Topic: ★★DigiByte|极特币★★[DGB]✔ Core v6.16.5.1 - DigiShield, DigiSpeed, Segwit - page 126. (Read 3058907 times)

Hy!

you can mine DigiByte now on https://miner-control.de ! with 1% fee!
Payout all 30 min.

CANCELED. RAM usage is too height. (over 22GB needed) (16GB ram is build in the server)

a complete own wallet foreach algo is to many...

Your numbers seem a bit weird. I assume you mean you bought at 3.2 cents. DGB price has never been greatly volatile, it stays flat for long periods and then experiences upticks now and then. The last one was certainly quite anomalous though, I'll grant you that. Hold for the long term and you will see returns.

WTF IS with this DGB price... insane. I bought at 0.32c when it fell from 0.60c.... GG... the biggest lose for me in crypto

DGB looks very interesting for investment. From the point of view of the price in 110-120 sat. The possible potential of a big. But pack entry point not see. The graph goes downhill. And while this trend is not broken. Thinking about the growth of spring this year and possible the x's from this project of course you want to invest in it. I will closely follow

Litecoin is setting itself up as a second layer solution for bitcoin.  A cohort, not a competitor.  Few other scrypt coins that share lots of litecoin DNA could manage to compete in the same space because they're not the strongest coin of their algorithm, i.e., one litecoin pool alone might be able to attack most scrypt altcoins.  But DGB's multi-algorithm approach, along with their faster, cheaper transactions puts them in a position to compete with litecoin without those security concerns. 

DGB seems ideally suited for that technologically speaking, but when I look at the roadmap, I don't see anything that looks like that.  DGB seems like it could compete to be the backbone of crypto payment processing, but instead of having to go out and convince billions of users to choose it over more familiar coins, it just needs to make a financial case to a tiny number of payment processors that running transactions through DGB LNs will be cheaper and faster and their customers will never know DGB was even involved.  DGB could win without having to challenge Bitcoin's network effect, in fact, it can benefit from Bitcoin users. 

Has Jared talked about this approach?  Is there a plan to possibly not just do that for Bitcoin, but perhaps all segwit/LN coins?  I'd love to see info on that if it's being worked on and thought about.

https://mobile.twitter.com/TREZOR/status/932902628085952512

It is legit, but this is just about the device firmware. We are looking for an appropriate wallet interface.

More information will come in an official announcement.
4:24 PM · Nov 21, 2017

Brilliant! Thank you Jared......hard not to love you. 

Once you have 5 data directories setup you can make a shell script like below:

Note: calling digibyted only works to start wallet. To execute commands run a script like below by calling "digibyte-cli":


Each instance of digibyted needs to run on a different RPC port. What we do is we run 4 out of the 5 algos with the "prune=550" command to keep from bloating the server. All data comes from one algo and gets relayed to other 4 algos locally.

Example Sha256 config:


The prune=550 command purges data beyond 550mb of the most recent blocks and txs. It is not enabled be default.

I am now expecting the possibility of another March-Mai pump event yet to come. Look at BTC and the reasons as why it's so high. People will start switching to alts as soon as :

-the free cash distributions at BTC drops
-huge BTC corrections start
-need for diversification and exposure to more cryptos grow

Basically around 50 bln taken from BTC in my view may land with alts. After all putting all the eggs in one basket was never very wise. That's where DGB is well positioned to take onboard +/-1 billion but of course we don't know what will happen

Note: You need to make sure each daemon runs on a different port aka deamon 1 on 14030, 2 14033 and so on.

Telegram is great....If you have a smart phone and it hasn't been hacked!

Haha , regarding my comment about 4.25% as I wrote was a joke if you read . Don't take things so personal close to heart  , I am myself very positive about the crypto ecosystem and DGB especially (in case you review my comments). We can't even say a word anymore , wow... 

OK, I stand corrected!  

While we are here, can we go into this a little further and spell out where and what changes Ian will need to make please?

I can see how the above conversation could lead to more mining on the DigiByte network.
I know how so many people hate asking questions but can’t wait to hear the answers, so they can try things for themselves without looking foolish.
 

Oh by the way this is an open question, anyone with the answers can butt in and explain with their community spirit. It doesn't have to be Jared who possibly just went to bed at 5am, if he's in HK. 

This is most definitely possible, you just need to specify separate data directories for each algo. We do 5 on one server for DigiHash. You could be trying to start two separate instances from the same directory.  That's what that error looks like.

I don't think you can. Don't think you can run two wallets on the same machine!

I am trying to setup a mining pool with 2 algorithms. I have 2 data directory, 2 different conf files. When I start the second process the debug.log shows

CDBEnv::Open: LogDir=/home/test/.digibytescrypt/database ErrorFile=/home/test/.digibytescrypt/db.log
2017-11-27 19:38:22 Selected Algo: scrypt
2017-11-27 19:38:22 Unable to bind to [::]:12024 on this computer. DigiByte Core is probably already running.
2017-11-27 19:38:22 Unable to bind to 0.0.0.0:12024 on this computer. DigiByte Core is probably already running.
2017-11-27 19:38:22 Error: Unable to bind to 0.0.0.0:12024 on this computer. DigiByte Core is probably already running.
2017-11-27 19:38:22 Error: Failed to listen on any port. Use -listen=0 if you want this.

Is it possible to run 2 digitbyte processes on the same server so that 2 algo could be mined at the same time?

Ian

Please let's leave price speculation out of here....before you know it, the pages get filled with guff....every long term holder should know how much the developers and majority of long-term holders hate this!

What u guys expect the price of dgb next two month with this btc rally. Will it go again to 2600 satoshi? I am longterm holder.

For those new to this forum and thread, this is no longer the most active or monitored communication channel for DGB.  Most of the community has Migrated to Telegram and the quickest updates can be found on DGB twitter.


https://www.digibyte.io/digibyte-community

https://twitter.com/DigiByteCoin

This issue has been corrected. The proper links are now on the website.