Whatever the motives behind the Bitcoin's development, it still cannot be consumed by nobody in its circulation chain. Meaning, profit or benefit for investors, criminal or not, can be obtained only by using funds from new investors. Hence, Ponzi scheme.
It is definitely NOT a Ponzi scheme. In a Ponzi scheme early investors make money off of newly injected money into the system. With bitcoin, criminals make money by using an uncontrolled unregulated transfer of value system or con men use various schemes to convince people to send them their money using an unregulated irreversible currency.
Well, criminals are just people who have committed a crime and as such they are not immune to Ponzi schemes. A Ponzis scheme is NOT when early investors make money off of newly injected money into the system, because every investment fits that definition. For e.g. if you had put 1000 USD into Apple stock at the beginning of the year, and sold it today, you, as an early investor, would have made money off of newly injected money into the system - which is injected by new investor, the buyer of your stocks. So, is Apple a Ponzi? No. A Ponzis scheme is when investors put in consumable resources - resources with the capacity to be used, consumed or practically utilized by end consumers for satisfying their needs, and end up with non-consumable item which has no end consumers and as such it cannot be used by anyone. For e.g. a car is used by end consumers for driving, a dollar for settling loan obligations, food for providing nutritional support, a raw material for producing finished products etc. Hence, investing into dollar, car or food industry, crude oil, etc., is a not a Ponzi scheme because funds are transfered into something that is used for satisfying actual human needs, and these needs are the very reason why economic activity that produces and trade consumable resources exists. But, when funds are transfered into bitcoin - a number associated with an address, this is a Ponzi scheme because this number cannot be used for satisfying actual human needs. Instead, it can only be transferred from hand-to-hand, from member-to-member, from address-to-address. If an owner of this address is criminal, nothing changed - Bitcoin is still a non-consumable item and thus, putting your funds into it is investment into a Ponzi scheme.
Wrong:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ponzi_scheme“Ponzi scheme
A Ponzi scheme is a fraudulent investment operation where the operator, an individual or organization, pays returns to its investors from new capital paid to the operators by new investors, rather than from profit earned through legitimate sources.”
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/Ponzi%20scheme“A Ponzi scheme is an investment scam that pays existing investors out of money invested by new investors, giving the appearance of earnings and profits where there are none. Ponzi schemes are also known as pyramid schemes.”
These definitions are correct, but imprecise since an existing investor who bought an Apple stock and sell it immediately for a small profit would not have made money from company's profit or earnings but from funds invested by a new investor - the buyer of the stock. Hence, given the definitions you provided, Apple is Ponzi. As you can see, it is not solely the source of the profit what defines a Ponzi scheme. You must also consider the type of resource in which was invested. In the above example it was invested into resources such as buildings, machinery, equipment, vehicles and tools that Apple uses to produce their products. All these resources are consumable - they can provide benefit to a human. That is why investment into Apple is not investment into Ponzi. But, by investing into Bitcoin it was invested into number associated with an address, and this number obviously cannot be consumed by humans, but only transferred from address-to-address. That's why Bitcoin is a Ponzi scheme.
You can’t just change the meaning of a word. You can call bitcoin a bad thing if you like but it’s not a Ponzi.
If no human being is able to use Bitcoin for satisfying his or her needs, but only transfer it to another's address, how can someone in Bitcoin circulation chain benefit from it? Well, only by leaving it. And in order to do something like that, a new investor must join the chain by bringing usable resources like dollar, car, food, mobile phone, software, share in a company, etc. These resuorces can then be actually used. Either for fulfilling loan obligations, driving, eating, sending and receiving phone calls, text editing or producing goods and services. So Bitcoin in itself is useless the same as membership in a Ponzi scheme and one can benefit from it only by leaving it.
There are many financial scams that you can compare bitcoin to that are not “Ponzi schemes”. Stop using the word Ponzi because it makes people not listen to you.
Bitcoin is NOT the same financial scam that Bernie Madhoff used. Bitcoin is more like Enron. Enron used a variety of deceptive, bewildering, and fraudulent accounting practices and tactics to cover its fraud in reporting Enron's financial information.
Bitcoin exchanges, which are collectively used to set bitcoins price, use a variety of deceptive, bewildering, and fraudulent accounting practices and tactics to cover its fraud in reporting the exchange rate of bitcoin.
Insiders at Enron knew about the offshore accounts that were hiding losses for the company; the investors did not.
Bitcoin insiders like Roger Ver knew Mt Gox was cooking the books to hide losses; bitcoin holders did not.
Enron was the only company that would not release a balance sheet along with its earnings statements. Bitcoin exchanges are the only “banks” in the world that do not release balance sheets or earnings statements.
There isn’t a single solitary person in the world that can confirm bitcoin exchange rates reflect actual correct volume. As Enron executives sold their shares, the price began to decrease. Enron loyalists told investors to continue buying stock or hold steady if they already owned Enron because the stock price would rebound in the near future.
As Bitcoin early adopters and major investors sell their coin the price decreases. Bitcoin loyalists tell investors to continue buying bitcoin and hold steady if they already own bitcoin because the price will rebound in the near future.
Enron’s success was measured by undocumented financial statements, actual balance sheets were inconvenient. Enron's unscrupulous actions were often gambles to keep the deception going and so increase the stock price. An advancing price meant a continued infusion of investor capital on which debt-ridden Enron in large part subsisted.
Bitcoin’s success is measured by undocumented financial statements from exchanges, actual balance sheets are inconvenient. The worldwide system of exchanges unscrupulous actions are often gambles to keep the deception going and so increase the exchange rate. An advancing price means a continued infusion of investor capital on which a failing Bitcoin in large part exists.
Enron was diversified into online marketplace services, broadband services, commodities services, capital and risk management services, project development and management services and general international investments.
Bitcoin can claim the use of all of the above systems of diversification to hide the reality of actual value. All the while, bitcoin investors are told to hodl.
Enron operated the fraud for decades so don’t assume because bitcoin has been around 10 years its any safer. Even the former lead developer Gaven Andresen warned bitcoin users to “not invest anything they couldn’t afford to lose”.
You see, bitcoin is not a Ponzi. If anything, Bitcoin is a “distributed crime system”. However, unlike Enron, there is no single entity that can be held accountable. If you close one Mt Gox, BTCe, Tradehill, or Silk Road three more pop up in their place. You can lock up the criminal but you can’t stop the crime. Bitcoin is pure criminal brilliance.