Do bounty participants enjoy longer or shorter campaigns? - page 2.

wumBowo

sr. member

Activity: 770

Merit: 298

tozex.io

Quote from: chermtaty46 on May 18, 2019, 01:50:02 PM

I understand that short-term companies are preferable. But, the number of participants also significantly affects the amount of remuneration. Or does it depend on the type of payment?

if you're talking the campaigns which using 'percentage' instead of fixed rate, sure the number of participants will gives an affect of how much bounty participants will receive.
Type of payments also included on the factor since most of campaign that using BTC always give a fixed rate payments while the other is based on stakes which bounty participants earned during campaigns

chermtaty46

newbie

Activity: 6

Merit: 0

I understand that short-term companies are preferable. But, the number of participants also significantly affects the amount of remuneration. Or does it depend on the type of payment?

wumBowo

sr. member

Activity: 770

Merit: 298

tozex.io

Depends, i'm enjoying the shorter campaigns once especially if the payment type is the coin/token which belongs to their project. Otherwise, if the payment is an established coin such as BTC/ETH and we received it weekly like a signature campaings on sub-board services i prefer a long-term campaigns

Quote

What's your most disliked type of bounty campaign?

A campaigns which require a weekly report on their threads instead of using a handy report forms like google form

erikalui

legendary

Activity: 2632

Merit: 1094

Quote from: posi on May 16, 2019, 09:37:28 AM

How long or short a bounty campaign is, is not what bounty participants enjoy, for what they enjoy is the team treating them like a human and co-worker. Besides, they like the team to keep their own side of the bargain in terms of making payment in time with keeping to the rules and regulation consider no KYC issue.

You spoke my mind. I hate the fact that the teams treat the participants as some beggars begging for money when infact we are working in their promotional campaign. They just ban users from their telegram groups who complain about a valid issue and don't even answer them via a personal message. Even if the team is working positively towards their project, such rudeness shows they can't be trusted for long.

Avirunes

legendary

Activity: 3094

Merit: 1472

Quote from: r1a2y3m4 on May 18, 2019, 11:37:14 AM

Quote from: NovaToken Community on May 14, 2019, 11:59:12 AM

Bonus: What's your most disliked type of bounty campaign?

I don't like bounty campaign combining their bounty thread with their announcement thread. Their announcements are being spammed by the social media participants.

Just report them to moderators if you happen to find something like that. There is a whole section dedicated for bounty threads to be posted and yet they are doing something like this in order to get some bumps.

r1a2y3m4

full member

Activity: 504

Merit: 127

Match365> be a part of 150BTC inviting bonus

Bounty participants enjoy longer campaigns only if the bounty is big. But if the bounty is small then most probably bounty hunters wanted it as a short term campaign.

Although we have signature campaigns. For these signature campaigns, participants wanted it to lasts because it's a weekly payment and you know that these campaigns are paying.

Quote from: NovaToken Community on May 14, 2019, 11:59:12 AM

Bonus: What's your most disliked type of bounty campaign?

I don't like bounty campaign combining their bounty thread with their announcement thread. Their announcements are being spammed by the social media participants.

Akonobea

member

Activity: 72

Merit: 10

I am a bounty hunters but I enjoy short campaigns more than long ones. There are some campaigns that turn out to be scam or do not reach their soft cap. Imagine if you participated in a campaign like this, you have wasted a lot of time and resources.

r1s2g3

sr. member

Activity: 742

Merit: 395

I am alive but in hibernation.

Quote from: NovaToken Community on May 14, 2019, 11:59:12 AM

Hello all,

Looking for some feedback on this particular topic. In general as a participant in bounty campaigns would you rather have one that:

1) is short in length but may provide limited opportunity to earn coins or tokens

Depend upon your time, if you are going to be busy in next month or so, you will like to take part in short campaign.

Quote from: NovaToken Community on May 14, 2019, 11:59:12 AM

2) one that drags on for longer time periods (up to a year) but give you the opportunity to earn a larger share of the total bounty fund

Let me know your thoughts and why!

If you are paying weekly in some liquid coin and token then people will love to do long campaigns otherwise it is waste of year.

Quote from: NovaToken Community on May 14, 2019, 11:59:12 AM

Bonus: What's your most disliked type of bounty campaign?

Bounty campaigns distributing their worthless token in name of bounty.

posi

hero member

Activity: 2268

Merit: 579

Vave.com - Crypto Casino

How long or short a bounty campaign is, is not what bounty participants enjoy, for what they enjoy is the team treating them like a human and co-worker. Besides, they like the team to keep their own side of the bargain in terms of making payment in time with keeping to the rules and regulation consider no KYC issue.

Indamuck

hero member

Activity: 1120

Merit: 554

There have been a lot of successful "long" running funding rounds. Even though I don't like EOS, they raised billions of dollars over a year. That is very long compared to these other projects that are only running initial investment for a couple of months.

joshy23

sr. member

Activity: 1078

Merit: 256

Quote from: Commie on May 16, 2019, 04:36:07 AM

it's hard to say basing just on the length. Most campaigns pay only at the end of them so entering a long one (which I prefer, taking all other factors into account) gives you higher risk of not being paid or significant reduction of your payout, as with time long campaigns tend to get more and more participants. My ideal campaign would be a) run by a very reputable manager, b) with limited number of participants and c) 1-3 months in length.

Learned from what happened with those previous long term projects, most of them turned to a scam or not being listed from the exchange,
so if giving a chance it's much better to join in a short term campaigns so you can see the results right away and move to another after.

CryptopreneurBrainboss

legendary

Activity: 2408

Merit: 4282

eXch.cx - Automatic crypto Swap Exchange.

As a bounty manager one of my criteria for accepting future bounty campaigns to manage will be, they have to be short term campaigns and if the project intend hiring me for longer campaign period then it'll be carried out in batches (payment to be made after completion of each batch maximum 2-3months for each batch). I don't fancy long campaigns beside in the Altcoin market, hype plays a roll in the success of your project (that's just facts) so if you're to give a reason to the bounty participants (convincing them) into investing in your project, capitalizing on the hype opportunity and treating the bounty participants right by paying them on time will go a long way. That's the advantages of short term campaigns, longer campaign will get them frustrated which will lead to selling your tokens the moment they can laid their hands on it.

Kasabus

hero member

Activity: 2814

Merit: 576

Long bounty campaign is boring for me, so I don't enjoy it.
As a bounty hunter, if we were given a chance to choose between a long and short period bounty campaign, we will surely
choose a short term so we can sell our reward and enjoy it right away.

Commie

full member

Activity: 621

Merit: 108

it's hard to say basing just on the length. Most campaigns pay only at the end of them so entering a long one (which I prefer, taking all other factors into account) gives you higher risk of not being paid or significant reduction of your payout, as with time long campaigns tend to get more and more participants. My ideal campaign would be a) run by a very reputable manager, b) with limited number of participants and c) 1-3 months in length.

orions.belt19

full member

Activity: 686

Merit: 146

Campaigns that stretches for longer periods are preferable unless the payment will be made by the time the campaign ends. The reputation of the campaign or its manager also helps. If the payment will be made in tokens, ETH or any other coin asides from BTC, then I'd probably prefer a shorter campaign.

What I don't like about a campaign is when it requires a ridiculous amount of posts/has no limit/promotes spamming or even when they allow spam posters to participate. Those who spam should not be given the opportunity to earn from it, it's like paying someone to trash a place.

Ipwich

hero member

Activity: 1050

Merit: 529

Student Coin

That depends on the reward, if the reward is not big enough then of course I would prefer for a short term.
Long term campaign will gain a lot of participants overtime, hence that will result to a decrease of stakes or reward.
Further, there's a lot of opportunity in the market, so it's good if we can also participate on other project.

1 month bounty is already good for me, some smart bounty hunters are really clever, the moment they sees the project is getting better, they then joined even in the last week, and these people are high rank so this will result to a significant decrease of reward.

In signature campaign, bounty, those who have higher ranks will enjoy the benefit, as they do the same job with the low rank, but they earn better stakes.

Pmalek

legendary

Activity: 2730

Merit: 7065

I don't take part in bounties except my signature campaign but if I was a bounty hunter I would prefer a bounty that pays their participants in the coins they raise, or at least a part of the bounty pool. Meaning, BTC, ETH, LTC or whatever funding options are available. That would give legitimacy to the project. Unfortunately there are almost no projects that do that and that is why I don't like bounties. There are also no weekly or at least monthly payments and no guarantees participants will ever get paid.

If it were up to me I would make it a rule that parts of the bounty allocation has to be escrowed in BTC/ETH as a guarantee that bounty participants will get paid.

jossiel

hero member

Activity: 3150

Merit: 636

DGbet.fun - Crypto Sportsbook

The 2nd choice would be favorable for them. As they dont have to keep on joining and enrolling different bounty from time to time. For a year they will be secured with that bounty as long as it is legit and theu will pay with a worthy token.

But the problem has been said that many bounties now that are likely to run for a long time, and at the very end of the campaign no payment will be sent.

rosezionjohn

sr. member

Activity: 882

Merit: 301

The major concern of bounty participants nowadays is working months on a bounty and ends up getting paid with coins or tokens that's worth a few pennies. Notice that some long running campaigns were now abandoned. I guess hunters have learned their lessons.

I personally prefer shorter campaigns with a decent pool. But if I find a campaign that's really good, I'd be fine with a 15 week campaign (max).

Quote from: NovaToken Community on May 14, 2019, 11:59:12 AM

Bonus: What's your most disliked type of bounty campaign?

Campaigns that keeps on extending.
Campaigns that runs until ICO ends but with an ICO that has no specific dates.
Campaigns that adds rules during or at the end of the bounty like KYC or some kind of exchange voting shit.

RapTarX

hero member

Activity: 1358

Merit: 851

In campaign of ICO, I guess members want a shorter period because there's no cash and it's boring to work at a stress without any payment.
On the other hand, if someone is in a campaign which pays BTC, they will likely to wish the campaign run long. It's a hassle to switch campaign to campaign. Better to stick with one, although pay rate matter sometimes.

Topic: Do bounty participants enjoy longer or shorter campaigns? - page 2. (Read 594 times)