Feedback doesn't really matter if they're not on the trusted list. People will likely just ignore feedback if it's left for silly things and isn't sourced.
You are missing the point.
I acquired my first negative feedback because of nothing to do with trading or scamming people. It was because someone didn't like that I 'defended' Ponzi site operators. In actual fact I have a very long and lengthy article pinned to the Gambling page to caution people about scams. At the same time, I'm open to the idea that some Ponzi sites can exist that reward everyone as long as the players are all aware how the game works. If all donators know how the money pays out, and agree that it is okay, it's not a scam. A scam is when the new money is unaware of the idea they are paying the old money.
So because I chose to allow people to read the facts and decide on their own, I must be pro-Ponzi and must be a scammer.
Then we have the same moron threatening to leave negative trust because of people who are spamming the same content.
It's disturbing when someone takes it upon themselves to target your trust based on the fact you don't agree with them and then because you are spamming (which wasn't me by the way). What if tomorrow I decided I wanted to target people who were pro-casinos and said they encouraged scamming. Then I went and flooded every casino thread with large big red 'SCAM' letters.
OF course logic like this falls on deaf ears. Because I am not a sheeple and because I believe investors can make their own decisions I must be labeled as untrustable.
So I disagree... feedback DOES matter to me, in the sense that it's being misused as a weapon.
Look at my feedback page if you want a laugh. Even got bad feedback because apparently I moved someone's thread to off topic, and he never even tried to talk to me about it.
