Does He evade Ban? Is It Sufficient Proof? - page 2.

nutildah

legendary

Activity: 3010

Merit: 8114

Quote from: KingsDen on September 03, 2022, 07:16:53 PM

Quote from: Crypt0S0ul on September 03, 2022, 10:10:41 AM

I sent him a PM regarding this on 31st August and I didn't get an answer yet. So, Let's discuss it publicly.

I don't really know why some users ignore PMs relating to accusation, but later on when things are getting serious you see them show up with some excuses/reasons/defense.

A simple PM reply stating that the address they send btc to is an exchange or a corporative address (if something of that exist), would have solved this problem. Now, you have made it public, I believe he will have to reply. Maybe he is waiting to see the forum reactions first before he will clear the air.

I disagree. Nobody owes you an explanation in such matters. If you can't make your case using only post history + blockchain, then you don't have a case.

Privacy-invasive behavior should be discouraged.

This type of inquisition is the lowliest approach to merit farming.

The Sceptical Chymist

legendary

Activity: 3556

Merit: 7011

Top Crypto Casino

Quote from: Stalker22 on September 03, 2022, 03:15:54 PM

That address belongs to a wallet from coins.ph - Philippine crypto exchange. So he sends coins every week to exchange for cash.

I understand that concept, but does coins.ph only give out one address for many individual members to use? If that is indeed the case, then there's no merit to OP's suspicion.

Even if it isn't true, sending coins to someone's address every week doesn't necessarily mean they're alt accounts. There could be any number of reasons someone would do that, and to hand out negative/neutral trust based on that evidence alone would be unfair IMO.

KingsDen

legendary

Activity: 1302

Merit: 1089

Goodnight, o_e_l_e_o 🌹

Quote from: Crypt0S0ul on September 03, 2022, 10:10:41 AM

I sent him a PM regarding this on 31st August and I didn't get an answer yet. So, Let's discuss it publicly.

I don't really know why some users ignore PMs relating to accusation, but later on when things are getting serious you see them show up with some excuses/reasons/defense.

A simple PM reply stating that the address they send btc to is an exchange or a corporative address (if something of that exist), would have solved this problem. Now, you have made it public, I believe he will have to reply. Maybe he is waiting to see the forum reactions first before he will clear the air.

coupable

hero member

Activity: 2338

Merit: 757

Top-tier crypto casino and sportsbook

These transactions cannot be considered as proof that the accounts are owned by one person.
In the country where I live, there are local sellers who only have wallets on the exchanges where they have a single address that they can't change and they take all the bitcoin they buy at one address. Which means that if there are many transfers that reach that address, there is a hypothesis that the banned member is a reseller who buys Bitcoin from the suspicious member every week. As long as this hypothesis exists, it is not possible to confirm the connection between the two accounts based on transactions only.
Of course, almost all of us are sure that the two accounts belong to one person, but from the point of view of the moderators, all possible assumptions must be taken into account so that no one is wronged.

logfiles

copper member

Activity: 2198

Merit: 1837

🌀 Cosmic Casino

Quote from: Pandu Geddon on September 03, 2022, 10:32:22 AM

So you have to provide data matching from the banned account with the active account. and of course, the post is still on the forums. it hasn't been removed by the user, as @Xal0lex said.

Quote from: Xal0lex on August 13, 2022, 03:37:10 PM

Based on their own experience, global moderators do not consider links to posts from Ninjastic.space, as well as Loyce.club, as evidence. Posts that are used as evidence of any violation of the rules by users should be on the forum on a mandatory basis.

Wow, this is a new one for me, I had no idea. Any reason why they don't consider data from third party archive sites?

OP, have you tried reporting this case of ban evasion to the mods? If not, please try and do so. Maybe they just didn't see the post. Personally, I think the blockchain evidence gives enough proof.

Stalker22

legendary

Activity: 1526

Merit: 1359

Code:

35fB61PKCR1a1PTuLwjCk7WkCi2WY6wLEh

That address belongs to a wallet from coins.ph - Philippine crypto exchange. So he sends coins every week to exchange for cash. This means that @crzy is most likely an alt of other accounts or part of a farm of accounts that all used that same deposit address.

Pandu Geddon

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 583

most likely the @crzy account is indeed an alternative to the banned account. but the proof of transaction that you provide will not be enough to penalize the @crzy account.

It seems that the Mod is also more careful in handling cases of account ban reports compared to cases of plagiarism.

So you have to provide data matching from the banned account with the active account. and of course, the post is still on the forums. it hasn't been removed by the user, as @Xal0lex said.

Quote from: Xal0lex on August 13, 2022, 03:37:10 PM

Based on their own experience, global moderators do not consider links to posts from Ninjastic.space, as well as Loyce.club, as evidence. Posts that are used as evidence of any violation of the rules by users should be on the forum on a mandatory basis.

Crypt0S0ul

full member

Activity: 127

Merit: 142

Defend Bitcoin and its PoW: bitcoincleanup.com

Username crzy
Bitcoin Address: bc1q94fzl2e920xe8eepq3m2m7qx4khszt0ahshhy7

Quote from: crzy on November 16, 2020, 10:37:26 PM

Bitcointalk Profile Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/crzy-1151196
Current amount of posts (including this one): 2330
SegWit (preferably bech32) BTC Address for Payouts: bc1q94fzl2e920xe8eepq3m2m7qx4khszt0ahshhy7
EARNED merit in the last 120 days: 6

I'll update my signature once accepted and once my campaign ended tomorrow. Thank you!

I sent him a PM regarding this on 31st August and I didn't get an answer yet. So, Let's discuss it publicly. I am not sure if it's sufficient to prove the connection. He is on Duelbits signature campaign for two years. Every week, He receives his payment to this address bc1q94fzl2e920xe8eepq3m2m7qx4khszt0ahshhy7. After receiving the payment, He sent it to this address every week. 35fB61PKCR1a1PTuLwjCk7WkCi2WY6wLEh
Which is used by banned users. Three of them are banned and one of them gets signature banned until 2029.

Quote from: Veleor on September 24, 2019, 09:07:54 PM

Accounts Connected:

Seeker01 (banned)
richminded (banned)
Dreamchaser21 (banned)
creeps (Signature banned until August 02, 2029)
CryptoManiac21 (inactive) - Brand New profile, probably one of the connected accounts

Proof:

Quote from: creeps on August 30, 2018, 05:21:57 AM

Btctalk name: creeps
Rank: Full Member
Current post count: 871
BTC address(No BCH): 35fB61PKCR1a1PTuLwjCk7WkCi2WY6wLEh
Wear appropriate signature: YES
Wear avatar: YES

(Archive)

Quote from: Seeker01 on July 24, 2017, 06:43:25 PM

Btctalk name : Seeker01
Rank : Full Member
Current post count : 575
BTC Address : 35fB61PKCR1a1PTuLwjCk7WkCi2WY6wLEh

Please today is the last day of my current campaign, if i given the chance i will update my signature right away.
Thank you so much.

(Archive)

Quote from: Seeker01 on July 26, 2017, 10:47:32 PM

Bitcointalk username: Seeker01
Link to your Retweet: https://twitter.com/CryptoManiac21/status/890419436942893057
https://twitter.com/nexus_socials/status/890192755892248578
https://twitter.com/nexus_socials/status/890134652073250817
https://twitter.com/nexus_socials/status/890136846256177153
Twitter followers: 123
Twitter audit link: https://www.twitteraudit.com/CryptoManiac21
Bitcoin address: 35fB61PKCR1a1PTuLwjCk7WkCi2WY6wLEh

(Archive)

Quote from: richminded on December 01, 2017, 09:36:06 PM

Link to your Tweet about Stamps: https://twitter.com/CryptoManiac21/status/936785878332030977
Twitter followers: 400
Twitter audit link: https://www.twitteraudit.com/cryptomaniac21
Bitcoin address: 3C7M1d32LczvFmC2BVvAfWj3vMjb2hFah2
Telegram username: richminded (JM)

RETWEET:
1. https://twitter.com/StampsPlatform/status/934429397104447490
2. https://twitter.com/StampsPlatform/status/930938016389939200
3. https://twitter.com/StampsPlatform/status/936467523301765120
4.
5.

(Archive)

Dreamchaser21 asked the reason why he was banned and a few days after he has sent a bounty report for the banned member Seeker01. The original message has been deleted but was saved in the quote:

Quote from: crypto-sumeet on August 08, 2017, 07:15:45 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Facebook Bounty Claim share/post links - week 1: August 3 - 7 2017
1.https://www.facebook.com/johnmarkglino/posts/1422423554460630?pnref=story
2.https://www.facebook.com/johnmarkglino/posts/1422423554460630
3.https://www.facebook.com/johnmarkglino/posts/1419209464782039
4.https://www.facebook.com/johnmarkglino/posts/1418487668187552
5.https://www.facebook.com/johnmarkglino/posts/1418415924861393
6.https://www.facebook.com/johnmarkglino/posts/1418415478194771

....

Twitter bounty campaign members. To claim your bounty use following template and post your twitter tweet/quote link on this (bitcointtalk bounty) thread every week (Monday - Sunday)

Twitter Bounty Claim tweet/quote links - week 1: August 1 - 9 2017
1.https://twitter.com/CryptoManiac21/status/894778669855424512
2.https://twitter.com/CryptoManiac21/status/894700694766198785
3.https://twitter.com/CryptoManiac21/status/894477431821574144
4.https://twitter.com/CryptoManiac21/status/894477081605660673
5.https://twitter.com/CryptoManiac21/status/894341639086288896
6.https://twitter.com/CryptoManiac21/status/894107705865981953
7.https://twitter.com/glu_token/status/892548921263669248
8.https://twitter.com/glu_token/status/892548522402136064
9.https://twitter.com/CryptoManiac21/status/895065969998970880

This transaction is for Seeker01, hope you still consider this one Thank you so much.

Thank You. Week 1 ran from 07/31 - 08/06. Week 2 is from 08/07 - 08/13. Kindly submit eligible entries till 08/06 for now. Thanks. Week 2 submission opens up on 08/14.

(Archive)

Dreamchaser21 and creeps have registered at the same day. Also, according to BPIP, creeps and Dreamchaser21 have changed passwords within 15 minutes:

Code:

8/15/2018 9:07:22 AM password changed - creeps
8/15/2018 9:22:26 AM password changed - Dreamchaser21

Related Addresses:

Code:

35fB61PKCR1a1PTuLwjCk7WkCi2WY6wLEh
Twitter @CryptoManiac21

Miscellaneous:
Cheating bounty campaigns with alt accounts: DIMCOIN Signature Campaign (Archive), [BOUNTY] HIGH PAYING BTC SIGNATURE CAMPAIGN (Archive)
Sending merit between alts (richminded, Dreamchaser21, creeps): https://bpip.org/smerit.aspx?to=Dreamchaser21

I believe they are alt accounts and evading bans. Because he received his payment every week at his address and sent it to another address on weekly basis. What do you think about it? If you think it's sufficient proof. I will post it on Ban evading thread.

Topic: Does He evade Ban? Is It Sufficient Proof? - page 2. (Read 622 times)