Topic: Do You Think New Casino Should Partnered With Bounty Managers To Gain Trust? - page 10. (Read 1943 times)

I don't think they can't be part of the team if they don't have any skills that they can provide to the gambling site but with partnering with them through promotions, sure. Of course there's an advantage to the gambling site since known managers and reputable managers make sure that the site is safe and reliable and if not their reputation is on the line.

ya.ya.yo!

We notice that this is the trend in the last two years that many gambling sites have existed on the forum to run adverts for their business through signature campaign by highering campaign managers from the top reputed members of the forum. Before this time, the face of the campaign was on ico coins at least around 2017 when I newly joined this forum. At that time, most of the campaigns then where on coin listing and awareness around it and they also had the bounty side where you are promised to get some tokens at the end of the bounty timeframe (if they delivered or not is a talk for another time). All these bounty and campaign where organized by top members here , and I think majority of the bounty didn't succeed, they were scam mostly and I think that also affected the signature campaign side at that time because the ico business started collapsing and many signature campaign couldn't continue because they were lacking funds and not meeting up on sale basically because they were not really genuine and couldn't get trust from the public. I think at that season, the forum was almost empty of signature campaigns, just very few existed.

Therefore, my point to your question is that IMO from my explanation and background above, gradually casino business started having a place in the forum. I don't believe that it is the highering of the campaign managers from the forum as partners is the reason for the positive growth (because, the same campaign managers were managing the ico bounties and signature campaigns) but that the product is genuine. The casinos are mainly genuine and giving free opportunity for luck on people and players in their platform and without clear signs to scam people and even when they are alleged for being scammed, it is seriously examined and the casino management is ready for explanation and face the consequences. Because they are genuine with the business of exchange of service for money. Sometimes some casinos do bonus and contest for people. This is purely the casinos being ready to provide services, product and get patronage. The campaign managers are helping to get the work done on their product.

If you're pertaining about a signature campaign for a new casino then yes, partnering with trusted managers would be an advantage. Nowadays, gaining trust is quite hard because people want to get rid of scam sites and projects as much as possible so putting up a casino site with the help of trusted managers will surely boost the reputation of a site. Being promoted especially on this forum has a huge point.

It's a good boost to your project if you managed to partner with good managers but gaining trust through manager? I don't think that would work, even though they are partnered with good manager doesn't mean they can be trusted since managers only good at promoting projects.

Yes it has really an advantage knowing that there are scam campaign managers which can possibly run the whole budget allocated on the campaign. So acquiring quality reputable managers will be good since it can gain trust to its participants and also maybe to the people who supports the manager.

Also the trust will always depends on how the performance provide by the casino since if they fail especially on support side which is more important upon building a business for sure the trust score they get is low.

Well, it has an advantage because you have someone that can rely on when it comes to managing your sig campaign that can also attend to concerns of gamblers since he's also part of the team. But its not really necessary because many successful casinos here are able to maintain a good reputation and still competitive to other casinos even without partnership with a bounty managers. I think it depends how the casino team will manage their business to become successful with or without a running campaign.

Partnering with a trusted bounty manager will give them more visibility if they run the signature campaign for a couple of weeks as a bare minimum like many new entry casinos do here from time to time.The problem though is that the trust is never gained because of this but because of running an honest business,the bounty manager can't be held responsible for if this casino after a couple of months running the signature campaign cheats for example and do not pay a whale who has won the jackpot.

No, because campaign managers is just handling the bounty campaigns and how does the casino reputation be included on that? Casino is the only one can work with their reputation and campaign managers cannot do with it if they do good and provide outstanding service to their costumers then by that they can earn good reputation. Maybe on marketing perspective it can contribute a little bit since many can assure to receive what they are expecting for hiring a reputable campaign managers.

I think Royse have direct contact or part of the team who owns that gambling site (Not sure) but about partnership with bounty managers to gain trust won't guarantee that the gambling site would gain trust and reputation since the managers would stop involving or promoting the gambling site if it turns out that it would be a scam. So partnership with reputable bounty manager is good idea but won't guarantee that your gambling site would immediately build trust with the players and gamblers.

I am sure that a manager with a good reputation can greatly increase the popularity of the new casino with his services, but it seems to me that now not every well-known manager will take such a job because in case of fraud he may lose his reputation. Of course, you can use the scheme in which the manager gets to his account for the full implementation of his work, but I'm not sure that every new casino is able to meet these conditions.

I think it's not necessary, but it would certainly help. I don't know the exact numbers for the amount of new players that bounty campaigns pull, but for sure it is something positive because a lot of casinos do that. It increases exposure and help promote the brand easier across the forum and it's just smooth sailing from there.

Ultimately it is still within the discretion of the casino if they want to promote the brand or not with the help of a bounty manager. But with a lot of casinos doing bounties and creating signature campaigns, perhaps it's a no-brainer to do what others do, especially if it's proven effective.

With or without bounty managers, new casinos still have to be able to gain the trust of people because it is something that cannot be obtained easily and must be done alone. In this case, maybe the bounty manager can help introduce the casino. However, a representative from the casino should still be there and be involved in the discussion because the bounty manager may not necessarily know all the casino's plans. Even if the bounty manager eventually joins the casino as a representative, it would be better if someone could attend and help explain and help the bounty manager. But it all depends on the casino and the bounty manager and if they think that the presence of the bounty manager is enough, then that's okay.

It's not a necessity, but it is something that can easily build up their reputation rather quickly. But again, if the casino themselves offered quality services, then even by hiring well-known bounty managers or having them manage it themselves, they'd still be able to attract customers for their casinos. A lot of people here always check out people who post their casinos in the gambling section so it isn't that hard to actually tell them that your casino is existing. Making them remember would be the hard part.

And additionally, hiring bounty managers just simplifies the things they need to do, thereby reducing the amount of time they have to invest since they can just leave it up to the manager. If they know their stuff, then I'm pretty sure they'd be able to handle their own ann threads.

For gaining trust, it doesn't have to be the case. We've also seen gambling platforms that started with a signature campaign managed by a reputable manager but still ended up scamming. Casino name is on the tip of my tongue.

For starting on the right foot, absolutely. Competition among casinos today is tough and a platform will likely get ahead of the pack if they get someone who knows how to get them news users.

The competition among casinos is not based on who managed their promotions in a certain forum. It is always about casino features and services. So whether the fact that a new casino is having a signature campaign in this forum which is managed by a trusted manager will cause a spike or not, such effect will be insignificant to the general success or failure of the casino. So casino owners should adopt a wider and deeper view on how to make their business successful.

So many cases of this where new casino eventually shutdown because the casino offers nothing new but just dice, lottery ans slot with same interface to other trusted casino already. When promoted by a trusted bounty manager, it could spike users for awhile. But because of the competition in crypto casino, its a lot harder now. The owner will really have to have a deep pocket to succeed. 

Its possible that casino suddenly scam by shutting down the operation without notice once they are not profiting which could ruin the reputation of the bounty manager enable to pay the participants.

If there is an effect to new casinos by whoever managers they are hiring in promoting their sites, it will be very limited. There might be a few who would want to try it out because it is a new casino that is being promoted in bitcointalk under a respected manager but it will be only up to that.

Without a great experience, nobody would stick to that new casino. There's probably no gambler who remains playing in a certain casino simply because it has a signature campaign in the forum by a respected manager.

Just look at these signature campaigns all over the place and you will know that participating with them is a great impact to your casino. And if someone don't want to be part of it they always have a choice but it might take long for them to get noticed since a lot of gambling platforms and casino are competing nowadays.

You have to advance your marketing strategy so that you won't be left out and imagine how much it cost if you do it on your own compared to partnering with the reputable bounty manager.

There will be certainly an edge and a bias once you see an online gambling platform partnering with bounty/campaign managers here in the forum.

It somehow says a lot of an online casino partners with someone here. They have the necessary funds and they allocated it precisely to further boost their reputation across the forum. If I saw an online casino being affiliated with a bounty manager here, it will somehow give me the impression that such casino is trustworthy and genuine- but these are all just the INITIAL impression.

Despite having a partner, what matters are actual feedback from players who experienced using the services of the said online casino. If lack the online casino essentials (e.g. customer service, payouts, etc.), then they are bound to fail at some point.

Not necessary overall but it's a good choice and highly recommended.

But for me, should be just for the campaign purposes and not as a direct partnership as when it comes to an unexpected worst event, the name of the campaign manager involved will also be in jeopardy. And besides, just referring to the status of the campaign here in the forum, even if they don't hire or be associated with a campaign manager, there still lots of users who will participate in their campaign to promote the brand name as there's money for it. They just need to be honest throughout and payments should be sent on time or easily, just escrowed.

Although, I just hope these new sites won't use the reputation of those campaign managers to plan on their "fishy" attempt to lure users on the site.