Topic: Don't trust LAUDA - page 3. (Read 2002 times)
You are just saying to don't trust Lauda. But I didn't find the right logic on it. They are making forum as a trusted platform and a good source. Always green trust on such folks. Forum needs more folks like him/her.
he admited it was a big failure.
LOL, it wasn't a failure at all. True, I have to retract all the negs I left shitposters, but I'm cool with that--very cool, because now Theymos implemented the merit system. I don't know if that was already in the works, but I'm grateful it came about. And the campaign of tagging shitposters got all of them to wake the fuck up. I call that a success.Blazed has been putting up with requests ad nauseam from members looking to have Lauda scratched out of existence for as long as he's had Lauda in his trust list. Blazed seems to be a rock in that respect--so good luck trying to get anyone booted off DT.
Like i said it takes a bit longer to collect all evidences and to make sure a large scale of crypto users will read it.
I like to hit like a bulldozer.
Once hit you won't stay up anymore.
You guys are already clearly afraid so lauda already edited the mistakes he posted in public as he feeled so confident nothing could happen at his position.Some other group member start to not join and support you guys like they did in the past .....i guess to not get hit too.
The beauty of this community is that a big part is not stupid.Not posting much since they are making money but are reading a lot.And once they will read about your actions you can expect a shitstorm over you since you were destroying every value this board has with your moronic actions .
Blazed will be held responsible since i belive it was his only decissions to use you morons for it and still keeps justifying the abuse of hundreds of legit accounts even he admited it was a big failure.
I guess thats also the reason he doesnt reply to the accusation against him since he is now aware that he fucked up
I like to hit like a bulldozer.
Once hit you won't stay up anymore.
You guys are already clearly afraid so lauda already edited the mistakes he posted in public as he feeled so confident nothing could happen at his position.Some other group member start to not join and support you guys like they did in the past .....i guess to not get hit too.
The beauty of this community is that a big part is not stupid.Not posting much since they are making money but are reading a lot.And once they will read about your actions you can expect a shitstorm over you since you were destroying every value this board has with your moronic actions .
Blazed will be held responsible since i belive it was his only decissions to use you morons for it and still keeps justifying the abuse of hundreds of legit accounts even he admited it was a big failure.
I guess thats also the reason he doesnt reply to the accusation against him since he is now aware that he fucked up
who cant get over your Lauda addiction??
Have you ever been slapped by the famous wet trout? I have, it has given me more hopes and I'm addicted, do you know any NA sponsor?Where is QS to merit the OP? and please don't address Lauda as a he, I have plans, they would only work on a she.
I'm looking for a topic on Lauda where no signature campaign is mentioned, OP has negative trust and he knows there is no way to participate in any signature campaign, he is just worried about other beggars.
OP, quote me, because I need those 400K people to know about my ITO a.k.a activity tokens and if there is any orphan teenage girl for holy matrimonial purposes, I am here (why orphan? because there is no family to force me to work, I could just make a paid prostitute out of her to earn for both of us).
(no I don't really care if my wife is a prostitute, I'd only have a jumping experience once in a week).
what drugs are you on? I want some.. I really do.
as for NA help I hear that OG Nasty and his fanclub are still recruiting
But as to this topic....weren't we supposed to be privy to some bombshell that Thule was dropping on us at some point in the last 48 hours? I seem to recall predicting it would be yawn-worthy, but I've not seen anything yet. Just empty threats and trolling. Boy, that almost sounds like something QS would do. Thule, do you take two sides of a three-sided escrow deal, by any chance?
i want to spent two words on lauda
is kind moderator and answers to my stupid questions always
and i use him like escrow, never ONE problem with him
and cooperate for SMAS list, never ONE problem
i'm not in lauda gang (lol) but i trust him
i'm not trust in a "new" guy with alt-account
is kind moderator and answers to my stupid questions always
and i use him like escrow, never ONE problem with him
and cooperate for SMAS list, never ONE problem
i'm not in lauda gang (lol) but i trust him
i'm not trust in a "new" guy with alt-account
i would recommend keep searching there is another post where you also said to call these managers corrupt.
Happy searching and editing
Here from the same thread where Lauda edited his text to force and basicly abuse project managers and ITO's which deny to accept their rules
from LoyCev
Happy searching and editing
Here from the same thread where Lauda edited his text to force and basicly abuse project managers and ITO's which deny to accept their rules
from LoyCev
Yeah, it is his forum so I will make sure the red for shit posting stops. I was not sure if it would work, but at least it got something else implemented for us. I remain doubtful that anything will fix the spam here until we hold campaign managers accountable for their users.
Most of the red users I have seen are guilty of shit posting for pay
And at the same time admits hundreds of legit accounts got destroyed and defamed because of their action .....and he is fully aware of it but didn't even care to fix them 
I saw you edited your posts.I got it already archivised by a 3rd party service.
Let's see who the people are going to belive.
Your new sentence seems so educated and concerned about project managers LOL
Yeah Lauda thats you full of bullshit.It just proofs you are getting nervous and since i knew you are going to edit it i made before talking about it archives which can't be denied since they are made by 3rd party services.
So i wish you happy editing.It won't help you anymore
I don't even..Let's see who the people are going to belive.
Your new sentence seems so educated and concerned about project managers LOL
Yeah Lauda thats you full of bullshit.It just proofs you are getting nervous and since i knew you are going to edit it i made before talking about it archives which can't be denied since they are made by 3rd party services.
So i wish you happy editing.It won't help you anymore
I saw you edited your posts.I got it already archivised by a 3rd party service.
Let's see who the people are going to belive.
Your new sentence seems so educated and concerned about project managers LOL
Yeah Lauda thats you full of bullshit.It just proofs you are getting nervous and since i knew you are going to edit it i made before talking about it archives which can't be denied since they are made by 3rd party services.
So i wish you happy editing.It won't help you anymore
For the public.
He changed his sentence to force all managers and defame if needed into
Luckily i got everything archivised which will be posted on the article including proof Lauda is editing his own words to destroy all evidences.
People will see themself and can ask Lauda why he is editing it now
or maybe ask Blazed why he isnt replying at all
Let's see who the people are going to belive.
Your new sentence seems so educated and concerned about project managers LOL
Yeah Lauda thats you full of bullshit.It just proofs you are getting nervous and since i knew you are going to edit it i made before talking about it archives which can't be denied since they are made by 3rd party services.
So i wish you happy editing.It won't help you anymore
For the public.
He changed his sentence to force all managers and defame if needed into
Quote
Re latter part: How do you do that? What happens in 2 our of 30 reject the agreement? How to prevent new managers popping up that don't accept the agreement? How do you enforce this agreement? While the suggestion may seem simple, it is most certainly not.
Luckily i got everything archivised which will be posted on the article including proof Lauda is editing his own words to destroy all evidences.
People will see themself and can ask Lauda why he is editing it now
or maybe ask Blazed why he isnt replying at all Hey Lauda you deny your own words you where talking in your group together with blazed ?
Whats up ?Why don't you stand to your own words?
None of those are my words. You're doing some strong drugs, it seems. Whats up ?Why don't you stand to your own words?
Hey Lauda you deny your own words you where talking in your group together with blazed ?
Whats up ?Why don't you stand to your own words?
Whats up ?Why don't you stand to your own words?
You don't do that but already plan your next step to force (your own words) project managers or ITO's to accept your own made rules who they are allowed to accept and who not and if they won't agree you will defame them with your group and call in public corrupt (your own words) to make them comply against their will else you will destroy their reputation ?
Is that a lie ?
Let me repeat this again:Is that a lie ?
You need to get your head examined.
And just an FYI, I am a competitor of Laudas and I do just fine.
Probably, with some minor exceptions, the only actual competitor to ALU. Most campaign management services offered here are practically a joke. The whole argument being made is exactly that, a joke. You don't do that ?..... but already plan your next step to force (your own words) project managers or ITO's to accept your own made rules who they are allowed to accept and who not and if they won't agree you will defame them with your group and call in public corrupt (your own words) to make them comply against their will else you will destroy their reputation just because they disagree with your self made rules ?
Is that a lie ?
And just an FYI, I am a competitor of Laudas and I do just fine.
Probably, with some minor exceptions, the only actual competitor to ALU. Most campaign management services offered here are practically a joke. The whole argument being made is exactly that, a joke. And just an FYI, I am a competitor of Laudas and I do just fine.
Probably, with some minor exceptions, the only actual competitor to ALU. Most campaign management services offered here are practically a joke. The whole argument being made is exactly that, a joke. when are you going to call them scammers and destroy their accounts for low quality ?
Don't trust Lauda.
Abusing the trust system and destroying competitor with fake scam accusation.
Laura was accused for scam and was kicked out of staff as a result.
DO NOT TRUST THEM
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/escrowing-on-demand-1938190
Abusing the trust system and destroying competitor with fake scam accusation.
Laura was accused for scam and was kicked out of staff as a result.
DO NOT TRUST THEM
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/escrowing-on-demand-1938190
i sent 0.025 btc to lauda. i received what was promised.
which rules ?
The one Lauda and his group created themself ?
Maybe we will enforce now also the new rule they talked about to force project managers or ITO's to accept their guidelines which will tell them which users they are allowed to accept and which not and if they disagree the group will start defaming him or the whole ITO.
Seems to me a very legit person/group and a great plan with a positiv benefit for the whole community
But since you are also in Ad management i can understand why you join this scam
You're not offering any logical arguments here. Anybody that tries to argue against you is automatically part of Lauda's scam team and thus their opinion is invalid. Anybody that sides with you is automatically right.The one Lauda and his group created themself ?
Maybe we will enforce now also the new rule they talked about to force project managers or ITO's to accept their guidelines which will tell them which users they are allowed to accept and which not and if they disagree the group will start defaming him or the whole ITO.
Seems to me a very legit person/group and a great plan with a positiv benefit for the whole community
But since you are also in Ad management i can understand why you join this scam
With that kind of labeling, of course you would never be at fault.
You seem to continually talk about the arbitrary rules that 'Lauda and his group' declared. Here's the thing: the trust system actually allows for that—subjectivity in feedback—since it is given at a user's discretion. Like for example, the feedback that you sent Slow death: "I don't like you.Am now going to use the Trust feedback the same way like Lauda and his group is doing which you support".
You're allowed to send negative feedback to someone you don't trust. That is, after all, how it's supposed to work. So if several community members don't think that account trading is trustworthy, are we not then allowed to send negative feedback?
You people need to grow up. Tossing out scam accusations just because you are butthurt over a tag given to you. If you feel the tag was given in error, then contact the person whom tagged you and try to work it out. No amount of bullshit threads will help you.
And just an FYI, I am a competitor of Laudas and I do just fine. I would also trust Lauda to hold any amount of funds for myself or a project if they asked for an escrow, so your argument of Lauda is tagging all competitors is FALSE.
If you are following the rules of the forum and doing things as they should be done, you will have no problems with Lauda or any other of us DT users.
And just an FYI, I am a competitor of Laudas and I do just fine. I would also trust Lauda to hold any amount of funds for myself or a project if they asked for an escrow, so your argument of Lauda is tagging all competitors is FALSE.
If you are following the rules of the forum and doing things as they should be done, you will have no problems with Lauda or any other of us DT users.
which rules ?
The one Lauda and his group created themself ?
Maybe we will enforce now also the new rule they talked about to force project managers or ITO's to accept their guidelines which will tell them which users they are allowed to accept and which not and if they disagree the group will start defaming him or the whole ITO.
Seems to me a very legit person/group and a great plan with a positiv benefit for the whole community
But since you are also in Ad management i can understand why you join this scam
And just an FYI, I am a competitor of Laudas and I do just fine.
Probably, with some minor exceptions, the only actual competitor to ALU. Most campaign management services offered here are practically a joke. The whole argument being made is exactly that, a joke. 
You people need to grow up. Tossing out scam accusations just because you are butthurt over a tag given to you. If you feel the tag was given in error, then contact the person whom tagged you and try to work it out. No amount of bullshit threads will help you.
And just an FYI, I am a competitor of Laudas and I do just fine. I would also trust Lauda to hold any amount of funds for myself or a project if they asked for an escrow, so your argument of Lauda is tagging all competitors is FALSE.
If you are following the rules of the forum and doing things as they should be done, you will have no problems with Lauda or any other of us DT users. Just common sense
And just an FYI, I am a competitor of Laudas and I do just fine. I would also trust Lauda to hold any amount of funds for myself or a project if they asked for an escrow, so your argument of Lauda is tagging all competitors is FALSE.
If you are following the rules of the forum and doing things as they should be done, you will have no problems with Lauda or any other of us DT users. Just common sense
xxx
Jump to: