Well, sometimes I look at the creation, price history and even read the white paper of Bitcoin and I would imagine what Satoshi wanted about Bitcoin and if he feels happy with what is going on now.
I don't think Satoshi would have want Bitcoin to even become a legal tender. Satoshi said Bitcoin is for the common man and woman to accept in payment on agreement, that's a simple p2p. He never wanted authorities or government to come together in agreement for Bitcoiners to use Bitcoin. He wanted every man to do his thing in a decentralized manner. But I guess that Bitcoin as a legal tender will even make the government to put a very close eye on how every individual is spending their Bitcoin which was not meant to be so.
You can add what you think.
It doesn't matter. Bitcoin being legal tender or not being legal tender doesn't affect what Bitcoin is. If a govt adds Bitcoin as legal tender, like how El Salvador did, that doesn't mean that govt has any sort of control over Bitcoin. These are decisions happening in the external world. They don't affect what Bitcoin is, it would just allow much greater participation in Bitcoin, which is a good thing. Bitcoin is a decentralized currency that allows self-banking. No matter who calls it legal tender, no matter who holds it in ETFs or other investment vehicles, no matter who holds it as a store of value or spends it daily, or whatever, doesn't change one bit what Bitcoin is.
I see people on here complain if it becomes legal tender or complain that rich people and corporations own it or complain that people are going to hold it as investments instead of use as money. Why would anyone care about that??? It's a currency that anyone can use in whatever way they see fit for themslelves. There is literally nothing wrong with any of these things, including if nations eventually decide to promote Bitcoin to legal tender.