Well, if you had been nice to her...
That is a stupid ass excuse. Women are evil regardless of how they are treated. 
Topic: Do you think a woman will make a better leader than a man? (Read 388 times)
Even the nice men need to apologize for such. You don't even have the ability to apologize enough.
Women are horrendous evil creatures.Regards,
-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.
Well, if you had been nice to her...
Women leadership is not good for the country. It is good to be a man to provide for the country, women will be their allies. Men are created to be physically and mentally strong, leading to male characteristics. And to be the characteristic helper of women, women have been created tender in mind and body. Women's leadership is at home and men's leadership is outside. Women and men are different by nature and their place of leadership is different
There is a generally different notion about this when you view the concept of leadership from the male's point of view and the reason why even the United States, which seems to be the most democratic state, did not allow women to become the president by voting for the male counterpart to win the just concluded our election. Nevertheless, leadership is about policy formulation and execution, and for that, if women are seen as the best managers, that means when it comes to running a country, they can also perform effectively, but let's not make it look or sound as if we are trying to compare women to the male.
Trying to make it look like a competition for who is a better leader is the reason why most top leaders will not allow women to take the seat of the affairs of their state and we should pay attention to that by all means, many time's Chance for women to finally climb that seat of the president has presented itself severally but still yet noble predecessor have hand over to a female at least none have been recorded.
Trying to make it look like a competition for who is a better leader is the reason why most top leaders will not allow women to take the seat of the affairs of their state and we should pay attention to that by all means, many time's Chance for women to finally climb that seat of the president has presented itself severally but still yet noble predecessor have hand over to a female at least none have been recorded.
It's the love for one's country that should be taken into consideration and the reason why a good leader will be called a "good" one. I don't think it matter what gender it is because a lot of women in this era have proven greatness in terms of all what men can do before and now.
The only problem is, the traditional belief that women are weak still lingers. It have been passed on by our ancestors and it's not easy to erase. I am a man but I do see my wife with lots of intelligence and ca actually be more patient than me most of the time when it comes to our kids. A leader is a parent, men or women, it doesn't matter.
The only problem is, the traditional belief that women are weak still lingers. It have been passed on by our ancestors and it's not easy to erase. I am a man but I do see my wife with lots of intelligence and ca actually be more patient than me most of the time when it comes to our kids. A leader is a parent, men or women, it doesn't matter.
It really depends on the person, but let’s be honest—having a female leader can bring some serious advantages. Studies show women tend to crush it when it comes to emotional stability, empathy, and making ethical decisions. And let’s face it, in a world where chaos is the norm, those skills are basically superpowers. Plus, women have spent ages navigating life as the underdog, so they often come with a built-in BS detector and a stronger sense of fairness. Long story short, a woman in charge could be exactly what the doctor ordered for a world this messy.
If you are looking at a woman for her college education, you are looking at her for entirely the wrong reason.
Women are insufferable morons who need to apologize for their horrendous behavior.Regards,
-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.
Women are the most wonderful, beautiful thing that happened in this life. The problem is with the macho ones. If they got married and had kids, they would be wonderful, too.
You are sorely sorely deceived. Women are potentially wonderful creatures in principle. But in reality, women are horrible creatures who need to apologize for being so horrible and absolutely insufferable. Right now, women are going to college and getting bullshit degrees from institutions that promote violence, and they are voting for communism and hatred because they are fucked up. I will not give any credit to the positive attributes of women until they acknowledge that their gender is absolutely horrendous on the inside.Regards,
-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.
If you are looking at a woman for her college education, you are looking at her for entirely the wrong reason.
Women are the most wonderful, beautiful thing that happened in this life. The problem is with the macho ones. If they got married and had kids, they would be wonderful, too.
You are sorely sorely deceived. Women are potentially wonderful creatures in principle. But in reality, women are horrible creatures who need to apologize for being so horrible and absolutely insufferable. Right now, women are going to college and getting bullshit degrees from institutions that promote violence, and they are voting for communism and hatred because they are fucked up. I will not give any credit to the positive attributes of women until they acknowledge that their gender is absolutely horrendous on the inside.Regards,
-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.
No. Each situation demands a different kind of leader, so I guess men or women can be good leaders depending the situation and depending the personal traits, skills and personalities of each individuals, what goes much beyond just being a man or woman.
We don't have to think only on political leadership positions. Think on families which are commanded by women alone. It's a difficult task, but many women manage to execute this duty with dignity and excellency. It means they are good leaders who can adapt to aversive situations in order to overcome its challenges.
After all, it's not a gender based discussion. It's about each individual's subjectiveness and responses to the demands imposed by the environment.
Women do not know how to interact in social settings. They do not know how to have a conversation. The only thing they know how to do is yell, nag, and bitch. They are trash.We don't have to think only on political leadership positions. Think on families which are commanded by women alone. It's a difficult task, but many women manage to execute this duty with dignity and excellency. It means they are good leaders who can adapt to aversive situations in order to overcome its challenges.
After all, it's not a gender based discussion. It's about each individual's subjectiveness and responses to the demands imposed by the environment.
Regards,
-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.
Women are the most wonderful, beautiful thing that happened in this life. The problem is with the macho ones. If they got married and had kids, they would be wonderful, too.
No. Each situation demands a different kind of leader, so I guess men or women can be good leaders depending the situation and depending the personal traits, skills and personalities of each individuals, what goes much beyond just being a man or woman.
We don't have to think only on political leadership positions. Think on families which are commanded by women alone. It's a difficult task, but many women manage to execute this duty with dignity and excellency. It means they are good leaders who can adapt to aversive situations in order to overcome its challenges.
After all, it's not a gender based discussion. It's about each individual's subjectiveness and responses to the demands imposed by the environment.
Women do not know how to interact in social settings. They do not know how to have a conversation. The only thing they know how to do is yell, nag, and bitch. They are trash.We don't have to think only on political leadership positions. Think on families which are commanded by women alone. It's a difficult task, but many women manage to execute this duty with dignity and excellency. It means they are good leaders who can adapt to aversive situations in order to overcome its challenges.
After all, it's not a gender based discussion. It's about each individual's subjectiveness and responses to the demands imposed by the environment.
Regards,
-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.
No. Each situation demands a different kind of leader, so I guess men or women can be good leaders depending the situation and depending the personal traits, skills and personalities of each individuals, what goes much beyond just being a man or woman.
We don't have to think only on political leadership positions. Think on families which are commanded by women alone. It's a difficult task, but many women manage to execute this duty with dignity and excellency. It means they are good leaders who can adapt to aversive situations in order to overcome its challenges.
After all, it's not a gender based discussion. It's about each individual's subjectiveness and responses to the demands imposed by the environment.
We don't have to think only on political leadership positions. Think on families which are commanded by women alone. It's a difficult task, but many women manage to execute this duty with dignity and excellency. It means they are good leaders who can adapt to aversive situations in order to overcome its challenges.
After all, it's not a gender based discussion. It's about each individual's subjectiveness and responses to the demands imposed by the environment.
Leadership is more of a man thing than a woman, because it was God that made it so. A man is far more wiser than a woman and can face whatever situation that is on ground no matter how difficult it is, and will finally find a way to overcome it. A woman is weak in this aspect and will run to a man for solutions because they are weak vessels. In your house, is woman the head of the family and if it is, how do you see your Dad? A woman was created to be under a man and to be submissive to him.
That's based literally on your own belief, and with that you are ignoring any science, or data about past women leaders. Places like Finland have prospered with women leadership, accomplishing so much towards their citizens. There are so many outstanding women in history, that imho you should rather google them and educate yourself, rather then me listing them here.I hope that some day you'll hear yourself now, and start to respect women equally to men, and maybe even over compensate because your past misogynism while you do it. Because even questioning if country would be worse under women leadership is highly disrespectful towards every woman in this planet, including your mom.
Although, gender status may not be consider as a factor that guarantee good leadership because good leadership comes from character, experience, wisdom and knowledge but I think a woman will make a better leader than a man because women are more rigid in terms decision making than men in so many ways and they less pose to distraction than men.
A man can be easily manipulated by both women and men but it's very difficult for a woman to manipulate her fellow woman.
Leadership requires important qualities such as character, experience and knowledge. And these qualities determine what kind of leader a person will be. It is difficult for women to gain respect or leadership in male dominated fields. A person's ability, credibility, and ability to motivate others are important factors in leadership. Gender is not the only determinant here that a person who can manage himself properly and create a positive view of others is capable of being a true leader. In all cases it is most important to gain trust through the qualities and skills of a leader. A man can be easily manipulated by both women and men but it's very difficult for a woman to manipulate her fellow woman.
Gender discrimination still exists in this world and is still very deep, the world is not as equal as we think, it's just that not many people dare to admit it. That's why I also say that Harris is unlikely to win even if she proves herself better than Trump in every way.
I don't agree with your opinions. I can see that Harris had all the chances (equal to Trump, even better) to win the elections. See this point: A media report said that The Harris Victory Fund and the Harris Action Fund, the joint fundraising committees between the Harris campaign, the Democratic National Committee, and state Democratic Party committees, raised $652 million between July and September of this year.
NBC news said that Harris has raised $1 billion in total since entering the race in late July after President Joe Biden dropped out, marking a significant fundraising milestone for her campaign against Donald Trump.
A lot of famous public figures support Harris as the singer Taylor Swift. I do not support the idea that the American people reject a woman as president, and the evidence for that is the voting results, which were close and Harris could have won. The american election has nothing to do with Trump being a man and Harris being a woman.
Does Harris have a chance against Trump, are you sure about that? Do you know that the difference in votes between the two is huge? Harris couldn't even win one of the seven battleground states, and the popular vote was also nearly 5 million votes apart and which is not a small number.
She raised a large amount of money and if that was considered a factor in her victory, then where was that money spent and what good was it when it could not bring her victory? It was even reported that she was $20 million in debt after the election ended.
From what you said, it makes me feel like there are a lot of people supporting Harris, but answer me one thing. Why is there such a huge difference in the popular vote and why can't she even win 1 of the 7 battleground states?
A woman leader needs men to back her up. No men, no strength.
lol.. Not all men are men; some are just given that gender because of the two balls below their legs, but in reality some ladies are physically stronger than them in terms of decision and have taken a bold step.In terms of leadership, I do consider gender to be seen as a factor to use and measure strength. If the person passes all criteria, then they should be given a chance. Some women can even be more productive than the men; the fear of discrimination and mockery alone is enough motivation for them.
If most of them can even lead homes and bring up children will without father figures, then how do you expect them to lead Nations? 
Truth is, women are too emotional and are the weaker gender. Give a woman power and see how bad things can go. At least I saw this with different leaders in my community and school. While most men looked cool, some women who thought they had a lot of "power and authority" were so annoying and unfriendly.
I think the creator of the Universe did not make a man to be a natural leader by mistake.
Truth is, women are too emotional and are the weaker gender. Give a woman power and see how bad things can go. At least I saw this with different leaders in my community and school. While most men looked cool, some women who thought they had a lot of "power and authority" were so annoying and unfriendly.
I think the creator of the Universe did not make a man to be a natural leader by mistake.
Although, gender status may not be consider as a factor that guarantee good leadership because good leadership comes from character, experience, wisdom and knowledge but I think a woman will make a better leader than a man because women are more rigid in terms decision making than men in so many ways and they less pose to distraction than men.
A man can be easily manipulated by both women and men but it's very difficult for a woman to manipulate her fellow woman.
Leadership is more of a man thing than a woman, because it was God that made it so. A man is far more wiser than a woman and can face whatever situation that is on ground no matter how difficult it is, and will finally find a way to overcome it. A woman is weak in this aspect and will run to a man for solutions because they are weak vessels. In your house, is woman the head of the family and if it is, how do you see your Dad? A woman was created to be under a man and to be submissive to him. A man can be easily manipulated by both women and men but it's very difficult for a woman to manipulate her fellow woman.
Gender does not guarantee good leadership. We actually have women leading countries, institution, companies and top positions, I would say they have been doing fine and that does not mean men are not doing great in leadership too. Corrupt systems in government has made it difficult for women to get more position and most men don't like the idea.
I think people's focus should be more on developing leadership qualities in everyone that is capable to take up positions in order to serve the people well and achieve goals.
I think people's focus should be more on developing leadership qualities in everyone that is capable to take up positions in order to serve the people well and achieve goals.
Being a better gender leader than the other gender in leadership, I do take it as an individual thing, not in comparison with gender status. You know why, a man or a woman can be a good or bad leader. Someone can't generalize that all men or women are good or bad leaders just because they found a being(a man or woman) treating their citizens good or bad. Every human being's character differs. I have mine, you have yours. That's what you should be aware of.
The aspect of leadership has an individual character and experience that a particular gender is meant or not meant to be better than the other gender generally. Each gender operates on their own accord individually in any leadership position they find themselves in. You can find some to be corrupt and others less corrupt. You don't crucify or praise all the said gender (men or women) because of that; rather, you will crucify or praise that particular being whom you found in that act. That's how leadership works by individual character.
The aspect of leadership has an individual character and experience that a particular gender is meant or not meant to be better than the other gender generally. Each gender operates on their own accord individually in any leadership position they find themselves in. You can find some to be corrupt and others less corrupt. You don't crucify or praise all the said gender (men or women) because of that; rather, you will crucify or praise that particular being whom you found in that act. That's how leadership works by individual character.
Jump to: