New Zealand Doctor Explains the Non-Science Behind Covid-19 and the €225,000 Reward for Anyone Who Can Prove it Exists[/b]
Dr. Samantha Bailey, a family doctor from New Zealand, answers questions about Covid-19. She begins by playing a video clip from the UK’s chief economic advisor, Sir Patrick Vallance, who says that the PCR test is useless because it responds to very low levels of cellular fragments that may not even be infectious. Therefore, a positive PCR test does not mean that a person is either sick or infectious.
Dr. Bailey says that Covid-19, known as SARS-CoV-2, has never been isolated, despite claims by some scientific papers. This is confirmed by Dr. Michael Laue of the The Robert Koch Institute, Germany’s institution for the prevention of infectious diseases, who said: “I am not aware of a paper which purified isolated SARS-CoV-2”. This is why there is cash award of €225,000 for anyone who can prove the actual isolation of SARS-CoV-2 and its genetic substance. There is little danger that the award will be paid. -GEG
"Dr. Bailey says that Covid-19, known as SARS-CoV-2, has never been isolated, despite claims by some scientific papers......"
Methththth
Somebody might have done the Covid virus isolation. There is no way to suggest for a fact that the isolation of the virus WAS NOT DONE. However, the isolating of it is not found in any reports.
There are thousands of reports... maybe millions. Finding the one or two that actually spell out the isolating, would be a full time job. So, what do we have to go on? Two things:
1. The guesswork that some of the researchers and doctors that claim they did the isolation, maybe really did it. That's called trust, especially since none of them in their reports show the isolating;
2. The fact that the CDC doesn't have a purified sample of the virus, for any doctor to compare what he has against the real virus, so that he can know with certainty that he has the real virus.
That sounds like a lot of run-around to me. They could properly isolate the virus and write the process in the reports. They could have a sample of the virus - if it were real - for all of us too see. Since they fail in these two areas, probably the virus hasn't been isolated. Maybe there isn't any virus at all.
BTW, all those reports that
franky1 and others link to, only say that they have done the isolating (if that). They don't show the doing of it in the reports. At least,
f-1 can't seem to come up with the wording that shows the doing of the isolating.