Pages:
Author

Topic: Does wikipedia remind of you the beggards on this forum? - page 2. (Read 6124 times)

legendary
Activity: 3752
Merit: 1217
What's to stop that not being taken over? When anything is open and free to use it's also free and easy to exploit it for your own gain.

Wikipedia had millions of volunteers, who had varying levels of knowledge in various subjects. It is not that easy to assemble that kind of editors for any other alternate Wiki site.

And it can't be taken over. The new Wikipedia admins are mostly selected by the owner and the existing admins, who are biased. People who don't agree with their policies can't become an admin. 
global moderator
Activity: 3934
Merit: 2676
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Personally I reckon it's time for a true anarchist/libertarian version of Wikipedia.

A lot of people are currently trying. I have heard that Metapedia has improved quite a lot these days. Have idea about any other alternate Wiki sites?

What's to stop that not being taken over? When anything is open and free to use it's also free and easy to exploit it for your own gain.
legendary
Activity: 3752
Merit: 1217
Personally I reckon it's time for a true anarchist/libertarian version of Wikipedia.

A lot of people are currently trying. I have heard that Metapedia has improved quite a lot these days. Have idea about any other alternate Wiki sites?
global moderator
Activity: 3934
Merit: 2676
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Yes, I do refute all of the above, unless you can convince me otherwise. What evidence do you have that Sandy Hook was a 'fake' shooting, or Boston Bombing was a false flag attack carried out by Nato etc? And what was the reasons for them?
It's not rocket science. The only way this current bankrupt system may continue in north America, is by turning the average American citizen or resident into a 'terrorist.' This translates to billions of dollars spent on high tech security equipment (vendors who just happen to be part of Homeland Security itself), and the opportunity to levy all sorts of spurious fines, fees and extra charges, to keep the machine going for as long as possible before the final collapse.

The reason for all the false flags is that there is NO real terrorist threat, so the government has to fabricate it. It's called psychological warfare. Wikipedia is part of the same psychological warfare outfit.

If you're interested to know more and have a weekend to spare, check out cluesforum.info.

"American people don't believe anything until they see it on television.” Richard M. Nixon


I agree with you that there is little-to-no worry for terrorist threats, and that the general public are easily mislead by the media, but you need some evidence other than pure speculation and assumption. Not everything is a conspiracy. Sometimes people just like to shoot and kill and blow each other up.
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 6403
Blackjack.fun
Isn't begging when you ask for money while you are not giving anything back in return?
I'm not sure Wikipedia is like that.
newbie
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
Yes, I do refute all of the above, unless you can convince me otherwise. What evidence do you have that Sandy Hook was a 'fake' shooting, or Boston Bombing was a false flag attack carried out by Nato etc? And what was the reasons for them?
It's not rocket science. The only way this current bankrupt system may continue in north America, is by turning the average American citizen or resident into a 'terrorist.' This translates to billions of dollars spent on high tech security equipment (vendors who just happen to be part of Homeland Security itself), and the opportunity to levy all sorts of spurious fines, fees and extra charges, to keep the machine going for as long as possible before the final collapse.

The reason for all the false flags is that there is NO real terrorist threat, so the government has to fabricate it. It's called psychological warfare. Wikipedia is part of the same psychological warfare outfit.

If you're interested to know more and have a weekend to spare, check out cluesforum.info.

"American people don't believe anything until they see it on television.” Richard M. Nixon
legendary
Activity: 2008
Merit: 1028
Fill Your Barrel with Bitcoins!
Wikipedia is great for things that have nothing to do with anything that matters. For instance, I'd check Wikipedia for facts about Kites or Mosh Pits.
global moderator
Activity: 3934
Merit: 2676
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Very funny. I had a feeling somebody would do that. Do you refute that Sandy Hook was a fake serial shooting?

Or that the Boston marathon attack was a false flag carried out by NATO, the World Bank, Homeland Security, Israeli Mossad (Max Brenner/Strauss Israel/IDF Leadership School), Jardine Matheson, Mayor's Office, Rotary Club, Harvard Medical School etc.

The latter has been totally deconstructed but it seems Wikipedia supports the official government version of events still.

Can you provide an explanation of that, beyond posting images of Alex Jones?

Yes, I do refute all of the above, unless you can convince me otherwise. What evidence do you have that Sandy Hook was a 'fake' shooting, or Boston Bombing was a false flag attack carried out by Nato etc? And what was the reasons for them?

Also:

newbie
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
Very funny. I had a feeling somebody would do that. Do you refute that Sandy Hook was a fake serial shooting?

Or that the Boston marathon attack was a false flag carried out by NATO, the World Bank, Homeland Security, Israeli Mossad (Max Brenner/Strauss Israel/IDF Leadership School), Jardine Matheson, Mayor's Office, Rotary Club, Harvard Medical School etc.

The latter has been totally deconstructed but it seems Wikipedia supports the official government version of events still.

Can you provide an explanation of that, beyond posting images of Alex Jones?
global moderator
Activity: 3934
Merit: 2676
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Wikipedia was probably a CFR/NSA/CIA front from the very beginning.

The whole premise of the site is to mix factual trivia with the many 'Big Lies' in falsified history, including major government black ops like the fake 9/11, 7/7, Madrid, Norway, Boston marathon and Sandy Hook terror or serial shooting attacks.

Wikipedia is clearly aligned with the global fascist government drive. It appeared out of nowhere with massive bandwidth and server resources, with no adequate explanation of how it secured these. It continues to report fully debunked and discredited falsified events as real, to aid the UN plans for gun control, free trade open borders, international socialism on steroids, the attack on Christianity, attack on the family etc.

I understand that only reference links from the likes of the BBC, Reuters, AP and CNN are permissable on Wikipedia now. In other words, Wikipedia is nothing more than an echo chamber for the SIX companies that control the global media. Most of the editors are university professors, doctors, economists, civil servants, teachers etc. who are Fabian socialists. The site is a complete joke.

Personally I reckon it's time for a true anarchist/libertarian version of Wikipedia.





How do you know Bitcoin isn't a CFR/NSA/CIA front?

hero member
Activity: 952
Merit: 1009
They have been a source of much of my knowledge.

My condolences.
newbie
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
Wikipedia was probably a CFR/NSA/CIA front from the very beginning.

The whole premise of the site is to mix factual trivia with the many 'Big Lies' in falsified history, including major government black ops like the fake 9/11, 7/7, Madrid, Norway, Boston marathon and Sandy Hook terror or serial shooting attacks.

Wikipedia is clearly aligned with the global fascist government drive. It appeared out of nowhere with massive bandwidth and server resources, with no adequate explanation of how it secured these. It continues to report fully debunked and discredited falsified events as real, to aid the UN plans for gun control, free trade open borders, international socialism on steroids, the attack on Christianity, attack on the family etc.

I understand that only reference links from the likes of the BBC, Reuters, AP and CNN are permissable on Wikipedia now. In other words, Wikipedia is nothing more than an echo chamber for the SIX companies that control the global media. Most of the editors are university professors, doctors, economists, civil servants, teachers etc. who are Fabian socialists. The site is a complete joke.

Personally I reckon it's time for a true anarchist/libertarian version of Wikipedia.

hero member
Activity: 490
Merit: 500
i wasn't clear about that.. i don't have a problem with wikipedia soliciting for donations. but it's just that they are too dumb or lazy to actually try out BTC. i mean they could get it converted to fiat easily, but they still won't do it.

I was an active user in Wikipedia for the past many many years. I had more than 30,000 edits to my name. From 2011, most of the sections in Wikipedia were under the control of organized cabals. I wrote to Jimmy Wales many times warning against this. But many of the users who voiced against this were later banned. In the section I was following, the leader of the Cabal was from Manchester, known by his alibi "Simon Tushingham". Despite this guy committing all sorts of one-sided edits, Wales supported him. Tushingham frequently bragged in Wikipedia that he regularly talked to Wales in his cell phone and were good friends in real life. I had enough and quit Wikipedia in 2011. I know many more who did the same.

Wikipedia is similar to a ponzi scheme. They publicized themselves as a "free" and "unbiased" online encyclopedia. Once they had enough following, they kicked out the old users and showed their true colors.

Is it just me or does it seem like all organizations turns into a den of snakes.
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
Really I don't mind, they do a great job and only ask for donations. At least they don't send a bill to my house and threaten to hurt me if I don't pay, if they did that, then I'd be annoyed.
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Don't use it, then ...

Obviously, Wikipedia is not the place to learn if you're after some ideologically loaded topics. Otherwise it's fine
So True
global moderator
Activity: 3934
Merit: 2676
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!


Maybe Jimmy should come up with a sobstory about he needs to buy his daughter a laptop or how somebody broke in and stole his Christmas presents or something, maybe that'd work.

sr. member
Activity: 840
Merit: 255
SportsIcon - Connect With Your Sports Heroes
Don't use it, then ...

Obviously, Wikipedia is not the place to learn if you're after some ideologically loaded topics. Otherwise it's fine
legendary
Activity: 3752
Merit: 1217
i wasn't clear about that.. i don't have a problem with wikipedia soliciting for donations. but it's just that they are too dumb or lazy to actually try out BTC. i mean they could get it converted to fiat easily, but they still won't do it.

I was an active user in Wikipedia for the past many many years. I had more than 30,000 edits to my name. From 2011, most of the sections in Wikipedia were under the control of organized cabals. I wrote to Jimmy Wales many times warning against this. But many of the users who voiced against this were later banned. In the section I was following, the leader of the Cabal was from Manchester, known by his alibi "Simon Tushingham". Despite this guy committing all sorts of one-sided edits, Wales supported him. Tushingham frequently bragged in Wikipedia that he regularly talked to Wales in his cell phone and were good friends in real life. I had enough and quit Wikipedia in 2011. I know many more who did the same.

Wikipedia is similar to a ponzi scheme. They publicized themselves as a "free" and "unbiased" online encyclopedia. Once they had enough following, they kicked out the old users and showed their true colors.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
i wasn't clear about that.. i don't have a problem with wikipedia soliciting for donations. but it's just that they are too dumb or lazy to actually try out BTC. i mean they could get it converted to fiat easily, but they still won't do it.
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
Crypto News & Tutorials - Coinramble.com
I don't think they do any wrong if they ask for some donations.
It's the largest fucking encyclopedia of the world! And the don't do much ads too.
They have been a source of much of my knowledge.
Pages:
Jump to: