Topic: Does Bitcoin had a back up by real money? (Read 1661 times)
Well in layman's terms, bitcoin is not backed up by anything but trust from both sides A and B. It is but air. But even so, bitcoin has people with big names that are fond of using ng bitcoin and making it a store of value. Which is if you think about it, isn't that bad, just as fiat is backed by government and banks, bitcoin has these big names that can back it up since they are heavily invested on it. Although not as reassuring, it still gains trust from many other crypto enthusiasts like you and me. For all we know, thee may also be government or bank employees that are invested in not just bitcoin but in this industry as a whole. That's how I understand bitcoin.
You might not understand how currency exchanges work, because you think Crypto currency has to be backed by Fiat currencies to be real money. If you bought Bitcoin from someone and not from a exchange, you can still pay for services and goods with those bitcoins, without you first having to convert it to Fiat (cash) currencies. (You just need to find those merchants or online websites that accepts Bitcoin as a payment option.)
Also, Exchanges are just the middleman between two parties.. On the one end you have people who wants to sell bitcoins for Fiat and on the other end you have people who wants to buy bitcoins with Fiat and they bring the two people together. (The charge a fee for that service)
Also, Exchanges are just the middleman between two parties.. On the one end you have people who wants to sell bitcoins for Fiat and on the other end you have people who wants to buy bitcoins with Fiat and they bring the two people together. (The charge a fee for that service)
does real money back up by real money?
Bitcoin is not back up money,it just by demand and supply so the bitcoin has value and it can be converted into money which equivalent value on the exchanges at the current day.
backed up by "belief " i think , belive that bitcoin will stable on the price and will not gone or scam instantly i think like that
although bitcoin didnt back up by anything , but dont forget about cost operational to mine bitcoin, it has similarity with gold back up for each fiat printed.each bitcoin mined has expensive cost too.
bitcoin has no real money reserves, only fiat has real money reserves. when everyone exchanges bitcoin for fiat, will it sell all? depending on the amount of fiat that is accommodated in the exchange, when enough, all bitcoins can be sold.
but if everyone sells bitcoin who buys it?
but if everyone sells bitcoin who buys it?
I think it is more like how much people sre willing to pay for it. Fron there the price just keeps on moving depending on the supply and demand for the coin. Same thing with gold and other precious metals. It will get more and more expensive as more and more people want to gwt their hands on a limited number of coin.
I think that bitcoin is similar to a product where bitcoin has a price when bitcoin doesn't have a price it won't be possible for other people to compete to have it as much as possible.
I think it is more like how much people sre willing to pay for it. Fron there the price just keeps on moving depending on the supply and demand for the coin. Same thing with gold and other precious metals. It will get more and more expensive as more and more people want to gwt their hands on a limited number of coin.
backed up by "belief " i think , belive that bitcoin will stable on the price and will not gone or scam instantly i think like that
I just wonder how bitcoin really works on local exchange around the world because if you will going to need a real money and you have bitcoin definitely you can sell your bitcoin and exchange it with real money in your local to be used. Well if all people around the world would exchange their bitcoin holdings is it possible because bitcoin is being back up by real money?
That is what happening now while bitcoin is in a stage of public analizing towards negotiation for final acoption for every people. You are definitely true local exchanger now is a back up of bitcoin to fiat money.
maybe, or maybe there is a bank that supports and is ready to print money on every bitcoin exchange to fiat? I also haven't found a theory about it.
Yeah bitcoin has real money on its back because when I buy bitcoin I will have to pay for it. Exchange will convert my local currency into dollar and then into bitcoin. That’s why I can say that all the bitcoin in the world has a value in real money and you can cash your coins any time for real money. Ups and downs do not affect the capitalization of real money. 
Bitcoins have no intrinsic value. But since they were introduced to the world in 2009 by inventor Satoshi Nakamoto (a pseudonym), they have turned into a billion-dollar market and have been designated a currency by the U.S. government. Since the days when stones and shells were recognized as a means of payment, currency has taken many forms. What makes bitcoin a currency is what it does, not what it is. "To the extent it looks, walks and acts like a duck, this 'duck' is a currency,"
The US government has never designated Bitcoin a currency. The closest to an official designation of any kind is by the IRS, which has deemed Bitcoin to be "property" for taxing purposes. That's not a currency. It is true however that Bitcoin has no intrinsic value. It doesn't represent anything in particular, but people have started acknowledging it to have value. This is an entirely artificial construct, and the value is only a representation of what large groups of people agree it is worth. Because of this, there is an inherent desire to constantly value it ever higher, because that's the only way you can get a return. On the other hand, potential buyers want to value it lower so they don't spend as much to acquire it. But real currencies are being traded to acquire the property (Bitcoin), the crypto itself doesn't function as a currency very much in the real world.
Ah but if it has no intrinsic value, how can they declare it an asset? Can't have both I'm afraid...
In the new age of the internet, anything online can be deemed to have intrinsic value. We saw this phenomenon in the late 1990's when everyone thought it would be a great idea to invest in websites with a lot of hits. These hits were of course perceived value, but they were being sold as intrinsic value. Logic had it at the time that more hits meant more profits for a company.
The intrinsic value in bitcoin is the blockchain behind it. That very code makes it worth much more than any other idea in the last 20 years.
You're confusing intrinsic value with extrinsic value. Intrinsic value is something that has value due to utility or some innate feature of the object that makes it valuable; essentially that the value comes from within (hence the name "intrinsic"). Extrinsic value is the value people assign to something, perhaps even arbitrarily. Silver has intrinsic value because it's a necessary metal for many industrial uses. Water has intrinsic value because it's necessary to survive. Both of these have value that comes from within the commodity. Bitcoin has value because everyone just decides it does. That's why it has value as an asset and it isn't intrinsic.
Your website example is not an example of things with intrinsic value. It was people arbitrarily assigning value to something that had no intrinsic value, which eventually collapsed the bubble. Bitcoin has traced the same path with the 70% crash this year. Additionally, Bitcoin isn't necessary for blockchain, so if you want to make the argument the blockchain has intrinsic value (and I'm not even sure I agree with that), it would mean nothing for Bitcoin.
Bitcoins have no intrinsic value. But since they were introduced to the world in 2009 by inventor Satoshi Nakamoto (a pseudonym), they have turned into a billion-dollar market and have been designated a currency by the U.S. government. Since the days when stones and shells were recognized as a means of payment, currency has taken many forms. What makes bitcoin a currency is what it does, not what it is. "To the extent it looks, walks and acts like a duck, this 'duck' is a currency,"
The US government has never designated Bitcoin a currency. The closest to an official designation of any kind is by the IRS, which has deemed Bitcoin to be "property" for taxing purposes. That's not a currency. It is true however that Bitcoin has no intrinsic value. It doesn't represent anything in particular, but people have started acknowledging it to have value. This is an entirely artificial construct, and the value is only a representation of what large groups of people agree it is worth. Because of this, there is an inherent desire to constantly value it ever higher, because that's the only way you can get a return. On the other hand, potential buyers want to value it lower so they don't spend as much to acquire it. But real currencies are being traded to acquire the property (Bitcoin), the crypto itself doesn't function as a currency very much in the real world.
Ah but if it has no intrinsic value, how can they declare it an asset? Can't have both I'm afraid...
In the new age of the internet, anything online can be deemed to have intrinsic value. We saw this phenomenon in the late 1990's when everyone thought it would be a great idea to invest in websites with a lot of hits. These hits were of course perceived value, but they were being sold as intrinsic value. Logic had it at the time that more hits meant more profits for a company.
The intrinsic value in bitcoin is the blockchain behind it. That very code makes it worth much more than any other idea in the last 20 years.
You're confusing intrinsic value with extrinsic value. Intrinsic value is something that has value due to utility or some innate feature of the object that makes it valuable; essentially that the value comes from within (hence the name "intrinsic"). Extrinsic value is the value people assign to something, perhaps even arbitrarily. Silver has intrinsic value because it's a necessary metal for many industrial uses. Water has intrinsic value because it's necessary to survive. Both of these have value that comes from within the commodity. Bitcoin has value because everyone just decides it does. That's why it has value as an asset and it isn't intrinsic.
Your website example is not an example of things with intrinsic value. It was people arbitrarily assigning value to something that had no intrinsic value, which eventually collapsed the bubble. Bitcoin has traced the same path with the 70% crash this year. Additionally, Bitcoin isn't necessary for blockchain, so if you want to make the argument the blockchain has intrinsic value (and I'm not even sure I agree with that), it would mean nothing for Bitcoin.
Is it the common usage? Because bitcoin is used and has a higher marketcap than most countries money as well. Is it laws and acceptance? Because I am pretty sure there are more places in the world where you can spend bitcoin and can't spend Zimbabwe trillions. Bitcoin IS REAL MONEY.
maybe, or maybe there is a bank that supports and is ready to print money on every bitcoin exchange to fiat? I also haven't found a theory about it.
Bitcoin is back up by it market capitalization and that is why bitcoin is registered in the world exchange market using the blockchain technology as it bank and once it market capitalization in the exchange market remains high the central bank have no choice then to back it up with traditional faint money so long as the block can be min.
Now the process of exchanging Bitcoin for real money has become easier due to the popularization of localbitcoins, but still it takes considerable time, in some countries it carries the risks of blocking cards and has high commissions of 5-8%.
I just wonder how bitcoin really works on local exchange around the world because if you will going to need a real money and you have bitcoin definitely you can sell your bitcoin and exchange it with real money in your local to be used. Well if all people around the world would exchange their bitcoin holdings is it possible because bitcoin is being back up by real money?
Yes, Bitcoin is backed by our Fiat currency. Though it is a digital currency, it could also serve as a means of transacting online because it can be converted to Fiat if used as a payment.
on exchanges, in speculative and not just order, there is reinforcement of the crypto currency with real money. People enter their dollars / rubles / euros and buy bitcoins on them, coins are reinforced directly with money, which in turn is backed by the real sector, where they earn money for goods and services. The growing turnover of "living money" inevitably supports and increases the cost of bitcoin.
Bitcoins have no intrinsic value. But since they were introduced to the world in 2009 by inventor Satoshi Nakamoto (a pseudonym), they have turned into a billion-dollar market and have been designated a currency by the U.S. government. Since the days when stones and shells were recognized as a means of payment, currency has taken many forms. What makes bitcoin a currency is what it does, not what it is. "To the extent it looks, walks and acts like a duck, this 'duck' is a currency,"
The US government has never designated Bitcoin a currency. The closest to an official designation of any kind is by the IRS, which has deemed Bitcoin to be "property" for taxing purposes. That's not a currency. It is true however that Bitcoin has no intrinsic value. It doesn't represent anything in particular, but people have started acknowledging it to have value. This is an entirely artificial construct, and the value is only a representation of what large groups of people agree it is worth. Because of this, there is an inherent desire to constantly value it ever higher, because that's the only way you can get a return. On the other hand, potential buyers want to value it lower so they don't spend as much to acquire it. But real currencies are being traded to acquire the property (Bitcoin), the crypto itself doesn't function as a currency very much in the real world.
Ah but if it has no intrinsic value, how can they declare it an asset? Can't have both I'm afraid...
In the new age of the internet, anything online can be deemed to have intrinsic value. We saw this phenomenon in the late 1990's when everyone thought it would be a great idea to invest in websites with a lot of hits. These hits were of course perceived value, but they were being sold as intrinsic value. Logic had it at the time that more hits meant more profits for a company.
The intrinsic value in bitcoin is the blockchain behind it. That very code makes it worth much more than any other idea in the last 20 years.
You're confusing intrinsic value with extrinsic value. Intrinsic value is something that has value due to utility or some innate feature of the object that makes it valuable; essentially that the value comes from within (hence the name "intrinsic"). Extrinsic value is the value people assign to something, perhaps even arbitrarily. Silver has intrinsic value because it's a necessary metal for many industrial uses. Water has intrinsic value because it's necessary to survive. Both of these have value that comes from within the commodity. Bitcoin has value because everyone just decides it does. That's why it has value as an asset and it isn't intrinsic.
Your website example is not an example of things with intrinsic value. It was people arbitrarily assigning value to something that had no intrinsic value, which eventually collapsed the bubble. Bitcoin has traced the same path with the 70% crash this year. Additionally, Bitcoin isn't necessary for blockchain, so if you want to make the argument the blockchain has intrinsic value (and I'm not even sure I agree with that), it would mean nothing for Bitcoin.
Bitcoins have no intrinsic value. But since they were introduced to the world in 2009 by inventor Satoshi Nakamoto (a pseudonym), they have turned into a billion-dollar market and have been designated a currency by the U.S. government. Since the days when stones and shells were recognized as a means of payment, currency has taken many forms. What makes bitcoin a currency is what it does, not what it is. "To the extent it looks, walks and acts like a duck, this 'duck' is a currency,"
The US government has never designated Bitcoin a currency. The closest to an official designation of any kind is by the IRS, which has deemed Bitcoin to be "property" for taxing purposes. That's not a currency. It is true however that Bitcoin has no intrinsic value. It doesn't represent anything in particular, but people have started acknowledging it to have value. This is an entirely artificial construct, and the value is only a representation of what large groups of people agree it is worth. Because of this, there is an inherent desire to constantly value it ever higher, because that's the only way you can get a return. On the other hand, potential buyers want to value it lower so they don't spend as much to acquire it. But real currencies are being traded to acquire the property (Bitcoin), the crypto itself doesn't function as a currency very much in the real world.
Ah but if it has no intrinsic value, how can they declare it an asset? Can't have both I'm afraid...
In the new age of the internet, anything online can be deemed to have intrinsic value. We saw this phenomenon in the late 1990's when everyone thought it would be a great idea to invest in websites with a lot of hits. These hits were of course perceived value, but they were being sold as intrinsic value. Logic had it at the time that more hits meant more profits for a company.
The intrinsic value in bitcoin is the blockchain behind it. That very code makes it worth much more than any other idea in the last 20 years.
Jump to: