I think once we start confronting the government with decentralized casinos, which require no KYC, they may decide to loosen up their regulations due to plain redundancy. It would not be fair for such laws to exist, if they are unenforceable in the first place.
Hm, the wide-eyed faith in the power of decentralized casinos to control government.
I never said decentralized casinos will control the government. I think you are misunderstanding the technical impossibility of controlling something that is sufficiently decentralized. Even for the government.
Is BISQ regulated? No. You cannot regulated anything which is truly decentralized, because there is no party to hold responsible.
I think once we start confronting the government with decentralized casinos, which require no KYC, they may decide to loosen up their regulations due to plain redundancy. It would not be fair for such laws to exist, if they are unenforceable in the first place.
If there were a bond or unity among the citizens of a country to pressure the government regards the extinction of KYC enforcement to online casinos, the government would accept the order of the people. However, only a small portion of the population is concerned about sharing their personal data online. Most people are fine about doing it blindly, without thinking twice... There is only a minority unhappy left, and this minority isn't sufficient to confront the government in anyways.
And the few individuals who will try bypassing the government's regulations, playing at decentralized casinos will be persecuted and punished by such governments, as will the decentralized casinos too for operating without permission from a local authority. For that reason, casinos prefer demanding KYC, instead of going against governments' regulations.
Yes, due to the fact that most people prefer user-experience comfort and leveraging third party responsibility over using complicated decentralized applications (for now) centralized platforms are preferred by the majority. And yes, the government
could go after singular individuals (if those individuals are not careful with their privacy) but this is unrealistic and not to mention such a witch hunt would be illegal in most countries. A more tyrannical government will only push people more towards going against it.
And let's be honest, if you trust a third party to not screw you over, you will end up like the Mt. Gox or FTX victims. I personally prefer my own security as my own responsibility.