Pages:
Author

Topic: Disputes and drama from the BTCFPGA thread - page 2. (Read 5166 times)

legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
November 05, 2012, 10:23:40 AM
#21
Josh, you *are* a paid BFL shill. If you are talking as a BFL employe, please use your other BFL Josh account. And answer the questions on the other threads that you are trying to dodge...
If I'm a known BFL employee, then I by default can not be a shill.  Please learn the definition of the words you use before you try to use them.
I did not imply you are a known BFL employee, for anybody who has joined the conversation in the last 30 days, there have been no posts from BFL_Josh, your last post was the 5th of October. Nor your .sig or profile gives background information that you talk for BFL.

And don't get me started about shills, I work a lot at trade shows and it's a common trick for an employe of a company to wander around posing as a visitor and when he sees a potential customer, he starts showing interest in the same product and talks it up to convince the potential buyer ("My mother has one just like this at home and she is very happy").
It's not because all the other vendors around it see this happen all day long and they know that he is working for the company, that the potential buyer knows he is employed. For this buyer, the employe is a shill.

Quote
I have never tried to hide my employment with BFL and everyone in this thread knows I am employed as such.

So now every visitor has to go and check out the hundreds of posts you did in the last weeks to see who you are? If you work and talk for BFL and feel like trolling other vendors, you should mention it in your profile. Just like with "Scammer tags" we could get you a "BFL Troll" tag, I'm sure that would clear up a lot of things.  




Ok, so by your infallible logic, what am I shilling for?  What, in the past 10 pages have I written to the detriment of Tom's offering?  Oh look, nothing... so again I ask you, how can I be a shill if I'm not promoting (or detracting) any given product?  

I'm simply "debating" with idiots, since it doesn't require a lot of effort (I use the term "debating" very loosely, since it's actually impossible to hold a real debate with people who don't even understand the definition of the words they use.).  The only time I post in this thread is when someone posts blatantly false information and I correct them... then people like yourself, cedivad and especially Syke decide to chime in about something completely irrelevant to the topic at hand and here we are, discussing nothing of import. All the while I get to enjoy the machinations of Syke et al trying to play in the deep end of the gene pool, flailing around and drowning themselves.  If it weren't so amusing watching posts like yours trying to twist logic and common sense all in a knot to make some tortured point, believe me, I wouldn't be doing it.  It's a soap opera and a train wreck all in one, it's hard to stop watching you crash over and over.  
legendary
Activity: 1112
Merit: 1000
November 05, 2012, 03:14:10 AM
#20
Josh, you *are* a paid BFL shill. If you are talking as a BFL employe, please use your other BFL Josh account. And answer the questions on the other threads that you are trying to dodge...
If I'm a known BFL employee, then I by default can not be a shill.  Please learn the definition of the words you use before you try to use them.
I did not imply you are a known BFL employee, for anybody who has joined the conversation in the last 30 days, there have been no posts from BFL_Josh, your last post was the 5th of October. Nor your .sig or profile gives background information that you talk for BFL.

And don't get me started about shills, I work a lot at trade shows and it's a common trick for an employe of a company to wander around posing as a visitor and when he sees a potential customer, he starts showing interest in the same product and talks it up to convince the potential buyer ("My mother has one just like this at home and she is very happy").
It's not because all the other vendors around it see this happen all day long and they know that he is working for the company, that the potential buyer knows he is employed. For this buyer, the employe is a shill.

Quote
I have never tried to hide my employment with BFL and everyone in this thread knows I am employed as such.

So now every visitor has to go and check out the hundreds of posts you did in the last weeks to see who you are? If you work and talk for BFL and feel like trolling other vendors, you should mention it in your profile. Just like with "Scammer tags" we could get you a "BFL Troll" tag, I'm sure that would clear up a lot of things. 

donator
Activity: 994
Merit: 1000
November 05, 2012, 02:12:01 AM
#19
Quote
You're doing it right now by not using your BFL account. You're hoping some people won't notice the BFL affiliation. And you're right. Some people don't know.

Again, you seem to have trouble with reality.  You have absolutely no idea as to what my motivations are, so quit spewing your BS everywhere.  Please, just stop being an idiot for 24 hours, see if you are capable of that.  I seriously want to see if you can go 24 hours without putting fingers to keyboard to make a proclamation about something you have absolutely no clue about.

I rarely reply to much on here, but serious just fucking shut up for once, you are grinding me down.

In what world does someone with this personality end up being doing PR for a business..
We should establish a turing test for him. Most of his replies look automatic and self-repeating.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
November 04, 2012, 11:47:25 PM
#18
Quote
You're doing it right now by not using your BFL account. You're hoping some people won't notice the BFL affiliation. And you're right. Some people don't know.

Again, you seem to have trouble with reality.  You have absolutely no idea as to what my motivations are, so quit spewing your BS everywhere.  Please, just stop being an idiot for 24 hours, see if you are capable of that.  I seriously want to see if you can go 24 hours without putting fingers to keyboard to make a proclamation about something you have absolutely no clue about.
If BFL was quoted on a stock exchange I would short you.

Seriously guys, how can you go on this way?
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
November 04, 2012, 11:21:35 PM
#17
Quote
You're doing it right now by not using your BFL account. You're hoping some people won't notice the BFL affiliation. And you're right. Some people don't know.

Again, you seem to have trouble with reality.  You have absolutely no idea as to what my motivations are, so quit spewing your BS everywhere.  Please, just stop being an idiot for 24 hours, see if you are capable of that.  I seriously want to see if you can go 24 hours without putting fingers to keyboard to make a proclamation about something you have absolutely no clue about.
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
November 04, 2012, 11:08:50 PM
#16
I have never tried to hide my employment with BFL
You're doing it right now by not using your BFL account. You're hoping some people won't notice the BFL affiliation. And you're right. Some people don't know.

Let me put it a different way, and provide a lesson in adult interactions while not accusing Inaba of any particular motive, which I cannot guess with certainty.

Inaba,
Generally when I see employees of vendors that I work with in forums and blogs, they make a point of showing their potential conflict of interest, and are up front about the fact that these are their personal opinions when appropriate. You have a historical post I saw that explained the difference between the accounts, but it's impossible to find unless you know where to look, a link to this in your signature might be nice. At a minimum I recommend at least a brief disclaimer (I work for BFL but speak for myself?) to assure that we don't have confusion by someone working on post number 6 or something.

Thanks everyone,

Back to our regular show?
legendary
Activity: 3878
Merit: 1193
November 04, 2012, 10:54:55 PM
#15
Josh, you *are* a paid BFL shill. If you are talking as a BFL employe, please use your other BFL Josh account. And answer the questions on the other threads that you are trying to dodge...
If I'm a known BFL employee

Some people know. But there are plenty of other readers of this forum which are not aware. You don't list it in your sig. You don't list it in your profile. You don't even post as BFL_Josh any more. In the past month you've posted roughly 250 posts as Inaba, and 0 as BFL_Josh.

I have never tried to hide my employment with BFL

You're doing it right now by not using your BFL account. You're hoping some people won't notice the BFL affiliation. And you're right. Some people don't know.
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
November 04, 2012, 09:55:32 PM
#14
Quote
BFL is the only company that can afford shills, using all that investor money to do it. Prove you're not a BFL shill by providing an order receipt from a major BFL alternative.

Please stop spreading FUD.  BFL does not now nor has it ever employed shills.

Josh, you *are* a paid BFL shill. If you are talking as a BFL employe, please use your other BFL Josh account. And answer the questions on the other threads that you are trying to dodge...

If I'm a known BFL employee, then I by default can not be a shill.  Please learn the definition of the words you use before you try to use them.  I'm sure it was cute when you were 10 and tried to use big words, but it's not cute when you are a (seemingly) adult and trying to hold an adult conversation... it just makes you look stupid.

I have never tried to hide my employment with BFL and everyone in this thread knows I am employed as such.
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1006
November 04, 2012, 09:42:36 PM
#13
Josh, you *are* a paid BFL shill. If you are talking as a BFL employe, please use your other BFL Josh account. And answer the questions on the other threads that you are trying to dodge...

He can't be a shill, he is a known employee.
what if mesarah is inaba's alt account?

does that mean mesarah is paid by bfl?

/tinfoilhat
member
Activity: 88
Merit: 12
Max Kaye
November 04, 2012, 08:55:45 PM
#12
Inaba doesn't qualify to be called a shill: its public hes a BFL employee.

I strongly agree with this. Most members posting here are unlikely to be unaware of social and professional ties any prominent members of the community hold.

While obvious disclosure is nice, it should be no means be a requirement.

Edit: I'm also updating the FAQ more at the moment
staff
Activity: 4242
Merit: 8672
November 04, 2012, 07:33:30 PM
#11
FWIW, BFL wrote me to say:  "Mesarah has nothing to do with BFL and I would appreciate it if such a connection wasn't implied by the moderators of bitcointalk",  and thats a request I think is completely reasonable.

For all I know MeSarah is some kind of crazy counter-agent that is maximally obnoxious in BFL's apparent favor just to make BFL look bad.  Then again, I have to say I also would have had the opinion about Inaba's posts in the last month, so take my crazy conspiracy theory guesswork for what it is: Not terribly reliable.

Frankly, the kind of trouble I've seen people cause is the sort that comes only from seeing the misfortune of others, of creating argument and drama, and not from promoting one interest or another. Chaos has no affiliation but its own.

In general we should judge participants in our community by their own actions and not by those of their sometimes unfortunate supporters.  I've certainly had my share of moments cringing at some of the agreement I've received.
legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1000
DiabloMiner author
November 04, 2012, 06:21:33 PM
#10
Quote
BFL is the only company that can afford shills, using all that investor money to do it. Prove you're not a BFL shill by providing an order receipt from a major BFL alternative.
BFL does not now nor has it ever employed shills.

Then what are you? You are employed by BFL, yet your sig and user profile are conspicuously absent of any mention of your employer. Yet here you are again, defending, and even speaking for BFL. If you're not going to post as BFL_Josh, then you're nothing more than a shill yourself, which makes your statement above false.

Inaba doesn't qualify to be called a shill: its public hes a BFL employee.
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
November 04, 2012, 05:57:30 PM
#9
Josh, you *are* a paid BFL shill. If you are talking as a BFL employe, please use your other BFL Josh account. And answer the questions on the other threads that you are trying to dodge...

He can't be a shill, he is a known employee.
legendary
Activity: 1112
Merit: 1000
November 04, 2012, 05:51:40 PM
#8
Quote
BFL is the only company that can afford shills, using all that investor money to do it. Prove you're not a BFL shill by providing an order receipt from a major BFL alternative.

Please stop spreading FUD.  BFL does not now nor has it ever employed shills.

Josh, you *are* a paid BFL shill. If you are talking as a BFL employe, please use your other BFL Josh account. And answer the questions on the other threads that you are trying to dodge...
BFL
full member
Activity: 217
Merit: 100
November 04, 2012, 05:47:27 PM
#7
Please excuse this intrusion into Tom's thread, but BFL keeps getting brought up as being responsible for any negative post against Tom.  Aside from Tom & Inaba's personal sparing, BFL has no bad feelings for bASIC.  We welcome Tom, Avalon and others into the market and look forward to friendly competition.  It will only benefit the consumers and the bitcoin community overall.

For the record...  Mesarah has nothing to do with BFL and we don't appreciate the mudd slinging.  

There's been well over a year of pleasure trolling at our expense and with moderator involvement.  This has had a negative impact on the value of these forums.  We've tried not to engage it and as a result have mostly left the forums to take their own course.  I think most people would agree with me that the signal to noise ratio has worsened considerably as a result.

Please be fair when that crowd think takes on other targets...   and don't assume BFL is the source.  We're not.  Having the moderators carry this assumption forward is doubly bad.  With a fair approach, we can restore the value of these forums, but it's going to take some effort and fresh thinking.

legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
November 04, 2012, 05:18:34 PM
#6
Syke, again you fail Jr. High School vocabulary.  So sad.  Please learn basic English before engaging me in the future, thanks!

legendary
Activity: 3878
Merit: 1193
November 04, 2012, 05:12:14 PM
#5
Quote
BFL is the only company that can afford shills, using all that investor money to do it. Prove you're not a BFL shill by providing an order receipt from a major BFL alternative.
BFL does not now nor has it ever employed shills.

Then what are you? You are employed by BFL, yet your sig and user profile are conspicuously absent of any mention of your employer. Yet here you are again, defending, and even speaking for BFL. If you're not going to post as BFL_Josh, then you're nothing more than a shill yourself, which makes your statement above false.
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
November 04, 2012, 04:56:08 PM
#4
Quote
BFL is the only company that can afford shills, using all that investor money to do it. Prove you're not a BFL shill by providing an order receipt from a major BFL alternative.

Please stop spreading FUD.  BFL does not now nor has it ever employed shills.  Furthermore, I'm getting really sick of the rhetoric about where BFL's funding comes from.  You know exactly nothing about BFL's finances, so please stop talking like you know anything.   Unless you can provide some proof to back up your BS, stop spreading it, especially being a moderator... or is there actually some validity to the bias accusations?

PS - the burden of proof is on YOU.  You're the one making the accusation.


staff
Activity: 4242
Merit: 8672
November 04, 2012, 02:44:06 PM
#3
@ gmaxwell, you have no proof that BFL is, paying these trolls,

Funny, I didn't mention which trolls I was talking about or who might be paying them.  I'm glad you could help people with your opinions on the subject.

Quote
as you put it and insinuating so is libelous. Sarcasm is not protected speech like parody is. gmaxwell sense the Bitcointalk forum has given you moderator status that makes you a legal agent for Bitcointalk and makes Bitcointalk liable for your comments. Bitcointalk has no Terms of Service that would insulate it from your comments and thus no protection from libelous statements made by it's moderators.
gmaxwell, you have taken away Bitcointalk's safe harbor on this issue.

You are very thoroughly confused about the law. But hey, feel free to send me the contact information for your attorney.  Mine wouldn't mind having a word with yours.

Quote
Don't worry I took a screen shot and uploaded to the internet where it's date can be easily verified.

Please provide hyperlinks. Note, I have not authorized and do not authorize public duplication of my writing. If you wish to make private copies for whatever purpose be my guest.

And as I previously directed— I would remove your posts if you continued to repeat the same material and I have done so, as promised... but your post was too funny to delete completely.
legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1000
DiabloMiner author
November 04, 2012, 01:44:10 PM
#2
@ DiabloD3, fuq'n try to get me banned. Show us just how tyrannical you can act because you're an angry bastard moderator. I only refer to you as an angry bastard because that's how you refer to yourself. Banning me would only serve to push me towards other avenues to express my beliefs where there would be no discussion and no chance for Tom to defend himself. And DiabloD3 don't fuq'n lump me in with BFL just because my signature contains a BFL contest signature. BFL and their contestants have no responsibility for my beliefs. DiabloD3 I wonder if you'll have the fuq'n courage to ban the shills with BTCFPGA.com and BitcoinASIC.com in their signatures, would you? Let us see you state publicly that you will treat Tom's contestants the same way. I'm willing to bet DiabloD3 that your too biased in favor of Tom's and his contestant to treat them the same way and actually ban them. DiabloD3 sense your so willing to lump in those that have nothing to do with my beliefs then hear this loud and clear. It would be a shame if Tom's international customers don't get their orders because Tom's products do not meet the regulations of the order's destination country and are turned back by custom authorities. Canada, Mexico, EU, Australia, New Zealand, China and other counties all have similar regulations as the FCC. In at least one of those counties the importer will get fined if customs rejects an unauthorized electronic device.

How do you like them fuq'n apples. There is a quote from a movie that goes something like, "If they put one of yours in to the hospital then put one of theirs in to the morgue." I still have many arrows in my quiver, I have yet to use the nuclear option(s). Push me, please.

Note, fuq is pronounced with a long sounding U, similar to fuschia.

BFL is the only company that can afford shills, using all that investor money to do it. Prove you're not a BFL shill by providing an order receipt from a major BFL alternative.

Quote
@ theymos, gmaxwell, DiabloD3, and other moderators, the specter of at least three court cases have been raised in this posting in addition to an admission of guilt to a criminal offence. Editing or removing this post might be considered tampering with or destruction of evidence. You might consider consulting with a lawyer before editing or removing this post to avoid possible criminal sanctions. theymos, you might want to implement a ToS that is easily accessible to the public.

@ Tom, scrubbing your postings might incur criminal sanctions, you know there are screen shots.

Tom, you know whats nice about being older and educated? College friends that are now lawyers to help you avoid pitfalls. The entirety of my words in this posting are solely my beliefs.

The twilight of the idols is now. Tom, you have been rope-a-doped for treating me like a, to use your words, 'troll', when all I was doing was trying to help you.

The irony here is Theymos could consider what you just said a threat of legal action against himself and preemptively sue you.

EDIT: Damn, he got banned.
Pages:
Jump to: