Pages:
Author

Topic: Do a lot of western governments like bitcoin and dislike banks? (Read 350 times)

legendary
Activity: 2884
Merit: 1117
Our government in Croatia probably did not even know what is Bitcoin, they are pretty negative about this promising technology, and mostly did not care about blockchain and Bitcoin. I think that they have totally wrong approach.
Same as Croatia more countries around the world oppose bitcoin without knowing better about the technology and the need for the cryptocurrency. Slowly the ban gets lifted from the countries helping with the increasing adoption and use in the global market.
Adoption by citizens will gradually be the proof to governments that they have no choice than to adopt it too if they don’t want the banking institution generally to become useless.

Most individuals and merchants are now seriously introducing the use of crypto currencies as payment, some are gradually introducing the crypto debit card services for the withdrawing of cryptocurrencies, all these will eventually push the government into it too since it is a system they cannot control even when they tend to ban it.
legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 3684
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Not sure there's really a correlation between economy and the attitude towards Bitcoin when it comes to official government stances, but there's certainly a lot less trust in the banking institution even from the state, particularly after the recent practical bankruptcies of significant economies in the past 10 years.

We've had those scenes in Greece where people couldn't withdraw their life savings and the state blackmailed by the EU. The same in Iceland only 11 years ago all three private big banks in the small nation defaulted. It still was the biggest economic collapse in recent memory in the West.

But it's important to note that alternatives usually don't involve something as drastic as Bitcoin. Iceland, for example, is still somewhat anti-Bitcoin.
hero member
Activity: 994
Merit: 502
Our government in Croatia probably did not even know what is Bitcoin, they are pretty negative about this promising technology, and mostly did not care about blockchain and Bitcoin. I think that they have totally wrong approach.
Same as Croatia more countries around the world oppose bitcoin without knowing better about the technology and the need for the cryptocurrency. Slowly the ban gets lifted from the countries helping with the increasing adoption and use in the global market.
legendary
Activity: 2996
Merit: 1132
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Our government in Croatia probably did not even know what is Bitcoin, they are pretty negative about this promising technology, and mostly did not care about blockchain and Bitcoin. I think that they have totally wrong approach.
Sooner or Later, they will get to know about Bitcoin either by social media or through massive usage of it by their citizens which they will definitely investigate and understand what it is.

Most government naturally will be slow in taking decision that will affect the citizen so that they will not be blamed for any misfortune that befalls citizen through crypto in case there is any but this fear is because they don’t have the full knowledge of the whole system but I believe as they get exposed to it, they will see the benefit to them and your government.
sr. member
Activity: 791
Merit: 273
This is personal
Our government in Croatia probably did not even know what is Bitcoin, they are pretty negative about this promising technology, and mostly did not care about blockchain and Bitcoin. I think that they have totally wrong approach.
copper member
Activity: 2856
Merit: 3071
https://bit.ly/387FXHi lightning theory

You say fiat isn't backed by anything of real value. For you Gold is this value, am I right? But has gold been backed by something? No, then how has it value? It's psycological factor, we measure everything by one unique thing so to my mind it doesn't matter if we use gold coins or paper notes. But the worst thing here is banking system, not actually fiat, the way bank systems are managed. Solution of bitcoin is that we can't create more than 21 million while governments can print as much paper as they want and cause inflation, they won't be able to do it with bitcoin.

There's a finite amount of physical gold you can hold. I'd actually retract that and say caesium is a great store of value because it costs about $100 per gram to buy and a similar amount to extract.
hero member
Activity: 2352
Merit: 905
Metawin.com - Truly the best casino ever
I've been questioning this for a while and most economists say that fiat is a scam or a lie as the central banks are selling people a promise we will pay them back.

It seems to me as if fiat came in when it was needed to help solve the issues of carrying heavy gold for big transactions but now we have bitcoin there seems to be no other real use for it once bitcoin gets adopted by the masses (or other cryptocurrency).

It feels like fiat was made by the government without them knowing the risk as to what it would potentially lead to in the central banks artificially inflating it so much.

I was watching a video recently of the roman empire currency where they used to clip coins and melt down the clippings in order to inflate the currency - exactly what has been done since fiat hasn't been backed by anything of real value bitcoin is the same but its limited.
You say fiat isn't backed by anything of real value. For you Gold is this value, am I right? But has gold been backed by something? No, then how has it value? It's psycological factor, we measure everything by one unique thing so to my mind it doesn't matter if we use gold coins or paper notes. But the worst thing here is banking system, not actually fiat, the way bank systems are managed. Solution of bitcoin is that we can't create more than 21 million while governments can print as much paper as they want and cause inflation, they won't be able to do it with bitcoin.
copper member
Activity: 2856
Merit: 3071
https://bit.ly/387FXHi lightning theory
I don't think western governments like bitcoin much as the like bank.  If they like bitcoin they could have adopted it since.  I think bitcoin is been like by individuals and programmers and that is why it is very difficult to get it into mainstream financial institutions.

Quite a few international banks recognise their ledgers via blockchain technology in order to send money representing assets to each other so it can't be said that banks hate bitcoin they just don't want other people to use it.

Although the ones who want to escape the banks clutches and the ones who want to program with it or see it as an innovative thing. If you don't understand how it works at its fundamental level when you buy in to bitcoin (sure its what we do with cash) but when people do it with bitcoin it does show what they're trying to escape... Especially in countries with hyperinflation as mentioned above.
sr. member
Activity: 882
Merit: 269
I don't think western governments like bitcoin much as the like bank.  If they like bitcoin they could have adopted it since.  I think bitcoin is been like by individuals and programmers and that is why it is very difficult to get it into mainstream financial institutions.
hero member
Activity: 1806
Merit: 672
A lot countries have suffered from over printing their currency too much Venezuela is the most recent country to to be victims of their own currency. The thing is fiat currency is backed by their country's economy with all countries have debt to each other printing more money won't be a solution as hyperinflation will just be there problem. So if they want to make their local fiat currency more valuable all they have to do is to pat off their debt aa well as improve their economy.it may look crazy but the world markets are also the ones valuing our money and the same principle for supply and demand is applicable.
hero member
Activity: 1190
Merit: 541
Well, when it comes to crypto currency and the western world, we will say it is a 50:50 thing and in has much as some prominent leaders there are serious fighting the adoption of cryto currency, many of the big time investors into the crypto market are still from there.

For fiat, it has been in existence for a very long term which is dated back centuries and it would, so as long as technology awareness is concerned, general acceptance and illiteracy in most part of the world, it might be difficult for crypto currency to put an end to FIAT, it can only be an optional one.
hero member
Activity: 2926
Merit: 640
I don't think the government has big issue with the technology, but you should know that the central bank controls the government and they will do all what the central banks tell them to do. Bitcoin is one of the biggest threat to the financial system of today making it a big threat to central banks and other financial institutions that have been extorting our money and making us poor just for them to remain in power and control over us. I know they won't want to accept it, but I can assure them that it's not a choice but a must.
copper member
Activity: 2856
Merit: 3071
https://bit.ly/387FXHi lightning theory


Which country is this? I remember in 2014/2015 my central bank wanted to make a cryptocurrency which is kinda funny to look back on because the generally haven't done much other than cancel the idea.

Also we were mainly discussing western governments so that's what prions would be referring to. Non-western governments have taken a diverse approach to cryptos.
hero member
Activity: 1148
Merit: 528
This is not so simple. Some governments maybe don't like banks very much but they are still depending on them because that is how economy is functioning. Western governments mainly support progress and Bitcoin is that category. They also realize that cryptocurrencies have become inevitable part of society and they should accept it or at least not ban it. But they will never replace fiat with Bitcoin or any other cryptocurrency, that is the truth.

So to speak, governments have been tolerating them. I think governments don't like banks very much because of how they don't have complete control or authority among them. In retrospect, they are able to circumvent the government's clutches in some ways. Also, the government has no choice but to rely on banks.

With regards to regulating crypto, I believe that governments have no choice but to tolerate them as well since they cannot eliminate its presence in the country. Some have chosen to completely ban it to avoid complications of regulating or compliance but others have chosen to impose their own regulations for bitcoin so that they may have some control over its adoption.
That is for the countries who are not corrupt and has transparency to the fullest in their system but for most government who does not operate a transparent system, they are the bank themselves which makes the government the problem of the financial institutions and that is why they are fighting against the crypto currency system because the fiat system pay them more.

We have a lot of government that dislike the crypto system, like in my country, the government are the central bank themselves and they quite kick against the adoption of this so called crypto but it is just a matter of time before they have no choice than to prefer it to the banking system.
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1179
as for banks, the problem has always been with the corruption of them. they seem to be doing whatever they want and get away with it too with bailouts like after they ruined the global economy in 2008.
It really does seem like governments don't care about this, because banks messing up gives them reason to fine them with mega sums, and the banks themselves seem fine with it as well.

Overall, the profits they managed to gain by breaking the law has always been much higher than the fines they end up paying. It's nothing more than collateral damage for banks, which is the worst part here.

The very fact that governments know this, but still don't raise their fines to match the profit margins of the banks they fine says enough. As long as this doesn't change banks will continue ripping people off.
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1057
Economists and governments are different. There are two types of economists, one is acedemist that is working in a college and writing thesis paper on how economy works and they are very aware of the fact that our current financial system can't be sustained and that is why we constantly have resets (financial crisis) that destroys all stocks at once and starts to go back up, if one stock goes down people leave it and it goes down even more destroying the company but if all stocks go down there is no reason to switch stocks.

Nonetheless, some economists are working in banks which they know the same things others know but they know they will be getting richer and richer on this unsustainable system, so even tough it makes poor people poorer they know it makes them richer.

Governments only care what benefits them, if crypto benefits them than they love it, if banks benefits them than they love that.
legendary
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1427
A much bigger threat than government bans is global economic crash/depression. I'm not sure what will happen to speculative assets in that situation. I guess it might depend whether fiat currencies stay viable in the next big crash.

That's going to be a fascinating event for sure. I'm afraid that if a global ecomical depression hits the world too soon, Bitcoin will be sold just as hard as anything else that's speculative, which is why I am perfectly happy with relatively strong economies right now. Bitcoin really needs time to actually become Gold 2.0 and it seems that it has all the time it needs to do so.

Sure, one could say that even Gold might be sold off hard, but Bitcoin being accepted as Gold 2.0 severely increases the odds of it to outperform everything around it instead of being dumped without a second thought.
legendary
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1137
exactly what has been done since fiat hasn't been backed by anything of real value bitcoin is the same but its limited.

i still don't get why this argument is a thing! why does currency have to be backed by anything to have value? it has never been like this! from early days people have used a lot of things a currency in the sense of "medium of exchange". for example ages ago "arrows" were used as a currency! they weren't backed by anything. but they had value because of their utility. and of course there was a finite number of them in circulation too.
that also explains bitcoin very well.

as for banks, the problem has always been with the corruption of them. they seem to be doing whatever they want and get away with it too with bailouts like after they ruined the global economy in 2008.
legendary
Activity: 1442
Merit: 1025
As per history, always western leads and rest are following Cheesy.

Due to higher literacy rate and readiness to adopt new things and more importantly modernized thinking, western people and government are marching forward always to new revolutions and this may continue in crypto adoptions too.

For example, when almost all the countries were silent or neural on bitcoins by 2014 after bitcoin peaked above $1000 for the first time, only few European countries opened their stand about cryptos like they declared that they will treat cryptos as asset whereas most eastern countries are not doing anything about cryptos even in 2019.

most economists say that fiat is a scam or a lie as the central banks are selling people a promise we will pay them back.
Yes, it is a lie with the hope of infinite "hand-over" among citizens so that never need to pay back.

fiat came in when it was needed to help solve the issues of carrying heavy gold for big transactions but now we have bitcoin there seems to be no other real use for it once bitcoin gets adopted by the masses.
For the exact same reason on-which fiat replaced gold, now it is time for bitcoin to replace fiat. History repeats itself.
sr. member
Activity: 2520
Merit: 280
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
I've been questioning this for a while and most economists say that fiat is a scam or a lie as the central banks are selling people a promise we will pay them back.

It seems to me as if fiat came in when it was needed to help solve the issues of carrying heavy gold for big transactions but now we have bitcoin there seems to be no other real use for it once bitcoin gets adopted by the masses (or other cryptocurrency).

It feels like fiat was made by the government without them knowing the risk as to what it would potentially lead to in the central banks artificially inflating it so much.

I was watching a video recently of the roman empire currency where they used to clip coins and melt down the clippings in order to inflate the currency - exactly what has been done since fiat hasn't been backed by anything of real value bitcoin is the same but its limited.
It is a known fact that central banks were trying to be their slaves by making deflation increases every year so we need to work more to pay the debts we got.

But people here understand that why we need bitcoin that fiat?

No,most of the people here to make more fiat money by suing th volatility so how it will get mass adoption.We need to let them know importance of decentralization.
Pages:
Jump to: