Topic: Do you agree with Ripple? (Read 232 times)
It seems to me Ripple makes a mistake trying to carry out this analogy with other cryptocurrencies. It is a standalone project and should be developed independently.
I think it's a coin with fantastic opportunities and potential, with banks already adopting them and so on.
BUT, it's the whole meaning and ideology behind Ripple I don't really agree with. The centralization nature, for example, and that it'll probably be the banks that will end up using them mostly.
What about you? Agree? Disagree? Thoughts?
I agree with you that Ripple is a fantastic and promising coin. as well as the benefits gained by having the coin is also quite a lot. so I really support Ripple. BUT, it's the whole meaning and ideology behind Ripple I don't really agree with. The centralization nature, for example, and that it'll probably be the banks that will end up using them mostly.
What about you? Agree? Disagree? Thoughts?
I don't agree with Ripple. Don't like its technology as it's centralized, don't like their ideology. Don't like the fact that they are getting banks into crypto world. This should be out of banks reach. But... It's a profitable token which is good for most of us, even though the fact that it violates crypto ideology...
I totally agree, because ripple coin includes 10 biggest coins after eth.
and ripple systems have been widely used in various banks.
and ripple systems have been widely used in various banks.
I agree with XRP because of the potential that it brings
Yes I agree because this coin has the potential of having a good platform and can generate more coins because Ripple is one of the most popular currencies that has a future with a centralized nature 
I think it's a coin with fantastic opportunities and potential, with banks already adopting them and so on.
BUT, it's the whole meaning and ideology behind Ripple I don't really agree with. The centralization nature, for example, and that it'll probably be the banks that will end up using them mostly.
What about you? Agree? Disagree? Thoughts?
BUT, it's the whole meaning and ideology behind Ripple I don't really agree with. The centralization nature, for example, and that it'll probably be the banks that will end up using them mostly.
What about you? Agree? Disagree? Thoughts?
I somehow agree with you. Also, Ripple has been quite fitting for short term investments because its price point is low, which means people can get a lot of it for less as compared to those high tier or high-valued coins. The good thing about Ripple is that it can grow quite exponentially in such a quick pace that it's actually easy to dispose for profit. It's one of the better performing altcoins in the market, and although its gain is not that much, if you hold a large amount of it, then it would still be good enough as a profit if you sum it all up.
Regardless if you agree or disagree, you have to admit that even if Ripple becomes the first world-wide usable cryptocurrency, it's still good for spreading the crypto culture in the world. More people become knowledgeable, start adopting it, etc.
Regardless what we think! They are doing their job well, news about
new Ripple contracts with banks and financial institutions can be seen
almost every week.
You can check my topic, started a month ago about Ripple:
-https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2954561.msg30320139#msg30320139
You can check some of my insights. Maybe creator of this thread should
check is there some similar thread before opening new one, mine is not
the only one. In one hand that reflects growing interest in Ripple. Maybe they
are centralized but that suits to banks and still majority of earth population
have at least one account in one bank!
I think it's a coin with fantastic opportunities and potential, with banks already adopting them and so on.
BUT, it's the whole meaning and ideology behind Ripple I don't really agree with. The centralization nature, for example, and that it'll probably be the banks that will end up using them mostly.
What about you? Agree? Disagree? Thoughts?
I disagree about XRP's position in the market,this is very morelikely a digital fiat,plain and simple isnt a cryptocurrency like what these developers and its founder is claiming to be,thats bullshit cryptocurrency with banking structure is indeed worst than doge coin that is why i wont be investing to this shitcoin ever again. BUT, it's the whole meaning and ideology behind Ripple I don't really agree with. The centralization nature, for example, and that it'll probably be the banks that will end up using them mostly.
What about you? Agree? Disagree? Thoughts?
I think it's a coin with fantastic opportunities and potential, with banks already adopting them and so on.
BUT, it's the whole meaning and ideology behind Ripple I don't really agree with. The centralization nature, for example, and that it'll probably be the banks that will end up using them mostly.
What about you? Agree? Disagree? Thoughts?
I still doubt if the ripple will be a fantastic coin, because the reality is now that ripple is still one of the coins at a price that does not rise significantly enough, so maybe if the ripple shows a good rise I will try to understand and approve your intentions. BUT, it's the whole meaning and ideology behind Ripple I don't really agree with. The centralization nature, for example, and that it'll probably be the banks that will end up using them mostly.
What about you? Agree? Disagree? Thoughts?
I think it's a coin with fantastic opportunities and potential, with banks already adopting them and so on.
BUT, it's the whole meaning and ideology behind Ripple I don't really agree with. The centralization nature, for example, and that it'll probably be the banks that will end up using them mostly.
What about you? Agree? Disagree? Thoughts?
They always say that Ripple will use by banks but until now they re not implementing it. I won't be surprise if one day the banks won't use it at all. I've heard that there are banks that refuse to use it.BUT, it's the whole meaning and ideology behind Ripple I don't really agree with. The centralization nature, for example, and that it'll probably be the banks that will end up using them mostly.
What about you? Agree? Disagree? Thoughts?
I think it's a coin with fantastic opportunities and potential, with banks already adopting them and so on.
BUT, it's the whole meaning and ideology behind Ripple I don't really agree with. The centralization nature, for example, and that it'll probably be the banks that will end up using them mostly.
What about you? Agree? Disagree? Thoughts?
They always say that Ripple will use by banks but until now they re not implementing it. I won't be surprise if one day the banks won't use it at all. I've heard that there are banks that refuse to use it. BUT, it's the whole meaning and ideology behind Ripple I don't really agree with. The centralization nature, for example, and that it'll probably be the banks that will end up using them mostly.
What about you? Agree? Disagree? Thoughts?
I do not understand what you mean, but in any case I will not agree with Ripple projects, because I believe that the Ripple project does not have anything good in principle. I think that the Ripple project carries only a negative in the crypto-currencies.
I also do not like Ripple and I also think that he will not find wide use in the modern world. I think about this currency over time will simply forget how many other altcoins.
I think Ripple will never reach the price of $ 5
I think it's a coin with fantastic opportunities and potential, with banks already adopting them and so on.
BUT, it's the whole meaning and ideology behind Ripple I don't really agree with. The centralization nature, for example, and that it'll probably be the banks that will end up using them mostly.
What about you? Agree? Disagree? Thoughts?
BUT, it's the whole meaning and ideology behind Ripple I don't really agree with. The centralization nature, for example, and that it'll probably be the banks that will end up using them mostly.
What about you? Agree? Disagree? Thoughts?
I personally do not think Ripple will make a significant leap in his price, precisely because of its centralized nature and focus on the banks. That is at least my opinion.
I do not understand what you mean, but in any case I will not agree with Ripple projects, because I believe that the Ripple project does not have anything good in principle. I think that the Ripple project carries only a negative in the crypto-currencies.
I agree with you but it can't be currency and we don't see it as a currency because it is centralized, and if it is centralized, there is nothing for me, it just take advantage of blockchain technology and make profit for their company and partners.
Agreed that XRP is being widely used by many banks' customers to transfer fund to the emerging market, this don't seemed to enhance the market value of the XRP as during each transfer the bank is only holding the XRP for mere 4 seconds, besides also with the centralized system the Ripple Inc. is holding many billions number of coins and is releasing billion into the market from time to time. With centralized system the XRP is ok as long as Ripple Inc. is doing well.
I think it's a coin with fantastic opportunities and potential, with banks already adopting them and so on.
BUT, it's the whole meaning and ideology behind Ripple I don't really agree with. The centralization nature, for example, and that it'll probably be the banks that will end up using them mostly.
What about you? Agree? Disagree? Thoughts?
A lot of investors were disappointed with Ripple for a few time ago and I agree with them bcz Ripple get much more hype around it and no profitable ideas. BUT, it's the whole meaning and ideology behind Ripple I don't really agree with. The centralization nature, for example, and that it'll probably be the banks that will end up using them mostly.
What about you? Agree? Disagree? Thoughts?
Ripple is generally an anomaly among the crypto currency. No one really buys, no one really does not need, but many at the same time write about the incredibility of this currency
Let me assure you at least a half of crypto coins are just like you said. Ripple is a hyped coin but just a small number of real people owning it.
I think it's a coin with fantastic opportunities and potential, with banks already adopting them and so on.
BUT, it's the whole meaning and ideology behind Ripple I don't really agree with. The centralization nature, for example, and that it'll probably be the banks that will end up using them mostly.
What about you? Agree? Disagree? Thoughts?
BUT, it's the whole meaning and ideology behind Ripple I don't really agree with. The centralization nature, for example, and that it'll probably be the banks that will end up using them mostly.
What about you? Agree? Disagree? Thoughts?
I do not seem to agree with ripple because we know the condition of the ripple developers team a little less in believe not only that total ripple supply is also very much and too much, the possibility of price will not be very expensive.
Ripple is generally an anomaly among the crypto currency. No one really buys, no one really does not need, but many at the same time write about the incredibility of this currency
Jump to: