Topic: Don't be too quick to judge ICOs - page 12. (Read 19843 times)
I certainly do not believe that view 99% of ICOs are scam. In my opinion, the biggest problem of the ICOs in the bear season was the lack of funding. In this case, many projects have been canceled. But that doesn't mean that those projects are scam. Many ICOs also succeeded. So I think that thinking of all ICOs as scam is damaging such platforms.
If you choose to invest in IEO to makeyour investments, then dont judge the projects that offers ico because no matter what they used as fundraising it can be scam,and not all ieo projects are good to make investments same as ico but it depends in the investors to choose what project he wanted to assure his or her profit.
Who said that 99 percent of all projects are scam 
? It is just silly, because people are not doing research on projects, are entering every single one and are wondering why 50 percent of them went scam. Be smart and try to find legit projects instead of investing in everything.
? It is just silly, because people are not doing research on projects, are entering every single one and are wondering why 50 percent of them went scam. Be smart and try to find legit projects instead of investing in everything. 
The winners will be judged. Now you do not need to somehow assess the success of this method of attracting money, because before that it worked quite well.
When it comes to judging icos or ieos; I believe there’s nothing like too quick
You have a split second to decide to invest or not
So once you get an project, figure out the idea and get it done swiftly either to join or not
You have a split second to decide to invest or not
So once you get an project, figure out the idea and get it done swiftly either to join or not
But the fact that there is now is that ico is already very bad. and I must be able to make an assessment that it is better to avoid ico in order to avoid greater losses. there are still many other potentials that we can get apart from ico who have lost trust by investors
I personally do not believe this statistics that 99% of ICOs are scam, because some ICOs fail do not mean they are all scam. I usually tell people that starting an ICO is like starting a new business, it might succeed immediately, it might fail presently but have a great future and it might fail totally beyond redemption. So because a project is failing to perform presently or fail totally do not mean it is a scam. Don't get me wrong here, I never said there are no scam projects but the rate is not as high as alleged. Judging a project based on its first few years is wrong, give it time to realize its potentials.
Not all ICOs are scam. It's a very wrong assumption to think that all of them are scam. That's a very wrong thing to believe. I think the problem we have in this community is that some people actually like publishing their hurts based on the challenges they have been through and in the process, they generalise the problems and make it look as if, since they have been disspointed before by an ICOs all of them are bad. That kind of assumption should never be made. Indeed, we should not be too quick to judge ICOs
In every location, there are good and bad people and that is how it is for ICOs, while there are undoubtedly bad ICOs that has made so.many people lose faith in ICOs in general, you have to admit that there are wonderful projects that did ICOs and are delivering in their promises now. All isn't a scam.
If you're too quick in judging, you end up being ashamed and regretted. Ico's need finances to progress to the next stage of their roadmap but since they are not having has made them static and surely when they get the money they will surely progress, let's stop judging icos quickly.
ICOs are often called scams because this scheme of collecting money for your business is very convenient for scammers and the guys with low responsibility level 
Collect money, try to create something valuable and useful, fail... and tell everyone that it's a business and the knew what they were doing - the risks were high
Collect money, try to create something valuable and useful, fail... and tell everyone that it's a business and the knew what they were doing - the risks were high
Not entirely an ICO project fails and already a lot of ICO success. I agree with your opinion that the ICO is already running and until the stage in exchange then the project collapses. Not fully failed the ICO and I think it can still be developed again. Now many people follow the ICO because of the risen Bitcoin price.
I think you are very right about this. Most people just join a project for the quick profit and judge the project as scam if it doesn't provide that quick profit, which is wrong. Before a project can start to bring good returns, it is when it starts to hit it's major milestones on its roadmap or at the peak of a bull run. I know of a project that did X0.6 when it got listed and it is now trading at X2 now, it increased as more milestone were met.
The fact remains that, ICOs were just the basis for every investment in the crypto space.
At a time, It was discovered that another form of investment will replace ICO, which is IEO.
At a time, It was discovered that another form of investment will replace ICO, which is IEO.
ICO projects worked very well for only one year. After that, the market began to fall and most of the projects could not get out of this pit. They had to deceive a lot of people. But they didn't plan to do that. I believe that there are still good projects.
What are you talking about? Many projects that have carried out their ICO more than a year ago are still working. When the market falls along with it, the price of everything falls almost without exception.
I think it works only for fundamental ICos like tezos, polkadot, atom, because they don't think about marketing, shilling and so on.
For smaller ICOs speed is required
For smaller ICOs speed is required
Now ICO projects are basically all bad and I think nothing will change soon, so many people are judging ICO
Being a prejudice has never been the best of human behaviour but sometimes experiences in life cloud our judgements. Anyway, to be on the safer side, Make a thorough research about the ICO before passing any comments and stop basing your judgements on what people are saying, they could all be wrong lol.
You can't judge the forest because of a single tree and do also it will be wrong to say all ICOs are scam all because you have participated in in ICOs that turned out to be a scam. We still have some good ICOs that are worth going for.
Not all but most of the new crypto projects are turning into the scams which makes that people to think that all the new crypto projects will be launching is going to be scam.
in the indication that ico fails and the scam is clearly different, scams contain rejection, usually their project complaints are successful but they do not make payments to investors or supporters of the project, while ico fails, they never run away from problems, and they are responsible for investors or support teams , they are transparent.
You can't judge the forest because of a single tree and do also it will be wrong to say all ICOs are scam all because you have participated in in ICOs that turned out to be a scam. We still have some good ICOs that are worth going for.
Jump to: