Topic: [DISCONTINUED] cryp.today Mining revenue stats Scrypt Scrypt-N X11 X13 - page 49. (Read 144326 times)

@Suchmoon: thank you. This post is so good.
 
Some help: ~0.0054 BTC/MHs/Day in nicehash scrypt pool in the last 24h. Not bad at all.

Currently the LTC P2Pool is doing better than any of the current multipools.

I'm unclear as to how a Litecoin P2Pool can beat LTC profitability. Can someone explain that to me?

I'm seeing the following error for the 10 day average panel of the google doc:

All series on a given axis must be of the same data type

Maybe a recent change broke this chart?

I added "ideal" lines for Doge and LTC - same colors, thin lines - to show the theoretical profitability based on difficulty. These are not very accurate, especially for Doge where profitability can vary significantly throughout the day (I'm only taking one difficulty sample per day). But it should give you a rough idea of how effective the multipools are and how much luck I'm having (or not) mining single coins.

As dragonmike mentioned, ipominer does not exchange to BTC, which leads to a couple of issues:
1) I would have to spend a disproportionate amount of time on testing this pool - to exchange coins and estimate earnings.
2) The result would depend heavily on my trading abilities, which aren't very good I have to note.

Having said that, I would like to add a pool like that, perhaps with some sort of simplistic trading plan (all coins exchanged once or twice a day) and without estimating unexchanged balances.

It has not been mining vertcoin much for whatever reason, so there isn't really a lot of correlation. Besides I'm exchanging VTC from vertco.in as soon as I earn them, whereas TradeMyBit might have a different trading strategy, so the results even on pure VTC might differ depending on which way the exchange rates move.

That discrepancy between vertcoin and trademybit (N) yesterday is quite weird tbh, surely these two should be quite correlated...

ipominer does not convert the coins it mines so it would be difficult to give an accurate BTC/Mh reading I reckon. All will depend on when you sell your mined coins.

if you can, please add one more pool to your list...

this one is a bit different from the rest, and i would describe it as a "high risk/high reward" type - https://www.ipominer.com/

i am not sure if they are somehow "related", but the site looks and acts identical to multipool.us...

thanks

I've used them in the past and their stats were wildly inaccurate back then, specifically unexchanged/exchanged balances, which I need to calculate day-to-day differences. I might look into it again, but it's very low on my list.

how about hashco.ws ?

No major changes today.

Regarding some pools mentioned here recently: I have coinfu and trademybit (regular scrypt) on my list as well as nicehash. I just need to get some new hardware first, ETA 2-5 days.

12 hours is not enough to evaluate performance, especially on a pool that has barely cracked 1 GH/s. Just look at the charts in the OP, only the larger pools like CM or WP have more or less steady lines, others are jumping all over the place every day.

They are still in beta, yesterday there were some problems with NET mining with diff=0, also they are trying to mine LTC much of a time, and with such low ~1GH hashpower at multi they seems have not find any LTC block yet (or I didnt noticed).

Was surprised by cat&cactus story too)

Ghash.io multipool is pretty bad so far. Mined for 12 hours on a ~1.15 MH/S rig and got 0.0017 BTC. There was something wrong with LOT, maybe that's why.

Sorry for the panic alarm...

Apparently it was a bored Ukrainian programmer.  Unfortunate timing though.

People who rent rigs most likely are NOT using my charts to decide where to mine . They have short term opportunities that don't justify investing in their own hardware, but may be profitable over the next few hours or days.

It's lyrics from a song by Russian band Бумбокс and it's not the first time it's happening.

Heartbleed exploit allows to read server's memory, it's not something you could use to deface a website, not without some luck and serious effort anyway. I doubt that whoever would be capable of that would use it for showing off their favorite pop song.


That's probably more likely 

i think all it means is that they have a bored russian developer with a quirky sense of humor

i see you tried TMB's scrypt N multi... have you tried the regular scrypt multi yet ?

a couple of months back i did a test similar to yours, though not nearly as thorough or "scientific"... basically i have a couple of rigs that are completely identical... same mobos, cpu's and ram, and same exact number/brand of cards attached with the same exact risers etc, etc, etc... basically, the two rigs are identical in every way...

i couldn't do all the pools at once, since i only have those two rigs, so i did two at a time for a few days at a time, and then compared results... like i said - not very scientific...

in my testing, the TMB multi consistently brought in better returns then any other multipool i tried, often by a long shot... i was so happy with the results, that i settled on TMB and have been with them since, never looking back...

TMB also has some other advantages that often do not necessarily reflect in stats... the pool owner/operator purposely limits the number of signups, this keeps the hash rate under control... this allows him to provide a more "boutique" and personal customer service, and allows the pool to dip into smaller coins that would be absolutely destroyed by the 20+mh that something like clever or waffle bring... plus, they do a great job of finding newer coins that are profitable, and not mined (and raped) by other multi's...

when the whole cryptorush fiasco happened, the pool owner instantly paid everyone out out of his own pocket without any hesitation - a class act...

take a look at them, if you haven't already... i'm curious to see how they compare to the rest... i know the n multi hasn't been doing great lately, but the scrypt multi has been solid, and i believe more profitable then the pools you have listed...