Topic: ★★DigiByte|极特币★★[DGB]✔ Core v6.16.5.1 - DigiShield, DigiSpeed, Segwit - page 312. (Read 3059020 times)
May 18, 2017, 05:10:41 AM
i have 0 conections on my wallet please help me!
May 18, 2017, 04:40:57 AM
Where’s the inconsistency with what I’ve written? Price speculation has nothing to do with Dev integrity, does it? All targets were met (okay, except for the .001, but I still have until July, and for those of you who still haven't read my post giving further explanation on that one, I'll just say
). What more do you want? I mean, what more do you want for free? The next levels are buy levels, but, hey, with attitudes like what I’m seeing here, maybe I’ll just forget about posting those.Dev integrity and price speculation do meet when there are major revelations though, and today’s public accusation is one of those. Credibility falls drastically when you falsely accuse someone, more so when that someone has been a long term positive contributor, and even more so when the data is twisted, manipulated, and misrepresented.
The 40 BTC, for example, was for a fully refundable escrow account upon NDA completion.
What? You people don’t want to hear “negatives” even when they are true? Are you sure about that?
May 18, 2017, 04:26:50 AM
Kindly settle whatever rift you have with dev personally.Thank you
At this point that is out of my hands. "Whatever rift", as you put it, that needs to be "settled" is something the Dev needs to do very PUBLICLY.
The rest of what I have to say here on this board is my analysis and opinion, and has nothing to do with the Dev's libelous statement. I am capable of differentiating between and not mixing the two.
Thanks for your advice though. I know it was well intentioned.
May 18, 2017, 04:22:02 AM
Kindly settle whatever rift you have with dev personally.Thank you
At this point that is out of my hands. "Whatever rift", as you put it, that needs to be "settled" is something the Dev needs to do very PUBLICLY.
The rest of what I have to say here on this board is my analysis and opinion, and has nothing to do with the Dev's libelous statement. I am capable of differentiating between and not mixing the two.
Thanks for your advice though. I know it was well intentioned.
May 18, 2017, 04:21:30 AM
Glad I got back into this a while ago, this was and is my gamble coin which I hope will work out. To find all the information is a bit of a pain but after seeing all the things that are planned this could be something decent.
I has one suggestion, if a one sheeter could be put together showing where DGB started, what it has already accomplished, it's current state and future plans I think that would be a great way for new investors to easily digest DGB, it would also make it easier for people to share.
I know there is a roadmap but something pretty and straight to the point would be great.
I has one suggestion, if a one sheeter could be put together showing where DGB started, what it has already accomplished, it's current state and future plans I think that would be a great way for new investors to easily digest DGB, it would also make it easier for people to share.
I know there is a roadmap but something pretty and straight to the point would be great.
tiggytomb,
That has been asked for, and requested for years, with no result other than the implicit: the dev simply refuses to do it for whatever the reason. Is it incapability? Laziness? Aloofness? Stupidity? Who knows? The point is that the reason why is not important. The only thing that is important for real investors' decision making is the fact that clear and thorough documentation is systematically refused by the dev.
By the way, I've been telling this to Jared both publicly and privately for the better part of two years now, and there's been no change. If anything, there's been a circling of wagons on his part with increasing obstinacy and further entrenchment refusing to take direction from others and surrounding himself with very dubious advisors to say the least.
You're right to say that it's a gamble, but I think you've got better odds in Vegas . . . where, even though the work against you, the rules are at least clearly stated.
There’s always the hope that things will change, but, as time goes by, that hope obviously dwindles in an ever accelerated manner.
Hope this helps not only you, but also everyone to better evaluate DGB's real prospects.
HR
May 18, 2017, 04:18:31 AM
What? You people don’t want to hear “negatives” even when they are true? Are you sure about that?
lol.. Really? Not sure how you could possibly ask those questions when all the majority care about is "to the moon!!!!!".The reality is that it says more about them wanting you to be a one dimensional yes man/drone than it says about you. Anyone that puts money into something without all the details needed to make a real risk assessment is just looking to have someone take their money from them. It's sort of amusing.
May 18, 2017, 04:18:15 AM
What's the best place to storage DGBs?
local dgb wallet is best place 
May 18, 2017, 04:15:48 AM
Where’s the inconsistency with what I’ve written? Price speculation has nothing to do with Dev integrity, does it? All targets were met (okay, except for the .001, but I still have until July, and for those of you who still haven't read my post giving further explanation on that one, I'll just say
). What more do you want? I mean, what more do you want for free? The next levels are buy levels, but, hey, with attitudes like what I’m seeing here, maybe I’ll just forget about posting those.Dev integrity and price speculation do meet when there are major revelations though, and today’s public accusation is one of those. Credibility falls drastically when you falsely accuse someone, more so when that someone has been a long term positive contributor, and even more so when the data is twisted, manipulated, and misrepresented.
The 40 BTC, for example, was for a fully refundable escrow account upon NDA completion.
What? You people don’t want to hear “negatives” even when they are true? Are you sure about that?
May 18, 2017, 04:09:44 AM
Where’s the inconsistency with what I’ve written? Price speculation has nothing to do with Dev integrity, does it? All targets were met (okay, except for the .001, but I still have until July, and for those of you who still haven't read my post giving further explanation on that one, I'll just say
). What more do you want? I mean, what more do you want for free? The next levels are buy levels, but, hey, with attitudes like what I’m seeing here, maybe I’ll just forget about posting those.Dev integrity and price speculation do meet when there are major revelations though, and today’s public accusation is one of those. Credibility falls drastically when you falsely accuse someone, more so when that someone has been a long term positive contributor, and even more so when the data is twisted, manipulated, and misrepresented.
The 40 BTC, for example, was for a fully refundable escrow account upon NDA completion.
What? You people don’t want to hear “negatives” even when they are true? Are you sure about that?
May 18, 2017, 03:29:49 AM
What's the best place to storage DGBs?
local dgb wallet is best place May 18, 2017, 03:26:13 AM
What's the best place to storage DGBs?
local dgb wallet is best place May 18, 2017, 03:19:44 AM
FOMO is starting to kick in. Buying/selling on Polo is starting to skip Satoshis. Price went from 167 straight to 170.
I've been in from day 1 and I can't remember it getting this high since the initial fall from several hundred Satoshi post-exchange listing
I've been in from day 1 and I can't remember it getting this high since the initial fall from several hundred Satoshi post-exchange listing
We have a new target on the 15 minute chart of 204 SAT.
I wouldn't be surprised with 300+ in the next few hours though.
It's all the same to me though since I won't be selling until we get to .001 BTC . . . which could be the first week of July.
This is a major ball bustin' bull market!
Valid point! HR flip floped, obviously trying to create smart FUD here.
@HR how it comes, you are now in other position?
In all seriousness, it looks like his offer was turned down and now he's upset.
Of course, 0.001BTC price is way too optimistic. 0.00001000BTC is much healthier prediction. It's unpredictable, how Polo whales will act with X or Y coin.
DGB is much better than BCN, it has some real usage, it is blazing fast (a lot of alts must have the transactions speed to be dramatically increased), but look at market caps. Polo whales didn't hesitate to bump BCN high.
Crypto is all about unfairness!
DGB and BCN should swap their market caps. It would be fair.
May 18, 2017, 03:18:20 AM
Coming from the guy privately trying to extort 40 BTC out of us that is pretty brazen.
And that's all we get out of you? A baseless, defamatory lie? Libel?
I presented you with an offer to work together: a straightforward business proposal that included proprietary analysis and trade secrets that could not be divulged without serious collaboration, which you refused.
You want to refer to that as extortion? It's your prerogative to make yourself out to be a fool, so I can't stop you, but is that really what you want to do?
I have clearly just called you a liar and accused you of character defamation. You can either apologize or publish the information you have (that doesn't exists, but in case it did, you could) to show that you haven't libelled me.
Nice job showing who you are and confirming my thesis just presented above in such quick and succinct fashion.
Hi HR, we were not looking forward to such negativity from you. We look forward to some very good analysis which you do, not this. Please try to understand.
May 18, 2017, 03:15:15 AM
There are 10 times as many miners on DGB than there were just 2 weeks ago.
5 times as many as 2 days ago!
DGB is in the spotlight.
Next up, a CoinDesk article.
May 18, 2017, 03:07:10 AM
FOMO is starting to kick in. Buying/selling on Polo is starting to skip Satoshis. Price went from 167 straight to 170.
I've been in from day 1 and I can't remember it getting this high since the initial fall from several hundred Satoshi post-exchange listing
I've been in from day 1 and I can't remember it getting this high since the initial fall from several hundred Satoshi post-exchange listing
We have a new target on the 15 minute chart of 204 SAT.
I wouldn't be surprised with 300+ in the next few hours though.
It's all the same to me though since I won't be selling until we get to .001 BTC . . . which could be the first week of July.
This is a major ball bustin' bull market!
Valid point! HR flip floped, obviously trying to create smart FUD here.
@HR how it comes, you are now in other position?
In all seriousness, it looks like his offer was turned down and now he's upset.
May 18, 2017, 03:03:57 AM
FOMO is starting to kick in. Buying/selling on Polo is starting to skip Satoshis. Price went from 167 straight to 170.
I've been in from day 1 and I can't remember it getting this high since the initial fall from several hundred Satoshi post-exchange listing
I've been in from day 1 and I can't remember it getting this high since the initial fall from several hundred Satoshi post-exchange listing
We have a new target on the 15 minute chart of 204 SAT.
I wouldn't be surprised with 300+ in the next few hours though.
It's all the same to me though since I won't be selling until we get to .001 BTC . . . which could be the first week of July.
This is a major ball bustin' bull market!
Valid point! HR flip floped, obviously trying to create smart FUD here.
@HR how it comes, you are now in other position?
May 18, 2017, 03:01:41 AM
It seems that the developer deliberately ignores my question about the solo mining...
May 18, 2017, 02:59:52 AM
FOMO is starting to kick in. Buying/selling on Polo is starting to skip Satoshis. Price went from 167 straight to 170.
I've been in from day 1 and I can't remember it getting this high since the initial fall from several hundred Satoshi post-exchange listing
I've been in from day 1 and I can't remember it getting this high since the initial fall from several hundred Satoshi post-exchange listing
We have a new target on the 15 minute chart of 204 SAT.
I wouldn't be surprised with 300+ in the next few hours though.
It's all the same to me though since I won't be selling until we get to .001 BTC . . . which could be the first week of July.
This is a major ball bustin' bull market!
Edit: Never mind. Just read your last post.
May 18, 2017, 02:51:57 AM
Coming from the guy privately trying to extort 40 BTC out of us that is pretty brazen.
And that's all we get out of you? A baseless, defamatory lie? Libel?
I presented you with an offer to work together: a straightforward business proposal that included proprietary analysis and trade secrets that could not be divulged without serious collaboration, which you refused.
You want to refer to that as extortion? It's your prerogative to make yourself out to be a fool, so I can't stop you, but is that really what you want to do?
I have clearly just called you a liar and accused you of character defamation. You can either apologize or publish the information you have (that doesn't exists, but in case it did, you could) to show that you haven't libelled me.
Nice job showing who you are and confirming my thesis just presented above in such quick and succinct fashion.
May 18, 2017, 02:39:05 AM
What's the best place to storage DGBs?
Core wallet. Encrypted passphrase. Backed up in 3 separate physical locations. You back up the wallet.dat file.Located in C:/your username/AppData/local/roaming/digibyte ... on windows, application support on mac.
You might have to enable view hidden folders to see it.
Download wallet here: https://github.com/digibyte/digibyte/releases/tag/v6.14.2
Is that possible to keep it on the mobile? iOS
Jump to: