Topic: Disputes and drama from the BTCFPGA thread - page 2. (Read 5172 times)

I did not imply you are a known BFL employee, for anybody who has joined the conversation in the last 30 days, there have been no posts from BFL_Josh, your last post was the 5th of October. Nor your .sig or profile gives background information that you talk for BFL.

And don't get me started about shills, I work a lot at trade shows and it's a common trick for an employe of a company to wander around posing as a visitor and when he sees a potential customer, he starts showing interest in the same product and talks it up to convince the potential buyer ("My mother has one just like this at home and she is very happy").
It's not because all the other vendors around it see this happen all day long and they know that he is working for the company, that the potential buyer knows he is employed. For this buyer, the employe is a shill.


So now every visitor has to go and check out the hundreds of posts you did in the last weeks to see who you are? If you work and talk for BFL and feel like trolling other vendors, you should mention it in your profile. Just like with "Scammer tags" we could get you a "BFL Troll" tag, I'm sure that would clear up a lot of things.  

If I'm a known BFL employee, then I by default can not be a shill.  Please learn the definition of the words you use before you try to use them.

I have never tried to hide my employment with BFL and everyone in this thread knows I am employed as such.

I rarely reply to much on here, but serious just fucking shut up for once, you are grinding me down.

In what world does someone with this personality end up being doing PR for a business..

Again, you seem to have trouble with reality.  You have absolutely no idea as to what my motivations are, so quit spewing your BS everywhere.  Please, just stop being an idiot for 24 hours, see if you are capable of that.  I seriously want to see if you can go 24 hours without putting fingers to keyboard to make a proclamation about something you have absolutely no clue about.

You're doing it right now by not using your BFL account. You're hoping some people won't notice the BFL affiliation. And you're right. Some people don't know.

You're doing it right now by not using your BFL account. You're hoping some people won't notice the BFL affiliation. And you're right. Some people don't know.

If I'm a known BFL employee

I have never tried to hide my employment with BFL

Josh, you *are* a paid BFL shill. If you are talking as a BFL employe, please use your other BFL Josh account. And answer the questions on the other threads that you are trying to dodge...

He can't be a shill, he is a known employee.

Inaba doesn't qualify to be called a shill: its public hes a BFL employee.

Then what are you? You are employed by BFL, yet your sig and user profile are conspicuously absent of any mention of your employer. Yet here you are again, defending, and even speaking for BFL. If you're not going to post as BFL_Josh, then you're nothing more than a shill yourself, which makes your statement above false.

Josh, you *are* a paid BFL shill. If you are talking as a BFL employe, please use your other BFL Josh account. And answer the questions on the other threads that you are trying to dodge...

Please stop spreading FUD.  BFL does not now nor has it ever employed shills.

BFL does not now nor has it ever employed shills.

BFL is the only company that can afford shills, using all that investor money to do it. Prove you're not a BFL shill by providing an order receipt from a major BFL alternative.

@ gmaxwell, you have no proof that BFL is, paying these trolls,

as you put it and insinuating so is libelous. Sarcasm is not protected speech like parody is. gmaxwell sense the Bitcointalk forum has given you moderator status that makes you a legal agent for Bitcointalk and makes Bitcointalk liable for your comments. Bitcointalk has no Terms of Service that would insulate it from your comments and thus no protection from libelous statements made by it's moderators.
gmaxwell, you have taken away Bitcointalk's safe harbor on this issue.

Don't worry I took a screen shot and uploaded to the internet where it's date can be easily verified.

@ DiabloD3, fuq'n try to get me banned. Show us just how tyrannical you can act because you're an angry bastard moderator. I only refer to you as an angry bastard because that's how you refer to yourself. Banning me would only serve to push me towards other avenues to express my beliefs where there would be no discussion and no chance for Tom to defend himself. And DiabloD3 don't fuq'n lump me in with BFL just because my signature contains a BFL contest signature. BFL and their contestants have no responsibility for my beliefs. DiabloD3 I wonder if you'll have the fuq'n courage to ban the shills with BTCFPGA.com and BitcoinASIC.com in their signatures, would you? Let us see you state publicly that you will treat Tom's contestants the same way. I'm willing to bet DiabloD3 that your too biased in favor of Tom's and his contestant to treat them the same way and actually ban them. DiabloD3 sense your so willing to lump in those that have nothing to do with my beliefs then hear this loud and clear. It would be a shame if Tom's international customers don't get their orders because Tom's products do not meet the regulations of the order's destination country and are turned back by custom authorities. Canada, Mexico, EU, Australia, New Zealand, China and other counties all have similar regulations as the FCC. In at least one of those counties the importer will get fined if customs rejects an unauthorized electronic device.

How do you like them fuq'n apples. There is a quote from a movie that goes something like, "If they put one of yours in to the hospital then put one of theirs in to the morgue." I still have many arrows in my quiver, I have yet to use the nuclear option(s). Push me, please.

Note, fuq is pronounced with a long sounding U, similar to fuschia.

@ theymos, gmaxwell, DiabloD3, and other moderators, the specter of at least three court cases have been raised in this posting in addition to an admission of guilt to a criminal offence. Editing or removing this post might be considered tampering with or destruction of evidence. You might consider consulting with a lawyer before editing or removing this post to avoid possible criminal sanctions. theymos, you might want to implement a ToS that is easily accessible to the public.

@ Tom, scrubbing your postings might incur criminal sanctions, you know there are screen shots.

Tom, you know whats nice about being older and educated? College friends that are now lawyers to help you avoid pitfalls. The entirety of my words in this posting are solely my beliefs.

The twilight of the idols is now. Tom, you have been rope-a-doped for treating me like a, to use your words, 'troll', when all I was doing was trying to help you.