Do you like to see an Avatar Campaign? [POLL]

abyrnes81

hero member

Activity: 714

Merit: 500

Quote from: unsoindovo on April 14, 2015, 07:43:02 AM

Quote from: redsn0w on April 12, 2015, 05:41:40 AM

I have voted yes.

Quote from: Muhammed Zakir on April 12, 2015, 05:38:23 AM

Quote from: hilariousandco on April 12, 2015, 05:34:32 AM

Why would you need one? You can see other's that have them. Would you find them annoying if multiple people have the same avatar (if you can envisage)?

Multiple having same avatars is annoying to me. If enrollee's can put like Marco does, it will be okay.

However, you might have to hire a part time designer for editing enrollee's image. Wink

I think (for example) marcotheminer or other sig campaign maintainers will allow to keep our personal avatar but we should add a bit-x "logo" to the right side of it, and this way for me it's ok. I don't think it is annoying (more than the signature) and if someone don't want to see them, he can always use an extension (like ad block) for block specific avatars.

just look at the marcotheminer avatar...
he his asking to append the same stipe with bit-x logo

It seems marco buying member avatar:

Quote from: marcotheminer on April 14, 2015, 06:39:26 AM

I'm looking for a few members that are highly active and prominent throughout the forum (a few examples that come to mind that are in my campaign are: redsn0w, MZ, notlist3d, Amph, crazyivan, hilariousandco (in PrimeDice currently though)).

Please PM me with your offer to have Bit-X take up some of your avatar space and personal message. It will either be like mine (added onto your current avatar) or will take up close to the entire area. More likely like mine, to the side

There may or may not be an avatar/personal message campaign launched on behalf of Bit-X in the coming month.

Preferably enrolled in the campaign too!

Payments would either be a one time sum for the rest of the year or monthly or whatever term!

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bit-x-buying-avatars-personal-message-1024258

unsoindovo

legendary

Activity: 1932

Merit: 1042

https://locktrip.com/?refId=40964

Quote from: redsn0w on April 12, 2015, 05:41:40 AM

I have voted yes.

Quote from: Muhammed Zakir on April 12, 2015, 05:38:23 AM

Quote from: hilariousandco on April 12, 2015, 05:34:32 AM

Why would you need one? You can see other's that have them. Would you find them annoying if multiple people have the same avatar (if you can envisage)?

Multiple having same avatars is annoying to me. If enrollee's can put like Marco does, it will be okay.

However, you might have to hire a part time designer for editing enrollee's image. Wink

I think (for example) marcotheminer or other sig campaign maintainers will allow to keep our personal avatar but we should add a bit-x "logo" to the right side of it, and this way for me it's ok. I don't think it is annoying (more than the signature) and if someone don't want to see them, he can always use an extension (like ad block) for block specific avatars.

just look at the marcotheminer avatar...
he his asking to append the same stipe with bit-x logo

franckuestein

legendary

Activity: 1960

Merit: 1130

Truth will out!

Quote from: marcotheminer on April 14, 2015, 06:30:36 AM

Quote from: redsn0w on April 14, 2015, 06:05:02 AM

I think that rate is not decent, up to 0.016 btc/ month to rent your avatar space? As I said previously, an avatar is more noticeable than a signature, I think 0.10 btc/per month is a good and right rate.

0.1BTC is a lot solely for an avatar, even more if it's only part of an avatar.

I agree with redsn0w.
Marco, keep in mind that a logo is the first thing that you see when you're reading someone's comment. It's not a signature, it's an image with a service or company logo...

In my opinion it's the most "distinctive" thing that we have in our profile.

marcotheminer

legendary

Activity: 2072

Merit: 1049

┴puoʎǝq ʞool┴

Quote from: redsn0w on April 14, 2015, 06:05:02 AM

Quote from: erwin45hacked on April 13, 2015, 09:17:38 AM

Quote from: redsn0w on April 13, 2015, 08:38:34 AM

Quote from: erwin45hacked on April 13, 2015, 08:26:27 AM

Quote from: redsn0w on April 13, 2015, 07:52:33 AM

About that campaign (https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/first-avatar-campaign-up-to-0016month-for-your-avatar-1021711) it is really insane sell own avatar for 0.016 btc/month.

Insane in term of too cheap or too expensive? for me the rate is pretty cheap for a month, although the avatar does not contain a clickable link, it is worth for few people to milk every penny for their posts

It is too cheap in my honest opinion, an avatar can 'bring' more visit ((also if it is clickable) respect than a signature, because an avatar appears more than a sig ad (by the way this is only my personal opinion, and a good rate could be 0.10 btc per month).

I do think the rate is decent, since the picture isnt clickable, but an avatar + signature could be a better campaign since an avatar will actually show a part of the sites, and the link in the signatures is clickable and it is weird to see someone using A sites signature campaign, B sites Personal message campaign and C sites avatar campaign

I think that rate is not decent, up to 0.016 btc/ month to rent your avatar space? As I said previously, an avatar is more noticeable than a signature, I think 0.10 btc/per month is a good and right rate.

0.1BTC is a lot solely for an avatar, even more if it's only part of an avatar.

redsn0w

legendary

Activity: 1778

Merit: 1043

#Free market

Quote from: erwin45hacked on April 13, 2015, 09:17:38 AM

Quote from: redsn0w on April 13, 2015, 08:38:34 AM

Quote from: erwin45hacked on April 13, 2015, 08:26:27 AM

Quote from: redsn0w on April 13, 2015, 07:52:33 AM

About that campaign (https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/first-avatar-campaign-up-to-0016month-for-your-avatar-1021711) it is really insane sell own avatar for 0.016 btc/month.

Insane in term of too cheap or too expensive? for me the rate is pretty cheap for a month, although the avatar does not contain a clickable link, it is worth for few people to milk every penny for their posts

It is too cheap in my honest opinion, an avatar can 'bring' more visit ((also if it is clickable) respect than a signature, because an avatar appears more than a sig ad (by the way this is only my personal opinion, and a good rate could be 0.10 btc per month).

I do think the rate is decent, since the picture isnt clickable, but an avatar + signature could be a better campaign since an avatar will actually show a part of the sites, and the link in the signatures is clickable and it is weird to see someone using A sites signature campaign, B sites Personal message campaign and C sites avatar campaign

I think that rate is not decent, up to 0.016 btc/ month to rent your avatar space? As I said previously, an avatar is more noticeable than a signature, I think 0.10 btc/per month is a good and right rate.

Mt. Gox

full member

Activity: 350

Merit: 118

Quote from: hilariousandco on April 13, 2015, 06:44:18 AM

Quote from: Mt. Gox on April 13, 2015, 06:32:44 AM

I've seen many Internet forums during my time online and I don't think I've ever seen one where users are financially rewarded for changing their avatars to advertisements. For a newbie who is new to the forums, it would probably look quite strange.

Well this forum certainly is unique in being able to earn money from it with signatures etc. To newbies it will just look like any other forum until they realize you can monetize your personal spaces. When I first came here I had no idea all the people who had PrimeDice signatures we're getting paid for them until I stumbled upon their thread in Services. Found it hard to believe you could get paid so much for such a little thing as a signature but here we are.

The strange part would be the sheer number of identical avatars. Imagine you stumbled upon another forum's thread and a quarter of the people posting in that thread have the same cat avatar, another quarter with the same dog avatar, another quarter with the same horse avatar, etc. It would look pretty weird to someone who isn't aware of avatar campaigns as they might wonder why everyone is using the same avatars. Some forums have default avatars which are shared across multiple users but these are typically designed to look as generic as possible.

amiryaqot

legendary

Activity: 1050

Merit: 1000

Quote from: erwin45hacked on April 13, 2015, 09:17:38 AM

Quote from: redsn0w on April 13, 2015, 08:38:34 AM

Quote from: erwin45hacked on April 13, 2015, 08:26:27 AM

Quote from: redsn0w on April 13, 2015, 07:52:33 AM

About that campaign (https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/first-avatar-campaign-up-to-0016month-for-your-avatar-1021711) it is really insane sell own avatar for 0.016 btc/month.

Insane in term of too cheap or too expensive? for me the rate is pretty cheap for a month, although the avatar does not contain a clickable link, it is worth for few people to milk every penny for their posts

It is too cheap in my honest opinion, an avatar can 'bring' more visit ((also if it is clickable) respect than a signature, because an avatar appears more than a sig ad (by the way this is only my personal opinion, and a good rate could be 0.10 btc per month).

I do think the rate is decent, since the picture isnt clickable, but an avatar + signature could be a better campaign since an avatar will actually show a part of the sites, and the link in the signatures is clickable and it is weird to see someone using A sites signature campaign, B sites Personal message campaign and C sites avatar campaign

agreed with you avatar + signature campaign would be more attractive than use 2 different campaign, i think avatar is campaign will be nice option to get more views to any link.

erwin45hacked

legendary

Activity: 1064

Merit: 1000

Quote from: redsn0w on April 13, 2015, 08:38:34 AM

Quote from: erwin45hacked on April 13, 2015, 08:26:27 AM

Quote from: redsn0w on April 13, 2015, 07:52:33 AM

About that campaign (https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/first-avatar-campaign-up-to-0016month-for-your-avatar-1021711) it is really insane sell own avatar for 0.016 btc/month.

Insane in term of too cheap or too expensive? for me the rate is pretty cheap for a month, although the avatar does not contain a clickable link, it is worth for few people to milk every penny for their posts

It is too cheap in my honest opinion, an avatar can 'bring' more visit ((also if it is clickable) respect than a signature, because an avatar appears more than a sig ad (by the way this is only my personal opinion, and a good rate could be 0.10 btc per month).

I do think the rate is decent, since the picture isnt clickable, but an avatar + signature could be a better campaign since an avatar will actually show a part of the sites, and the link in the signatures is clickable and it is weird to see someone using A sites signature campaign, B sites Personal message campaign and C sites avatar campaign

abyrnes81

hero member

Activity: 714

Merit: 500

Quote from: umairsaleem on April 13, 2015, 09:04:29 AM

I'm not really want to see that, Signature campaign already takes most people's signature and that makes the forum kind of monotonous, people's signature are becoming the same, if everyone are wearing the same avatar and sig, then it could be annoying.

You can always disable them view with the internal forum function or using ad block (or similar extension).

umairsaleem

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 500

I'm not really want to see that, Signature campaign already takes most people's signature and that makes the forum kind of monotonous, people's signature are becoming the same, if everyone are wearing the same avatar and sig, then it could be annoying.

redsn0w

legendary

Activity: 1778

Merit: 1043

#Free market

Quote from: erwin45hacked on April 13, 2015, 08:26:27 AM

Quote from: redsn0w on April 13, 2015, 07:52:33 AM

About that campaign (https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/first-avatar-campaign-up-to-0016month-for-your-avatar-1021711) it is really insane sell own avatar for 0.016 btc/month.

Insane in term of too cheap or too expensive? for me the rate is pretty cheap for a month, although the avatar does not contain a clickable link, it is worth for few people to milk every penny for their posts

It is too cheap in my honest opinion, an avatar can 'bring' more visit ((also if it is clickable) respect than a signature, because an avatar appears more than a sig ad (by the way this is only my personal opinion, and a good rate could be 0.10 btc per month).

erwin45hacked

legendary

Activity: 1064

Merit: 1000

Quote from: redsn0w on April 13, 2015, 07:52:33 AM

About that campaign (https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/first-avatar-campaign-up-to-0016month-for-your-avatar-1021711) it is really insane sell own avatar for 0.016 btc/month.

Insane in term of too cheap or too expensive? for me the rate is pretty cheap for a month, although the avatar does not contain a clickable link, it is worth for few people to milk every penny for their posts

redsn0w

legendary

Activity: 1778

Merit: 1043

#Free market

Quote from: el kaka22 on April 13, 2015, 07:46:18 AM

Quote from: redsn0w on April 13, 2015, 07:40:17 AM

Quote from: Bitcoiner7788 on April 13, 2015, 07:14:04 AM

I would vote no. Because I am just a newbie (now) and I can't upload an avatar. Also many people having the same avatar is a really bad thing.

It will not be a problem because everyone will be allowed to keep his own avatar and add to the left/right side the logo of the service, or at least this is the best thing to do in my honest opinion. However you should only to be active and wait to be a full member and after you will be able to put an avatar. If you don't want to wait, buy a full member account from some buyers in the "Digital goods" section.

Quote from: NOT-newbie on April 13, 2015, 07:26:51 AM

I would vote for 'Yes/No' if it exists. Avatar is something personal and should be unique among users. So a paid campaign should buy less than 50% of someone's avatar. That's enough.

Also the signature is something personal but someone has invented the sig. campaign and this is the first forum I have seen that allow you to sell the signature place.

Nope. The current campaign requires the whole space. See the identical avatars posted there.
BTW, how can someone BUY an account from a BUYER??
What I am looking is not only a higher payout, but also a more personal advertising avatar.

Sorry, fixed. I meant the dadice and bit-x signature campaign, them could allow you (probable) to keep your avatar and add the site logo to the left or right side.

About that campaign (https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/first-avatar-campaign-up-to-0016month-for-your-avatar-1021711) it is really insane sell own avatar for 0.016 btc/month.

el kaka22

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 1165

www.Crypto.Games: Multiple coins, multiple games

Quote from: redsn0w on April 13, 2015, 07:40:17 AM

Quote from: Bitcoiner7788 on April 13, 2015, 07:14:04 AM

I would vote no. Because I am just a newbie (now) and I can't upload an avatar. Also many people having the same avatar is a really bad thing.

It will not be a problem because everyone will be allowed to keep his own avatar and add to the left/right side the logo of the service, or at least this is the best thing to do in my honest opinion. However you should only to be active and wait to be a full member and after you will be able to put an avatar. If you don't want to wait, buy a full member account from some buyers in the "Digital goods" section.

Quote from: NOT-newbie on April 13, 2015, 07:26:51 AM

I would vote for 'Yes/No' if it exists. Avatar is something personal and should be unique among users. So a paid campaign should buy less than 50% of someone's avatar. That's enough.

Also the signature is something personal but someone has invented the sig. campaign and this is the first forum I have seen that allow you to sell the signature place.

Nope. The current campaign requires the whole space. See the identical avatars posted there.
BTW, how can someone BUY an account from a BUYER??
What I am looking is not only a higher payout, but also a more personal advertising avatar.

redsn0w

legendary

Activity: 1778

Merit: 1043

#Free market

Quote from: Bitcoiner7788 on April 13, 2015, 07:14:04 AM

I would vote no. Because I am just a newbie (now) and I can't upload an avatar. Also many people having the same avatar is a really bad thing.

It will not be a problem because everyone will be allowed to keep his own avatar and add to the left/right side the logo of the service, or at least this is the best thing to do in my honest opinion. However you should only to be active and wait to be a full member and after you will be able to put an avatar. If you don't want to wait, buy a full member account from some ~~buyers~~ sellers in the "Digital goods" section.

Quote from: NOT-newbie on April 13, 2015, 07:26:51 AM

I would vote for 'Yes/No' if it exists. Avatar is something personal and should be unique among users. So a paid campaign should buy less than 50% of someone's avatar. That's enough.

Also the signature is something personal but someone has invented the sig. campaign and this is the first forum I have seen that allow you to sell the signature place.

el kaka22

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 1165

www.Crypto.Games: Multiple coins, multiple games

I just voted Yes. However the current existing avatar campaign's paying isn't high. I am looking for some higher payouts.

NOT-newbie

newbie

Activity: 6

Merit: 0

I would vote for 'Yes/No' if it exists. Avatar is something personal and should be unique among users. So a paid campaign should buy less than 50% of someone's avatar. That's enough.

Bitcoiner7788

newbie

Activity: 9

Merit: 0

I would vote no. Because I am just a newbie (now) and I can't upload an avatar. Also many people having the same avatar is a really bad thing.

Havelivi

hero member

Activity: 896

Merit: 1000

i voted yes for that Avatar campaign and hope that will be best campaign like the previous one. i am waiting for that upcoming campaign to join that.

Mewtwo

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 100

ROAD TO HEAVEN...

Avatar itself nothing bad at all, even very good if we use it in a positive way for the purpose of an impression to others, to the customers. I have also seen a number of avatars to make others feel uncomfortable , annoyed. Anyway, according to my thoughts, a avatar Campaign is OK but do not too abuse it

Topic: Do you like to see an Avatar Campaign? [POLL] (Read 3161 times)