Topic: DoubleBot.com - Always pays,100% guarantee. 195 BTC paid,more than 1 year online - page 32. (Read 150875 times)

proof of trading isnt hard to prove and snavy doesnt want to do it . and now he or she doesnt send out the payments when he has said before the bots are still running regardless off the updates on the site . he isnt trading people the scum bag disappeared

Except, of course, they aren't. Your failure to understand the basic principle of odds-based gambling doesn't permit you to simply lay a stinking turd of a lie like that without it being pointed out for the bullshit claim it is.

I think it is time for you to go to las vegas and accuse all the casinos, because they are all ponzis

Oh, I do understand you. But that does not make you right, you are idiot.

Are we in court? No, we are on a social forum and this is a community action. Absence of proof-of-legitimacy equals proof of no legitimacy.

No you are not. What part of depositing money and posting in these threads about your participation in the operation in order that it might encourage others to believe it is worth sending their money in so that you can get a share of it in return for your helping the scammers operate the scam, equates to gambling? Is fishing gambling? Is hoping to hook something on to your line gambling? No it is fishing. Posting of your participation in these operations is providing a baited hook you hope will result in a catch.

Simple enough for you to understand?

Simply because you did not proof your point. In which judicial system does the accused has to proof his point instead of the accuser? I do explicitly support the point that it is not wise to send money to this site right now (despite the fact that I still have a lot of investments in that system), I advise to wait until there are more confirmed payments coming in and even then it has to be seen as gambling, you should never send more than you can afford to lose, because you might lose all. You did not show how that makes me dishonest in any way.

I think it is ridiculous to give me negative trust for that, because I am not dishonest, not scamming, not misleading. I am gambling here and I'd like to share my experience. This is exactly what this section of bitcointalk is meant for. You don't like it? Fine, gtfo!

You don't trust Doublebot, that makes total sense to me. Fine. But you say with certainty that there is not trading bot and it is a ponzi scam. This might be, but you have no proof. You simply don't know that. This definitely makes you dishonest.

So how are you the bad guy? You and your gang are destroying peoples reputations without facts backing up your claims. There is enough reason for explaining why not to trust sites like doublebot, I mentioned a few points in this thread myself (for example the fact that SNavys identity is completely unclear). But you and your gang are sabotaging the trust system, making it easier for confirmed scammers to continue their business when people don't care about trust points any more. In long term you are supporting scammers by abusing the trust system for you stupid crusade.

That's really the only point of your reply, to express how frustrated you are that you can't excuse ponzi scams.

Listen, nobody is stopping you from seeking to profit from money stolen from other people, so what's the problem? All we're doing is communicating your lack of concern for where your profit comes from and reducing the supply of naive 'investors' to follow your deposit, which means you are likely to end up being the mug who doesn't get paid. How does that make us the bad guys?

Of course you don't want to be the mug who doesn't get paid. You want other people to be the mugs who don't get paid.

How does marking the scam and scumbag in that situation make us the bad guys?

No, it is scam if and only if it does not pay. If it is a ponzi scheme, it will stop paying for good eventually. Maybe this is what we are observing right now, maybe not. You claim to know better than everyone else, but you have no knowledge to back up your claims. Warnings are fine, but that is not what you are doing, you are straight out lying. You are an annoying piece of shit.

Jesus, you remind me of the scrypt.cc idiots who used to plead with the operator to prove people like me 'wrong' about it being a scam. It isn't just that 'all doubles sites are dangerous and will scam after a while' the whole thing is a scam pyramid structure, especially in this case where the asshole OP was pretending he had a 'magic' trading bot which would guarantee a steady profit. That is out and out fraud even beyond the illegality of the ponzi itself.

Unless an 'investment' site actually provides proof and accreditation as a legitimate investment service, it is a scam.

Please SNavy, feel free to disprove this statement:

all doubles sites are dangerous and will scam after a while

I think it is still possible that SNavy comes back and Doublebot continues to pay out. I would not bet further money on that right now, but fact is that Doublebot gave its users the impression it turned scam already a few times in the past and then it continued paying. I don't see any reason why SNavy should scam right now, except of course someone threw in like 100BTC or something. Does anyone know about that?

Thanks for the info.

I'll be the nice one See my post above. Learning how it works may come handy in the future. Not trying to bash you, just letting you know it's very possible.

To much to explain here, so I'll recommend Google.

You might wanna explain it to englighten me. And maybe that would be the most useful thing you can do. Not just here talking lot of accusations

Just a tip, before making posts like:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14147593

You can create hundreds, thousands of addresses on the go and send back and forth. You can pull random TX IDs from the blockchain.

Im not saying this is whats happening and also not trying to be a dick but learning this can be helpful when deciding if a site is legit or not.

rotating funds is not hard to do .   

He doesn't understand tech, he only understands that this is 'magic', but not a ponzi, according to the ponzi scamming scumbag OP.

I can't, coz I don't know that field

You might wanna explain to them that you can't send BTC back and forth to yourself using auto created wallets and why you can't pull random TX IDs from the blockchain. Maybe then they would understand.