Hey. You're on welfare. Eat and LIKE it.
Topic: Direct democracy in US - page 2. (Read 1017 times)
Direct democracy for the whole world!
If only...We could split the world into the different kind of population and I wouldn't have to bear with cocitizens like you ^^
Direct democracy for the whole world!
In my opinion, the even more important question would be: Do you trust the average american to make decision for the n°1 military power in the world ?
I would trust very few population for a direct democracy.
I would trust very few population for a direct democracy.
But you trust fucking politicians who fucked you for decades? Yeah makes much more sense...
In my opinion, the even more important question would be: Do you trust the average american to make decision for the n°1 military power in the world ?
I would trust very few population for a direct democracy.
I would trust very few population for a direct democracy.
Yes but, look at Brexit. The vote split was 17410742 to 16141241. This means that a whopping 16 million+ people will have to obey the wishes of a slightly larger majority, less than 17.5 million. Who is right?
So, do you trust the handful in the U.S. government to be able to make right decisions for 330 million? Create wars for us all over the world just so that the handful have an excuse to kill off our young men and women in the military, all the while making $billions for themselves while the rest of us live in near poverty.
With communications and transportation the way they are, don't need democracy OR the thing that we have presently. Get rid of government except to maintain order in the courts. Let the people be free except when they harm other people, and let the jury decide who is the guilty party based on the facts. Dump the rest of the stupid government that is raping and plundering us.
In my opinion, the even more important question would be: Do you trust the average american to make decision for the n°1 military power in the world ?
I would trust very few population for a direct democracy.
I would trust very few population for a direct democracy.
Do you think direct democracy in the US (referendum etc) would be a good idea or do you think the party system (Hillary, Trump etc) is better?
I think Direct democracy would never work, That implies every single issue going up for vote maybe a third party could win, but never does because the voters don't vote for them. Do you think direct democracy in the US (referendum etc) would be a good idea or do you think the party system (Hillary, Trump etc) is better?
I think Direct democracy would never work, That implies every single issue going up for vote maybe a third party could win, but never does because the voters don't vote for them.
WTF PEOPLE?
There is only one answer to that for God's sake!!!! It's YES
The question Op is asking is basically:
"do you prefer to vote yourself and propose laws and chose which should be applied or to elect someone who will decide for you?"
Direct democracy is the only kind of democracy. Representative democracy is no longer needed, we can propose and vote for laws ourself now, why voting for other people, can be Trump Hilary or whoever the fuck you want, why voting for them to take decision for you??? We should all make a fucking revolution until we get the right to decide ourselves!!!
There is only one answer to that for God's sake!!!! It's YES
The question Op is asking is basically:
"do you prefer to vote yourself and propose laws and chose which should be applied or to elect someone who will decide for you?"
Direct democracy is the only kind of democracy. Representative democracy is no longer needed, we can propose and vote for laws ourself now, why voting for other people, can be Trump Hilary or whoever the fuck you want, why voting for them to take decision for you??? We should all make a fucking revolution until we get the right to decide ourselves!!!
Maybe it should be ancient greece-like polis democracy?
There are three places for the U.S. government in America:
1. To oversee the court activities in court cases. This doesn't include to find defendants guilty or innocent. It only includes overseeing that the court acts logically and civilly in its operation.
2. To oversee corporations and other artificial entities so that they don't harm the people.
3. To protect the nation from attack.
That's it. Democracy and other things should not even play into the picture.
Let the States and local governments handle what goes on locally.
1. To oversee the court activities in court cases. This doesn't include to find defendants guilty or innocent. It only includes overseeing that the court acts logically and civilly in its operation.
2. To oversee corporations and other artificial entities so that they don't harm the people.
3. To protect the nation from attack.
That's it. Democracy and other things should not even play into the picture.
Let the States and local governments handle what goes on locally.
A good referendum for US is: Do you want the nationalization of FED?
Do you mean proportional representation, or the sham we have in the UK?
If a referendum is mandatory for any change in a law or constitution. If citizens get more votes, would it be a good thing? 
Do you mean proportional representation, or the sham we have in the UK?
Do you think direct democracy in the US (referendum etc) would be a good idea or do you think the party system (Hillary, Trump etc) is better?
Jump to: