Topic: Does ICO projects became an April Fools? (Read 512 times)
The problem with ICo`s is that many people has great expentance from them even if that specific ICO has no future. Scams have in theyr recepy lies and the infoa laq between the investors.
They have been around since, just that everyday they keep getting bigger. That’s why you need to dig deeper into any project and learn everything about them and be sure that they are saying the truth. Scammers makes use of fake profiles. You have to verify that everything they claim is real before you make up your mind to invest in it. Despite all that, there are still lots of good projects out there.
legendary
Activity: 2436
Merit: 1189
Need Campaign Manager?PM on telegram @sujonali1819
Market is getting better also, that is a good indication of good investments too.
we just need to be patient and more careful.
we just need to be patient and more careful.
I am agreed with this point to you. Some valuable information says that most of the ico during 2017 was scammed. But 2017's markets were good and bullish. And most of the people earned a huge profit despite scam project. That was possible only for bullish market.
So I want to say if market will bullish again then we can earn money by investing ICO even some Airdrops also because Investor and project both become hype during bullish market.
Yes, many ICO projects from the start were very promising and when the ICO ended they were just silent. The development team no longer looks active and the project is not developed. In April, all ICO projects must be able to rise again because the market price has begun to improve.
I dont think so, there are still so many project out there who are legit and will be one of the best.
Market is getting better also, that is a good indication of good investments too.
we just need to be patient and more careful.
Market is getting better also, that is a good indication of good investments too.
we just need to be patient and more careful.
Very many ICOs that end with no coin movements. In this case, I also believe that very much ICO is good. For me, before choosing ICO, it is better if we see who the team works for the ICO, with the aim of avoiding losses because the list of coins is silent or there is no movement.
legendary
Activity: 2436
Merit: 1189
Need Campaign Manager?PM on telegram @sujonali1819
If the coin dumps after the exchange launch, it is only the fault of team members and not bounty hunters that are dumping this coin. They should have locked tokens or buy them back, but in 99 percent of cases they are just blaming hunters for that.
Yes, you are right they only blaming bounty hunter even if the price is going to 0. I saw some project that was used buyback system for the increasing price. One of them is pundi x NPSX. Nice project ever I have seen. They announced a buyback policy will start instantly the price increased 2x. So for a successful project first need a team which is more active and experienced. Yes! some probably, make sure to read the white paper first before joining.
Scam project white paper is more attractive than other
Just like this photo:-
If the coin dumps after the exchange launch, it is only the fault of team members and not bounty hunters that are dumping this coin. They should have locked tokens or buy them back, but in 99 percent of cases they are just blaming hunters for that.
Yes! some probably, make sure to read the white paper first before joining. the name of the project usualy using weird name. just in case track the ico's on ico tracker or icobench
ICO projects have already started to joke to us in April. We started to see that there were many scam projects in bounty campaigns and ICO projects in the early days when the market entered a period of stagnation, but this was not as slow as expected and became widespread in a very short time. That day, the day of the spread of the projects began to joke for us. Moreover, these jokes were not funny, they were making fun of the investor. On the other hand, it should be reminded that new projects do not have a chance to joke.
actually how did that happen? they can be registered in exchange, and are being traded, we can judge the project ico as feasible or just junk. Is registered in an exchange only need money? and do not need quality from the project?
it seems like that, which has a lot of money that will live even though their projects don't work. because I see many projects that prioritize the development of their projects, in fact, the price of their tokens in exchange doesn't sell because they don't take care of it. 
All ICO just April Fools at least 99% 
.
Look at this ICO: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/zayka-token-5116142
Zaika
This is real trash, but they have trading exchange.
actually how did that happen? they can be registered in exchange, and are being traded, we can judge the project ico as feasible or just junk. Is registered in an exchange only need money? and do not need quality from the project? .Look at this ICO: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/zayka-token-5116142
Zaika
This is real trash, but they have trading exchange
.
All ICO just April Fools at least 99% .
Look at this ICO: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/zayka-token-5116142
Zaika
This is real trash, but they have trading exchange.
.Look at this ICO: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/zayka-token-5116142
Zaika
This is real trash, but they have trading exchange
. 
Of course, now the market is quite harsh, even for promising and sought-after projects, but this is not a reason to refer every time to this reason for their failures. Developers should understand the conditions in which they will have to perform their tasks, and, not to spread empty promises in their long-term plans.
Yes, we all come here to judge some of these developers based on their promises, well, they make their promises based on the plans and what they believe their project could offer, but they need to understand they are dealing with people that can have switch of mind any time, and it’s the way you present yourself that they take you even if they see reality.We need to understand that many ICO will actually have a drop on price or temporarily loose relevant because of the way investors too treats their project, some investors treats some good project as rubbish and dump the coin on them and we expect to see a high market, it will really take them time for them to work hard to meet up with the Initial ICO price and get past it. So we all have to be patient with these projects so they can function properly.
Chronobank ICO is best example of April Fools , After more than two years No working product only a wallet similar to MEW , they keep talking BLAH BLAH... testing phase after another and so on.... , They talking about mass adoption of their platform without doing any marketing or add their Time token to big exchanges , CEO of project throw a ton of promises none of them come true.....
ICO price was BTC0.01 and now token is traded at BTC0.00044
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/chronobank/
https://blog.chronobank.io/chronobank-ico-raised-5-4-million-usd-90f16e17188
ICO price was BTC0.01 and now token is traded at BTC0.00044
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/chronobank/
https://blog.chronobank.io/chronobank-ico-raised-5-4-million-usd-90f16e17188
For me it became April fools that fooling members because of their unsuccessful outcomes, and by that they wont make their promises, some of the bounty hunters participated in their ico wont receive any rewards even they meet the soft cap, so sad on the part of the bounty hunters and also from the investors.
Yes, managers run out of such projects, because they do not get their salary. If they continued to pay, they would continue to respond to your messages. I do not think that such people have shame. After all, they are protected from punishment by a great network.
These managers should at least inform us, bounty hunters, about the status of the project/s that they managed and don't just ignore us without knowing what happen at all.
I know that many good ICO's around and some were very promising. HOwever, there are other ICO projects to which now looks like an April Fools who's team always talk to much but in the end of the ICO period all they have to do is to be silent, list the coin of the project and then dump the project. This is why we really monitoring from these guys to keep their promises before, during and after the ICO period.
The most disappointing ico platforms are project that reached softcap
And end up listing on exchanges doing very well
But later on dump all supply on investors and elope away
It’s total absurd
the fundraising period was indeed driven to pursue coin sales target. after the fundraising target is reached. natural they are more silent. and after the fundraising they will work focus on the next process. usually the exchange listing process or project development process. they are not fooling, but indeed that is how it works
Only a few of the many projects that really lived in earnest. And now there may be only a few projects left, other than that it is scam or useless.
But with the IEO, hopefully this will usually be a way out for many investors
But with the IEO, hopefully this will usually be a way out for many investors
Jump to: