Pages:
Author

Topic: Do I need ICO? - page 2. (Read 947 times)

legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 1000
June 21, 2020, 08:52:28 PM
#76
if from my observation people only like ICO to the extent of 20%, 80% is to follow IEO in large exchanges,
because ICO has a bad history of investors will not take the same risk
Yaps, you are right. should follow the direction of the current trend like IEO. but if the project is in the development stage as the OP said, doing a private sale first would be better for funding a project. because the project is still not ready to be launched to the public.
but it would be nice for the team to have their own funds for development instead of doing ico and waiting a long time, because right now investors already don't believe in the existence of ico, there is too much manipulation of fund income on the website
jr. member
Activity: 784
Merit: 6
June 21, 2020, 08:16:01 PM
#75
if from my observation people only like ICO to the extent of 20%, 80% is to follow IEO in large exchanges,
because ICO has a bad history of investors will not take the same risk
that's quite interesting to see that and i guess if we can take a conclusion from there if OP needs IEO rather than ICO to give more guarantee for him to get a better profit. So many people have been migrating from ICO to the IEO and so far they have been getting a lot of profit too.
The like for ICO has seriously diminished. Although, the name ICO is nothing bad. It is those who use it for their bad scheme that made of bad. Actually, it could have been the best, because when it first came in and then , when developers really meant business, everything was working fine. What happens to ICO  is already happening to IEO, except for the intervention of some reputable exchanges
full member
Activity: 896
Merit: 108
June 21, 2020, 06:37:04 PM
#74
Investors have lost confidence in the ICO, especially in projects that are still in the initial stages.  you better rely on the connections you have, making a solid and strong team from your environment.  Make a plan and a mature strategy, then submit to the relevant company to get support.  With partner support, you can make stronger steps.  This opens up opportunities for developing projects and communities.  If the funds collected independently and the support of partners are sufficient, they can submit offers for potential exchange.
full member
Activity: 573
Merit: 102
June 21, 2020, 06:16:03 PM
#73
I ’m a technician, but I do n’t know how to promote it.
I hope that like Satoshi Nakamoto, there is no ICO, no pre-mining, but no one will develop for free. All need money.
The isomorphic multi-chain solution was designed by myself. The core technology has been implemented and verified to be feasible.

I can complete the technical project by myself.
I have developed the first technical version and will finish the second technical version.
The next plan is an application, which requires a formal team and a lot of funding.
The project is online more than half a year, but the promotion is slow.

It's really sad that their isn't a designed working structure or readily available angel investors to always help out team with good products but have no much funds to better develop their product as well to provide the need promotions and packaging to better sell their products to the public. You really need to raise some money and look for range exchanges such as probits and otgers to help u raise funds through ieo
member
Activity: 1165
Merit: 78
June 21, 2020, 06:04:17 PM
#72
I ’m a technician, but I do n’t know how to promote it.
I hope that like Satoshi Nakamoto, there is no ICO, no pre-mining, but no one will develop for free. All need money.
The isomorphic multi-chain solution was designed by myself. The core technology has been implemented and verified to be feasible.

I can complete the technical project by myself.
I have developed the first technical version and will finish the second technical version.
The next plan is an application, which requires a formal team and a lot of funding.
The project is online more than half a year, but the promotion is slow.

from all you've done so far.. I dont think theres need for initial coin offerings.. what you need is simply more exposure of your product and how to attract new investors.. or probably private sales (funding) Is another option... Goodluck all thesame
It not possible to attract the investors if the project team dont have an angel investors. IEO is the only option if the project is  own by a common person.
sr. member
Activity: 784
Merit: 251
June 21, 2020, 05:24:12 PM
#71
if from my observation people only like ICO to the extent of 20%, 80% is to follow IEO in large exchanges,
because ICO has a bad history of investors will not take the same risk
Yaps, you are right. should follow the direction of the current trend like IEO. but if the project is in the development stage as the OP said, doing a private sale first would be better for funding a project. because the project is still not ready to be launched to the public.
legendary
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1023
June 21, 2020, 03:36:32 PM
#70
My suggestions will be different. How far you go, you have to trust your project. Now you need a good team and funds to present an application. I don't think ICO could be worth the next plans. Make a good team, then let's try for IEO. Before IEO, try to make a good partnership. Or you can do more development, ICO could be successful in future.
If you have a great project then you can raise the money to complete the project giving a share to the investors and that is the base for any ICO projects and we had a wild ride in the past 3 years in the ICO market and can you personally pinpoint a dozen projects that fulfilled what they started and profiting from the idea they created, i bet you cannot find many and now people are turning to IEO and we will face the same fate. There is no doubt that these project developers are able to raise money but what is the end result after collecting the money, it is not that promising.
sr. member
Activity: 978
Merit: 250
June 21, 2020, 02:52:17 PM
#69
My suggestions will be different. How far you go, you have to trust your project. Now you need a good team and funds to present an application. I don't think ICO could be worth the next plans. Make a good team, then let's try for IEO. Before IEO, try to make a good partnership. Or you can do more development, ICO could be successful in future.
sr. member
Activity: 2016
Merit: 322
June 21, 2020, 02:07:53 PM
#68
if from my observation people only like ICO to the extent of 20%, 80% is to follow IEO in large exchanges,
because ICO has a bad history of investors will not take the same risk
99% of people in this market will stay away from ICOs. There are so many ICo scams in this market and people have seen that, if they intend to hold an ICO at the current stage, the project will surely fail. Come and agree on exchanges, which is the only way to raise money from the community
You may assume about 100% of people as well. Because, if there could be any of forum members still prefer to contribute on ICO then they must be shill of the same projects and must be advertising themselves to lure other naive investors. This had happened many times. Those shills are here to misguide many people here hence we should not listen to them and should not include those exceptional people as true investors.

I am not seeing any possibilities for ICOs to be returning; because there are enough exchanges to support the real projects hence if devs are really serious about their project then they may approach only exchanges to start with their IEO rather then risking on ICO with this community. Only devs who are new to this forum may try ICO here without knowing what happened on this forum few years back.
jr. member
Activity: 40
Merit: 1
June 21, 2020, 01:57:21 PM
#67
The starting up phase of a project is always the most difficult and it could be lonely if you carry out all the tasks yourself, coupled with the fact that you can't do it all. The interest of a team needs to be put into consideration as their input has a long way to go in the success of the project.
sr. member
Activity: 1092
Merit: 284
June 21, 2020, 12:54:48 PM
#66
if from my observation people only like ICO to the extent of 20%, 80% is to follow IEO in large exchanges,
because ICO has a bad history of investors will not take the same risk
99% of people in this market will stay away from ICOs. There are so many ICo scams in this market and people have seen that, if they intend to hold an ICO at the current stage, the project will surely fail. Come and agree on exchanges, which is the only way to raise money from the community
ICO is no longer interested by investors even though they have succeeded in raising funds from the ICO, the team will be crazy about the money that can be obtained and will run away now. I don't know about future trends about sales after IEO.
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 501
June 21, 2020, 12:02:31 PM
#65
if from my observation people only like ICO to the extent of 20%, 80% is to follow IEO in large exchanges,
because ICO has a bad history of investors will not take the same risk
99% of people in this market will stay away from ICOs. There are so many ICo scams in this market and people have seen that, if they intend to hold an ICO at the current stage, the project will surely fail. Come and agree on exchanges, which is the only way to raise money from the community
full member
Activity: 2324
Merit: 175
June 21, 2020, 11:59:00 AM
#64
I ’m a technician, but I do n’t know how to promote it.
I hope that like Satoshi Nakamoto, there is no ICO, no pre-mining, but no one will develop for free. All need money.
The isomorphic multi-chain solution was designed by myself. The core technology has been implemented and verified to be feasible.

I can complete the technical project by myself.
I have developed the first technical version and will finish the second technical version.
The next plan is an application, which requires a formal team and a lot of funding.
The project is online more than half a year, but the promotion is slow.

ICO is a big mess now, even good projects are failing because investors do not want to be part of ICO when investing, but you also need to showcase your project, if they find good in your project then you can do private or invite angel investors to look on your project and invest.
sr. member
Activity: 2268
Merit: 275
June 21, 2020, 11:55:15 AM
#63
the thing you need to do is form a team in advance for the development of the project that you created, because in the project there are several fields that are needed, such as promotion, marketing, coin making and several other fields needed for the success of a project.
Still, if you do not have expertise in the field, it will be a useless project. Every new project is certainly a mature and mentally strong mind to the pressure from its community, so all of that must be prepared in advance.
member
Activity: 350
Merit: 11
June 21, 2020, 11:22:19 AM
#62
the thing you need to do is form a team in advance for the development of the project that you created, because in the project there are several fields that are needed, such as promotion, marketing, coin making and several other fields needed for the success of a project.
sr. member
Activity: 1183
Merit: 251
June 21, 2020, 10:07:02 AM
#61
if from my observation people only like ICO to the extent of 20%, 80% is to follow IEO in large exchanges,
because ICO has a bad history of investors will not take the same risk
that's quite interesting to see that and i guess if we can take a conclusion from there if OP needs IEO rather than ICO to give more guarantee for him to get a better profit. So many people have been migrating from ICO to the IEO and so far they have been getting a lot of profit too.
full member
Activity: 1330
Merit: 100
C O M B O
June 20, 2020, 12:22:07 PM
#60
if from my observation people only like ICO to the extent of 20%, 80% is to follow IEO in large exchanges,
because ICO has a bad history of investors will not take the same risk
copper member
Activity: 351
Merit: 1
June 20, 2020, 12:12:59 PM
#59
I ’m a technician, but I do n’t know how to promote it.
I hope that like Satoshi Nakamoto, there is no ICO, no pre-mining, but no one will develop for free. All need money.
The isomorphic multi-chain solution was designed by myself. The core technology has been implemented and verified to be feasible.

I can complete the technical project by myself.
I have developed the first technical version and will finish the second technical version.
The next plan is an application, which requires a formal team and a lot of funding.
The project is online more than half a year, but the promotion is slow.

from all you've done so far.. I dont think theres need for initial coin offerings.. what you need is simply more exposure of your product and how to attract new investors.. or probably private sales (funding) Is another option... Goodluck all thesame
full member
Activity: 1050
Merit: 100
June 20, 2020, 11:22:27 AM
#58
Many projects giving fake promising then after they're getting scamming. So investors do not want trust ico even i would like ieo. At least if you need some funds for increasing development of your products. Even i can't imagine it because this time you can't make many investors i hope.
Do not get your hopes up in crypto if you do not want to experience disappointment, because IEO alone is not enough to prove a project is valid or not, because many new tokens that are born by the project have decreased prices to the root after being listed.
sr. member
Activity: 2030
Merit: 269
June 20, 2020, 11:49:10 AM
#58
As you can see a lot of people are commenting about you not pushing with your ICO, you can do IEO or private funding or gamble with your own money if the project is really that good it will take off, it will gain a lot of supporters and people will be in a hurry to be part of the project but right now ICO is being shun by investors..
Pages:
Jump to: