Pages:
Author

Topic: does anyone notice there are less coins to sell due to mass hodl? - page 2. (Read 3812 times)

hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 501
Quote
Re: does anyone notice there are less coins to sell due to mass hodl?

Huh  Wouldn't there be MORE coins to sell if everyone was hodling?? In my opinion, there's less coins to BUY because no one wants to give them up.
legendary
Activity: 2632
Merit: 1023
You do know that btc now isn't really a currency (and revolutionary, yet, but has potential), but store of value?!

yes but fiat currency isn't really currency either.
member
Activity: 67
Merit: 10
You do know that btc now isn't really a currency (and revolutionary, yet, but has potential), but store of value?!

It already is revolutionary. You haven't seen anything like this before, have you? If it's a good store of value then it is also a good currency. I use bitcoin to buy shit all the time. Any merchant that can hold for just a while will most likely be happy with their returns.

No it's not. Concept is revolutionary, but usage isn't. It's nowhere near it's potential.
Also gold and diamonds are good store of value, and you can buy shit with it, but it's not currency...


Holding = less bitcoin available = use of smaller BTC denomination (like mBTC) = purchase power of bitcoin going up

When there are enough merchants who adopt bitcoin and give discounts people will use it because it's simple and much easier. It has value as a payment system, that's one of the reasons people are adopting. Holding will not negate the value.
Denomination doesn't matter, hodling is bad for bitcoin (longterm, and good for hodlers, short to midterm).
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 508
With all those bit coin days destroyed one could theorize a huge purchase of XXX,XXX coins occurred by fortress or something which averted an entire bear market worth of coins on exchanges.
Didn't that huge spike coincide with 400k oldish coins moving from a single address? What makes you think a single holder would dump 400k coins on exchanges? Maybe I am misinterpreting.

I don't remember  400k except some transfer someone pointed out from 2011 to scare people. What we deduced was based on the days destroyed, it would have to be at least 96,000 coins.

Whatever the amount is, it could be some ASIC mining firm that wanted to cash out their investment or pay invoices on equipment parts. Who knows.
Oh yeah, I remembered wrong. Apparently I was remembering the 400k from here:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4092625
legendary
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
dafar consulting
Selling = using = adoptation = greatest year ever.
Hodling = not using = modest adoptation = same or little better than last year (at best), but with even more volatility (and that's bad longterm)

Holding = less bitcoin available = use of smaller BTC denomination (like mBTC) = purchase power of bitcoin going up

When there are enough merchants who adopt bitcoin and give discounts people will use it because it's simple and much easier. It has value as a payment system, that's one of the reasons people are adopting. Holding will not negate the value.
hero member
Activity: 1302
Merit: 502
You do know that btc now isn't really a currency (and revolutionary, yet, but has potential), but store of value?!

It already is revolutionary. You haven't seen anything like this before, have you? If it's a good store of value then it is also a good currency. I use bitcoin to buy shit all the time. Any merchant that can hold for just a while will most likely be happy with their returns.

With all those bit coin days destroyed one could theorize a huge purchase of XXX,XXX coins occurred by fortress or something which averted an entire bear market worth of coins on exchanges.
Didn't that huge spike coincide with 400k oldish coins moving from a single address? What makes you think a single holder would dump 400k coins on exchanges? Maybe I am misinterpreting.

I don't remember  400k except some transfer someone pointed out from 2011 to scare people. What we deduced was based on the days destroyed, it would have to be at least 96,000 coins.

Whatever the amount is, it could be some ASIC mining firm that wanted to cash out their investment or pay invoices on equipment parts. Who knows.



Or the Fortress fund?
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 255
When adoption is massive, it won't move much.  By then, it will be stable enough for business use.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 255
Selling = using = adoptation = greatest year ever.
Hodling = not using = modest adoptation = same or little better than last year

These are the same.
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
With all those bit coin days destroyed one could theorize a huge purchase of XXX,XXX coins occurred by fortress or something which averted an entire bear market worth of coins on exchanges.
Didn't that huge spike coincide with 400k oldish coins moving from a single address? What makes you think a single holder would dump 400k coins on exchanges? Maybe I am misinterpreting.

I don't remember  400k except some transfer someone pointed out from 2011 to scare people. What we deduced was based on the days destroyed, it would have to be at least 96,000 coins.

Whatever the amount is, it could be some ASIC mining firm that wanted to cash out their investment or pay invoices on equipment parts. Who knows.

member
Activity: 67
Merit: 10
You do know that btc now isn't really a currency (and revolutionary, yet, but has potential), but store of value?!
hero member
Activity: 1302
Merit: 502
And who said it will kill btc?!

And that'll probably kill btc (as a currency and something revolutionary).
member
Activity: 67
Merit: 10
And who said it will kill btc?!
hero member
Activity: 1302
Merit: 502

Volatility is bad for merchants wanting to use everyday in their coffee shops, bookstores, etc.  Volatility is bad for someone wanting to use this online purchases, ie, Overstock.com.  Will they be adjusting the price daily?  Hourly?  Etc.

Is it great for speculators though.

lololol. Bitpay.
Ideally, I think, merchants accepting bitcoin ≠ merchants dumping bitcoin for fiat.

I don't disagree. To say it will kill bitcoin is retarded though.
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 508

Volatility is bad for merchants wanting to use everyday in their coffee shops, bookstores, etc.  Volatility is bad for someone wanting to use this online purchases, ie, Overstock.com.  Will they be adjusting the price daily?  Hourly?  Etc.

Is it great for speculators though.

lololol. Bitpay.
Ideally, I think, merchants accepting bitcoin ≠ merchants dumping bitcoin for fiat.
hero member
Activity: 1302
Merit: 502
Also, larger BTC holders looking to sell will get a better price when selling off the markets to funds like the BIT, this will happen more and more.

Overall I'd guess the supply that's for sale has gotten slimmer, but it's harder to determine the supply than in the past and it will keep getting harder than in the past.
Nobody sane will pay more for BTC off exchange. Whales, funds, etc. especially
There is no incentive for anyone to sell, why would anyone sell Bitcoin when it's about to witness it's greatest year ever ? The fear of Bitcoin dying/failing has gone, people have never been as confident about Bitcoin as ever before.
Selling = using = adoptation = greatest year ever.
Hodling = not using = modest adoptation = same or little better than last year (at best), but with even more volatility (and that's bad longterm)

I'm not so sure it its BTC has capital "S" store of value (PeerCoin is likely better at this though). This does not rely on adoption of coffee shops.

Also volatility is not bad neither are speculators.
Volatility is real bad. At least for regular people and businesses. But hey, that's not important, like future of btc depends on them...
Volatility is part of the system. An intended part of the system. Get over it. No, excuse me. Get the fuck over it already.

(also nobody who accepts bitcoin as payment cares thanks to bitpay so really, shut up)
I can get over it cause i'm trader, but others won't. And that'll probably kill btc (as a currency and something revolutionary).
Btw. if it's intended part of the system, it's a bug, not feature

lololol. Bitpay.
member
Activity: 67
Merit: 10
Also, larger BTC holders looking to sell will get a better price when selling off the markets to funds like the BIT, this will happen more and more.

Overall I'd guess the supply that's for sale has gotten slimmer, but it's harder to determine the supply than in the past and it will keep getting harder than in the past.
Nobody sane will pay more for BTC off exchange. Whales, funds, etc. especially
There is no incentive for anyone to sell, why would anyone sell Bitcoin when it's about to witness it's greatest year ever ? The fear of Bitcoin dying/failing has gone, people have never been as confident about Bitcoin as ever before.
Selling = using = adoptation = greatest year ever.
Hodling = not using = modest adoptation = same or little better than last year (at best), but with even more volatility (and that's bad longterm)

I'm not so sure it its BTC has capital "S" store of value (PeerCoin is likely better at this though). This does not rely on adoption of coffee shops.

Also volatility is not bad neither are speculators.
Volatility is real bad. At least for regular people and businesses. But hey, that's not important, like future of btc depends on them...
Volatility is part of the system. An intended part of the system. Get over it. No, excuse me. Get the fuck over it already.

(also nobody who accepts bitcoin as payment cares thanks to bitpay so really, shut up)
I can get over it cause i'm trader, but others won't. And that'll probably kill btc (as a currency and something revolutionary).
Btw. if it's intended part of the system, it's a bug, not feature
hero member
Activity: 1302
Merit: 502

Volatility is bad for merchants wanting to use everyday in their coffee shops, bookstores, etc.  Volatility is bad for someone wanting to use this online purchases, ie, Overstock.com.  Will they be adjusting the price daily?  Hourly?  Etc.

Is it great for speculators though.

lololol. Bitpay.
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278
Also, larger BTC holders looking to sell will get a better price when selling off the markets to funds like the BIT, this will happen more and more.

Overall I'd guess the supply that's for sale has gotten slimmer, but it's harder to determine the supply than in the past and it will keep getting harder than in the past.
Nobody sane will pay more for BTC off exchange. Whales, funds, etc. especially
There is no incentive for anyone to sell, why would anyone sell Bitcoin when it's about to witness it's greatest year ever ? The fear of Bitcoin dying/failing has gone, people have never been as confident about Bitcoin as ever before.
Selling = using = adoptation = greatest year ever.
Hodling = not using = modest adoptation = same or little better than last year (at best), but with even more volatility (and that's bad longterm)

I'm not so sure it its BTC has capital "S" store of value (PeerCoin is likely better at this though). This does not rely on adoption of coffee shops.

Also volatility is not bad neither are speculators.
Volatility is real bad. At least for regular people and businesses. But hey, that's not important, like future of btc depends on them...
Volatility is part of the system. An intended part of the system. Get over it. No, excuse me. Get the fuck over it already.

(also nobody who accepts bitcoin as payment cares thanks to bitpay so really, shut up)
hero member
Activity: 994
Merit: 501
Also, larger BTC holders looking to sell will get a better price when selling off the markets to funds like the BIT, this will happen more and more.

Overall I'd guess the supply that's for sale has gotten slimmer, but it's harder to determine the supply than in the past and it will keep getting harder than in the past.
Nobody sane will pay more for BTC off exchange. Whales, funds, etc. especially
There is no incentive for anyone to sell, why would anyone sell Bitcoin when it's about to witness it's greatest year ever ? The fear of Bitcoin dying/failing has gone, people have never been as confident about Bitcoin as ever before.
Selling = using = adoptation = greatest year ever.
Hodling = not using = modest adoptation = same or little better than last year (at best), but with even more volatility (and that's bad longterm)

I'm not so sure it its BTC has capital "S" store of value (PeerCoin is likely better at this though). This does not rely on adoption of coffee shops.

Also volatility is not bad neither are speculators.
Volatility is real bad. At least for regular people and businesses. But hey, that's not important, like future of btc depends on them...

Volatility is bad for merchants wanting to use everyday in their coffee shops, bookstores, etc.  Volatility is bad for someone wanting to use this online purchases, ie, Overstock.com.  Will they be adjusting the price daily?  Hourly?  Etc.

Is it great for speculators though.
member
Activity: 67
Merit: 10
Also, larger BTC holders looking to sell will get a better price when selling off the markets to funds like the BIT, this will happen more and more.

Overall I'd guess the supply that's for sale has gotten slimmer, but it's harder to determine the supply than in the past and it will keep getting harder than in the past.
Nobody sane will pay more for BTC off exchange. Whales, funds, etc. especially
There is no incentive for anyone to sell, why would anyone sell Bitcoin when it's about to witness it's greatest year ever ? The fear of Bitcoin dying/failing has gone, people have never been as confident about Bitcoin as ever before.
Selling = using = adoptation = greatest year ever.
Hodling = not using = modest adoptation = same or little better than last year (at best), but with even more volatility (and that's bad longterm)

I'm not so sure it its BTC has capital "S" store of value (PeerCoin is likely better at this though). This does not rely on adoption of coffee shops.

Also volatility is not bad neither are speculators.
Volatility is real bad. At least for regular people and businesses. But hey, that's not important, like future of btc depends on them...
Pages:
Jump to: