Pages:
Author

Topic: Does martingale really works? - page 68. (Read 123290 times)

legendary
Activity: 2562
Merit: 1414
March 12, 2015, 06:51:20 AM
Or he was extremely lucky, 99.9% of people come here and show their lose streaks it is not weird that at least 1 person wins a lot

Shortly after Hufflepuff withdrew his winnings, a "different" user won over 100 49.5% bets in a row:

-snip-

Was he extremely lucky too? Or was this HufflePuff giving PD the finger?

But if the two players are the same person, why wouldn't him just keep playing "cleverly" and take another 2000 btc?

clearly it is not huffflepuff, If I am hufflepuff, ill be satisfied with my 2k btc, that could be my entire life saving, and never bother PD again since I could be red flagged, for this reason I stand clearly that they are a different person
newbie
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
March 12, 2015, 06:45:36 AM
i´m a 10 years forex expert
in 1 sentence

martingale does work  Shocked
( conter martingale )

set your profit to around 20 $ daily as equity target and you are fine
you need around 500 $ margin which is fantastic


in casino i hear a report from scientist that you need 170.000 $ to have a 99% chance to win 50 $
which is insane ( + casino has a betting limit so this calculation is nulled )

hope you understand me
legendary
Activity: 2604
Merit: 1036
March 12, 2015, 06:12:02 AM
Maybe he would have raised some red flags if he were to run it up to 2000 in one sitting but how can one know the server seed in the first place?
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000
March 12, 2015, 05:55:51 AM
Or he was extremely lucky, 99.9% of people come here and show their lose streaks it is not weird that at least 1 person wins a lot

Shortly after Hufflepuff withdrew his winnings, a "different" user won over 100 49.5% bets in a row:

-snip-

Was he extremely lucky too? Or was this HufflePuff giving PD the finger?

But if the two players are the same person, why wouldn't him just keep playing "cleverly" and take another 2000 btc?
legendary
Activity: 2604
Merit: 1036
March 12, 2015, 05:38:36 AM
100 consecutive winning bets and around 1500 bitcoins later... Yeah sounds completely reasonable if you ask me  Cool
legendary
Activity: 3514
Merit: 1280
English ⬄ Russian Translation Services
March 12, 2015, 05:28:17 AM
Or it was the owner of Primedice in disguise. Looks very fishy, to put it mildly (unless something is broken there)... I remember you posted statistics from your previous dice casino, and if I'm not mistaken, there had been only one winning streak at 49.5% with 31 winning rolls in a row... Cool

I'm pretty sure that Stunna wouldn't do that. What would he get out of this anyways? Doing this wouldn't attract more players. Maybe he wanted to lower the max bet?

Then somebody evidently managed to hack the site. dooglus, you say that the number of winning bets in a row was above 100. Could you please give us the exact number? Even with 100 bets it looks more like a job than a stroke of luck...
full member
Activity: 145
Merit: 100
March 12, 2015, 05:21:36 AM
Or he was extremely lucky, 99.9% of people come here and show their lose streaks it is not weird that at least 1 person wins a lot

Shortly after Hufflepuff withdrew his winnings, a "different" user won over 100 49.5% bets in a row:



Was he extremely lucky too? Or was this HufflePuff giving PD the finger?

Or it was the owner of Primedice in disguise. Looks very fishy, to put it mildly (unless something is broken there)... I remember you posted statistics from your previous dice casino, and if I'm not mistaken, there had been only one winning streak at 49.5% with 31 winning rolls in a row... Cool

I'm pretty sure that Stunna wouldn't do that. What would he get out of this anyways? Doing this wouldn't attract more players. Maybe he wanted to lower the max bet?
hero member
Activity: 1624
Merit: 645
March 12, 2015, 05:21:06 AM
Or he was extremely lucky, 99.9% of people come here and show their lose streaks it is not weird that at least 1 person wins a lot

Shortly after Hufflepuff withdrew his winnings, a "different" user won over 100 49.5% bets in a row:



Was he extremely lucky too? Or was this HufflePuff giving PD the finger?

Or it was the owner of Primedice in disguise. Looks very fishy, to put it mildly (unless something is broken there)... I remember you posted statistics from your previous dice casino, and if I'm not mistaken, there had been only one winning streak at 49.5% with 31 winning rolls in a row... Cool

Dooglus said the user knew the seed. It was not luck
legendary
Activity: 3514
Merit: 1280
English ⬄ Russian Translation Services
March 12, 2015, 05:19:21 AM
Or he was extremely lucky, 99.9% of people come here and show their lose streaks it is not weird that at least 1 person wins a lot
Was he extremely lucky too? Or was this HufflePuff giving PD the finger?

Or it was the owner of Primedice in disguise. Looks very fishy, to put it mildly (unless something is broken there)... I remember you posted statistics from your previous dice casino, and if I'm not mistaken, there had been only one winning streak at 49.5% with 31 winning rolls in a row... Cool
hero member
Activity: 1624
Merit: 645
March 12, 2015, 05:17:59 AM
Or he was extremely lucky, 99.9% of people come here and show their lose streaks it is not weird that at least 1 person wins a lot

Shortly after Hufflepuff withdrew his winnings, a "different" user won over 100 49.5% bets in a row:



Was he extremely lucky too? Or was this HufflePuff giving PD the finger?

Oh. In that case you were right 100 wins in a row is something almost impossible (something like 0.00000000000000000000000000007889 %) if my math is correct lel
full member
Activity: 145
Merit: 100
March 12, 2015, 05:16:06 AM
Or he was extremely lucky, 99.9% of people come here and show their lose streaks it is not weird that at least 1 person wins a lot

Shortly after Hufflepuff withdrew his winnings, a "different" user won over 100 49.5% bets in a row:



Was he extremely lucky too? Or was this HufflePuff giving PD the finger?

That's just crazy. Are you sure that it's 100 bets in a row?
legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1333
March 12, 2015, 05:14:10 AM
Or he was extremely lucky, 99.9% of people come here and show their lose streaks it is not weird that at least 1 person wins a lot

Shortly after Hufflepuff withdrew his winnings, a "different" user won over 100 49.5% bets in a row:



Was he extremely lucky too? Or was this HufflePuff giving PD the finger?

something like 150 wins in a row  Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked



hero member
Activity: 1624
Merit: 645
March 12, 2015, 04:39:02 AM
Well if someone has a theory of how Hufflepuff has managed to get 1100 coins out of Primedice without using martingale would be a good start Cool

He knew his server seed?

Or he was extremely lucky, 99.9% of people come here and show their lose streaks it is not weird that at least 1 person wins a lot
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
March 12, 2015, 04:38:24 AM
As with all the "strategies", it works until it fails. You should just stop before that happens.

yes I think all the same strategy, in the end if you are too old to play to lose. but play single bet better than auto in my opinion Smiley

Essentially, you have to know when to stop.
hero member
Activity: 546
Merit: 500
March 12, 2015, 04:14:59 AM
As with all the "strategies", it works until it fails. You should just stop before that happens.
legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1333
March 12, 2015, 03:59:03 AM
Well if someone has a theory of how Hufflepuff has managed to get 1100 coins out of Primedice without using martingale would be a good start Cool

He knew his server seed?
legendary
Activity: 2604
Merit: 1036
March 12, 2015, 03:54:53 AM
Well if someone has a theory of how Hufflepuff has managed to get 1100 coins out of Primedice without using martingale would be a good start Cool
legendary
Activity: 3514
Merit: 1280
English ⬄ Russian Translation Services
March 12, 2015, 03:53:28 AM
Douglus, I'm having trouble finding post where you explained how your odds increased slightly if you bet to increase your money 3 times at 33% instead of just splitting it in half and betting at 50%. I forgot if this was proven to be true or not.

I don't think I ever said quite that.

I've written about how your chance of doubling your money is a little higher if you use a single martingale progression instead of a single all-in bet. Most recently in this post:
  https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10529739

I've almost forgotten that I had been on this thread too. So how are things going, martingale (or some of its variants) proved to work finally? Cool
legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1333
March 12, 2015, 03:44:12 AM
This is true as well, but we make decisions based on the assumption this won't happen. Otherwise we wouldn't be playing on the site/in that casino regardless as to if we wanted to martingale or not, Smiley.

We don't usually concern ourselves with the finite lifetime of the casino because the finite nature of our own bankroll becomes the limiting factor first. But if we're assuming infinite bankroll and no max bet house limit then such things become more significant.
legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1333
March 12, 2015, 03:40:07 AM
Douglus, I'm having trouble finding post where you explained how your odds increased slightly if you bet to increase your money 3 times at 33% instead of just splitting it in half and betting at 50%. I forgot if this was proven to be true or not.

I don't think I ever said quite that.

I've written about how your chance of doubling your money is a little higher if you use a single martingale progression instead of a single all-in bet. Most recently in this post:
  https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10529739
Pages:
Jump to: