Topic: DORIAN NAKAMOTO LAUNCHES LEGAL DEFENSE FUND AT WWW.NEWSWEEKLIED.COM (Read 3398 times)

+1 good luck to Dorian Nakamoto.

You have any other proves beside guys quote?

not really. 
the fact that he couldn't wait to quote me made me even more suspicious that this, in fact, IS A SCAM.

So maybe next time you will be more careful. Hopefully.

Wish him good luck, probably just a victim of press

This looked dodgy to me from the get go. Hope this isn't true about the lawyer as that is very sketchy. Hopefully he isn't just trying to take advantage of Dorian. I hope he doesnt get him involved in a costly legal case that he could lose.

"@DanielJonss @DorianSatoshi It may however be a scam by the lawyer against Dorian. I am highly suspicious of the intentions of the lawyer"
https://twitter.com/aantonop/status/521854456829186048

So, Andreas supports our suspicions.

Bah, well, guess we'll wait and see what happens then.

The quote that Andreas substantiated this is not true, look at his Twitter.

https://twitter.com/aantonop

You might be right with your conclusion about Dorian and Kirschner, but that I am associated with them is wrong and makes no sense. Where did I act like a scammer anyway? Just because I posted the second link to cryptome to verify that the link I posted was legit? Because right after that Franky1 called me a scammer and a low life and even thought I was the owner of cryptome, which is the most ridicolous bullshit I heard in a long time.
I simply found this link on cryptome, checked it and then I posted it, because it is bitcoin related.

As you think Frank1 is right, you also might think that I am the owner of cryptome, who is using his freedom of speech site to scam donators in the name of Dorian Nakamoto. This is worth a new topic in "Speculation" ...

franky1 is right about, that you acted like a scammer and we still can't know, if you are associated with Kirschner & Associates. How did you even find that site?

I wouldn't send a single Satoshi to this adress for reasons already mentioned here.
Even when Dorian is behind it, it seems like some law firm is trying to take advantage  of him, which pretty much confirms, that he is not SN, but some really naiv person. They most probably baited him with promises of fame and money.

SEE.. I DELETED MY POST!  (within less than 3 minutes) and yet the OP still quote me.   i was hesitant after i did my own searching, but the OP's anxiety to respond made it irresistible for me to believe it's a scam.

i may be wrong but it still feels weird due to op's behavior. 

Franky1, you made yourself a clown already and you still don't get it. Don't make it worse with your ridiculous comments.
Next time when you read something on the net, first check, if it could be legit before you accuse somebody to be a scammer and a low life.

OffTopicCliffs:

- I post a link to Dorian Nakamotos/Lawers funding website
- Franky1 thinks its fake and a scam
- I post another link to a file on crptome.org to verify that it looks legit to me
- Franky1 offenses me and accuses me beeing a scammer and the owner of cryptome.org (famous freedom of speech website since 1996. Owner: John Young)
- Big press worldwide already released the story about Dorian and his defense fund, but Franky1 still thinks its all a scam/fake and that I am the head behind it. He even thinks that I am the one who is sending the news to sites like coinbase, cnet, nzz, spiegel and calls them all "crap media"
- Later Franky1 realizes, that he was completely wrong, but is unable to admit it. Instead he is making me responsible for his foolish comments.

I would consider the attorney to be a scammer. It is pretty rare that attorneys will attempt to crowd-fund a legal "defense" fund for someone when they are suing another company like this. It is much more common for attorneys to work on a contingent fee basis that would allow them to get paid only if they win the case or if the case is settled out of court (they are usually entitled to more then the standard 1/3 of damages and will also be reimbursed for any costs they incur out of the settlement).

I would say that his attorney had doubts as to if he can win a case but wants to take it on anyway because he thinks the bitcoin community will fund the cost of litigation.

I also think the legal theory behind a potential lawsuit against newsweek is dubious at best. I certainly do not agree with how newsweek handled the situation, is an example of poor investigative journalism, however is certainly not an example of a tort against Dorian.

The fact that Dorian is wiling to attempt to pursue such a lawsuit is, in my eyes proof that he is not Satashi as I would think that Satashi would be able to clearly see that this is not a valid case.

I also find it strange that money is being raised for a "defense" fund when Dorian is not putting on a defense but rather is filing a lawsuit.

no need to PM me. its all been said publicly.

yea before suspecting you i did atleast check you out.. but to be honest its your emotional attachment to endlessly defend the links your post as being legit, which makes you look worse,

Sorry you are late with your conclusion, buddy. Franky1 already has found out, that I am John Young, owner of cryptome.org and I am using my site to scam people. PM him for more delicate details about my life. He knows everything.

Why dont you read all posts in this thread and see the story?

Is Dorian the japanese guy that supossedly was Satoshi Nakamoto but wasn't? What is OP trying to do, profit on a rumor?

You were completely wrong and you don't have the guts to simply admit it.

Andreas already set up a Bitcoin address for Dorian Nakomoto. Why would this site ask people to send their bitcoin donations to a different one than the one he set up for Dorian?
Most of it sounds plausible, but that whole new bitcoin address seems...doesn't make sense.