Topic: Do you think Institutions secretly HODL Bitcoin? - page 2. (Read 2498 times)
well, this is a lot of question marks because as I know there are some companies that pay attention to technology that is increasingly sophisticated even payment or money transactions are also increasingly sophisticated because implementing a digital currency system and they understand saving digital currencies will make the future brighter because can get many benefits when saving large amounts of currency.
I've read an article recently where coinbase stating that a large fund has entered in their website and it was believe by the ceo that it was from institution. I don't know if I am glad to hear this because in my perspective, these institutions are just doing it in case the tables are turned and bitcoin really succeed. But I think more and more institutions will do this after we hit either $50k or $100k btc.
Apparently, these big institutions are aware of the benefits of Bitcoin and will not sit down and watch as investors enjoy everything. These institutions invest huge into crypto and since most of the transactions are anonymous, they tend to hide behind the transactions because most of them play important roles in governmental affairs. The institutions know Bitcoin and cryptocurrency cannot be stopped and will receive a mass adoption some years to come which will boost its market price. 
I believe they would HODL bitcoin, it is the “internet of money” and they are just waiting for more adoption. Even Watford FC is planning to accept it as a means of payment for its merchandise.
For sure but silently holding because if they will announce, it would create a big hype in the market and bitcoin might again pump which is bad for long term. These big institution are accumulating at the best time, so if Bitcoin is slowly growing or will dump, that's the time they will continue to buy and for at least a year already, bitcoin gives us an opportunity to accumulate since it's very cheap that period especially last year and early this year. When they hold, they will hold it for long term, and this will bring positive effect to the market as the circulation will be lowered while it's inevitable that the demand will continue to increase, with that, we can expect a surge of price in the long run. So, if we haven't invested yet, we should think twice that we are missing an opportunity now.
I heard some information that some financial industries including central banks in several countries are experimenting with Bitcoin. Which actually isn't anything strange, their business is to watch all kinds of financial movements and inovation. They need to know what are their options and opportunities with cryptocurrencies because they are aware this is something that can't be avoided anymore. And I think they have much more positive attitude towards crypto that public thinks.
Bitcoin is the real solution to cashless policy advocacy, thou a risky venture, but with strong fundamental therefore several institution has secretly acquire BTC in order to take advantage wealth transfer through cryptocurrency.
I agree.Even if they are 'afraid' of crypto, because they will lose their power from the current financial system, they are going to have at least 2 huge reasons.
Profit out of it.
And if they can't kill it, it is even better to try and control it.
The reason why most are not public about it, I think it's because they want to get as much as they can before mass adaption.
I believe they would HODL bitcoin, it is the “internet of money” and they are just waiting for more adoption. Even Watford FC is planning to accept it as a means of payment for its merchandise.
Cryptocurrency is something that they cannot ignore, this is an investment that started from a few dollars and now it's worth thousands of dollars, I'm pretty sure that they are holding and hodlers of a large amount of Bitcoin.
They might not like to discuss it now, because it is still premature, and they want to discuss it at the right time.
They might not like to discuss it now, because it is still premature, and they want to discuss it at the right time.
I've read an article recently where coinbase stating that a large fund has entered in their website and it was believe by the ceo that it was from institution. I don't know if I am glad to hear this because in my perspective, these institutions are just doing it in case the tables are turned and bitcoin really succeed. But I think more and more institutions will do this after we hit either $50k or $100k btc.
We should be glad regardless of their purpose as Institutional money can create big demand in the market. And also, I doubt that article is telling the truth because coinbase is a regulated exchange and they don't have the right to divulge information regarding money going in and out on their exchange.
I've read an article recently where coinbase stating that a large fund has entered in their website and it was believe by the ceo that it was from institution. I don't know if I am glad to hear this because in my perspective, these institutions are just doing it in case the tables are turned and bitcoin really succeed. But I think more and more institutions will do this after we hit either $50k or $100k btc.
We should be glad regardless of their purpose as Institutional money can create big demand in the market. And also, I doubt that article is telling the truth because coinbase is a regulated exchange and they don't have the right to divulge information regarding money going in and out on their exchange.
I've read an article recently where coinbase stating that a large fund has entered in their website and it was believe by the ceo that it was from institution. I don't know if I am glad to hear this because in my perspective, these institutions are just doing it in case the tables are turned and bitcoin really succeed. But I think more and more institutions will do this after we hit either $50k or $100k btc.
I wouldn't doubt the fact that the prominent and institutional leaders of our various countries hold some Bitcoin. Since the whole technology and idea is decentralized and anonymous, who can tell exactly who holds BTC? I believe these renowned personalities are the major holders yet will come out strongly criticizing BTC - the game of politics on Bitcoin.
Bitcoin is the real solution to cashless policy advocacy, thou a risky venture, but with strong fundamental therefore several institution has secretly acquire BTC in order to take advantage wealth transfer through cryptocurrency.
How the institutions can hold Bitcoin secretly, when the holdings are regularly audited and cross-checked every now and then? If the authorities go ahead with purchase of Bitcoin without informing anyone, then they'll later face legal action and will be held accountable. Tax revenue can't be spend as per the individual preferences. Any spending (related to crypto or not) requires permission from the parliament.
I have heard of several conspiracy theories, but this one is one of the most ridiculous ones that I ever came across. You can claim that the banks and some of the wall street giants may be accumulating Bitcoin. There is no ambiguity, as they don't need any permission from anyone to do so. But if you are talking about institutions, then it is an entirely different game.
I have heard of several conspiracy theories, but this one is one of the most ridiculous ones that I ever came across. You can claim that the banks and some of the wall street giants may be accumulating Bitcoin. There is no ambiguity, as they don't need any permission from anyone to do so. But if you are talking about institutions, then it is an entirely different game.
Certainly yes but it's difficult to prove since no one can trace someone's Bitcoin wallet through searching using their name. If we as individual were able to hold Bitcoin secretely, why can't they do it too? Institutions aren't stopping looking and grabbing for every opportunity they can get too which is normal. Nevertheless it's beneficial to crypto market itself since they can occupy huge portions of Bitcoin's supply, making its price higher.
It would be possible, anything is possible, but we can surely be positive on that if we thoroughly investigate. Maybe around them must have some people who are willing to dispose intel on that. I guess if they have so, they are not just the kind of people to show it to public and just keep it with themselves.
It is very likely that large institutions - which can afford important investments, especially risking clients' money - use a portion of the figures they manage to experiment in "risk zones". Obviously they will never admit it.
We can sure could always impeach NASDAQ , NYSE, DOW JONES and any other what you call as "financial institutions" they are holding bitcoin without want to expose it all .
But still it would always be a baseless opinion without a real data and mean nothing. There's no value in it.
What's the point? Building fundamentals ?
But still it would always be a baseless opinion without a real data and mean nothing. There's no value in it.
What's the point? Building fundamentals ?
institutions like investment funds? I am almost sure they do , even if they say they do not
if you look at the major investment funds almost all of them are keeping distance from bitcoin
they say so , but as professionals in investment , they cannot be oblivious to the asset performance
bitcoin has done better than most of the assets , including gold - nearly 100x only for the past 4 years
if they do not HODL bitcoin , there must be something wrong with their professional capacity , so I'm sure they do
maybe not as an institution , since bitcoin is a grey are legally-wise , but the individual analysts and managers must be piling them up like crazy
if you look at the major investment funds almost all of them are keeping distance from bitcoin
they say so , but as professionals in investment , they cannot be oblivious to the asset performance
bitcoin has done better than most of the assets , including gold - nearly 100x only for the past 4 years
if they do not HODL bitcoin , there must be something wrong with their professional capacity , so I'm sure they do
maybe not as an institution , since bitcoin is a grey are legally-wise , but the individual analysts and managers must be piling them up like crazy
I don't think they would hold bitcoins instead of stocks that already have a bright future , since the value of bitcoins goes up and down so fast they must really be scared to hold something like this ..they would either save the money or invest in something stable ... Institutions needs stability and resources ... The good ones won't ...
It is risky and doesn't really define as investment its more like luck by change .
The value of bitcoin goes up very fast and goes down is similar but as you can see, the profit that bitcoin can bring us when its value goes up, a number that any investor proved surprised, and with such profits, secret institutions will be very interested in investing money in bitcoin. Add a reason, secret organizations operate in an underground system, the sources of money and what they invest in need to have a high degree of anonymity, errors that sometimes bring a huge loss in the face of government, Bitcoin is a product that is too favorable for secret institutions to accumulate and increase assets It is risky and doesn't really define as investment its more like luck by change .
I don't think they would hold bitcoins instead of stocks that already have a bright future , since the value of bitcoins goes up and down so fast they must really be scared to hold something like this ..they would either save the money or invest in something stable ... Institutions needs stability and resources ... The good ones won't ...
It is risky and doesn't really define as investment its more like luck by change .
It is risky and doesn't really define as investment its more like luck by change .
Jump to: