Pages:
Author

Topic: Does He evade Ban? Is It Sufficient Proof? - page 2. (Read 612 times)

legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114
September 04, 2022, 12:14:57 AM
#8

I sent him a PM regarding this on 31st August and I didn't get an answer yet. So, Let's discuss it publicly.
I don't really know why some users ignore PMs relating to accusation, but later on when things are getting serious you see them show up with some excuses/reasons/defense.

A simple PM reply stating that the address they send btc to is an exchange or a corporative address (if something of that exist), would have solved this problem.  Now, you have made it public, I believe he will have to reply. Maybe he is waiting to see the forum reactions first before he will clear the air.

I disagree. Nobody owes you an explanation in such matters. If you can't make your case using only post history + blockchain, then you don't have a case.

Privacy-invasive behavior should be discouraged.

This type of inquisition is the lowliest approach to merit farming.
legendary
Activity: 3500
Merit: 6981
Top Crypto Casino
September 03, 2022, 11:00:01 PM
#7
That address belongs to a wallet from coins.ph - Philippine crypto exchange. So he sends coins every week to exchange for cash.
I understand that concept, but does coins.ph only give out one address for many individual members to use?  If that is indeed the case, then there's no merit to OP's suspicion. 

Even if it isn't true, sending coins to someone's address every week doesn't necessarily mean they're alt accounts.  There could be any number of reasons someone would do that, and to hand out negative/neutral trust based on that evidence alone would be unfair IMO.
legendary
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1081
Goodnight, o_e_l_e_o 🌹
September 03, 2022, 07:16:53 PM
#6

I sent him a PM regarding this on 31st August and I didn't get an answer yet. So, Let's discuss it publicly.
I don't really know why some users ignore PMs relating to accusation, but later on when things are getting serious you see them show up with some excuses/reasons/defense.

A simple PM reply stating that the address they send btc to is an exchange or a corporative address (if something of that exist), would have solved this problem.  Now, you have made it public, I believe he will have to reply. Maybe he is waiting to see the forum reactions first before he will clear the air.
hero member
Activity: 2338
Merit: 757
September 03, 2022, 05:19:37 PM
#5
These transactions cannot be considered as proof that the accounts are owned by one person.
In the country where I live, there are local sellers who only have wallets on the exchanges where they have a single address that they can't change and they take all the bitcoin they buy at one address. Which means that if there are many transfers that reach that address, there is a hypothesis that the banned member is a reseller who buys Bitcoin from the suspicious member every week. As long as this hypothesis exists, it is not possible to confirm the connection between the two accounts based on transactions only.
Of course, almost all of us are sure that the two accounts belong to one person, but from the point of view of the moderators, all possible assumptions must be taken into account so that no one is wronged.
copper member
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1822
Top Crypto Casino
September 03, 2022, 04:24:05 PM
#4
So you have to provide data matching from the banned account with the active account. and of course, the post is still on the forums. it hasn't been removed by the user, as @Xal0lex said.
Based on their own experience, global moderators do not consider links to posts from Ninjastic.space, as well as Loyce.club, as evidence. Posts that are used as evidence of any violation of the rules by users should be on the forum on a mandatory basis.
Wow, this is a new one for me, I had no idea. Any reason why they don't consider data from third party archive sites?



OP, have you tried reporting this case of ban evasion to the mods? If not, please try and do so. Maybe they just didn't see the post. Personally, I think the blockchain evidence gives enough proof.
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1359
September 03, 2022, 03:15:54 PM
#3
Code:
35fB61PKCR1a1PTuLwjCk7WkCi2WY6wLEh

That address belongs to a wallet from coins.ph - Philippine crypto exchange. So he sends coins every week to exchange for cash. This means that @crzy is most likely an alt of other accounts or part of a farm of accounts that all used that same deposit address.
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 583
September 03, 2022, 10:32:22 AM
#2
most likely the @crzy account is indeed an alternative to the banned account. but the proof of transaction that you provide will not be enough to penalize the @crzy account.

It seems that the Mod is also more careful in handling cases of account ban reports compared to cases of plagiarism.

So you have to provide data matching from the banned account with the active account. and of course, the post is still on the forums. it hasn't been removed by the user, as @Xal0lex said.
Based on their own experience, global moderators do not consider links to posts from Ninjastic.space, as well as Loyce.club, as evidence. Posts that are used as evidence of any violation of the rules by users should be on the forum on a mandatory basis.
full member
Activity: 127
Merit: 142
Defend Bitcoin and its PoW: bitcoincleanup.com
September 03, 2022, 10:10:41 AM
#1
Username crzy
Bitcoin Address: bc1q94fzl2e920xe8eepq3m2m7qx4khszt0ahshhy7

Bitcointalk Profile Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/crzy-1151196
Current amount of posts (including this one): 2330
SegWit (preferably bech32) BTC Address for Payouts: bc1q94fzl2e920xe8eepq3m2m7qx4khszt0ahshhy7
EARNED merit in the last 120 days: 6

I'll update my signature once accepted and once my campaign ended tomorrow. Thank you!

I sent him a PM regarding this on 31st August and I didn't get an answer yet. So, Let's discuss it publicly. I am not sure if it's sufficient to prove the connection. He is on Duelbits signature campaign for two years. Every week, He receives his payment to this address bc1q94fzl2e920xe8eepq3m2m7qx4khszt0ahshhy7. After receiving the payment, He sent it to this address every week. 35fB61PKCR1a1PTuLwjCk7WkCi2WY6wLEh
Which is used by banned users. Three of them are banned and one of them gets signature banned until 2029.

Accounts Connected:

Seeker01 (banned)
richminded (banned)
Dreamchaser21 (banned)
creeps (Signature banned until August 02, 2029)
CryptoManiac21 (inactive) - Brand New profile, probably one of the connected accounts


Proof:

Btctalk name: creeps
Rank: Full Member
Current post count: 871
BTC address(No BCH): 35fB61PKCR1a1PTuLwjCk7WkCi2WY6wLEh
Wear appropriate signature: YES
Wear avatar: YES
(Archive)

Btctalk name : Seeker01
Rank : Full Member
Current post count : 575
BTC Address : 35fB61PKCR1a1PTuLwjCk7WkCi2WY6wLEh

Please today is the last day of my current campaign, if i given the chance i will update my signature right away.
Thank you so much.
(Archive)


(Archive)

(Archive)


Dreamchaser21 asked the reason why he was banned and a few days after he has sent a bounty report for the banned member Seeker01. The original message has been deleted but was saved in the quote:

Thank You. Week 1 ran from 07/31 - 08/06. Week 2 is from 08/07 - 08/13. Kindly submit eligible entries till 08/06 for now. Thanks. Week 2 submission opens up on 08/14.
(Archive)


Dreamchaser21 and creeps have registered at the same day. Also, according to BPIP, creeps and Dreamchaser21 have changed passwords within 15 minutes:

Code:
8/15/2018 9:07:22 AM password changed - creeps
8/15/2018 9:22:26 AM password changed - Dreamchaser21


Related Addresses:

Code:
35fB61PKCR1a1PTuLwjCk7WkCi2WY6wLEh
Twitter @CryptoManiac21


Miscellaneous:
Cheating bounty campaigns with alt accounts: DIMCOIN Signature Campaign (Archive), [BOUNTY] HIGH PAYING BTC SIGNATURE CAMPAIGN (Archive)
Sending merit between alts (richminded, Dreamchaser21, creeps): https://bpip.org/smerit.aspx?to=Dreamchaser21

I believe they are alt accounts and evading bans. Because he received his payment every week at his address and sent it to another address on weekly basis. What do you think about it? If you think it's sufficient proof. I will post it on Ban evading thread.
Pages:
Jump to: