Topic: Do you trust core? - page 4. (Read 2696 times)
Bitcoin, a decentralized and trustless protocol ....
blockstream - 100% no
core - 95% no (theres only a couple people who defy the gmax whip, but you dont hear them speak much)
core have become too dependant on gmax CTO and founder of blockstream
evidence: if core was 'independent' there would be no:
'its not core its an altcoin'
'they just took core code and tweaked it so REKT them as an altcoin'
there would be
'anyone can independently tweak core code'
core - 95% no (theres only a couple people who defy the gmax whip, but you dont hear them speak much)
core have become too dependant on gmax CTO and founder of blockstream
evidence: if core was 'independent' there would be no:
'its not core its an altcoin'
'they just took core code and tweaked it so REKT them as an altcoin'
there would be
'anyone can independently tweak core code'
Core is in the hands of Blockstream; attempting to promote off-chain centralization. Yes, Miners are greedy assholes who too want centralization, BUT at-least their vested interests coincide with that of bitcoin users and holders. Bitcoin is pseudo-decentralized so pick the lesser of 2 evils which coincides with Satoshis original vision of Bitcoin.
i don't trust who is supporting bitcoin only for his own business and profit, you can't trust chinese miners as they primarely reason to exist is to milk yuan from bitcoin
there fore you can't trust their signaling for BU, what is left to trust? only core, but i'm always open for better proposal like the extention block for example, which on paper look better than segwit+LN
there fore you can't trust their signaling for BU, what is left to trust? only core, but i'm always open for better proposal like the extention block for example, which on paper look better than segwit+LN
seriously, do you trust what they tell you?
Jump to: