When you do have it back up, think you could add TerraCoin? I'm curious.
I only track coins that many people care about / are actively traded on exchanges now. It used to be "all chains" because people cared about "all chains".
Topic: Difficulty estimation website up for main forks. - page 4. (Read 17319 times)
I only track coins that many people care about / are actively traded on exchanges now. It used to be "all chains" because people cared about "all chains".
When you do have it back up, think you could add TerraCoin? I'm curious.
My vps host is reporting a security compromise and possible mass destruction of data.... allchains will be down for a bit. I can restore from an embarrassingly old backup if the situation does not turn out for the best... I will give them two days, then find another host and restore.
Too bad, let us know when you get it back up.
My vps host is reporting a security compromise and possible mass destruction of data.... allchains will be down for a bit. I can restore from an embarrassingly old backup if the situation does not turn out for the best... I will give them two days, then find another host and restore.
Just wondering, why don't you list Bitminter?
There may be some service interruption while I transfer domain registrars today.
Anyone have suggestions on how to make allchains more useful? Send me a PM or talk to me on irc.
Anyone have suggestions on how to make allchains more useful? Send me a PM or talk to me on irc.
Can you please add market cap to the table? The calculation is very easy, [total block number] * 50 (BTC/LTC) *[average price in USD].
LTC is down.
Hi, can you please add a Price and Difficulty chart for LTC?
Quote
Yeah that's the part I never understood, only about 40% blocks left but only 0.10% measured. That used to happen all the time, even before the update. Well, anyway, no issue then I guess, I thought maybe there was a bug or something...
Yea, should all be fixed now.. and save/restore state if i have to restart the scripts ever.
Right, there was also a big giant header at the top of the page that said there will be errors during the update. And now that header says allow 2016 blocks to pass and then accuracy will be Sp0t on.
Ah, well I didn't see the first one then (it's gone now), that's why.See how it says it has measured %0.10 of blocks? That means its basing that estimate off only 0.1 * 2016 completed blocks which means nothing. After a full cycle, it will equal to the elapsed blocks / 2016.
Yeah that's the part I never understood, only about 40% blocks left but only 0.10% measured. That used to happen all the time, even before the update. Well, anyway, no issue then I guess, I thought maybe there was a bug or something... There is something weird going on with BTC:
Quote
btc 162474 872M 2016 163296 822 0.10% 1250757.75000 4764791.42857 280.95% 1d 11hr 57m 45s
A few hours ago it was rather in the +10%, as far as I remember.Right, there was also a big giant header at the top of the page that said there will be errors during the update. And now that header says allow 2016 blocks to pass and then accuracy will be Sp0t on.
See how it says it has measured %0.10 of blocks? That means its basing that estimate off only 0.1 * 2016 completed blocks which means nothing. After a full cycle, it will equal to the elapsed blocks / 2016.
Major Update!
New scripts in place. I patched all 8 clients to output directly to the scripts so I no longer have to poll getinfo on the clients. So after 2016 blocks, all chains should be exactly accurate for diff estimates and chain speed. (No longer errors due to polling timestamps.)
I will be adding solidcoin back to the page. I had removed it primarily because it locked up with frequent polling, which is no longer necessary (not because its super-silly and centralized).
Note: gg estimates are still useless because of its tiny target and cycle length.
New scripts in place. I patched all 8 clients to output directly to the scripts so I no longer have to poll getinfo on the clients. So after 2016 blocks, all chains should be exactly accurate for diff estimates and chain speed. (No longer errors due to polling timestamps.)
I will be adding solidcoin back to the page. I had removed it primarily because it locked up with frequent polling, which is no longer necessary (not because its super-silly and centralized).
Note: gg estimates are still useless because of its tiny target and cycle length.
There is something weird going on with BTC:
Quote
btc 162474 872M 2016 163296 822 0.10% 1250757.75000 4764791.42857 280.95% 1d 11hr 57m 45s
A few hours ago it was rather in the +10%, as far as I remember.
Major Update!
New scripts in place. I patched all 8 clients to output directly to the scripts so I no longer have to poll getinfo on the clients. So after 2016 blocks, all chains should be exactly accurate for diff estimates and chain speed. (No longer errors due to polling timestamps.)
I will be adding solidcoin back to the page. I had removed it primarily because it locked up with frequent polling, which is no longer necessary (not because its super-silly and centralized).
Note: gg estimates are still useless because of its tiny target and cycle length.
New scripts in place. I patched all 8 clients to output directly to the scripts so I no longer have to poll getinfo on the clients. So after 2016 blocks, all chains should be exactly accurate for diff estimates and chain speed. (No longer errors due to polling timestamps.)
I will be adding solidcoin back to the page. I had removed it primarily because it locked up with frequent polling, which is no longer necessary (not because its super-silly and centralized).
Note: gg estimates are still useless because of its tiny target and cycle length.
Please re-list Eligius, it is still a significant chunk of the network's hashing power.
There is no point in penalizing the whole bitcoin and namecoin communities and Eligius' miners by withholding information just because of what Luke-jr did without anybody's permission, and especially without Eligius' miners' permission.
There is no point in penalizing the whole bitcoin and namecoin communities and Eligius' miners by withholding information just because of what Luke-jr did without anybody's permission, and especially without Eligius' miners' permission.
No.
Please re-list Eligius, it is still a significant chunk of the network's hashing power.
There is no point in penalizing the whole bitcoin and namecoin communities and Eligius' miners by withholding information just because of what Luke-jr did without anybody's permission, and especially without Eligius' miners' permission.
There is no point in penalizing the whole bitcoin and namecoin communities and Eligius' miners by withholding information just because of what Luke-jr did without anybody's permission, and especially without Eligius' miners' permission.
Difficulty for ixcoin has jumped from around 600 to 12,000+ in the last few days. I assume a large pool has started merged mining them. Anyone know which one?
Also, big thanks to Sp0tter for allchains.info. The site has all the info I care about nicely collected on a single page. Bravo!
Also, big thanks to Sp0tter for allchains.info. The site has all the info I care about nicely collected on a single page. Bravo!
mmpool, have ixc,i0c and nmc
Difficulty for ixcoin has jumped from around 600 to 12,000+ in the last few days. I assume a large pool has started merged mining them. Anyone know which one?
Also, big thanks to Sp0tter for allchains.info. The site has all the info I care about nicely collected on a single page. Bravo!
Also, big thanks to Sp0tter for allchains.info. The site has all the info I care about nicely collected on a single page. Bravo!
ixc seems to have stopped updating. ixcoind crashed?
And SC
Jump to: