Personally I don't see it as an issue as it means I have more choice and it forces competition.
The market will adjust itself accordingly, it is still trying to work itself out and the users are growing daily.
Topic: Do you think it is good that ICOs keep coming frequently? (Read 385 times)
Emergence of a large number of ICO causes the huge competition among teams, but also generates a large number of swindlers who want to be enriched on it, the mechanism for ICO regulation is necessary.
In decentralized platform they will not comes with the any big regulations bro so it will all operates independently in the crypto currency market bro. ICO is the one of the biggest investment which is keep on coming from the different person so work out independently and choose best ICO to get the more profit with the help of the potential ICO.
So i believe ICO are the healthy option to invest on the crypto platform.
Emergence of a large number of ICO causes the huge competition among teams, but also generates a large number of swindlers who want to be enriched on it, the mechanism for ICO regulation is necessary.
I do not think it is good if too many coins keep coming in a short span of time. Many times people cannot uphold a coin for a long time and it ends up into oblivion. There are some scammers too who pop up at times.
These can be avoided if the introduction of a coin is regularized. However, this is not easy and it comes as a collective responsibility of our crypto community.
When there are way too many coins fighting to occupy space and success it may not be conducive to the digital market. The demand for only one existing coin may be so much that the others will have to be withdrawn from the race because there is equal distrust with all new coins.
When a structure comes into existence and when there is a serious regulation in place then I feel doors will be automatically opened for new coins. There should be a balance and investment should be made after thorough analysis of the ICOs.
These can be avoided if the introduction of a coin is regularized. However, this is not easy and it comes as a collective responsibility of our crypto community.
When there are way too many coins fighting to occupy space and success it may not be conducive to the digital market. The demand for only one existing coin may be so much that the others will have to be withdrawn from the race because there is equal distrust with all new coins.
When a structure comes into existence and when there is a serious regulation in place then I feel doors will be automatically opened for new coins. There should be a balance and investment should be made after thorough analysis of the ICOs.
yes, you are right in your point no.1 but I believe if we do our due diligence we can get hold of those hidden gems which do get their value and retain too in the long run if they have a genuine idea and project behind it.
but yes there has to be some regulation sort of things to control the huge influx of icos.
ICO before was a good thing, because they were legitimate. Having good project and a promising team. After a huge succese with the past ICOs, a lot of people created a team to launch their own ICO projects with the hopes of success, while others took advantage and turned it to a scam. Theres nothing wrong with a lot of ICO's coming as long as its a legit project. The only thing that makes it worse is the ICO scams.
why not? it is market. Here comes what is popular
I think it is a good thing as it pushes competition and also gives the potential investor more choice.
if you find a weak ICO you simply move onto the next one.
if you find a weak ICO you simply move onto the next one.
Without ICO, a coin company couldn't survive the circulation and this time is different from Bitcoin's struggles last 2009 so the toughness of competition is really the hardest part on promoting a coin so therefore each coin company should come up with the most reliable project that could help them bring their coin advancement. Good social Community also more effective way to attract investors as well.
ICOs are the most effective way to promote and distribute coins and tokens to the public and the same time earning revenue at ICO sales. Yes, ICOs keep on coming because there's no regulations on launching ICOs in the market. Team dedication and project effectiveness are the few aspects that could compete with newer currencies this year.
I think it's a good thing as an person who understands ICO's. It allows me to pick and choose as I please. I understand though it can be very off putting for people who are new to this.
I also see it as a sort of competition, that will only increase the level of ICO's
I also see it as a sort of competition, that will only increase the level of ICO's
I do not think it is good if too many coins keep coming in a short span of time. Many times people cannot uphold a coin for a long time and it ends up into oblivion. There are some scammers too who pop up at times.
These can be avoided if the introduction of a coin is regularized. However, this is not easy and it comes as a collective responsibility of our crypto community.
When there are way too many coins fighting to occupy space and success it may not be conducive to the digital market. The demand for only one existing coin may be so much that the others will have to be withdrawn from the race because there is equal distrust with all new coins.
When a structure comes into existence and when there is a serious regulation in place then I feel doors will be automatically opened for new coins. There should be a balance and investment should be made after thorough analysis of the ICOs.
These can be avoided if the introduction of a coin is regularized. However, this is not easy and it comes as a collective responsibility of our crypto community.
When there are way too many coins fighting to occupy space and success it may not be conducive to the digital market. The demand for only one existing coin may be so much that the others will have to be withdrawn from the race because there is equal distrust with all new coins.
When a structure comes into existence and when there is a serious regulation in place then I feel doors will be automatically opened for new coins. There should be a balance and investment should be made after thorough analysis of the ICOs.
This is life whenever people learn of an opportunity and see the reward, some people would try to get some profits as quickly as possible while others would create something worthwhile
For now the Crypto market is in this phase; it is just a matter of time before people will learn the hard lesson and startups promote coins using best practices
it's not good, because if ico often comes and release will undoubtedly disrupt the token sales movement. and the concentration of investors for investment in one ico with large quantities should be split into some ico. finally an ico can not get the maximum target and only get the minimum target.
I think it is both bad and good. It is good as this increases competition in the crypto space, forcing developers to deliver better products in order to compete. On the other hand, it is bad as there is a higher chance that members of the crypto community get scammed.
with the coming of ico continuously, i still consider it good because in the era of crypto technology is increasingly sophisticated is very good for investment despite having a very high risk but provides many advantages. before investing in ico make sure that ico will not be a scam, learn the whitepaper or concept.
I do not see how that is not good. Sure, in terms of the market getting super saturated, one may be worried. However, this brings in room for competition and there is enough space for every developers or company to come up with theirs, work hard and get the coin staying relevant just like we have in the outside world. It is only left in the hands of the investors to select an ICO base on their own findings and believe in the team, that the project or coin in the end will do well because at the end, a lot of them will end up packing their bags out of the community and that is for sure.
to see how much profit we will get is the heart of our seriousness in analyzing an altcoin.
I think the current ICO project is too many, so it needs some regulation to restrict the ICO market, and the ICO market is full of the taste of speculation.
There aren't a lot of ICOs at the start of this year, which is kind of expected. The creation of ICOs depend on the people or groups that make them, different coins have different and specific uses for different platforms, you can not tell which will rise or which will die short after they are released. Some coins survive because of the innovation that their campaign offers, others are just trying to make profit.
In my opinion that no good because too many ICO make many investor confused to choose it and which ICO should be jump it. Now there are ahundreed ICO in amonth and some of them has bad quality project so that can disadvantageous investor. Now we need maksimum quality of the project and not quantity.
It will be better to meet new ICO rarely but they should be more effective reliable and responsible. I still don’t know what instrument should be created for verifying these projects. Such tools are exist yet but they are not truly productive.
As there a a lot of start ups there will be a lot of ICO to fund whose start ups. it is very easy to gather funds like this
Jump to: