Hey Everyone ,
firstly , i know that there are many other threads about merit points between supporter and opponent . i know moderators have implemented this system to raise quality of posts but is it the right way to do it ?!!
For example , some people just post simple replies to threads (including me) regarding rating portfolios , opinion about some coins , advantages & disadvantages , coins with potential , under radar ,.... etc .
- Does that mean it's not quality posts !!
i saw many hero&legendary members have posts to give people merit points depending on quality of their posts , what i noticed is that they looking for Flawless ones like a a whole comparison of privacy coins with details of their technology , anything less than this isn't considered a quality post for them !
this is a community where people ask for advice and share info and not every reply have to be complicated to get a merit point , as long it convey member point of view , it's good .
Another point , low rank members have very low numbers of Smerit to give like i have only 5 points ! , i keep seeing good reply but can't decide whether it's qualified for point or not as if i gave him just 1 point , it's 1/5 of my total points ! . that way it gets really had to get enough points to rank up .
Finally , not all users here are Native-speakers ( i'm one of them ) their posts might not be as good as a native one , although some might see it as a low quality but i real they just have a tough time expressing their opinions . and local sections aren't active only very few languages you can say it's live .
people are already abusing points and there are some posts about that issue . i like this system but it needs some modifications to make this forum HEALTHY AND FAIR TO EVERYONE .
