reanalyzing the analysis of the experts will help the gambler to have a firsthand information on the predictions and why it was kept the way it is by the expert. That would be extra work for the gambler, coupled with the amount of money he has paid to the expert. Many wouldn't want to engage into such stress again, they'll wager the amount of money that looks substantial for a big win on the prediction, because it's from an expert. The gambler would think it's accurate, then he'd definitely make it big. That's always a bad experience for gamblers in money aspect. In most case if the prediction works at some point the gambler won't stop buying the predictions. He'd stick to it despite seeing he's not winning anymore with the expert's help. It's fine that we may not mind wagering more money, even when we are losing out money.
But of what use would it be patronizing, over and over, an expert who contributes to the losses. It'll be great for the gambler to do it himself, since no difference is spotted. The player may get luckier using his prediction compared to what the expert has to offer. I've realized that gambling requires not much stress, doing lots of research and analysis. Investing little time predicting the game can be profitable than reading all the sport channels for hours trying to know what a football result will become in the next few hours. What will be of the match will be, and no amount of research would change it. The casual prediction has worked for many gamblers, including myself. Those games you thought wouldn't be positive or yield profits, ends up playing in your favor. While the ones we think is sure, ends up disappointing us, the gambler.
At least, it will increase gamblers' knowledge, which will be useful for analyzing other matches. And if they can get useful lessons, they can also improve their analytical skills to be even better because they can get lessons from other people. It may make him spend more time than usual, but it is worth doing because this can help them improve their abilities. But if they don't want to study the analysis and place their bets immediately, they won't understand what and how the person who predicted the bet can get the analysis results. But if they don't want to study this analysis, they can reduce the amount of money they bet so they won't lose as much if their chosen team loses.
Indeed, gamblers must be able to learn this analysis so that they only depend a little on other people's predictions and can search for and obtain good sources of information to provide the data they need. Obtaining this data requires time and practice to find the source of the data. Of course, by looking for the data source, they can get this information, which they can then use to analyze each match that will take place. Becoming a match analyst takes time, and you cannot get this ability quickly because we have to learn continuously to improve this ability. If they can get analysis from a pro, they will also increase their knowledge, improving their analytical skills.
Well, the truth is I'm a little more expressive about knowing who they are, do I consider them to be professionals? How do you consider yourself pre-professional? Why can someone win 10 times in a row and already say that she is a professional? I don't know, but I have a criterion that for me to be a professional is and has to fulfill only one thing, that is to make transactions, bets, whatever with money close to $1M, for me that is a professional, because risking money like that , for me it is professional, otherwise I would not consider a person professional, and even less so in gambling or in a casino, of course the same applies to people who trade, that is why I consider someone who is worse if and only If you handle that amount of money, they are not restorative to me, but considering that they are influencers, that there are many people who do not trust those people, well, it is something that I do not immediately launch into believing them, because they could be lies, Influencers base their audience on pure things that sometimes don't make much sense.
A person who can be considered a professional is that, that he has options with that particular money, if not, for me they are not, however, a person who has some good results, puts them and buys them, who made the bets , that he saw what he gained, what he lost and that his gains are greater than the losses because he is someone for me who can stop him and gives importance to his advice, otherwise I believe that he trusted my analysis more than that of another That's why when I'm in any type of bet, I always see what is most likely to fall, or if my prediction goes with the most stable standards as far as the team is concerned, then I have the best of all. The analysis does not guarantee that If you can win, it may be that something happens in a sports game that invalidates all the previous analysis because in sports sometimes extraordinary things happen.
A professional gambler is not an expert enough to win all the time whenever he wagers. But ranking them to be those who own or wager about 1m dollars can still not be right. There are several celebrity gamblers who wager huge amount of money, but only do it for fame purposes, and may not have a single interest knowing about how gambling works. Would they be considered professionals? I think such people can be tagged rich gamblers. However, one who is a professional is being expected by people to have such an amount. But somehow even if he's won a huge sum of money in the past wouldn't qualify the gambler as an expert. So, gamblers are expected to have some criteria for qualifying an expert. Like Luckmcfly does. It's a nice idea, so that you wouldn't have any reason to bother about doing that research over and over, the person you bought prediction from meets all the criteria, automatically he'd be trusted. Though nice, but the player wouldn't stay patronizing the expert forever.
Learning during the period with the professional is also important, at least to build the intelligence of the gambler. That's why the need to look into the predictions would be a better idea. Few people have access to a professional gambler who owns such influence capable to change game and provide accurate game prediction. That would have to do with an internal body. Don't seem to understand why most players who wager $1m usually win more than they lose. The limited amount of game, let's say one game, may be used to justified this in sports. But if so, players who have some substantial amount of money still wager over multiple games. If they knew or cared about winning, they can easily wager those substantial amounts in one game and maximize their profits. Or is it just some behavioral differences between the rich and low rolling gamblers.
Yes, I know what you mean, but in part I maintain my belief because as I said before, considering yourself professional is very big, I have seen some who make predictions and call themselves professional, and something that is difficult is considering yourself professional, If nothing more professional for me is to consider a person who has graduated from a university degree, and why do I know that at least 5 years have been consolidated studying, and that for me is a pre-professional, now someone who makes predictions and who has some luck, and that I have some experience because for me it is not a criterion, as I said before, for me a pre-professional person is one who manages those amounts of money, and since I know that it is very difficult for someone to manage them, well for me They are not, that is like the traders who also give signals, I have the same criteria for them, in addition to obviously having to show their previous bets and their balances, profits and losses, because only then is it a convincing way for things to be given. for good and believe them.
What I can think of so that I do this type of work is for those who want to believe in them, in fact those who have groups on telegram their great accuracy is less than 80% which for me is not profitable, because for me It is worthwhile in sports bets to have Someone who maintains above 85% accuracy in their predictions, but for that reason I better start doing my own analysis and learn more without being dependent on people who are super professionals, who, as I said before, are not They are for me, so in view of these things I consider things that way, I respect the criteria of others, plus I don't believe much in the groups that have their predictions or things like that , it seems that they don't have the assertiveness that should be at the level.
