Topic: Doctors beg people to take the vaccine (Read 1356 times)

It's over Covid-19 is King cobra venom
Dr. Bryan Ardis reveals BOMBSHELL origins of covid, mRNA vaccines and remdesivir
https://www.brighteon.com/2b090826-787f-4d03-9f78-a1a80d3fe767

Clif high comment
https://clifhigh.substack.com/p/watch-the-water?s=r&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email

Have you already forgotten our discussion from two days ago, where I showed you exactly where in the UKHSA reports it explains how to interpret the data? I mean, I used the week 9 file as an example... and now you're saying "yeah but week 8" and then quoting the same thing. Please actually look at the detail of what you're posting, and in particular the associated disclaimers. Don't just parrot misleading rubbish.




Even if this were true, it would be entirely expected. And it says precisely zero about vaccine effectiveness.
More people died in 2021 than died in any single year of the stone age... therefore it was safer to live 10,000 years ago, right?  

An isolated figure can mean nothing or, worse, can be construed as meaning something that it does not.

If vaccines are hugely effective (but not 100% effective), and the vaccination level in a population is extremely high, and if vaccines are given to the most vulnerable people first, then what would you expect?
Efficacy of Covid vaccines is well understood; we have an abundance of data, with context. So don't strip it of context.

Toxic shots work as intended
https://www.bitchute.com/video/dKIfUZZ3Sn1Q/
Lets see in twenty years time how many died of cancer and what not





Autopsies Show COVID Vaccines Are Killing People
https://www.bitchute.com/video/KFTkTBY07tqQ/
Correlation DOES Equal Causation

The sources are so overwhelmingly abundant, that you must not be very interested if you can't find any. Simply go to any major Covid hospital and get the stats personally. Or, search for it in all the alternative media.

Is there any proof for your claiming? Any source? Certainly not, because as usual, you're simply stating something that is simply your opinion and has nothing to do with science. Even if you do provide a source, it will be one of those blogspot sites you conspiracy theorists read.

Except that about 90% of current hospital covid deaths are in the fully vaccinated.

You can check here how bad a particular batch/lot number is. And the so called "vaccine" a load of toxins only will make you sick.
https://howbad.info/

It's surprising that we're still talking about vaccine efficacy, something which can be statically proven, while unvaccinated people account for the largest percentage of deaths or severe illness, which would require hospitalization in an ICU. I believe that we're heading towards the end of the pandemic, it's an undeniable fact that vaccines played a vital role in reducing the amount of total deaths (6,054,087 till now).

Your chart still shows absolutely nothing that relates to vaccine efficacy. I've explained this before, so not sure why you persist in posting it. What point are you attempting to demonstrate?
BTW - on a totally unrelated note, did you know that more people die in plane crashes now than a hundred years ago? Time to get rid of that crappy modern technology and go back to building stuff out of wood and bits of string, amirite?

I would imagine Dr Fauci doesn't believe in hell....yet.

The battle will go on for years

I had a chance encounter with a dermatologist today.  I was just waiting for my wife when I saw a dermo clinic and they said the doctor could see me in half an hour.

As background, I am living in a certain English speaking SE Asian country.  I got something in the end of 2020 which had a profound effect on my immune system for about a week, then some fasciatis and unsightly lesions on my lower legs which have not really healed over the course of 15 months (though Ivermectin at around month 6 had a significant positive impact.)  Visually the best match seems to be what is known as Leishmaniasis.  (Just FWIW, study of this protozoal infection just happens to be why Dr. Fausti's NAIAD organization was funding research in Tunisia which involved paralyzing dogs and and letting flies eat their faces for hours on end.)

OK, so when I finally see the 'doctor', I tell her that all I want to do is to rule out certain of the 'neglected tropical diseases' which can product long term damage to internal organs of the infected.  I tell her how/when I got the symptoms and that Ivermectin in two doses, 6 months after the initial lesions, seemed to have had a noticeable effect.  She seemed to turn a little bit pale and halted the conversation.  She said it's not 'worms'.  It's a bug bite.  Then launches into a spiel about bug bites and gives me a prescription for bug bite medicine (15 months after the supposed incident mind you.)

Now even the most basic understanding of the multitude of parasitic infections involves the understanding that the 'bug' is just a carrier for the parasite.  It's 'bite' and the effects of the bug bite itself is transient and irrelevant.  That is easily learned just by taking a minute and looking at wikipedia even if it was somehow overlooked in 'med school'.  I refuse that to believe that any dermatologist is this ignorant.

I sense even more strongly that in various parts of the world, there is a broad and growing list of conditions that are a 'third rail' for 'doctors' and they are simply not allowed to 'identify' them (much less treat them.)  I've heard whistle-blower doctors say as much.

Let this be a lesson to people that they are going to be better off to 'be their own doctor' for a lot of things if they have an IQ higher than room temp.  What we have learned in the plandemic is that the corruption of the medical system is even greater than in my worst estimates.  Here in the 'developing world', the subversion is nearly 100%, but not quite.  The silver lining is if one can find the one or two doctors in a given area to didn't go along with the fraud, they are probably reliable (and probably competent as well.)  Good luck finding them though unless one is involved in a pretty strong (and currently 'underground' to a degree) network.



Better, but bitcointalk won't proxy it:
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Christine-Petersen-6/publication/234087025/figure/fig10/AS:299943567872009@1448523527931/The-life-cycle-of-Leishmania-species-Sandflies-inject-infective-promastigotes-into-a.png

And for fun, Dr. Mengele Jr. who is still the guy responsible for the health of Americans:

Are the doctors pockets full now or are they still begging people to take a useless toxin shot?
https://ibb.co/RQFKKk0

It's especially ironic that VAIDS (Vaccine Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome) seems to be a condition which develops relatively slowly over several years as it progressively weakens the immune system.  Repeat administration of the gene therapy 'boosters' do seem to speed up the process.

---

More on-topic, good 'Doctors beg people to take Ivermectin'.  And for good reason!

Whoever took this clip was good enough to link to the fully show where the show-notes are.

Only on this forum would you expect someone called "slowdeath" to be giving medical advice. Please don't take medical advice from someone who's username ends with death

Will never agree to this scam test.
Johns Hopkins University confirms: You can be vaccinated with a PCR test, even without knowing
https://www.cosmicworld.site/johns-hopkins-university-confirms-you-can-be-vaccinated-with-a-pcr-test-even-without-knowing?fbclid=IwAR0vNrjVxSnsvrxy5oxz6g4fjzzOAWo2_JEGf4Gzrj1ZrlboKqLZdfXWapk

Correct.

Obviously my experiments are not rigorous in almost any way.  I don't even know particularly what I was fighting although I think it a fair guess that in all cases it's been viral (or 'vaccine shedding' or 'broad area biological agent deployment', all of which are pretty hypothetical.)  Whatever I've had several episodes of seem 'flu-like' in most ways, and different from one another.

My best estimate is that within 6 hours the substance (in suggested or relatively high dosages) has a dramatic effect.  From 12->36 hours even more effect to the degree that I actually felt 'better than normal' in one case but I don't recommend the dosing that I used in at least one of those tests.  By 48 hours, I'll again start to feel mildly shitty again (but mostly don't take another dose if I already had two and a day later am done with the bug.)  My best estimate is that the substance has 'dropped out the peak' (if timed right) but it is less clear what impact it had on the whole duration of the event.  If any, it would have likely shortened it.

It's certainly a valid hypothesis that by taking Ivermectin on the first bout of illness it allowed for following bouts weeks later.  Again, without a lot more rigor and sample sizes and such, it would be impossible for me to deny this possibility.  Some countries have actually allowed genuine scientific studies of Ivermectin within the last year, but it's impossible to do in 'the developed world.'  I've not read any of these yet.  I'll be interested to see how their findings compare with my own.

I would stress again that THE reason I am willing to try these Ivermectin experiments on myself is because of safety profiles known before 2021.  Honestly, even when I got it it was under some political pressure which caused some supply/demand issues and I was unclear if I got bogus (or even dangerous) stuff or not.  I had it on pretty good faith that it was from the same suppliers who got doctors their personal supply.  After some personal experience, I developed enough confidence to suggest it for two people (and it provided seemingly good results for them too.)

Yes, I saw it. It may or may not be real, who knows? If real it would just mean that some people are willing to buy Ivermectin, which we know is true anyway.



Yes, I've seen those posts, quite interesting. The symptoms keep coming back though, right?



I'm still not sure what your criteria are for determining whether or not a chart is credible. Does it really seem likely that almost everyone has some sinister underlying motive?

We have seen vaccinated people die of Covid-19. People feel that since vaccinated people can be re-infected, then there is no need taking the vaccine.
Also, the rush in the production of the vaccine, plus superstition and religious belief will make doctors to keep begging.

Every semi-credible chart I look at shows that the de-pop shot is doing quite well at killing and maiming people, and, even as we cross the 40% increase in all-cause mortality for 2021, the killing fields are just starting to warm up.

Of course it will be the randomly appearing new form of HIV causing the 'Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome' which will be killing people like bugs, dontcha know?  Total coincidence and nothing do to with the injection or the genetic inserts from HIV when they designed the spike protein of course.

Two years ago at the 'two weeks to flatten the curve' juncture I would have drastically underestimated that such a high percentage of people could possibly be so gullible.  I also would have thought it was more correlated with IQ, but I didn't understand the mechanism of hypnosis at that time.

  https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/deep-dive-vaccine-acquired-immune-deficiency-syndrome-hiv-inserts-sars-cov-2-aftermath/

  https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/hiv-aids-compared-sars-cov-2-covid-19-darpas-immune-system-focused-bioweapon-agenda/

Have not watched the 2nd one yet.  Still going through some of the massive numbers of footnotes and links on the first.  Alas, it takes some time and effort to be informed about the world.  Most people just don't have what it takes.  Maybe they'll find the happiness they are promised by more simplistic presenters in Zuckerberg's 'metaverse' or whatever.