Topic: Do bounty hunters understand cryptocurrency more than investors? - page 4. (Read 2420 times)
September 25, 2018, 09:38:34 AM
Actually yes bounty hunters choose goof projects for work because they have to work in it for 3 months and after a lot of experience bounty hunters are now become so sensible and wise they are aware about every up and down and icos very well I am also here for 3 months only but now I understand every up and down.
September 25, 2018, 05:17:49 AM
I think that investors more carefully choose a project that is studied by a large number of criteria. I believe that investors and bounty hunters should conduct a strict selection of projects, because they can lose time and money if the project is not successful. In any case, it is important to have experience and carefully study the project, this will reduce the risk of falling into fraud.
September 25, 2018, 05:05:58 AM
I think that it is impossible to judge knowledge only by the availability of capital. Perhaps you are the first bounty hunter who chose a successful project, and then an investor. In any case, everyone is at risk. Only one loses his time, other money.
all need knowledge in determining a project to be chosen. in fact, either the bounty hunter or the investor will definitely choose the project with the best. here investors are more risky because they can lose their money, if they are wrong in choosing a project. if the bounty hunter will also lose their time in work. I think both need knowledge about crypto to be able to choose a project. September 25, 2018, 04:56:55 AM
I think that is only partially, because many bounty hunters are only "origin" in participating for projects, because many projects fail after they follow, I think that is an indication that not all bounty hunters have experience in determining ICO projects.
September 25, 2018, 04:44:06 AM
Help very much help, the more hunters involved in the project, the safer project. I follow this indicator, it's part of my analysis, which I conduct every time when you choose ICO.
September 25, 2018, 04:27:22 AM
That's true. But this question applies only to bounty hunters who already have experience of trading on the exchange and investing in ICO projects. Newbie bounty hunter usually gets a poor understanding of the ICO projects, and participate in the bounty campaigns only because of the possible rewards.
September 25, 2018, 04:14:05 AM
Investors are more experienced in the field and tend to spend more time studying whether the project is worth investing in. Bounty hunters also can't always be sure the project is a scam.
September 25, 2018, 04:10:59 AM
That may be true with some bounty hunters, but not all. Some bountie hunters do not seem to have much idea of crypto and just want to make money without really understanding crypto.
September 25, 2018, 04:01:45 AM
I think that it is impossible to judge knowledge only by the availability of capital. Perhaps you are the first bounty hunter who chose a successful project, and then an investor. In any case, everyone is at risk. Only one loses his time, other money.
September 25, 2018, 03:59:35 AM
I think the several experiences in working with different projects has made bounty hunters very experienced. They can determine a good project from the start but some of the investors are just new and do not really determine a promising project from a scam and in the end scammers run away with their money. So bounty hunters who invest in ICOs will never invest if they do not trust the project.
I think those bounty hunters who started in 2018 will not invest in ICO for long time because they see how the token price of most project goes down right after listing.
September 25, 2018, 03:51:09 AM
I am not thinking so. investors are much more knowledgeable. they are prepared and know the risks they will face because it concerns the problem of the capital they provide investment in ICO. If only haphazardly chose the ICO is certainly already clear risk they are going to get, so at least they will be more selective. bounty hunter also sometimes have an analysis in choosing the bounty they would follow, but many were only joined suppose based solely on the best manager or simply view the site rating ICO without any analysis.
September 25, 2018, 03:09:26 AM
I think the several experiences in working with different projects has made bounty hunters very experienced. They can determine a good project from the start but some of the investors are just new and do not really determine a promising project from a scam and in the end scammers run away with their money. So bounty hunters who invest in ICOs will never invest if they do not trust the project.
I think those bounty hunters who started in 2018 will not invest in ICO for long time because they see how the token price of most project goes down right after listing.
September 25, 2018, 03:05:19 AM
I think the several experiences in working with different projects has made bounty hunters very experienced. They can determine a good project from the start but some of the investors are just new and do not really determine a promising project from a scam and in the end scammers run away with their money. So bounty hunters who invest in ICOs will never invest if they do not trust the project.
I think those bounty hunters who started in 2018 will not invest in ICO for long time because they see how the token price of most project goes down right after listing. September 25, 2018, 03:00:02 AM
Depends on the type. If it is an experienced, not spammer bounty hunter, then yes, that person can have a great feeling on investments.
But that does not mean that an investor cannot have deeper insights, or can judge better from the same information.
However, I feel that if you are translating, you are essentially understanding and translating the whole whitepaper, making it possibly the best form to understand the whitepaper. And you can extract various information about how it's written, what is emphasized, how its phrased, the effort put into it, etc.
While investors usually don't go so deep, but their reviewings cover much more projects at the same time, essentially making their readings more effective. So its hard to judge, because if an experienced investor put plenty of time into evaluating a single project, may understand it deeper and judge it better than a bounty hunter .
But that does not mean that an investor cannot have deeper insights, or can judge better from the same information.
However, I feel that if you are translating, you are essentially understanding and translating the whole whitepaper, making it possibly the best form to understand the whitepaper. And you can extract various information about how it's written, what is emphasized, how its phrased, the effort put into it, etc.
While investors usually don't go so deep, but their reviewings cover much more projects at the same time, essentially making their readings more effective. So its hard to judge, because if an experienced investor put plenty of time into evaluating a single project, may understand it deeper and judge it better than a bounty hunter .
September 25, 2018, 02:50:32 AM
I think the several experiences in working with different projects has made bounty hunters very experienced. They can determine a good project from the start but some of the investors are just new and do not really determine a promising project from a scam and in the end scammers run away with their money. So bounty hunters who invest in ICOs will never invest if they do not trust the project.
there is no definite measure in every comparison between investors or bounty hunters. Of course all of that depends on one's experience and how you respond to every event that makes knowledge and insight in this industry. I am a prize hunter including investing in altcoin or ico.
September 25, 2018, 02:47:32 AM
In my own opinion, bounty hunters understand crypto because they have the experience on working with such big projects and mostly bounty hunters are also an investors. There are some investors who invest their money without any hesitation in themselves even the project/s they are investing are not recommended by other people. I think it is better for them to study first the project/s before investing.
September 25, 2018, 02:42:23 AM
On my on understanding i will say that bounties hunters understand cryptocurrency very well more than investor's why because bounty hunters alway's like to study more about crypto for them to make more money but investor's are just after the money the are putting in it only.
September 24, 2018, 10:08:17 PM
at its core is probably the same. What is done by the bounty hunter and investors will be looking to analyze the ICO best with views from various aspects. but many also acknowledged not all Bounty Hunter has a good analysis or even just join the lively bounty or followed by a high rank to make it look convincing. So overall I think investors understand more about crypto because they were ready to risk their capital.
September 24, 2018, 09:37:16 PM
TO an extent, I would say no. Many of these investors have seen a lot of things in this market. So many of them have made a lot of choices, both good and bad, and they have learnt and unlearnt so many things in the process. Meanwhile, Many bounty hunters on the other side, only have people's story to tell, they have not witnessed another level of the market, and as such, I can't say that they understand the market better.
September 18, 2018, 12:17:32 AM
I think both must understand cryptocurrency, not just bounty hunters or investors who understand cryptocurrency. Investors need to understand and research Crypto first, so the bounty hunter must do research before joining the campaign. because now a lot of projects are scam, all need to be careful in making choices.
Jump to: