Topic: [Donated $2k+ To Charity] Clean Water Coin: A Crypto Charity (Pure PoS) - page 125. (Read 195732 times)
April 04, 2014, 03:41:46 AM
534 votes now.
April 04, 2014, 03:25:05 AM
@Cleanwatercoin.........instead of quoting which floods the thread with very long posts, I'll kinda start a new reply.
You state 101 people will now have access to clean water, which is of course kewl if that means permanent access to clean water. For example spending $2000usd to dig a protected well that supplies 101 villagers might be a tad expensive, but worth the cost. If, however, that means rainwater catchments...........that is WAY OVER THE TOP expensive! I guess my point is very simple.......it matters a great deal WHAT is done with the donations, not just how many people it affects.
At no point think I am hate'n on ya or the concept. My posts relate to how the funds are actually used. As I pointed out, $2000usd for some makeshift guttering is obscene, while that same amount for a water purification system for a village of over 100 people is not only worthwhile but rather noble.
Short version: Don't tell me you spent $2000 to give water to 101 people. That is about $20 a person, but it tells me nothing about the long term sustainability of that expenditure.
You state 101 people will now have access to clean water, which is of course kewl if that means permanent access to clean water. For example spending $2000usd to dig a protected well that supplies 101 villagers might be a tad expensive, but worth the cost. If, however, that means rainwater catchments...........that is WAY OVER THE TOP expensive! I guess my point is very simple.......it matters a great deal WHAT is done with the donations, not just how many people it affects.
At no point think I am hate'n on ya or the concept. My posts relate to how the funds are actually used. As I pointed out, $2000usd for some makeshift guttering is obscene, while that same amount for a water purification system for a village of over 100 people is not only worthwhile but rather noble.
Short version: Don't tell me you spent $2000 to give water to 101 people. That is about $20 a person, but it tells me nothing about the long term sustainability of that expenditure.
I guess the best answer I can give you is to check back once we reach our fundraising goal. Once the project is fully funded, we will get a very detailed report as to where the money went and how it was used to provide a long-term and lasting solution. If you would like to see an example of what I am referring to, go here: http://my.charitywater.org/p/myprojectsview?project_id=ET.GOH.Q4.09.048.213
Also keep in mind that $2,000 is just the beginning... there is a lot more money to raise. But it is a fantastic start in my opinion, and something I am proud to be apart of!
-Zach
Also keep in mind that some of your funds raised are going towards funding the promotion and development of this coin. I am waiting to see absolute transparency on every Water Coin that you have raised and where it has gone before I invest in this organization (a block explorer is a good first step). This is a practice that the organizations you are donating to appear to do (and you could do even better if you use the technology bitcoin offers you). It is understandable that you can use some coins to ensure the development of this coin is taken care of. I would wait until a community of trust is built before doing so. Again absolute transparency down to your home address... again you are a charity and you want to develop a solid community of people who will put value in this coin long term. Not just pump and dump fanboys abusing charitable ideas (even though if you do this right charity will still gain from them).
I'm calling BS! You can't say gimme the money and once I get enough I'll say how it will be spent. Time will tell everything my ass.......without a transparent advance plan, only an idiot would invest.
Go into any bank, ask a banker for 1 million dollars. He will want to see your FULL business prospectus, full month by month expenditure analysis, full every dam thing. To then tell him..............oh I can't say yet, just gimme the money and I'll let you know later.........you'll get shown the door. FFS!
do you actually spend anytime reading before you roll your face across the keyboard??? like seriously...
these guys (clean water coin) aren't the ones making up the rules as to where the money goes, and it's not their burden to prove where the money they donate goes... that is up to charity water to account for. however, charity water has been audited by KPMG that backs their 100% claim... i doubt you will read that, so all that means is 100% of the money CWC donates is guaranteed to go out to the field to help fund clean water projects. if you decide to not be lazy, go here: http://www.charitywater.org/100percent/
now if you would use just the slightest bit of your brain and read the info zach posted you would of seen an example of a project that was funded and completed with a very transparent report... even a fancy google pin as to where the well was drilled: http://my.charitywater.org/p/myprojectsview?project_id=ET.GOH.Q4.09.048.213
please stop wasting all of our time with your idiotic and disillusion posts
Apparently the concept of accountability eludes you. Party A is asking me to mine or invest. They intend to have Party B use that money.
It is not up to me to do the fucking research to see if Party B is doing the right thing. Party A is the one asking me for the dam money! When Party A can't tell me specifically how the funds will be spent, twits like you say go ask Party B. Party B is NOT the one asking me for money. Party A is the one accountable to me, and Party B doesn't even know I exist.
Until you get a full grasp on who is asking you for money and how/if they intend to be accountable..........stfu!
April 04, 2014, 03:19:16 AM
@Cleanwatercoin.........instead of quoting which floods the thread with very long posts, I'll kinda start a new reply.
You state 101 people will now have access to clean water, which is of course kewl if that means permanent access to clean water. For example spending $2000usd to dig a protected well that supplies 101 villagers might be a tad expensive, but worth the cost. If, however, that means rainwater catchments...........that is WAY OVER THE TOP expensive! I guess my point is very simple.......it matters a great deal WHAT is done with the donations, not just how many people it affects.
At no point think I am hate'n on ya or the concept. My posts relate to how the funds are actually used. As I pointed out, $2000usd for some makeshift guttering is obscene, while that same amount for a water purification system for a village of over 100 people is not only worthwhile but rather noble.
Short version: Don't tell me you spent $2000 to give water to 101 people. That is about $20 a person, but it tells me nothing about the long term sustainability of that expenditure.
You state 101 people will now have access to clean water, which is of course kewl if that means permanent access to clean water. For example spending $2000usd to dig a protected well that supplies 101 villagers might be a tad expensive, but worth the cost. If, however, that means rainwater catchments...........that is WAY OVER THE TOP expensive! I guess my point is very simple.......it matters a great deal WHAT is done with the donations, not just how many people it affects.
At no point think I am hate'n on ya or the concept. My posts relate to how the funds are actually used. As I pointed out, $2000usd for some makeshift guttering is obscene, while that same amount for a water purification system for a village of over 100 people is not only worthwhile but rather noble.
Short version: Don't tell me you spent $2000 to give water to 101 people. That is about $20 a person, but it tells me nothing about the long term sustainability of that expenditure.
I guess the best answer I can give you is to check back once we reach our fundraising goal. Once the project is fully funded, we will get a very detailed report as to where the money went and how it was used to provide a long-term and lasting solution. If you would like to see an example of what I am referring to, go here: http://my.charitywater.org/p/myprojectsview?project_id=ET.GOH.Q4.09.048.213
Also keep in mind that $2,000 is just the beginning... there is a lot more money to raise. But it is a fantastic start in my opinion, and something I am proud to be apart of!
-Zach
Also keep in mind that some of your funds raised are going towards funding the promotion and development of this coin. I am waiting to see absolute transparency on every Water Coin that you have raised and where it has gone before I invest in this organization (a block explorer is a good first step). This is a practice that the organizations you are donating to appear to do (and you could do even better if you use the technology bitcoin offers you). It is understandable that you can use some coins to ensure the development of this coin is taken care of. I would wait until a community of trust is built before doing so. Again absolute transparency down to your home address... again you are a charity and you want to develop a solid community of people who will put value in this coin long term. Not just pump and dump fanboys abusing charitable ideas (even though if you do this right charity will still gain from them).
I'm calling BS! You can't say gimme the money and once I get enough I'll say how it will be spent. Time will tell everything my ass.......without a transparent advance plan, only an idiot would invest.
Go into any bank, ask a banker for 1 million dollars. He will want to see your FULL business prospectus, full month by month expenditure analysis, full every dam thing. To then tell him..............oh I can't say yet, just gimme the money and I'll let you know later.........you'll get shown the door. FFS!
do you actually spend anytime reading before you roll your face across the keyboard??? like seriously...
these guys (clean water coin) aren't the ones making up the rules as to where the money goes, and it's not their burden to prove where the money they donate goes... that is up to charity water to account for. however, charity water has been audited by KPMG that backs their 100% claim... i doubt you will read that, so all that means is 100% of the money CWC donates is guaranteed to go out to the field to help fund clean water projects. if you decide to not be lazy, go here: http://www.charitywater.org/100percent/
now if you would use just the slightest bit of your brain and read the info zach posted you would of seen an example of a project that was funded and completed with a very transparent report... even a fancy google pin as to where the well was drilled: http://my.charitywater.org/p/myprojectsview?project_id=ET.GOH.Q4.09.048.213
please stop wasting all of our time with your idiotic and disillusion posts
I don't know how old you are to be so blind and not understanding that investors give their
Bitcoins to CleanWaterCoin and not to Charity Water, HUGE difference and a major flaw in your rant.
Let Adults with legitimate concerns express themselves.
Right now the gif joke is on you.
April 04, 2014, 02:50:47 AM
@Cleanwatercoin.........instead of quoting which floods the thread with very long posts, I'll kinda start a new reply.
You state 101 people will now have access to clean water, which is of course kewl if that means permanent access to clean water. For example spending $2000usd to dig a protected well that supplies 101 villagers might be a tad expensive, but worth the cost. If, however, that means rainwater catchments...........that is WAY OVER THE TOP expensive! I guess my point is very simple.......it matters a great deal WHAT is done with the donations, not just how many people it affects.
At no point think I am hate'n on ya or the concept. My posts relate to how the funds are actually used. As I pointed out, $2000usd for some makeshift guttering is obscene, while that same amount for a water purification system for a village of over 100 people is not only worthwhile but rather noble.
Short version: Don't tell me you spent $2000 to give water to 101 people. That is about $20 a person, but it tells me nothing about the long term sustainability of that expenditure.
You state 101 people will now have access to clean water, which is of course kewl if that means permanent access to clean water. For example spending $2000usd to dig a protected well that supplies 101 villagers might be a tad expensive, but worth the cost. If, however, that means rainwater catchments...........that is WAY OVER THE TOP expensive! I guess my point is very simple.......it matters a great deal WHAT is done with the donations, not just how many people it affects.
At no point think I am hate'n on ya or the concept. My posts relate to how the funds are actually used. As I pointed out, $2000usd for some makeshift guttering is obscene, while that same amount for a water purification system for a village of over 100 people is not only worthwhile but rather noble.
Short version: Don't tell me you spent $2000 to give water to 101 people. That is about $20 a person, but it tells me nothing about the long term sustainability of that expenditure.
I guess the best answer I can give you is to check back once we reach our fundraising goal. Once the project is fully funded, we will get a very detailed report as to where the money went and how it was used to provide a long-term and lasting solution. If you would like to see an example of what I am referring to, go here: http://my.charitywater.org/p/myprojectsview?project_id=ET.GOH.Q4.09.048.213
Also keep in mind that $2,000 is just the beginning... there is a lot more money to raise. But it is a fantastic start in my opinion, and something I am proud to be apart of!
-Zach
Also keep in mind that some of your funds raised are going towards funding the promotion and development of this coin. I am waiting to see absolute transparency on every Water Coin that you have raised and where it has gone before I invest in this organization (a block explorer is a good first step). This is a practice that the organizations you are donating to appear to do (and you could do even better if you use the technology bitcoin offers you). It is understandable that you can use some coins to ensure the development of this coin is taken care of. I would wait until a community of trust is built before doing so. Again absolute transparency down to your home address... again you are a charity and you want to develop a solid community of people who will put value in this coin long term. Not just pump and dump fanboys abusing charitable ideas (even though if you do this right charity will still gain from them).
I'm calling BS! You can't say gimme the money and once I get enough I'll say how it will be spent. Time will tell everything my ass.......without a transparent advance plan, only an idiot would invest.
Go into any bank, ask a banker for 1 million dollars. He will want to see your FULL business prospectus, full month by month expenditure analysis, full every dam thing. To then tell him..............oh I can't say yet, just gimme the money and I'll let you know later.........you'll get shown the door. FFS!
do you actually spend anytime reading before you roll your face across the keyboard??? like seriously...
these guys (clean water coin) aren't the ones making up the rules as to where the money goes, and it's not their burden to prove where the money they donate goes... that is up to charity water to account for. however, charity water has been audited by KPMG that backs their 100% claim... i doubt you will read that, so all that means is 100% of the money CWC donates is guaranteed to go out to the field to help fund clean water projects. if you decide to not be lazy, go here: http://www.charitywater.org/100percent/
now if you would use just the slightest bit of your brain and read the info zach posted you would of seen an example of a project that was funded and completed with a very transparent report... even a fancy google pin as to where the well was drilled: http://my.charitywater.org/p/myprojectsview?project_id=ET.GOH.Q4.09.048.213
please stop wasting all of our time with your idiotic and disillusion posts
April 04, 2014, 02:24:01 AM
@Cleanwatercoin.........instead of quoting which floods the thread with very long posts, I'll kinda start a new reply.
You state 101 people will now have access to clean water, which is of course kewl if that means permanent access to clean water. For example spending $2000usd to dig a protected well that supplies 101 villagers might be a tad expensive, but worth the cost. If, however, that means rainwater catchments...........that is WAY OVER THE TOP expensive! I guess my point is very simple.......it matters a great deal WHAT is done with the donations, not just how many people it affects.
At no point think I am hate'n on ya or the concept. My posts relate to how the funds are actually used. As I pointed out, $2000usd for some makeshift guttering is obscene, while that same amount for a water purification system for a village of over 100 people is not only worthwhile but rather noble.
Short version: Don't tell me you spent $2000 to give water to 101 people. That is about $20 a person, but it tells me nothing about the long term sustainability of that expenditure.
You state 101 people will now have access to clean water, which is of course kewl if that means permanent access to clean water. For example spending $2000usd to dig a protected well that supplies 101 villagers might be a tad expensive, but worth the cost. If, however, that means rainwater catchments...........that is WAY OVER THE TOP expensive! I guess my point is very simple.......it matters a great deal WHAT is done with the donations, not just how many people it affects.
At no point think I am hate'n on ya or the concept. My posts relate to how the funds are actually used. As I pointed out, $2000usd for some makeshift guttering is obscene, while that same amount for a water purification system for a village of over 100 people is not only worthwhile but rather noble.
Short version: Don't tell me you spent $2000 to give water to 101 people. That is about $20 a person, but it tells me nothing about the long term sustainability of that expenditure.
I guess the best answer I can give you is to check back once we reach our fundraising goal. Once the project is fully funded, we will get a very detailed report as to where the money went and how it was used to provide a long-term and lasting solution. If you would like to see an example of what I am referring to, go here: http://my.charitywater.org/p/myprojectsview?project_id=ET.GOH.Q4.09.048.213
Also keep in mind that $2,000 is just the beginning... there is a lot more money to raise. But it is a fantastic start in my opinion, and something I am proud to be apart of!
-Zach
Also keep in mind that some of your funds raised are going towards funding the promotion and development of this coin. I am waiting to see absolute transparency on every Water Coin that you have raised and where it has gone before I invest in this organization (a block explorer is a good first step). This is a practice that the organizations you are donating to appear to do (and you could do even better if you use the technology bitcoin offers you). It is understandable that you can use some coins to ensure the development of this coin is taken care of. I would wait until a community of trust is built before doing so. Again absolute transparency down to your home address... again you are a charity and you want to develop a solid community of people who will put value in this coin long term. Not just pump and dump fanboys abusing charitable ideas (even though if you do this right charity will still gain from them).
I'm calling BS! You can't say gimme the money and once I get enough I'll say how it will be spent. Time will tell everything my ass.......without a transparent advance plan, only an idiot would invest.
Go into any bank, ask a banker for 1 million dollars. He will want to see your FULL business prospectus, full month by month expenditure analysis, full every dam thing. To then tell him..............oh I can't say yet, just gimme the money and I'll let you know later.........you'll get shown the door. FFS!
April 04, 2014, 02:19:47 AM
ladies and gentlemen,
attention please. look at here
http://www.cryptocurrencyconvention.com/
i think water should be here, it's a good chance.
attention please. look at here
http://www.cryptocurrencyconvention.com/
i think water should be here, it's a good chance.
water should be here! thanks.
@CleanWaterCoin
+1
why not ? it's not far away from Canifornia.
find the convention is interesting .
dev. , will you attend it ?
April 04, 2014, 02:15:39 AM
well, ask for help . can a miner tell me how many WATERs i will get with 1M hash /day?
Just under 1000.http://whatmine.com
maybe less I get about 3000 with 6M a day
April 04, 2014, 02:10:51 AM
well, ask for help . can a miner tell me how many WATERs i will get with 1M hash /day?
April 04, 2014, 01:25:11 AM
@Cleanwatercoin.........instead of quoting which floods the thread with very long posts, I'll kinda start a new reply.
You state 101 people will now have access to clean water, which is of course kewl if that means permanent access to clean water. For example spending $2000usd to dig a protected well that supplies 101 villagers might be a tad expensive, but worth the cost. If, however, that means rainwater catchments...........that is WAY OVER THE TOP expensive! I guess my point is very simple.......it matters a great deal WHAT is done with the donations, not just how many people it affects.
At no point think I am hate'n on ya or the concept. My posts relate to how the funds are actually used. As I pointed out, $2000usd for some makeshift guttering is obscene, while that same amount for a water purification system for a village of over 100 people is not only worthwhile but rather noble.
Short version: Don't tell me you spent $2000 to give water to 101 people. That is about $20 a person, but it tells me nothing about the long term sustainability of that expenditure.
You state 101 people will now have access to clean water, which is of course kewl if that means permanent access to clean water. For example spending $2000usd to dig a protected well that supplies 101 villagers might be a tad expensive, but worth the cost. If, however, that means rainwater catchments...........that is WAY OVER THE TOP expensive! I guess my point is very simple.......it matters a great deal WHAT is done with the donations, not just how many people it affects.
At no point think I am hate'n on ya or the concept. My posts relate to how the funds are actually used. As I pointed out, $2000usd for some makeshift guttering is obscene, while that same amount for a water purification system for a village of over 100 people is not only worthwhile but rather noble.
Short version: Don't tell me you spent $2000 to give water to 101 people. That is about $20 a person, but it tells me nothing about the long term sustainability of that expenditure.
I guess the best answer I can give you is to check back once we reach our fundraising goal. Once the project is fully funded, we will get a very detailed report as to where the money went and how it was used to provide a long-term and lasting solution. If you would like to see an example of what I am referring to, go here: http://my.charitywater.org/p/myprojectsview?project_id=ET.GOH.Q4.09.048.213
Also keep in mind that $2,000 is just the beginning... there is a lot more money to raise. But it is a fantastic start in my opinion, and something I am proud to be apart of!
-Zach
Also keep in mind that some of your funds raised are going towards funding the promotion and development of this coin. I am waiting to see absolute transparency on every Water Coin that you have raised and where it has gone before I invest in this organization (a block explorer is a good first step). This is a practice that the organizations you are donating to appear to do (and you could do even better if you use the technology bitcoin offers you). It is understandable that you can use some coins to ensure the development of this coin is taken care of. I would wait until a community of trust is built before doing so. Again absolute transparency down to your home address... again you are a charity and you want to develop a solid community of people who will put value in this coin long term. Not just pump and dump fanboys abusing charitable ideas (even though if you do this right charity will still gain from them).
April 04, 2014, 01:15:39 AM
@Cleanwatercoin.........instead of quoting which floods the thread with very long posts, I'll kinda start a new reply.
You state 101 people will now have access to clean water, which is of course kewl if that means permanent access to clean water. For example spending $2000usd to dig a protected well that supplies 101 villagers might be a tad expensive, but worth the cost. If, however, that means rainwater catchments...........that is WAY OVER THE TOP expensive! I guess my point is very simple.......it matters a great deal WHAT is done with the donations, not just how many people it affects.
At no point think I am hate'n on ya or the concept. My posts relate to how the funds are actually used. As I pointed out, $2000usd for some makeshift guttering is obscene, while that same amount for a water purification system for a village of over 100 people is not only worthwhile but rather noble.
Short version: Don't tell me you spent $2000 to give water to 101 people. That is about $20 a person, but it tells me nothing about the long term sustainability of that expenditure.
You state 101 people will now have access to clean water, which is of course kewl if that means permanent access to clean water. For example spending $2000usd to dig a protected well that supplies 101 villagers might be a tad expensive, but worth the cost. If, however, that means rainwater catchments...........that is WAY OVER THE TOP expensive! I guess my point is very simple.......it matters a great deal WHAT is done with the donations, not just how many people it affects.
At no point think I am hate'n on ya or the concept. My posts relate to how the funds are actually used. As I pointed out, $2000usd for some makeshift guttering is obscene, while that same amount for a water purification system for a village of over 100 people is not only worthwhile but rather noble.
Short version: Don't tell me you spent $2000 to give water to 101 people. That is about $20 a person, but it tells me nothing about the long term sustainability of that expenditure.
I guess the best answer I can give you is to check back once we reach our fundraising goal. Once the project is fully funded, we will get a very detailed report as to where the money went and how it was used to provide a long-term and lasting solution. If you would like to see an example of what I am referring to, go here: http://my.charitywater.org/p/myprojectsview?project_id=ET.GOH.Q4.09.048.213
Also keep in mind that $2,000 is just the beginning... there is a lot more money to raise. But it is a fantastic start in my opinion, and something I am proud to be apart of!
-Zach
Also keep in mind that some of your funds raised are going towards funding the promotion and development of this coin. I am waiting to see absolute transparency on every Water Coin that you have raised and where it has gone before I invest in this organization (a block explorer is a good first step). This is a practice that the organizations you are donating to appear to do (and you could do even better if you use the technology bitcoin offers you). It is understandable that you can use some coins to ensure the development of this coin is taken care of. I would wait until a community of trust is built before doing so. Again absolute transparency down to your home address... again you are a charity and you want to develop a solid community of people who will put value in this coin long term. Not just pump and dump fanboys abusing charitable ideas (even though if you do this right charity will still gain from them).
April 04, 2014, 01:09:02 AM
April 04, 2014, 01:07:13 AM
@Cleanwatercoin.........instead of quoting which floods the thread with very long posts, I'll kinda start a new reply.
You state 101 people will now have access to clean water, which is of course kewl if that means permanent access to clean water. For example spending $2000usd to dig a protected well that supplies 101 villagers might be a tad expensive, but worth the cost. If, however, that means rainwater catchments...........that is WAY OVER THE TOP expensive! I guess my point is very simple.......it matters a great deal WHAT is done with the donations, not just how many people it affects.
At no point think I am hate'n on ya or the concept. My posts relate to how the funds are actually used. As I pointed out, $2000usd for some makeshift guttering is obscene, while that same amount for a water purification system for a village of over 100 people is not only worthwhile but rather noble.
Short version: Don't tell me you spent $2000 to give water to 101 people. That is about $20 a person, but it tells me nothing about the long term sustainability of that expenditure.
You state 101 people will now have access to clean water, which is of course kewl if that means permanent access to clean water. For example spending $2000usd to dig a protected well that supplies 101 villagers might be a tad expensive, but worth the cost. If, however, that means rainwater catchments...........that is WAY OVER THE TOP expensive! I guess my point is very simple.......it matters a great deal WHAT is done with the donations, not just how many people it affects.
At no point think I am hate'n on ya or the concept. My posts relate to how the funds are actually used. As I pointed out, $2000usd for some makeshift guttering is obscene, while that same amount for a water purification system for a village of over 100 people is not only worthwhile but rather noble.
Short version: Don't tell me you spent $2000 to give water to 101 people. That is about $20 a person, but it tells me nothing about the long term sustainability of that expenditure.
I guess the best answer I can give you is to check back once we reach our fundraising goal. Once the project is fully funded, we will get a very detailed report as to where the money went and how it was used to provide a long-term and lasting solution. If you would like to see an example of what I am referring to, go here: http://my.charitywater.org/p/myprojectsview?project_id=ET.GOH.Q4.09.048.213
Also keep in mind that $2,000 is just the beginning... there is a lot more money to raise. But it is a fantastic start in my opinion, and something I am proud to be apart of!
-Zach
April 04, 2014, 01:04:34 AM
@Cleanwatercoin.........instead of quoting which floods the thread with very long posts, I'll kinda start a new reply.
You state 101 people will now have access to clean water, which is of course kewl if that means permanent access to clean water. For example spending $2000usd to dig a protected well that supplies 101 villagers might be a tad expensive, but worth the cost. If, however, that means rainwater catchments...........that is WAY OVER THE TOP expensive! I guess my point is very simple.......it matters a great deal WHAT is done with the donations, not just how many people it affects.
At no point think I am hate'n on ya or the concept. My posts relate to how the funds are actually used. As I pointed out, $2000usd for some makeshift guttering is obscene, while that same amount for a water purification system for a village of over 100 people is not only worthwhile but rather noble.
Short version: Don't tell me you spent $2000 to give water to 101 people. That is about $20 a person, but it tells me nothing about the long term sustainability of that expenditure.
You state 101 people will now have access to clean water, which is of course kewl if that means permanent access to clean water. For example spending $2000usd to dig a protected well that supplies 101 villagers might be a tad expensive, but worth the cost. If, however, that means rainwater catchments...........that is WAY OVER THE TOP expensive! I guess my point is very simple.......it matters a great deal WHAT is done with the donations, not just how many people it affects.
At no point think I am hate'n on ya or the concept. My posts relate to how the funds are actually used. As I pointed out, $2000usd for some makeshift guttering is obscene, while that same amount for a water purification system for a village of over 100 people is not only worthwhile but rather noble.
Short version: Don't tell me you spent $2000 to give water to 101 people. That is about $20 a person, but it tells me nothing about the long term sustainability of that expenditure.
i think it's very clear that the donation will be used for clean water project!
not buy water for people.
April 04, 2014, 12:42:17 AM
@Cleanwatercoin.........instead of quoting which floods the thread with very long posts, I'll kinda start a new reply.
You state 101 people will now have access to clean water, which is of course kewl if that means permanent access to clean water. For example spending $2000usd to dig a protected well that supplies 101 villagers might be a tad expensive, but worth the cost. If, however, that means rainwater catchments...........that is WAY OVER THE TOP expensive! I guess my point is very simple.......it matters a great deal WHAT is done with the donations, not just how many people it affects.
At no point think I am hate'n on ya or the concept. My posts relate to how the funds are actually used. As I pointed out, $2000usd for some makeshift guttering is obscene, while that same amount for a water purification system for a village of over 100 people is not only worthwhile but rather noble.
Short version: Don't tell me you spent $2000 to give water to 101 people. That is about $20 a person, but it tells me nothing about the long term sustainability of that expenditure.
You state 101 people will now have access to clean water, which is of course kewl if that means permanent access to clean water. For example spending $2000usd to dig a protected well that supplies 101 villagers might be a tad expensive, but worth the cost. If, however, that means rainwater catchments...........that is WAY OVER THE TOP expensive! I guess my point is very simple.......it matters a great deal WHAT is done with the donations, not just how many people it affects.
At no point think I am hate'n on ya or the concept. My posts relate to how the funds are actually used. As I pointed out, $2000usd for some makeshift guttering is obscene, while that same amount for a water purification system for a village of over 100 people is not only worthwhile but rather noble.
Short version: Don't tell me you spent $2000 to give water to 101 people. That is about $20 a person, but it tells me nothing about the long term sustainability of that expenditure.
April 04, 2014, 12:40:19 AM
Due to the extremely low trading volume on http://www.ecoinfund.com/exchange, we are not considering this as our Chinese exchange site.
yes , bter.com and btc38.com are the best for water.
but we should do more and more.
http://www.ecoinfund.com/
i recommended this one as it doesn't supply CNY exchange, central bank of China can not limit it as they are doing to bter/btc38/okcoin/btcchina and any other popular exchanges now.
April 04, 2014, 12:29:25 AM
April 04, 2014, 12:23:44 AM
http://www.ecoinfund.com/vote
i find a Chinese exchange here, can someone lead to request adding water?
i find a Chinese exchange here, can someone lead to request adding water?
I'll show this to Water_kel.
thank you .
we should speed up to introduce CleanWaterCoin to Chinese, not after block 7,000, or even later.
shall we ?
waiting for reply from Chinese community manager.
Naming Suggestion for Clean Water Coins: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--555566
Just simply write down a few words and you have a chance for getting 500 WATER or even more.
After the suggestion, a voting thread will be added. The voters can get free coins.
There is a more interesting feature for that giveaway. You will know very soon.
After that my plan is to promote the coin on QQ.
My ultimate aim is to help the coin to get on some Chinese media.
For that Chinese exchange, I will contact it today.
Do you have any suggestion for promoting this coin for Chinese?
Glad to see some Chinese here.
good.
QQ is necessary , every altcoin has a QQ group in China, or more .
Chinese media is also good.
my only suggestion is : speed up taking your plan actions , please. we've launched for days.
after block 7,000 ,reward will decrease , that's a little unfair to Chinese .
i have seen a QQ group here :water水币cleanwatercoin 151277401
why do the official promotions largely fall behind their fans?
agree , pls speed up your promotions .
同意！
I have my day job to do and I am not contributing all the time into the coin.
We need your help as my own power is not strong enough.
Please help to suggest one or two names for the coin and I will end the suggestion part.
The voting and giveaway part will be opened soon.
April 03, 2014, 11:55:59 PM
April 03, 2014, 11:49:46 PM
http://www.ecoinfund.com/vote
i find a Chinese exchange here, can someone lead to request adding water?
i find a Chinese exchange here, can someone lead to request adding water?
I'll show this to Water_kel.
thank you .
we should speed up to introduce CleanWaterCoin to Chinese, not after block 7,000, or even later.
shall we ?
waiting for reply from Chinese community manager.
Naming Suggestion for Clean Water Coins: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--555566
Just simply write down a few words and you have a chance for getting 500 WATER or even more.
After the suggestion, a voting thread will be added. The voters can get free coins.
There is a more interesting feature for that giveaway. You will know very soon.
After that my plan is to promote the coin on QQ.
My ultimate aim is to help the coin to get on some Chinese media.
For that Chinese exchange, I will contact it today.
Do you have any suggestion for promoting this coin for Chinese?
Glad to see some Chinese here.
good.
QQ is necessary , every altcoin has a QQ group in China, or more .
Chinese media is also good.
my only suggestion is : speed up taking your plan actions , please. we've launched for days.
after block 7,000 ,reward will decrease , that's a little unfair to Chinese .
i have seen a QQ group here :water水币cleanwatercoin 151277401
why do the official promotions largely fall behind their fans?
agree , pls speed up your promotions .
同意！
I have my day job to do and I am not contributing all the time into the coin.
We need your help as my own power is not strong enough.
Please help to suggest one or two names for the coin and I will end the suggestion part.
The voting and giveaway part will be opened soon.
April 03, 2014, 11:14:39 PM
http://www.ecoinfund.com/vote
i find a Chinese exchange here, can someone lead to request adding water?
i find a Chinese exchange here, can someone lead to request adding water?
I'll show this to Water_kel.
thank you .
we should speed up to introduce CleanWaterCoin to Chinese, not after block 7,000, or even later.
shall we ?
waiting for reply from Chinese community manager.
Naming Suggestion for Clean Water Coins: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--555566
Just simply write down a few words and you have a chance for getting 500 WATER or even more.
After the suggestion, a voting thread will be added. The voters can get free coins.
There is a more interesting feature for that giveaway. You will know very soon.
After that my plan is to promote the coin on QQ.
My ultimate aim is to help the coin to get on some Chinese media.
For that Chinese exchange, I will contact it today.
Do you have any suggestion for promoting this coin for Chinese?
Glad to see some Chinese here.
good.
QQ is necessary , every altcoin has a QQ group in China, or more .
Chinese media is also good.
my only suggestion is : speed up taking your plan actions , please. we've launched for days.
after block 7,000 ,reward will decrease , that's a little unfair to Chinese .
i have seen a QQ group here :water水币cleanwatercoin 151277401
why do the official promotions largely fall behind their fans?
agree , pls speed up your promotions .
同意！
Jump to: