Good question, I would encourage you to post it in the official thread as well.
First of all, 'several months' may indeed be 'a few weeks'. We don't know. Like I said, 100TH is already planning on starting deployment with these chips next week. It is less and less likely there will be delays, but the contract states September so that I won't be over-promising anything.
Second, my bond pays a bonus which is most likely going to be 1.25 months of mining revenue (or just over 5 weeks). This is the likely avenue, but as someone pointed out, if the miner performs above specs (like most ASIC devices) that bonus is higher. At a 10% higher rate, the bonus is closer to 2 months of bonus dividends, but not that this will be dividends from the launch month.
Third, when I announced this asset, the competing assets immediately dropped (TAT.VM was trading at just under 0.7 the day before I made the announcement) so the asset pricing included a discount compared to other assets. It is not unlikely that people are bidding down those assets because they know my asset is coming.
With regards to DMS.Mining, that is a bit of a strange asset that is claimed to behave like a PMB but does so only in terms of dividends. Because of the way it is issued, it will actually carry a double exposure to price changes because those that buy .Purchase gets one vote for PMB and one vote against PMB; they cast two votes effectively. Thus, prices will move more rapidly with the DMS.* assets, and investors need to be extra careful if they plan on mitigating risk by selling at a certain level.
Essentially, my asset is better priced and less risky than other assets, but is essentially (and different from other mining contracts) a bet on how quickly Bitfury and his companions get their chips to market.
.b
You call $20 USD per G/hashrate , sold by 20X at $400 per G/hash is good investment for people???
OMG, You are making huge benefit out of those people....This why I am posting here.