many conspiracies? Simply because people appear naturally to be attracted to conspiracies. Conspiracies certainly are far more interesting than the possibility that things are as they seem.

no i dont belive in that

In the history of science neil armstrong is the first man who land in the moon. But the other people said thats fake it took a photo in a studio. Because russia and USA on that day are being competed in science technology. But I believe many people in the USA are trully land in the moon.  I THINK 3 OR MORE PERSOM IN THE USA was go there in the moon correct me if Im wrong. I dont know what is the total of people was go there in the moon and who is the latest anyone could say?

yes.

anyone who says otherwise needs some fresh air and objectivity.

yes they did 

Materials on the Moon's surface contain helium-3 at concentrations on the order of between 1.4 and 15 ppb in sunlit areas,[49][50] and may contain concentrations as much as 50 ppb in permanently shadowed regions.[5] A number of people, starting with Gerald Kulcinski in 1986,[51] have proposed to explore the moon, mine lunar regolith and use the helium-3 for fusion. Because of the low concentrations of helium-3, any mining equipment would need to process extremely large amounts of regolith (over 150 million tonnes of regolith to obtain one ton of helium 3),[52] and some proposals have suggested that helium-3 extraction be piggybacked onto a larger mining and development operation.[citation needed]

The primary objective of Indian Space Research Organisation's first lunar probe called Chandrayaan-I, launched on October 22, 2008, was reported in some sources to be mapping the Moon's surface for helium-3-containing minerals.[53] However, this is debatable; no such objective is mentioned in the project's official list of goals, while at the same time, many of its scientific payloads have noted helium-3-related applications.[54][55]

Cosmochemist and geochemist Ouyang Ziyuan from the Chinese Academy of Sciences who is now in charge of the Chinese Lunar Exploration Program has already stated on many occasions that one of the main goals of the program would be the mining of helium-3, from which operation "each year three space shuttle missions could bring enough fuel for all human beings across the world."[56] To "bring enough fuel for all human beings across the world",[57] more than one Space Shuttle load (and the processing of 4 million tonnes of regolith) per week, at least 52 per year, would be necessary.[citation needed][dubious – discuss]

In January 2006, the Russian space company RKK Energiya announced that it considers lunar helium-3 a potential economic resource to be mined by 2020,[58] if funding can be found.[59][60]

Mining gas giants for helium-3 has also been proposed.[61] The British Interplanetary Society's hypothetical Project Daedalus interstellar probe design was fueled by helium-3 mines in the atmosphere of Jupiter, for example. Jupiter's high gravity makes this a less energetically favorable operation than extracting helium-3 from the other gas giants of the solar system, however.

Not all authors feel the extraterrestrial extraction of helium-3 is feasible. Dwayne Day, writing in The Space Review, identifies some major obstacles to helium-3 extraction from extraterrestrial sources for use in fusion, and questions the feasibility of extraterrestrial extraction when compared to production on Earth.[62]

Several science fiction works have featured helium-3 extraction on the moon, including the films Moon (2009) and Iron Sky (2012), the video game Anno 2205 (2015) and the novel Luna: New Moon (2015). The novel Morning Star (Pierce Brown, 2016) features helium-3 mining on Phobos (a moon of Mars), while his novel Red Rising (2014) features helium-3 extraction from Mars itself.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helium-3

Yes indeed and I believe that they have been secretly mining the moon as I saw some vehicle tracks

It's false. Science fiction is not real life. Helium-3 does not exist in commercially useful quantities on the Moon, nor is it a source of energy (cheap or otherwise) without a fusion power plant.

Everything can be, but this information is too secret for ordinary people. It seems to me that yes.

I heard that on the moon there is a substance such as helium-3. They say that it will have a lot of cheap energy. Maybe it's true? Perhaps for this reason, the Americans stopped flying to the moon, then when the oil on earth runs out to get it.

Because there's nothing there of any value. They only did it in the first place to impress the Russians, who would have called bullshit by now if it was fake.

If they really did it before, why they just stopped for like more than 20 years?

They really did land on moon .stop believing in rumors and read other facts too.