Topic: Do you think Poker Player behavior is acceptable? (Read 473 times)

Thank you, that is enough.
I removed the feedback from your profiles and I am locking this topic now.
All the best.

Nope. All you can do is frequently check the topic.

Disregarding your speculation about the "why" and "who", none of this strikes me as unacceptable.

I learned something new

For me, his post about it is enough. I don't think we should require medical records to check someone's story. And I don't think any hospital registers him as "lightlord", just like "LoyceV" won't ever get hospital papers.
I can also imagine he doesn't need additional worries about his 10 years old online reputation at this moment.

Why? What's wrong with disagreeing with someone? It sounds like snowflakism to not talk to someone again because you don't always agree with him. I'd say ignore people if you don't value their posts and never want to read them again.
See, I disagree. You're not going to ignore me now and hurt my feelings, are you?

Why do you consider that a threat? If anyone wants to create an "Is LoyceV's behaviour acceptable"-topic: let them

I sense some anger indeed.... I think this is getting to you much more than an anonymous person on the internet should ever be able to.

This doesn't seem important enough for Mods Admins to start snooping around in PMs.

Inbox:



Outbox:

Very interesting story and I would like if moderators could confirm that you really talked in PM several times without exposing the content or your messages, but you can also post screenshot of that yourself.
If you show that than I will repent, say that I was wrong and lock this topic.
Thank you in advance.

In other words, a thread has been open for more than a month and a half and when I finally lock it, now it turns out that I am denying the right to reply.

Pass me the phone number of your dealer, that shit you're smoking is sure to be very good.

The "right to reply" in the thread that you locked.

But you knew that with your deflection.

Do you really want me to answer that nonsense? Well, I'm going to.

It is obvious that I did not deny anyone the right to reply. If you are going to maintain that I expect you to cite it with evidence just as I expect evidence that naim027 and I are the same person.

Without that evidence what you say is bullshit.

And the abusive language comes from previous insults.

Edit: dkbit98 has posted false feedback without any proof (because there isn't) saying that naim027 is connected to me.

I'm waiting for the proof dkbit98, and I think this deserves another thread.

You're on your own since you denied anyone the "right of reply" in your own thread and lost the high ground with your abusive language - now you want to come here do the same?

I don't think so.

Let's see if this works:

Can a moderator confirm that naim027 and I post from different IP addresses?

Does it prove that I am an alt of that guy? Since I already explained what happened?

Why don't you check yourself? Prove your claims.

LMAO. He obviously wan't going to do that because he already decided he was going to create this thread before I locked and unlocked it:


But since he can't prove that any of my behavior is unacceptable, he has seized on the fact that I locked and unlocked the thread. And I've done it again now to quote him.

Ninja could only find two uses of that wallet address. https://ninjastic.space/addresses?address=bc1qguayhqyd774w6sg83p7ehexqe3fp3r5ds0a8kv in different campaigns, but according to you, you cherry picked one post to copy from from a week prior.

I always find that whoever says things like that is because they have run out of arguments and he does not want to admit his mistake.

If you had evidence or believed that you would be able to find it, you would not say that.

I have thought of something to see if you do not have to waste time in these investigations and we dismantle OP's argument once and for all.

Honestly the starting point here could have been you sending a pm to poker player and asking questions. Then, if you're not satisfied with his answers, open a thread and ask opinions. I really don't think anyone cares either way as he is not breaking any forum rules that I can see, but as you know everyone here likes to give their opinion.

I would probably just chalk this up as coincidence rather then say alt account.

I always find the ones who sequel the loudest are usually most closely connected.

I'm probably biased on this topic, but it's just that I'm re-reading the OP and I find it, quite simply, ridiculous.

Let's review:


It is clear that if it is a bug, it is not a reputation issue. The reputation issue is if there is alt abuse like creating fake conversations or sending merits between your alts.

But then he says this:


Which completely contradicts the OP, the main point of this thread.

Again, dkbit98 can't just accuse me of that without further evidence. It doesn't seem to me like an acceptable behavior for a DT member.

Later on if I'm in the mood I'll do a point by point review of dkbit98's behavior in this case with quotes.



Today 100% of my posts are in this thread, and it looks like I'm going to write a few more here.  

Oh really? here we go. I have visited that thread for the first time and I was about to post a reply there. I was almost done but after I post I got an error and The thread was locked. I copied my post and saved it to my PC. I told the "Poker Player" I wrote a post and suddenly you locked it. I want to post there. could you please unlock one more time? I never knew him before yesterday. Since you are saying we are alts, prove it.


Oh WOW. Great Investigator you are. Can I say you are hired by dkbit98?
But, I feel sorry for you that you wasted your valuable time.
To find the connection between me and minairia3's wallet address, You don't have to go that far.

Here I Quoted both his and my post for better understanding,

Thread: [CFNP] Roobet.com Signature Campaign | The Honest Online Casino | Full Members+



What happened: We both Applied in the Same Campaign. While that guy applied a week ago. and I applied after a week. I got a Notification on November 23 Early Morning that Hhampuz just Posted there and a new position opened up. Instantly I logged in to the forum with my mobile to try. I copied previous participants Submission format and changed Merit count, post count, and profile UID. Then I posted it without changing the wallet address. I just logged in to Coinbase wallet, copied my BTC wallet address and edited that post, and replaced the wallet address.



The Hhampuz must be noticed that I made several changes to my post. Every time I got a merit, I edited the post and updated it.
So based on the last edited time, You cannot say that I made that change after 27 hours since I edited it after a few minutes of the post were made. LOL.
One more thing, You Noticed the wallet changes, did you intentionally miss the merit count changes?

Anyways, based on that, You cannot say that I am an alt of someone. Good try. Keep up your shitty investigation.

I don't quite understand why you post this here instead of in your known alts thread.

This thread, is supposedly about whether my behavior is acceptable. Which the cyberbully who created this thread already threatened me with before I locked LL reputation thread, and now all he has been able to come up with is that I unlocked and locked a thread.

If you have any proof that me and naim027 are connected, I'd appreciate it if you'd post it, but I'm telling you, you don't have it, just like the angry 7 year old who opens the thread doesn't have it either because we are not related at all. I didn't know anything about him until yesterday he sent me a PM for me to unlock the thread.

2 Accounts Connected:

minairia3, naim027,

About 27 hours after applying for a signature campaign, naim027 changed their wallet address from bc1qguayhqyd774w6sg83p7ehexqe3fp3r5ds0a8kv to 3Q24Jvtg2Lr5SyQE4RaCYtNTFxFwY44Sip - naim027 applied to join a full three weeks after minairia3 used that wallet address in a TOTALLY DIFFERENT SIGNATURE CAMPAIGN.

There are literally only twelve posts between naim027's application and when @Hhampuz accepts it (just three hours after naim027 changes their post).  No one in the twelve posts makes mention of the duplicated wallet address.

[OPEN] Roobet.com Signature Campaign | The Honest Online Casino | Full Members+ [Ninja]

---

---

[OPEN] blender.io Signature Campaign | Sr./Hero&Legendary Members | - [Ninja]

The thing is so simple even for a childishly angry person like the OP to understand.

A few hours after locking the thread, I went back to log in the forum and saw that I had a message from naim027 saying that he was about to reply in the thread and that just as he was about to post I locked the thread. He asked if I could unlock it so he could post the reply. At that moment I unlocked it and I was in the forum for a while but I saw that he didn't post it and I thought that maybe he was offline. After a while I received a PM from him again, saying that he had been again about to post without being able to because I had locked it again. Anyway, I unlocked it again, he posted and I locked it again.

Nice shitpost the OP has pulled out of his sleeve. Total because some time ago he came with demands for Lightlord's thread and as I didn't pay attention to him, and on top of that I gave him weighty arguments, he ended up leaving me a false feedback, which he has left in neutral instead of negative because he knows that if he leaves it in negative it would be an abuse of the trust system.


That's exactly what happens. I've got the PMs to prove it.


You are wrong about this. I have said several times in the thread that I would like things to change and change Lightlord's feedback from negative to neutral. I neither seek confrontation with him or anything and in the last few posts I have said that I am afraid that he does have some serious health or personal problem because he is letting his businesses die. Nor do I have an alt involved in his casinos or anything.


Not only you started by insulting me, but now you are making serious accusations against me. Prove it.

OK, well you did bring it up as well as lightlord's alleged health issues, which I have my doubts about (but to respect you and this thread, that's the last mention I'll make of the latter).  If you do, in fact, have evidence of Poker Player and naim027 being alts that you could present within minutes--as you said--why don't you just do that?  It's not a witch hunt, and it would explain what everyone here is spending time speculating about.

Saying something like "Oh, I could instantly prove so-and-so are alt accounts but I just don't have time for that" is just a backhanded slap in the face to whoever it is that's being accused.  It would be better to either not make a statement like that or show the evidence if you've got it.  Just saying.

Possible variant of how the events could unfold:

- Poker Player unlocked the thread at 22.58 (for a reason known to him).
- naim027 received a notification because she was subscribed to updates and publishes a post on 23.00.
- Poker Player sees that the discussion turns into a holivar and at 23.03 blocks the thread.


Then Bob and Alice exchange mutual neutral feedback of a negative nature, and that's all, since both understand that any unreasonable red tag will entail reputational losses. Whatever it was, adding to the lists of ignoring each other seems to me the best solution if someone disagrees with someone. 

As others have mentioned, naim027 may have asked PP to unlock the thread so he could add to it. I have done this in the past when I wanted to add a point to a thread locked by the OP of the thread, and most of the time they let me make the post.

I do however think it is poor etiquette to re lock a thread immidiately after allowing someone to make a post in a previously locked thread. I think if you are going to allow a post to be made, you should generally allow others to respond to the thread, and add their own comments. This is especially true if the post is asking questions about (and/or accusing) someone else who was participating in the thread.

I have all this turned off, that is why I asked about exact times

I can show the connection in few minutes, but I am not in the mood for alt witch hunts now and that was never the point of this topic.
Sending merits to your own alt accounts and talking to yourself is also not cool, but whatever.
I am not offended about insults he said to me, and I am glad that he finally closed that inquisition topic.

He said it himself, and I am not going to talk about him and speculate anymore.

Hmm.  Poker Player registered in 2020 and naim027 in 2017.  That doesn't mean the two accounts couldn't be alts, but in this case I find it unlikely based on writing style.  I know that could be faked, but I just have the feeling Poker Player didn't use an alt to make a quick reply to your post, lock the thread, and then merit his alt. 

I've been wrong before, but I think you're way off base on this one.

I'm not asking this in a challenging way, though it might look like it when you're reading it:  Do you know for a fact that lightlord truly has health issues?  I know that was what he claimed, but has that claim been substantiated?

1) I have at times asked people who locked threads to unlock them, and after I made my post they have been immediately locked again.

2) I think PP took this entire thing way to far and at this point I *think* there is something else going on and he is trying to force a confrontation with a LL and a few people who for the most part really don't give a crap. No idea why.

3) Reading the other thread again, I don't get why he got so bent out of shape unless an alt of his, is / was involved with LL or the casinos unless as I said in #2 he is trying to get a reaction for some reason.

4) As of *now* 1/2 of the last 20 posts from PP are about LL / his casinos. So make what you want from that.

-Dave

You don't have to be a mod for that. If you're watching the topic you get e-mail notifications. The topic was locked three times and unlocked twice. I still don't think it means anything. It's Poker Player's thread, he was asked repeatedly to lock it, do we really need to tell him now to lock it only after everyone gets their last word in... sounds a bit too much.

Yeah, but then unlocks it just so naim027 could make a post and locks it against seconds after... not a chance this is coincidence. 

I am just asking if moderators or someone else (maybe LoyceV) could see times of locking and unlocking of topics, that was my question

PS
My skin is thick (it can always get thicker) and I am just curious.

I'm gonna try my best LoyceV impression and suggest to grow a thicker skin and let it go. I've had some heated arguments with Poker Player but I don't really think he means any harm. Multiple users asked to lock the topic, he did it. End of story.

Edit: removed confusing irrelevant phrase.

I would like to ask DT members if there is a way to see when specific threads are being locked and unlocked, because I noticed something strange, maybe it's a bug or case of alt account abuse.

On October 10 member Poker Player created a TOPIC about other member Lightlord, that is know to have serious health issues.
Fast forward more than a month ago, this topic was still kept alive mostly artificially, disregarding several members (including me) asking to lock the topic.

Interesting thing happened after that, topic was locked, and then magically unlocked just so that butthurt thin skin member could use his alt account (or his buddy) naim027 to make a post and seconds after that to lock this topic all over again.
So he enabled his alt-account (buddy) to reply to my post not allowing me to answer anything, and not only that that Poker Player even merited this post.

Please check out time and see that topic was locked second/minutes after post made by naim027, and it was locked for hours before that.
Other members who participated in that conversation could probably confirm my claims.

Archive: https://archive.ph/lHfRM

Do you think Poker Player behavior is acceptable?